Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Scott Mikus

Melius Research · covers Industrials, Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
70on tracked calls
Challenge rate
14%10 of 70 questions
Companies
11questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 70 of 70 questions from 11 companies

TDGTransDigm Group13 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
TDG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is it fair to assume that Prince & Izant has significantly higher content on the 737 MAX and A320neo

Show response

Mike declined to disclose platform-specific content for Prince & Izant but described it as proprietary and mostly aftermarket engine content such as fuel nozzles and rocket engines.

Calendar 2026 Q1

was there any strength or abnormally strong sales in any particular submarket, like a rebound in interiors?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Joel directly named engine and passenger as the strongest submarkets and said prior destocking headwinds had eased; growth was good across the board.

Calendar 2025 Q4

was part of the rationale also to deter other companies from PMA-ing your OEM parts

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike firmly rejected the deterrence thesis. Acquisitions driven purely by same TransDigm 20% IRR M&A logic. Businesses will run and operate independently.

is there upside to your deal model if Jet Parts Engineering and Victor Sierra start distributing the PMAs from your other operating units?

Show response

Mike said any cross-selling would require arm's length agreements between operating units. Not in the acquisition case and not banked on. All 56 businesses will run independently.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Is there a possibility that under your tenure, TransDigm takes a more serious look at acquisitions outside of aerospace and defense?

Show response

Mike noted CalSpan and Raptor as two branches outside core aerospace hardware, both performing well early. But current M&A focus remains on traditional aerospace and defense components. Could potentially branch out in the future but not there yet.

were there any noticeable trends among the four submarkets there, whether it's freight interior, bizjet, helicopter, passenger?

Show response

Joel said no dramatic changes in Q4 aftermarket orders. Interiors picked up more after lagging the prior year. Engine strong all year. Freight was pretty solid after struggling the prior year.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is selling assets and buying back your own stock on the table?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mike firmly rejected the idea of selling assets despite publicly traded aftermarket companies trading at higher multiples. Happy to own all 52 operating units.

do you maybe prioritize engine content when it comes to M&A?

Show response

Mike said engine would look better all else equal but they can't grocery shop for specific component types. M&A approach unchanged: 20% IRR, focused on components.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are we getting to the point with the amount of cash that this business is generating at share repos or special dividends are going to be a regular part

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin said shareholder returns have always been part of strategy. Special dividends and buybacks are the right tools when no immediate sizable M&A opportunities exist.

is there any meaningful margin differential in commercial aftermarket sales to the engine supply chain versus the airframe side?

Show response

Kevin confirmed no meaningful margin difference between engine and airframe aftermarket content.

Calendar 2024 Q4

are your operating units receiving orders from Boeing that support a ramp to 38 per month or higher in the back half of this year

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Joel said current Boeing orders support about half of 38/month rate but they're optimistic rates will increase. Will add people as necessary.

are valuations for acquisition targets just too elevated relative to the quality of the assets? Or do you think that your stock is trading

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin said buyback was purely opportunistic during market turmoil, not a signal about M&A pipeline. Doesn't say anything about the M&A market.

Calendar 2024 Q3

if you end the year at four turns of net leverage to get back towards six turns by the end of the year, you need to deploy more than $7 billion

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin confirmed the math on capital deployment needed and emphasized ample capacity. Sarah validated the leverage math.

HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 4 of 11 challenging
HII company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how much of that goes to Newport News versus Electric Boat, if you have a ballpark figure there

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Stiehle sized Newport News's share at approximately $25 billion plus about $5.5 billion on Columbia; Kastner said material for a tenth boat was bought as a funding mechanism.

Calendar 2026 Q1

there's a lot of funding in there for auxiliary and support ships. Just wondering how you're thinking about that opportunity set when it comes to Ingalls and could that put upward pressure on the m...

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kastner said Ingalls has plenty of baseline work plus battleship and frigate. Not currently planning to compete for auxiliary ships but will evaluate case-by-case as acquisition strategies develop.

Calendar 2025 Q4

the first quarter guide, if my math is right, calls for shipbuilding sales to be up 13% year over year. But then that implies that shipbuilding sales are down 1% for the remaining three quarters.

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Stiehle said some Q4-to-Q3 material pull-ahead occurred but the growth trend is real and sustainable. Conservative start-of-year guide; expects revenue to continue ramping through 2026.

is there a possibility that a Japanese or Korean shipyard could fund some of the CapEx to fulfill their obligations under the recent trade deals

Competitive DynamicsCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kastner said foreign investment to expand industrial base capacity is a possibility. Acquisition strategy for the battleship is still being defined.

Calendar 2025 Q3

You had the wage increase go in at Newport News, I think, in June. When is the wage increase going in at Ingalls?

Labor MarketCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ingalls wage increase requires union negotiation. Current agreement expires next year. Hoping for late 2025 or early 2026 implementation.

Is there anything that's potentially holding up that negotiation maybe due to government employees being furloughed? And then also from a high-level perspective, does it make sense for industry and...

ChallengingDemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kastner confirmed furlough is not impacting submarine negotiations. Emphasized that incremental awards would undermine the consistent demand signal needed by the industrial base and supply chain.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is that 5-year cumulative free cash flow target of $3.6 billion now back on the table, but just from 2025 through 2029

Capital AllocationGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Stiehle declined to reinstate multi-year FCF target, focusing on credibility through consistent annual guidance delivery. Raised current year FCF guide to $500-600M.

how much capital would you and the Navy need to invest to make that happen? And would you have enough skilled labor or optionality to outsource

ChallengingCapex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kastner said significant capital investment would be required for sole-source Virginia production. Comfortable with current teaming arrangement with General Dynamics but willing to support Navy's evaluation of alternatives.

Calendar 2025 Q1

should we expect a greater share of shipbuilding orders over the remainder of this year and next year to be more cost-plus incentive fee type structures

MarginLabor MarketTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kastner said contract types will be evaluated case-by-case for Block VI and Columbia Build II. The hybrid approach forms an interesting basis but doesn't dictate future structures.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is there any assumption baked in there for what net EACs will be for this year

Show response

Stiehle declined to provide specific EAC assumptions, saying they reevaluate every 90 days and expect stabilization and improvement going forward.

what lessons did you learn from the late 2000s and early 2010s that are still relevant and can be applied today

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management drew parallels to post-Katrina recovery but couldn't give a specific date for EAC improvement. By 2027, majority of work will be post-COVID contracts, which should improve profitability.

LDOSLeidos8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 8 challenging
LDOS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Did you get information from the customer on why they chose to go that route?

Competitive DynamicsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Bell said in-sourcing interest is rising across agencies but Leidos transitions to higher-level mission systems integration; the customer still needs Leidos to maintain and enhance systems.

Calendar 2026 Q1

do you think the business would benefit from a more streamlined portfolio? And could we see that over the next, say, 12 to 24 months

Capital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bell argued the reorganization at year start already streamlined delivery alignment. Recently appointed a COO in Defense to drive execution and scaling. Portfolio breadth is a strength because customers need reliable partners across domains, but Leidos is focused within growth pillars. SES JV is an example of surgical portfolio shaping.

Calendar 2025 Q4

does the guide assume that you will receive task orders this year that would, convert to revenue, or is that purely upside to the guide

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bell confirmed IDIQs are never included in backlog until task orders arrive. Cage noted some element of new business wins is always assumed in annual guidance, but material Golden Dome, FAA, or microelectronics task orders would represent upside.

are you concerned that AI could cause a race to the bottom on price particularly for digital modernization programs

ChallengingCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bell argued AI proliferation is a force multiplier, not a threat. Leidos uses AI internally as a beta tester and then deploys lessons to help customers shift budgets from maintenance to high-value mission outcomes. Will Johnson's transformation office embracing AI to drive efficiency internally and externally.

Calendar 2025 Q3

does it make sense to potentially explore spinning off Dynetics given that it might attract a higher valuation outside of the broader Leidos portfolio

ChallengingCapital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Bell rejected the spinoff thesis, arguing Dynetics combined with Leidos mission systems creates unique value competitors can't match. Plans to invest and help market value Leidos higher because of the crown jewel asset.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is the guidance just extremely conservative due to DOGE and all the executive orders from the new administration?

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Cage clearly stated fundamentals are strong across all segments. Guidance conservatism driven by wanting capacity to invest in NorthStar 2030 opportunities and partner with agencies like GSA.

Calendar 2024 Q4

do you think that, that increased competition could be offset by a greater share of exams being outsourced?

Regulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bell deferred to the administration and agency heads on privatization decisions, but signaled eagerness to capitalize on any such opportunities.

the guidance implies almost no underlying EPS growth. I'm just kind of wondering, is that conservatism

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Cage acknowledged the math and noted headwinds from higher interest rates on refinanced debt and taxes. Framed 2025 as an investment year with potential to raise guidance later.

GDGeneral Dynamics7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
GD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Just wondering when you're expecting that to be awarded and then also going back to Rob's question earlier on the supply chain

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Danny said Block VI discussions are ongoing but couldn't share timing. On steam turbine dual-sourcing, noted the Navy has been working on adding turbine generator capacity for some time.

Calendar 2025 Q3

should Marine sustainably be growing sales at least $1 billion per annum until we hit that cadence?

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Confirmed continued robust Marine growth trajectory, linked margin expansion primarily to supply chain stabilization and throughput improvements

Calendar 2025 Q2

if the Navy were to actually pursue that route, how much capital would you need to invest to make that happen?

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Confirmed sufficient labor availability for additional growth, would need some additional but not enormous capital investment for solo Virginia build

Have you seen any uptick in the pipeline since the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was signed into law and reinstated bonus depreciation?

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Declined to attribute demand strength to any single macro factor, acknowledged bonus depreciation always helps but noted multiple contributing drivers

Calendar 2025 Q1

Is there interest from the DoD that you've heard about increasing the Columbia program to maintain a one to one replacement

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Acknowledged longstanding debate about Columbia fleet size but reported no new developments on expanding beyond current program of record

Calendar 2024 Q4

what percentage of those included EPA clauses or some sort of language to protect you from future inflationary pressures?

Show response

Confirmed all Marine contracts include EPA clauses but acknowledged inflation far exceeded contemplated levels, with some materials up 37%

are you considering ramping up some of your material purchases or production that happens in Mexico or Canada to preempt

Show response

Deflected tariff question by citing US-heavy manufacturing base and willingness to adapt to policy changes as they emerge

RTXRTX Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
RTX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Are they looking to become a risk-sharing partner in future engine programs?

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Calio agreed the next-gen single-aisle propulsion business model must change to smooth upfront investment, but said the focus stays on current execution.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Just how are you thinking about that in the context of retaining your best employees and engineers, so they don't join a defense tech company where they get significant upside from the equity valua...

ChallengingLabor MarketCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Calio acknowledged challenge with defense tech startup valuations. RTX focuses on competitive compensation and mission-driven culture. About 60,000 engineers representing 1/3 of workforce. Retention has been largely successful.

Calendar 2025 Q4

does it make sense from a capital deployment perspective to pursue vertical integration at Raytheon, whether it's organic or inorganic?

Capital AllocationSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Calio favored strengthening existing supply base and bringing new suppliers vs. vertical integration. Cited solid rocket motors and castings as constrained value streams needing investment. Partnering with DoW on industrial base strengthening.

Calendar 2025 Q3

when you think about V2500 shop visit visibility into next year, are you requiring customers to put down deposits to reserve shop visits

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Calio said V2500 demand continues above prior expectations with significant runway. Fleet average age 15 years, 40% pre-second shop visit. Customers need lift from V2500 aircraft.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if the customer wants to retrofit to the GTF hot section plus, is that cost being covered by the customer or by RTX

Show response

Calio said RTX intends to capture value for GTFA investment on customer-by-customer basis. Hot section plus provides 90-95% of the 2x time on wing improvement.

Calendar 2025 Q1

There is a labor negotiation with the vote on a contract in early May. I'm just wondering how you're approaching that

Labor MarketSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Calio declined specifics but expressed cautious optimism citing strong track record on recent labor negotiations. Emphasized longstanding relationship with the union.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was hoping if you guys could provide some color on the production rates implied in your guidance for the 737, A320, 787

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Calio deferred to customers on specific rates but confirmed mid-single-digit OE growth expectation. Collins has protected long-lead items for potential upside.

NOCNorthrop Grumman6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
NOC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Is that low 11% margin rate for both those segments? The right jumping off point? For 2027?

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

John would not endorse a specific model but noted strong backlogs and that ex the one DS program, margins are about 11%.

Calendar 2026 Q1

are we starting to see European customers become wary about ordering equipment from U.S. companies given uncertainty on delivery timing

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Warden acknowledged European sensitivity on buy-local and delivery timelines but emphasized robust demand and capacity from 20 new facilities to serve both U.S. and European customers.

Are you starting to see the administration speed up that process, and are you engaged with international customers about building a pipeline of opportunities

Geographic ExpansionRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Warden confirmed growing space international pipeline including Hungarian partnership, expects international to be a key Space contributor in five to ten years.

Calendar 2025 Q3

would actually increasing the program of record to 150 or 200 units via completely separate negotiation potentially with additional financial benefits

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Warden confirmed expanding program of record beyond 100 is separate from rate acceleration funded by reconciliation. Decision not yet made by DOD.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is there a possibility that the classified space program that was canceled could end up being restarted under this new administration?

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Warden said requirements drive program decisions and canceled programs could be reevaluated, though current-year expectations don't reflect it.

it looks like there was an explosion at a plant in Utah. That produces solid rocket motors. So I'm just wondering how you're thinking about that

Supply ChainProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Warden clarified the Promontory Utah facility is in space (not DS), produces propellant ingredient with alternative sources. No expected impact to Sentinel or any program.

Show 5 more companies
GEGE Aerospace5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
GE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

does that in any way impact your pricing strategy on CFM56, GE90, or any of the legacy engine programs

Show response

Ghai said 2026 catalog pricing is consistent with last year, with incremental pricing on newer platforms over time.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Boeing flagged a fatigue issue with the engine, so just curious if you could provide an update on that. Is there any change to the expectations you had for losses

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Culp was unequivocal: no schedule or loss changes. Explained the mid-seal durability crack is a known issue, root cause identified, modification underway, deliveries will be more H2-weighted but full year unchanged.

Calendar 2025 Q3

has anything structurally changed about the business model that could cause your aftermarket growth to decouple or sustainably outperform ASK growth

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Rahul attributed the disconnect to pent-up demand (shop visits below 2019), increasing wide-body work scopes, external LEAP channel growing to 30% by 2030, and pricing. Expects engines coming off wing up double digits driving continued outperformance vs departures.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how long are you expecting it to take to retrofit the roughly 9,000 plus LEAPs that are already delivered

Innovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Larry said LEAP-1A durability kit fully in production for new make and aftermarket; retrofit is multiyear as engines come in for next shop visits. LEAP-1B kit expected early next year. Improved supply chain output partly driven by new HPT blade.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how are you thinking about balancing the price increases to offset tariffs and inflation while avoiding demand destruction

Show response

Larry emphasized principles of sharing value created and earning adequate returns on investments, with confidence they can implement pricing constructively.

LMTLockheed Martin5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
LMT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how confident are you that the current administration's push towards a commercial acquisition system will be durable

Regulation PolicyCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jim addressed durability via long-term framework agreements but gave a philosophical rather than a concrete answer on reversal risk.

Calendar 2026 Q1

an opportunity to reach an agreement with the customer to accelerate production of the classified missile program

Revenue GrowthDemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Taiclet confirmed heightened customer demand and interest in accelerating production of the classified MFC program. Noted no charges taken since Q4 2024 and conversations with government about expansion.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you changing your overall capital deployment strategy of returning 100% free cash flow to shareholders following the president's executive orders? And if so, should investors expect that to be ...

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim described three capital deployment vectors: long-term framework contracts with ROI above cost of capital, stepped-up R&D with company-funded prototypes (autonomous Black Hawk, COMET cruise missile, CCA drone wingman), and M&A exploration including vertical integration. Emphasized conditions have changed but process remains disciplined.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Do you have those prices for those options locked in with suppliers?

Cost PressureSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Evan confirmed firm fixed-price through all phases, over 70% of supplier costs negotiated, with growth allowances assumed. Not seeing elevated supplier risk on the program.

Calendar 2025 Q2

does it make sense to sell the DOD the technical data rights to the F-35 as part of a broader deal to ensure DoD buys a minimum amount of units

Competitive DynamicsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim stated all Lockheed-controlled data already provided to the government; some supplier data is outside their control. Demand driven by 4th-gen fleet retirement and unsuitability for modern operations.

LHXL3Harris4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
LHX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how much of your material spend at Missile Solutions is with sole-source suppliers?

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO stated virtually no significant sole-source suppliers remain after focused effort to qualify second and third sources for cases, nozzles and igniters.

Calendar 2025 Q4

where do you expect book-to-bill to come in for the year

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kubasik expected at least 1.1 book-to-bill for 2026, with orders growing double digits against 7% revenue growth. Awaiting FY2026 appropriations and FY2027 PBR.

Calendar 2025 Q3

your IRAD spend as a percentage of sales, I think, declined from 3.5% to 2.4%

ChallengingInnovation & R&DCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kubasik emphasized total R&D spend across IRAD, CRAD, and venture investments. Past investments opened new markets now transitioning to production.

Calendar 2025 Q2

You're effectively going to be competing with Lockheed and Raytheon, who are two of Aerojet's largest customers

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kubasik noted Wolf Pack is a pre-AR initiative for attritable launch effects. Targeting a couple hundred million in revenue in next several years, with hot production line and over 40 flight tests.

BAThe Boeing Company2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
BA company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

what are your early observations? What are your priorities? And given that the company will end the year with about $33 billion of cash

Capital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Malave corrected cash estimate to high-20s after transactions. Priorities: get up to speed, restore balance sheet health, enable sustainable recovery improvements.

Calendar 2025 Q1

There was a comment from the administration about the EMD phase being cost plus but there were some competitively priced options for LREP

Competitive DynamicsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ortberg declined to share contract details beyond public Air Force disclosures, but assured they haven't repeated past fixed-price mistakes.

HWMHowmet Aerospace2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
HWM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how you're thinking about the uplift to defense spares in the second half of this year and in 2027

Show response

John said no current spares uplift from heightened missions yet, but expects a significant 2027 increase in aircraft spares and is fielding missile rate-increase requests.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are there any conversations between you and either the DoD or the administration about construction or upgrades to new heavy forging presses?

Regulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Plant acknowledged Howmet owns 2 of only 4 US presses over 35,000 tons, critical for F-47 and F-55. Said the question may stimulate conversations with DoD about support.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
TDG TransDigm Group130%none of 13 questions
HII Huntington Ingalls Industries1136%4 of 11 questions
LDOS Leidos838%3 of 8 questions
GD General Dynamics70%none of 7 questions
RTX RTX Corporation714%1 of 7 questions
NOC Northrop Grumman60%none of 6 questions
GE GE Aerospace50%none of 5 questions
LMT Lockheed Martin50%none of 5 questions
LHX L3Harris450%2 of 4 questions
BA The Boeing Company2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • TDG
    TransDigm Group · 13 questions
    0%none of 13 questions
  • HII
    Huntington Ingalls Industries · 11 questions
    36%4 of 11 questions
  • LDOS
    Leidos · 8 questions
    38%3 of 8 questions
  • GD
    General Dynamics · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • RTX
    RTX Corporation · 7 questions
    14%1 of 7 questions
  • NOC
    Northrop Grumman · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • GE
    GE Aerospace · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • LMT
    Lockheed Martin · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • LHX
    L3Harris · 4 questions
    50%2 of 4 questions
  • BA
    The Boeing Company · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
Show all 11 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
HWM Howmet Aerospace2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • HWM
    Howmet Aerospace · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q4922%2 of 9 questions5
2025 Q1100%none of 10 questions8
2025 Q21118%2 of 11 questions8
2025 Q31225%3 of 12 questions10
2025 Q4922%2 of 9 questions6
2026 Q11010%1 of 10 questions9
2026 Q280%none of 8 questions8
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  3. 2025 Q110 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 8 companies
  4. 2025 Q211 questions · challenge rate 18% (2 of 11 questions) · 8 companies
  5. 2025 Q312 questions · challenge rate 25% (3 of 12 questions) · 10 companies
  6. 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
  7. 2026 Q110 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 9 companies
  8. 2026 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 8 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand22
  • Competitive Dynamics15
  • Capital Allocation11
  • Regulation Policy10
  • Revenue Growth8
  • Margin8
  • Guidance Reliability8
  • Supply Chain7
  • M&A6
  • Capex Investment6
Show all 18 topics
  • Cost Pressure5
  • Innovation & R&D4
  • Product Launch4
  • Labor Market4
  • Pricing3
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Trade Tariffs1