Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Sebastiano Petti
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 25on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 12%3 of 25 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 25 of 25 questions from 6 companies
TAT&T7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you help us think about what does that mean from a seasonality perspective as we think about FWA and fiber over, net additions over the course of the year
Show response
Stankey warned of a compressed Lumen integration timeline creating a two-quarter ramp learning curve, with seasonality, footprint expansion, and Lumen onboarding all complicating near-term modeling. H2 volumes expected higher than H1 as in prior years.
Does the year-end leverage target, does that assume some level of cash inflows from the Lumen JV
Show response
Desroches confirmed the leverage target of approximately 3x by year-end incorporates expected proceeds from the JV equity partner plus EBITDA growth during the year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
In FWA, I mean, have you noticed a similar pattern on an underlying basis
Show response
Stankey expects some Q4 seasonality in FWA but less pronounced than fiber since no home installation needed. GigaPower penetrating as expected with AT&T as anchor provider.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Any reason to think that, that would not necessarily occur this year
Show response
Stankey confirmed normal H2 seasonal uplift expected for fiber, with mix shifting from copper migrations to cable share gains and penetration north of 40%.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the comfort or the confidence in getting to the high higher end of the mobility service revenue, I guess, more particularly the EBITDA guidance
Show response
Desroches noted Q1 3.5% EBITDA growth absorbed guarantee launch costs, and auto bill pay adjustments plus accelerated cost actions will help the balance of the year.
does that put your forty-five million fiber target passing, you know, at risk at all as you think about or extrapolate over the next several years
Show response
Stankey firmly defended fiber investment as a decades-long structural bet that benefits from share-taking dynamics regardless of GDP growth, with limited tariff exposure.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you maybe pack -- unpack a little bit of what you're seeing in that market, John, obviously, against the context of the broader industry
Show response
Stankey attributed business growth opportunity to improving distribution in mid/low-end markets through partnerships and better prospecting tools.
VZVerizon Communications Inc.6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
How should we think about the expectations for buyback in 2026?
Show response
Skiadas confirmed $2.5B in Q1 buybacks and $5.4B total shareholder returns. Said plan of at least $3B remains appropriate but would have ability to do more with excess cash flow. Wouldn't commit to a higher number.
should we still anticipate $8 million to $9 million FWA subs by 2028? Is that still a target for the management team?
Show response
Schulman confirmed FWA subscriber targets remain unchanged. May see more mix shift toward fiber, but overall broadband ambition intact.
Calendar 2025 Q3
2026 free cash flow
Show response
Tony said the business starts from a very strong cash flow position and expects 2026 FCF growth year-over-year all-in including Frontier, driven by significant cost transformation already underway (Dan's leaner operating plan), aggressive portfolio decisions, CapEx efficiency, and prioritizing mobility and broadband investments. 2025 will likely come in at the lower end of the $17.5-18.5B CapEx range or better. Dan addressed the account decline by pointing back to the strategic reset, the status quo isn't working, Verizon will be 'much more aggressive in delighting customers.' He analogized competition to gravity, respected AT&T and T-Mobile leadership, but pointed to 5-8 million new postpaid subs per year plus switcher pools and new services (convergence, AI infrastructure) as ample industry opportunity. Verizon will 'win smart and responsibly, focus on what our customers want, not on our competitors' with no plan to ratchet up promotional spend.
Calendar 2025 Q2
any way to unpack maybe free line contribution in Trecora
Show response
Hans said Frontier timing is unchanged, first quarter 2026 close as originally announced. On consumer gross adds, the free-line offer was insignificant and only active for a very short time as part of the June 24 launch; strong gross adds reflected real execution and product resonance. Tony said prepaid is working with four straight quarters of growth across Straight Talk, Visible, and Total Wireless, and with four quarters of volume growth Verizon has reached an inflection point, prepaid will contribute positively to wireless service revenue growth in H2 2025. Tony confirmed prepaid-to-postpaid migrations were not a significant contributor to the Q2 19% gross adds increase.
Calendar 2025 Q1
was there any perhaps savings or a pullback in spend related to SG&A that will resurface
Show response
Hans confirmed Verizon is already ramping fiber deployment from 450k to 650k OFS per year within the existing CapEx plan, with no intention to partner, focus is on closing Frontier where the post-close target is '+1 million OFS per year' with the plus meaning plus. On convergence, Sampath emphasized the vast majority of Q1 broadband net adds were in converged offerings with mobility attached, delivering 50% mobility churn reduction when paired with Fios. Tony said Q1 EBITDA growth of 4% reflected disciplined spending, Verizon did not chase volumes in Q1 knowing Verizon Value Guarantee would launch in early April, preserving firepower to launch from financial strength.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how should we think about the underlying growth rate within that revenue bucket that will be reclassified
Show response
Hans acknowledged FWA will see slightly less opportunity in H1 2025 as C-band deployment priority remains mobility (pushing FWA to Tier 2/3 markets) but said MDU solution launch plus accelerating Fios will keep broadband strong. Sampath emphasized the 350-400k quarterly broadband net adds pace with fluctuations, more than 50% industry share capture, and strong ARPU increases from gig/premium plan upgrades. Tony addressed the reclassification: handset protection is recurring revenue complementary to connectivity, historical revenue will be recast for comparability, the 2024 baseline goes to approximately $82 billion, and the impact on growth rates is only 5-10 basis points. He confirmed no change to the 'other' service revenue category.
ECHOEchoStar Corporation4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
why increase the buyback from $2 billion-$3 billion, but yet be out of the market?
Show response
Ergen cited bond-indenture restrictions on repurchases and walked through the sum-of-the-parts value: ~$14-15B cash, the $5-7B liability, Boost, video, 261.8M SpaceX shares and spectrum, against a conglomerate discount.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I want to see if you could update us on how you are thinking about passive versus active investments within EchoStar Capital
Show response
Hamid said they are evaluating capital deployment options including debt paydown, tax mitigation, investments, and shareholder returns, but specifics await transaction closings.
how do you think you see how you see that ecosystem evolving having spent, you know, decades around the industry
Show response
Charlie said they are betting on SpaceX for D2D, don't expect much from others in the near term, and already have Boost customer connectivity agreement.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I wanted to address wireless segment EBITDA pressure and potential cost levers, and also inquire about the LEO strategy integration with D2D wireless and enterprise efforts.
Show response
Hamid pointed to on-net migration as the primary cost lever. On LEO D2D, he deferred detailed announcements, calling it one of the most important strategic priorities.
CHTRCharter Communications3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Just wanted to see if you could circle back on prior expectations for -- to grow EBITDA, ex the transition cost. Is that still the plan for the year?
Show response
Jessica confirmed slight EBITDA growth plan with political tailwind. Chris said no determination yet on broadband price increase; philosophy is to keep prices low for competitiveness. On Cox synergies upgrade ($500M to $800M): driven by procurement including programming and better financial visibility.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the $45 million one-timer on other revenue. What's the flow through to the bottom line there?
Show response
Jessica confirmed ~$38M net flow-through. Cost to serve still flat to slightly down for year despite Q2 comp difficulty. Chris emphasized long-term cost opportunity from AI-driven transaction reductions.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you could comment, just around EBITDA, you do expect growth for the year. Any color perhaps at a OpEx level across the different buckets
Show response
Jessica provided detailed OpEx outlook: programming/cost-to-serve flat to slightly down, sales and marketing low-to-mid single digit growth. Chris discussed tax policy benefits for infrastructure builders.
TMUST-Mobile US, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you help us think about what is your percent? Why isn't it higher? What are you doing to try to drive incremental bundling to your base?
Show response
André said roughly 70% of T-Mobile broadband customers also have mobile versus AT&T's 45% metric, and the direct-to-device JV long-form agreement is progressing.
Calendar 2026 Q1
where are you in that migration or integration of that base? And when should we anticipate churn perhaps converges
Show response
John Saw said network migration is behind them, customer migration is underway using Sprint integration learnings, and substantially complete by year-end. Srini clarified UScellular is not driving account churn increase.
How are you thinking about perhaps the appetite for additional share repurchases or an accelerated buyback program here?
Show response
Peter declined to discuss daily trading dynamics but indicated buyback decisions are guided by the discount to intrinsic value. Executed $4.9B in Q1 buybacks.
CMCSAComcast2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you provide more detail on target leverage and dividend policy for each of the 2 stand-alone companies
Show response
Armstrong declined to add specifics beyond the separation announcement, reiterating the goal of two investment-grade balance sheets.
Calendar 2026 Q1
any color you might be seeing domestically in the parks or from maybe some of your ad partners
Show response
Mike reported no domestic consumer pullback in parks or advertising yet, though international inbound travel remains below pre-COVID levels. Brian noted fiber overlap at about 55% of residential footprint.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| T AT&T | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| ECHO EchoStar Corporation | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| CHTR Charter Communications | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| CMCSA Comcast | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- TAT&T · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- VZVerizon Communications Inc. · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- ECHOEchoStar Corporation · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- CHTRCharter Communications · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- CMCSAComcast · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 67%2 of 3 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 67% (2 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Subscriber Growth8
- Capital Allocation7
- M&A7
- Margin6
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Demand3
- Revenue Growth3
- Macroeconomic2
- Innovation & R&D2
- Capex Investment2
Show all 14 topics
- Cost Pressure2
- Pricing1
- Guidance Reliability1
- Regulation Policy1