Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Sebastien Naji
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 24on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 8%2 of 24 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 24 of 24 questions from 7 companies
ARMArm Holdings5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you maybe just talk a little bit about what you're seeing in terms of unit demand and mix
Show response
Rene answered directly that V9 and CSS migration insulates Arm, then handed to Jason who conceded incremental slowdown versus start-of-year expectations.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how the shift in your business model is impacting some of your existing IP customers who also sell Arm-based CPUs in some form
Show response
Rene said every partner asked endorsed the strategy. Over 50 partners provided quotes, references, or videos. Emphasized the silicon strategy was driven by customer demand.
Calendar 2025 Q3
How do you feel about Arm's strategic positioning with respect to these AI deals?
Show response
Rene emphasized power efficiency as the key differentiator driving hyperscaler adoption. All incremental compute announced has been Arm-based, driving Neoverse royalties more than doubling YoY.
Calendar 2025 Q2
whether some of the loosen GPU export controls we've seen here over the last month could drive a more meaningful contribution from Arm China
Show response
Rene said Arm China tracks global trends with consistent growth. H20 export control changes have minimal impact. China was 21% of Q1 revenue, up from 15% last quarter and 14% a year ago.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you help us maybe understand the structure of this deal and whether this was more of a one-off
Show response
Rene explained the deal gives Malaysian startups CSS-level access for chip design. Would not forecast new deals but sees potential knock-on effect from other governments.
ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how should we be thinking about ASPs for the higher radix solutions?
Show response
Management said bigger switches carry higher ASP, but AI-fabric features beyond lanes drive content past $1,000 per accelerator.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is it right to think that your average ASP for the solution or the content opportunity should go up meaningfully
Show response
Management said custom solutions have higher attach (one per accelerator) offsetting lower ASP, and content per XPU keeps growing each generation.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the willingness for Chinese hyperscalers to maybe use more open technologies like PCIe or UALink
Show response
Management said IP constraints drive China toward PCIe Gen 5 scale-up with more GPUs per cluster, a larger per-cluster opportunity for Astera.
Calendar 2025 Q2
which you might be seeing on Gen 5 PCIe adoption and general-purpose servers
Show response
Management said general compute is a tracked transition with new Aries, Taurus and Leo design opportunities from PCIe Gen 6 and CXL CPUs.
CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
are you accumulating enough link level telemetry that the data itself has become a bit of a competitive advantage
Show response
Bill gave rich detail on the Pilot telemetry platform (per-link sensing, ESD/dust detection) and confirmed the growing dataset feeds better next-gen solutions.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Could they represent 10 or even 20% of total revenue over the next few years, or is that too aggressive
Show response
CEO called Neoclouds one of the biggest trends and agreed the group collectively could be on the order of 20% of revenue over coming years.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I guess what type of supply chain risks are you seeing for Credo, if any?
Show response
Bill said Credo secured wafer and packaging supply across 12/7/5/3nm, and flagged industry-wide memory as a concern that Weaver's DDR-over-HBM approach can help address.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how much of your business is tied to ASIC versus merchant silicon deployments today
Show response
Bill said Credo doesn't track ASIC versus merchant GPU mix and is agnostic to GPU type; he believes customers order connectivity alongside GPUs, limiting inventory risk.
ANETArista Networks3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Where do you think you make the most progress as we go into 2026? Is it geographic expansion
Show response
Todd outlined three priorities: campus expansion with VeloCloud, geographic acceleration (strong Asia numbers), and new logo acquisition through channel investment.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you maybe comment on what you're seeing on more of that traditional cloud titan demand and whether that's trending ahead of expectations
Show response
Jayshree noted balanced spend between AI and traditional cloud in 2025 vs the sharp AI pivot of 2023, with environment much more balanced.
Calendar 2024 Q4
does Arista's opportunity differ across these two chip types? And is there one approach that would maybe pull in more Arista versus the other
Show response
Jayshree sees NVIDIA's 80-90% GPU share potentially falling to 50-50 in 2-3 years, positioning Arista as GPU-agnostic scale-out networking provider.
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
could we see, for example, outside strength in Meraki and slower demand for Catalyst or vice versa
Show response
Robbins expects unified platform to benefit Catalyst adoption by adding cloud management. With 35 million devices cloud-managed, customers get choice of on-prem or cloud-managed operation.
what your expectations are for Ethernet and scale-up going forward. And if we should expect new Silicon One announcements
Show response
Robbins said current hyperscaler clusters mostly use native connectivity within clusters. Scale-up Ethernet opportunity could emerge over time, Cisco has unannounced road maps to address it.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you maybe just comment on whether you see white box eating up a big part of the spending pie
Show response
Robbins said no meaningful shift to white box, noted Cisco can integrate silicon into white box when customers prefer it. Herren added two-thirds of $600M+ orders were systems vs optics.
FFIVF5, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you perhaps update us on your CDN product that came out of the Lilac Cloud acquisition
Show response
Francois clarified F5 isn't competing directly in CDN against players like Akamai. Instead, CDN is bundled with security capabilities. A number of the 1,000+ DCS customers took the full bundle including CDN.
Calendar 2024 Q3
can you give us a sense for how much of your growth each quarter is coming from new customers?
Show response
Francois noted new customer wins occur across all product families, with distributed cloud services growing from 500 to 800+ customers. However, majority of growth comes from existing customer expansion and cross-selling.
What are you serving as an alternative to here? Are you replacing a native NVIDIA load balancer?
Show response
Francois acknowledged competition will emerge but emphasized F5's two decades of Layer 4-7 traffic management expertise is unique and directly applicable to AI workloads. Noted remaining work is in go-to-market and commercial models.
Show 1 more company
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you are looking at data center exposure that is approaching roughly 50%. I mean, is that the right way to think about it
Show response
Validated the components of the calculation and walked through the storage sub-buckets, without confirming the 50% figure outright.
Is any of that on newer node processes, like 40-nanometer, or is that mostly on existing 65-nanometer solutions?
Show response
Answered directly that it is mostly existing nodes and redirected to system-level and back end qualification as the real complexity.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ARM Arm Holdings | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| ANET Arista Networks | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| FFIV F5, Inc. | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| MPWR Monolithic Power Systems | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- ARMArm Holdings · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- ANETArista Networks · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- FFIVF5, Inc. · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- MPWRMonolithic Power Systems · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand9
- Competitive Dynamics8
- Cloud & AI7
- Product Launch4
- Revenue Growth4
- Geographic Expansion4
- Innovation & R&D2
- Supply Chain2
- Capex Investment2
- Pricing2
Show all 13 topics
- Cost Pressure1
- Regulation Policy1
- Subscriber Growth1