Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Shaul Eyal

TD Cowen · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
21on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 21 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 21 of 21 questions from 5 companies

FTNTFortinet10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
FTNT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

maybe how AI is propelling the convergence of firewall SASE forward

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Ken Xie tied the convergence to AI-generated machine-to-machine traffic inside enterprises and data centers, and to zero trust initiatives, with the eight figure cloud deal as evidence.

Do you think customers are viewing Fortinet as a platform provider in a similar way they’re looking at

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Christiane Ohlgart, Ken Xie and John Whittle all engaged, citing single-OS integration, cost benefits and customers buying across all three pillars as platform evidence.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what drove the strength this quarter? But probably more so, what provides you with the confidence in this strong guidance?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ken attributed strength to AI tailwinds, 15 years of AI investment with 500+ patents, direct operations model, and accelerating convergence of networking and security.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what are your views on AI [ eating ] software, specifically as it relates to cybersecurity?

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ken positioned AI as an opportunity for cybersecurity through enterprise demand for internal segmentation to control agentic AI and data leakage protection. Cited edge computing investments over the past 5-10 years as preparation for this shift.

what drove the strength or the change that you've seen during the quarter, specifically the Unified SASE billings and the strong guide? What gives you confidence into 2026?

Cloud & AIGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ken cited three unique Sovereign SASE advantages: no competitor offers it, ASIC-accelerated product in customer data centers, and cost advantage at roughly 1/3 of peers. Christiane confirmed broad-based Q4 execution across enterprise, OT, SASE, and AI. John Whittle highlighted diversification across geographies, segments, and verticals.

Calendar 2025 Q3

If you guys can unpack it for us a little bit -- how would you characterize probably the SD-WAN being a little bigger than the SASE contribution?

Show response

Christiane clarified the deal was more SD-WAN and sovereign SASE (on-premises) than cloud-delivered SASE. Ken emphasized sovereign SASE as a unique advantage for government and large enterprise data governance requirements.

Calendar 2025 Q2

one of the questions we are constantly receiving from investors is whether sales of FortiSASE potentially cannibalize the core appliance business

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Christiane cited win-loss data showing minimal evidence of cloud cannibalization. Ken positioned SASE as enhancement to firewall, not replacement. John Whittle noted both markets are growing with fragmented share.

Maybe a little bit of a long-term view of kind of already touching on the fiscal '27 cohort of products that will be refreshed

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Christiane clarified the 2027 cohort is low-end units, significant in volume but less so in product revenue. Value is in upsell conversations about security strategy rather than box replacement.

Calendar 2025 Q1

When we unpack those transactions, and I know they could differ from one another, are they representative of the entire Fortinet platform stack?

Show response

Christiane confirmed SD-WAN deployments as the primary entry point for large deals, with customers then expanding into the broader Fortinet Security Fabric including additional solutions.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Do you see that being sustained into 2025 given some of your prior investments? What are the plans specifically as it relates to US sales operations?

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ken confirmed optimism for US as fastest-growing region, citing investments in enterprise sales capacity, channel partnerships, and significant local resources and facilities.

NETCloudflare, Inc.4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
NET company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

partners increased to 30% of revenue this quarter. What is driving this increase

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Prince credited Mark Anderson's two-year partner motion, especially for Act 2 consultative selling. Partners who embrace agentic AI will drive additional value and velocity.

Could you provide more color on expectations to continue to grow capacity relative to productivity

Revenue GrowthLabor MarketTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Seifert explained AI-driven productivity gains in support ratios free up dollars to deploy more quota-carrying AEs within the same spend envelope.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Specifically, Matthew, I wanted to ask about NET Dollar. We have received many questions about this product. It could become a meaningful long-term growth driver. How should we think about the regu...

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Prince described NET Dollar as currency for agentic commerce, approaching regulatory compliance thoughtfully with Stephanie Cohen's financial services expertise. Not all-in on any one payment method, also partnering with Coinbase (X402), Visa, Mastercard, AmEx. AI content gatekeeper going extremely well with media companies reporting markedly better AI deals, expanding beyond media to financial services research departments and brands.

Calendar 2025 Q1

you mentioned tariffs as potentially being the final straw for some of the final holdouts. We're still using boxes

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Prince detailed diversified supply chain capabilities including Mexico assembly, white box servers, used equipment redistribution. Financial services and healthcare moving from on-prem.

PANWPalo Alto Networks4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
PANW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I actually want to ask a double-click on Koi and the Agentic endpoint and progress and interest that you guys are seeing

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Nikesh explained vibe coding tools bring a whole new Agentic endpoint ecosystem requiring specialized security, which Koi uniquely provided.

Calendar 2025 Q3

These wars, are these with privates? Are these with some other players out there

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Nikesh explained agentic AI requires browsers, driving consumer browser wars. Enterprises will mandate secure browsers just as they mandate enterprise versions of other tools.

Calendar 2025 Q2

From where you sit, would you rank them as Palo Alto's probably better acquisitions over the course of the past four or five years

Show response

Nikesh argued future security will run on unified data lakes with agentic AI, making XSIAM the foundational platform. Browser becomes an edge device feeding the data lake.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm interested in your views on the curator and overall IBM partnership

Show response

Nikesh called it spectacular, citing the UK Home Office deal and Asian bank where ARR grew five times. Suggested a future Harvard Business School case study.

CRWDCrowdStrike2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
CRWD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

5 billion on your balance sheet. You guys focus predominantly on those tuck in acquisitions

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kurtz emphasized thoughtful integration over bolt-on acquisitions, noting proven track record of native integration rather than stitching products together.

Calendar 2025 Q2

If we think about one or two legacy same incumbents that you are most frequently displacing, who would those be

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kurtz named Splunk and QRadar as primary SIEM displacement targets, noting the built-in 10 GB free tier makes it easy for customers to try and convert.

ZSZscaler1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ZS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

What are the two or three reasons that attracted you specifically to this asset over the others? Is it technology? Market reach, clients, revenue scope?

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jay cited three reasons: experienced detect/threat intel engineers, production-ready agentic AI technology for reasoning and workflow (unlike 20 startups with only plans), and go-to-market team that can serve as a specialist takeoff team.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
FTNT Fortinet100%none of 10 questions
NET Cloudflare, Inc.40%none of 4 questions
PANW Palo Alto Networks40%none of 4 questions
CRWD CrowdStrike2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ZS Zscaler1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • FTNT
    Fortinet · 10 questions
    0%none of 10 questions
  • NET
    Cloudflare, Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • PANW
    Palo Alto Networks · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • CRWD
    CrowdStrike · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ZS
    Zscaler · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q250%none of 5 questions4
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions4
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions2
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  6. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI8
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • M&A5
  • Revenue Growth5
  • Innovation & R&D4
  • Demand4
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Product Launch2
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Labor Market1
Show all 13 topics
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Geographic Expansion1