Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Simon Clinch
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 40on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 10%4 of 40 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 40 of 40 questions from 6 companies
FICOFair Isaac12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 4 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how easy is it for you to actually monitor any sort of evidence of volume loss in that regard?
Show response
Lansing conceded monitoring is not easy; Weber described triangulating against bureau and public mortgage data rather than exact numbers.
the auto, card, and personal loans, Could you just give us a bit of color as to how things are progressing there
Show response
Declined to give any specifics, saying it is early days and there is nothing to share on next year's pricing.
Calendar 2026 Q1
relative to initial sort of expectations, it feels like it's taking longer than expected. And I was wondering if you could talk about sort of what has been behind some of the prolonged process here
Show response
Lansing acknowledged they expected DLP to be live already but the remaining blocker is FHFA sign-off on reseller score calculation, not technical issues.
how you think lenders will treat the success fee in that kind of situation and how we should think about that dynamic in that sort of comparison?
Show response
Lansing reiterated revenue neutrality between per-score and performance models. The $0.99 upfront encourages prospecting and customer acquisition while the funding fee captures downstream value.
Calendar 2025 Q3
some of the assumptions around the actual direct licensing model that you built into the guidance for the year? And how we should think about the cadence of that through the year
Show response
Weber detailed performance model timing lag (mortgage origination to close), acknowledged more conservatism than usual, and said within a couple of quarters they'll have better visibility.
Calendar 2025 Q2
your approach to engaging with regulators right now. And how you're thinking about what is the best pathway of that engagement for the benefit of FICO shareholders and the industry
Show response
Lansing described established relationships with FHFA and GSEs, noted the industry was surprised by the rapid reversal and expects careful analysis before action.
how should we think about the value gap potential in your other categories outside of mortgages and the ability for those areas, those segments to take on the heavy lifting
Show response
Lansing confirmed FICO evaluates the full portfolio for pricing opportunities annually, without committing to specific non-mortgage pricing actions.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I was wondering if you could perhaps break it down. Was that an overall comment around sort of the aggregate level of volumes? Or is there any sort of detail at the sort of vertical level
Show response
Weber deflected to credit bureaus for real-time volume data, noting FICO receives reporting in arrears with limited granularity.
the booking strength was notable this quarter. That's sort of maintained as why everything was going on. I just wonder if you could give us some a little context around pipeline build
Show response
Lansing confirmed strong demand and pipeline. Weber clarified headwinds were specifically in CCS usage, not product demand.
Calendar 2024 Q4
for the GSEs when they -- should they go private to start employing sort of some cash flow modeling internally to their own sort of credit scoring capabilities
Show response
Lansing argued the US mortgage system works well with FICO and any internal models would be complementary, not competitive.
Calendar 2024 Q3
where you are in terms of exploring the investments behind expanding your distribution beyond just your financial
Show response
Lansing outlined dual strategy: partner-driven vertical expansion via system integrators and longer-term self-service model via open APIs and marketplace.
give some thoughts around really around the FHFA's proposal and implementation of this proposal in the fourth quarter
Show response
Lansing acknowledged industry slowness and uncertainty under new administration, noting possible delays as most likely scenario.
EFXEquifax11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I was wondering if I could get your thoughts on VantageScore 5.0. I know we're all talking about 4.0
Show response
Management believes VantageScore 4.0 already competes well with FICO 10T and Vantage keeps investing.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Hi, thanks for fitting me in. Mark, I was wondering if you could help us think about quite an important question today,
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Really useful. Thank you, Mark. And I think just as a follow on to that, I mean, as I'm thinking particularly long term
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Yes, okay. That's really helpful. Just a follow-up question.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
I was curious on the government side, Mark, perhaps you could talk to us about the funding side of that discussion that
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Maybe I could go back to the question previously about the challenges you're facing a
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
That's really useful. Thanks, Mark. And just to does this bill do you consider the new policies as expanding that $5 bil
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can I just start with a bit of a housekeeping one, please?
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Okay. Yes, well, sorry for asking the question. Maybe I could turn on to something slightly longer term.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Yes. And if I strip out the records growth contribution?
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I've got two questions.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
CMECME Group8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
whether you see any actual adjacent opportunities or symbiotic opportunities between listed futures and perpetual futures
Show response
Terry framed rival retail venues as a free incubator that could funnel clients into CME's retail products over time.
Calendar 2026 Q1
if you give us an update on how that's progressing. Any benefits you're seeing
Show response
Mike Dennis reported over 35 clients connected, including derivative-space participants trading exclusively on BrokerTec Chicago. ADV grew 93% month-over-month in March with a record $1.2 billion day on April 8.
what you're seeing, the early behaviors of those kinds of accounts
Show response
Tim McCourt framed prediction markets as potentially capturing traders' first-ever financial market trade, meeting them earlier in their life cycle. Terry acknowledged it's difficult to predict behavior but the long game is graduating them into futures.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how this strategy might actually change the fortunes of BrokerTec within the context of U.S. treasuries
Show response
Mike Dennis reported 25+ firms connected, 2-sided markets in all 7 instruments, 66% of volume at price points not on NY CLOB. Terry emphasized dealer community drove the initiative.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could just give us a sense of how big the base of retail traders you have on the platform
Show response
Terry emphasized education and retention focus, new traders aren't expected to be fully active on day one. Julie noted post-COVID traders are more sophisticated with better simulation tools.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you just walk us through the very good expense control we saw this quarter and how we should expect that to ramp through the year
Show response
Lynne outlined expenses ramping through year: Google Cloud migration, professional fees, Q4 marketing events, merit increases. Q1 professional fees were light due to project timing.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you give us the latest update on the Google Cloud spend for 2025, and what spend was in fourth quarter '24?
Show response
Q4 cloud migration spend was $22M ($18M tech, $4M professional services). Full year $85M. 2025 guidance $115M, skewing more toward technology.
How should we think about the breakdown of volume growth here and the growth going forward given it's been consistently in that kind of high-single-digit range
Show response
Julie attributed data growth to 3.5% pricing plus professional subscriber growth and derived data demand. Non-professional device usage up almost 40% Q3 to Q4.
NDAQNasdaq, Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
could you give us a sense of, I guess, how rapidly and how sophisticated your clients are at the outset
Show response
Adena said clients are eager and quick to adopt AI automations given clear ROI, citing up to 80% time savings on financial-crime workflows.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how you balance that the potential for buyback because you're gonna have a lot of capital coming your way. And against that, the sort of the general range of leverage that you're willing to operate in
Show response
Youngwood outlined capital priorities: organic growth investment, progressive dividend, share and debt repurchases, and bolt-on M&A evaluation with build versus buy approach. $2.2 billion free cash flow with 109% conversion provides significant flexibility.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if you could maybe give some color around the durability of that or how to think about the structural dynamics there
Show response
Friedman highlighted three-pillar strategy of product innovation, international diversification and institutional expansion with 33 new products including 7 in insurance annuity space.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how the business and the structural drivers are different today versus the last time we went through a market downturn in 2022
Show response
Friedman highlighted diversification with 50% of Q1 inflows into non-Nasdaq 100 products and multiple growth vectors including derivatives and data revenue.
ICEIntercontinental Exchange3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
I just wanted to again, on the mortgage side, just what could you update us on the transition from SDKs?
Show response
Ben said SDK transition is lower priority for clients given other innovations. Gave clients more time since it wasn't slowing innovation pace. No impact on sales success or competitive landscape.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could you perhaps talk about TTF in the concept of its share of total gas volumes across the U.S. and Europe and where that might go to
Show response
Ben said TTF has half of Brent's active participants and only 15% of Henry Hub's OI/ADV. Asia Pacific coal-to-gas transition opportunity equals entire North American energy demand. Trade settlements with Korea, Japan, EU include energy commitments.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I was wondering if you could update us on your thinking around that, particularly after your recent ICE 2025 experience
Show response
Ben confirmed $14B TAM unchanged. Focus on executing revenue synergies through cross-selling across front-to-back ecosystem. Cited 100 data cross-sells to Encompass clients in Q1 alone.
CBOECboe Global Markets2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Or do you consider them more feeder opportunities into your existing core?
Show response
Hocking said KPIs are both adjacent opportunities and feeders into the core toolkit, describing the interconnected value chain from KPI to EPS to stock to sector to index. Direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how you see the size of the relative opportunities for just the prediction market opportunity on its own at Cboe
Show response
Craig called event contracts both a standalone segment and a stepping stone to options strategies, but said it is hard to size the market precisely now.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| FICO Fair Isaac | 12 | 33%4 of 12 questions |
| EFX Equifax | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| CME CME Group | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| NDAQ Nasdaq, Inc. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| ICE Intercontinental Exchange | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| CBOE Cboe Global Markets | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- FICOFair Isaac · 12 questions33%4 of 12 questions
- EFXEquifax · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- CMECME Group · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- NDAQNasdaq, Inc. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- ICEIntercontinental Exchange · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- CBOECboe Global Markets · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 5 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Competitive Dynamics13
- Demand11
- Revenue Growth8
- Product Launch8
- Cloud & AI8
- Pricing6
- Innovation & R&D6
- Credit6
- Regulation Policy4
- Subscriber Growth2
Show all 16 topics
- Guidance Reliability2
- Capex Investment2
- Geographic Expansion2
- Capital Allocation1
- M&A1
- Cost Pressure1