Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Spark Li

Jefferies · covers Utilities, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q2 – 2025 Q4 (3 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 6 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
6on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 6 questionsLimited sample
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
3with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 6 of 6 questions from 3 companies

AWKAmerican Water Works3 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 3 challenging
AWK company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

What is your latest expectations or plans for the Peoples Gas business use of proceeds to the extent that you opt for a sale

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

John Griffith deferred Peoples Gas decisions to post-close, noting proceeds would go to debt repayment and continued rate base investment.

What was your 2025 realized FFO to debt? And how do you forecast that over the period pro forma for the Essential Utilities transactions

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

David Bowler declined to share FFO-to-debt specifics, pointing analysts to public financial statements for approximation.

do you expect to reach settlements in Pennsylvania New Jersey and Illinois rate cases pending

Show response

David Bowler confirmed openness to settlements but only on constructive terms that provide fair returns.

ATOAtmos Energy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
ATO company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

I believe you mentioned 60 -- roughly 60% for distribution, 40% for APT. I'm just thinking, would that 60-40 split change meaningfully year-over-year just given potentially different CapEx cadence ...

Show response

CEO confirmed the 60-40 distribution/APT split for HB4384 benefits is expected to remain stable throughout the 5-year plan given consistent capital planning cadence.

Just given the durability of the HB 4384 uplift, is it fair to view this dividend guide up as a long-term guide up here?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO confirmed the 15% dividend increase is a permanent rebasing aligned with the rebased EPS guidance, with 6-8% annual dividend growth planned over the 5-year period.

PWRQuanta Services1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
PWR company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

is there really opportunity to increase near-term targets just by pulling forward renewable projects?

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Duke confirmed growth in renewables for 2026-2028 and beyond. Highlighted Texas battery curves as underappreciated proof of renewables grid value.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
AWK American Water Works30%none of 3 questions
ATO Atmos Energy2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
PWR Quanta Services1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • AWK
    American Water Works · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • ATO
    Atmos Energy · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • PWR
    Quanta Services · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q430%none of 3 questions1
  1. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Regulation Policy3
  • Capital Allocation3
  • M&A1
  • Demand1