Loading…
Loading…
if there's any legislative priorities that you guys are advancing or if there's anything we should be legislative topics that you think will be pertinent
signing this 2.7 gigawatts, even if it's in the tail end, looks like it would be upside to what was kind of laid out
Can you just level set us on what amount of data center load growth is embedded in the 3% to 4% enterprise load growth
the footnote said that it is gross of minority interest investments and or minority investments. And so just with the impact of the DEF transaction
if I try to back into what that means from an incremental load from data centers, it seems like it's only 400 or 450 megawatts
Can you talk a little bit more about the alternative financing agreements that you guys are using
how many customers does that represent? Or how many sites? Just so that we can maybe -- any way we can get some type of idea
can you just talk a little bit about what that means for steady-state equity needs for the company? Obviously, there's upside capital that we can talk about
can you just talk about like effectively at a high level, what's left there, what the main sticking points are?
what is a typical build time for a CT
can you talk about what that does in Iowa for your ability to potentially stay out longer than the five years you have agreed to
What drove that sizing? Is it more reflective of the near-term opportunity within the 20 gigawatts, or is it a function of available capacity at Desert Sun or gas capacity?
4Q looks like it's accelerating. Maybe there's some art versus science of weather normalization in a weak weather quarter. But can you just talk a little bit about what the sales growth trend looks...
to the extent it's back at the top end and outperformance by 50 basis points or 100 basis points, like what that means for like an EPS sensitivity.
does that $0.55 benefit scale linearly with the increase in transmission spending? Or is there something that's causing super normal growth in recoveries
I guess I would just step back and say it doesn't seem like the magnitude or mix is really that different given both years were 4% to 6% total, of which 3% to 5% was from large C&I. So can you just...
To the extent the ramps exceed minimum bills and come close to what is projected by hyperscalers, what does that mean for customer rates
How does that interplay with the 2 to 6 gigawatts, or the sizing of the RFP that you are currently working on?
Can you just give us a little flavor on like what the all like energy plus capacity or how impactful that could be
how big that could be and then what effectively you'd be looking for and your ability to potentially marry those expansions with some of your data center offtakers
to the extent you do move forward with replacing the Point Beach PPA with generation, do you have interconnect generation interconnect agreements? Or slots in the MISO queue
do you think that getting the VLC tariff through the Public Service Commission will help potentially broaden the customer base?
what do you think that large loads do for earned returns or structural under-earning that you have in any of your jurisdictions as they come online
I think it was the proposal was 2.1 gigs company-owned across a portfolio of 4.9 gigawatts. And so what does that look like in the you know, in the this tranching out
now that that combined bucket looks like it's doubling to almost six gigawatts. What does that mean for your sales growth
it implies a pretty significant compression in earned ROEs, implied earned ROEs