Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Steve Valiquette

Mizuho Securities · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
31on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 31 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 31 of 31 questions from 7 companies

ALGNAlign Technology7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
ALGN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Just curious how much, you know, that might be playing a role in the, the increased guidance for ’26

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Hogan set expectations down explicitly, saying not to lean on ART for 2027 while describing lab adoption progress.

Calendar 2026 Q1

should we assume generally the same trends stronger in international than maybe America is a little more -- I guess you're characterizing as stable in particular.

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

John confirmed Q2 expects international to continue growing faster than North America, consistent with recent quarters. The Q2 2025 scan-vs-treatment dislocation has 'more or less returned to normal' since then.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is that material enough to where that was, a factor in your guidance, or do think would have guided for like your volume trends kind of regardless of what's going on and competitor pricing front?

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

John confirmed competitor pricing actions are not in guidance but are noted as a positive evolution. Some competitors forced to raise prices from tariffs and profitability needs, which helps Align's competitive positioning.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Just curious if that help in any notable way to help get patients across the finish line in the third quarter? Or is that still maybe going to be just a bigger factor for the fourth quarter and int...

Show response

John said HFD is playing out as planned in Q3 with growing doctor enrollment and incremental lift in treatment. Expects more impact in Q4 and beyond as adoption expands.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Do you think your software volume was in line with the overall clear aligner market trend? Or do you think you're maybe losing share

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Joe attributed weakness entirely to macro/economic factors rather than competitive dynamics, noting a competitor even raised prices during the quarter.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if you're manufacturing in China for the Chinese market, you would essentially have 0 impact from tariffs

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

John clarified the tariff impact is limited to raw material sourcing for China manufacturing, not product movement, and they're adjusting supply sources to mitigate.

Calendar 2024 Q4

whether some practitioners in the US may be a little more hesitant to want to buy into the ecosystem of really any competitors that are headquartered or based outside the US

Competitive DynamicsTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Joe declined to speculate on practitioner geopolitical views but noted Chinese competitors operate at unsustainable pricing, and Align wins on technology, service, and relationships.

CAHCardinal Health6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
CAH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Just want to get your thoughts on that dynamic just within the just reported quarter really for any of the segments

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CEO characterized weather as slight financial impact with MSOs seeing modestly more impact due to difficulty rescheduling lost physician visits and procedures.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how much of that is driven from either, you know, growth of, you know, from the existing portfolio versus new products? And also, what's your appetite for just, you know, runway to just still incre...

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jason clarified new products are within existing categories (compression, nutrition pumps), not new categories. Prioritizing broader/better products within current categories over expansion into new ones. Still significant runway to grow Cardinal brand mix in existing categories.

Calendar 2025 Q3

one of your competitors kind of divested their business recently. I'm wondering if that creates any opportunity for you if that changes the competitive landscape

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jason noted competitor divestiture doesn't hurt. Cardinal focused on service levels and operational quality to be supplier/partner of choice. Continued investment in GMPD appropriate for turnaround stage.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Given the change in the liability classification, what should we expect for just the total net earnings or loss attributable to noncontrolling interest on the P&L for FY '26?

Guidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Aaron did not directly answer whether NCI would be near zero. Referenced the raised guidance framework and directed to 10-K for detailed accounting treatment.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is there any dynamic for this year where it makes sense for the company to procure higher levels of certain product inventory

InventoryTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jason noted inventory up ~8%, in line with business growth. At $16B representing less than 1 month of sales, significant pre-buying would create extreme balance sheet burden.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'm curious whether you have any further color, just from your own point of view in relation, to these "illness season dynamics"

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jason distinguished pharma treatment volumes (stable/strong) from medical testing volumes (weaker). Respiratory/lab weakness on GMPD side, not pharma side.

VEEVVeeva Systems Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
VEEV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

just on the current level of customer concentration within Crossix.

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Brian said Crossix is diversified across measurement/audiences and many clients, with no major single-customer concentration risk.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are there any learnings for Veeva Systems Inc. from all of this

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Peter said no particular learnings, decisions were customer-specific with some wanting to try something new. Now largely through the competitive distraction, entering the AI age. Vault CRM of 2026-2028 will be fundamentally different from 2022-2023.

Calendar 2025 Q3

just want to confirm how you're still thinking about that lumpiness for the back half of fiscal 'twenty-six

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Brian confirmed both measurement and audiences drove growth in Q2. Audiences remains the smaller but higher-growth segment. Declined to break out a specific quarterly growth rate but confirmed audiences remains the primary growth driver.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is there anything high level you can point out, you know, one or two factors that just, you know, mechanically might bring the margins back down

Show response

Brian said about three-quarters of margin outperformance was from revenue (Crossix usage-based and services timing), and one-quarter from expense timing. Both are non-recurring benefits. Q2 margins expected around 44%.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you just remind us how much of that FX revenue headwind falls to the bottom-line versus some sort of natural offsets

Show response

Brian said FX is primarily a revenue-side headwind. Natural expense hedge mitigates most of the operating income impact.

Calendar 2024 Q4

do you guys actually look carefully at data points like that, or do you just focus more on your own customer discussions

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Paul said they monitor trial starts but don't over-index. Brian confirmed CRO revenue is about 5% and not materially changed.

CORCencora5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
COR company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

on the back of all the MFN drug-related policies from the US might be impacting pricing in Europe or the UK

Regulation PolicyPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bob confirmed no pricing changes from MFN in European markets. International performing within expectations. Highlighted strong growth in pan-European 3PL platform as part of specialty strategy.

Calendar 2025 Q3

should we think about the potential accretion or dilution related to any asset sales which we assume that you would most likely use sale proceeds to maybe do buybacks

Show response

Jim acknowledged potential short-term dilution from sales but emphasized long-term accretion from focusing on higher-growth businesses. All businesses in other are profitable. MWI and Profarma expected to grow profits in FY26.

Calendar 2025 Q2

it seems that brand drug manufacturers put in a bigger wave of AWP list price increases in mid-'25, really relative to any other midyear period in almost a decade

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jim said branded price appreciation about in line or slightly ahead of expectations but not material enough to call out. Reiterated that brand pricing has less P&L impact than historically as contracts have been rebalanced.

Calendar 2025 Q1

were there maybe just some customers where activity on clinical trials was subdued or was it definitely widespread phenomenon across the majority of your book

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bob confirmed weakness is market-wide, not customer-specific. Noted peak in clinical trial activity during COVID pandemic that has since reduced. Did not quantify the percent decline.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is there any update or additional comments that you have on this topic from your side, given their disclosures last month

Competitive DynamicsGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Bob described Walgreens as very important strategic customer, teams highly engaged. Jim confirmed guidance includes assumptions on all aspects including Walgreens.

SOLVSolventum5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
SOLV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I'm curious if you would maybe endorse that same sort of view or maybe saw something different.

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Bryan has not seen the ASC shift accelerate near-term; noted it is a long-running trend and Solventum products are used in both hospital and ASC settings, limiting impact.

Calendar 2025 Q4

For the 10% that's still going to be left, just remind us again, is that really more on the supply side

Cost PressureSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO differentiated remaining 10% TSAs (rebranding/supply chain) from the 100bps raw materials cost step-up option 3M holds for 2027; working with 3M on better solution for both companies.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Europe had a pretty strong recovery in 3Q but the U.S. market was still fairly choppy. Just curious within your dental portfolio, were you seeing similar trends

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO noted no dramatic regional differences; growth driven by global new product launches and specialized sales team rather than market dynamics.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are you able to quantify the revenue opportunity tied to that partnership? And also, what's the timing of that sort of implementation

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO explained Ensemble relationship but declined to quantify; noted autonomous coding is early stage and will drive Ensemble margin improvement and better revenue capture for hospitals.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm curious how you think you performed just relative to the market in Dental in the first quarter

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO noted resilient categories (restorative, prevention) and new innovation giving dental team tailwind; expects momentum throughout the year.

HSICHenry Schein1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
HSIC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

the approximate breakdown within that specialty area, how much of that profit growth was organic versus inorganic?

Show response

Ron said a significant majority of the 19.9% specialty profit growth was organic, with a back-half-2025 acquisition and margin efficiencies contributing the rest; no exact split.

Show 1 more company
MCKMcKesson Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
MCK company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

are you able to provide more color on just each individual acquisition and how it's performing relative to those original EPS accretion guidance metrics

M&AGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Britt confirmed both FCS and PRISM are in line with original accretion guidance ($0.40-$0.60 for FCS, $0.20-$0.30 for PRISM), with PRISM slightly ahead. Reminded 30-34% contribution is adjusted OP, not EPS, given debt raised and NCI below the line.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ALGN Align Technology70%none of 7 questions
CAH Cardinal Health60%none of 6 questions
VEEV Veeva Systems Inc.60%none of 6 questions
COR Cencora50%none of 5 questions
SOLV Solventum50%none of 5 questions
HSIC Henry Schein1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
MCK McKesson Corporation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • ALGN
    Align Technology · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • CAH
    Cardinal Health · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • VEEV
    Veeva Systems Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • COR
    Cencora · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • SOLV
    Solventum · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • HSIC
    Henry Schein · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • MCK
    McKesson Corporation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q440%none of 4 questions4
2025 Q150%none of 5 questions5
2025 Q250%none of 5 questions5
2025 Q360%none of 6 questions6
2025 Q450%none of 5 questions5
2026 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions4
  1. 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  2. 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
  3. 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
  4. 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 6 companies
  5. 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
  6. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand11
  • Competitive Dynamics11
  • Revenue Growth6
  • Margin4
  • Supply Chain3
  • M&A3
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Pricing3
  • Trade Tariffs3
  • Product Launch2
Show all 19 topics
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Regulation Policy1
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Fx1
  • Credit1
  • Inventory1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Cloud & AI1