Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Sunil Sibal

Seaport Research Partners · covers Energy

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
26on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 26 questions
Companies
4questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 26 of 26 questions from 4 companies

OKEONEOK11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
OKE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I was curious how does that translate into the EPS growth rate?

Revenue GrowthCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Hulse said EPS growth should exceed EBITDA growth as free cash flow builds and buybacks become possible.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Should we think about those as significant CapEx opportunities with some midstream people -- midstream players undertaking? Or is it -- should we think about more like incremental CapEx

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Walt explained projects fit within the ~$500-600M unallocated portion of the $2B+ run-rate CapEx framework. Projects at $400-700M each with strong returns, funded from existing capital budget.

Could you indicate how much of your total 2027 commodity price exposure is hedged now?

Show response

Walt declined to give specific 2027 hedge percentages but confirmed opportunistic hedging. Pierce added OKE uses programmatic hedging that methodically builds positions without trying to time the market.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I believe last quarter that was 15. So is there a pickup in rigs? So first of all, I want you to clarify that?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sheridan confirmed one rig added to 16 total on dedicated acreage, with 2026 outlook dependent on producers finalizing budget processes.

is the midpoint of the full year guidance, that $8.225 billion, still a good kind of an anchor point

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Walt affirmed confidence within the range but stopped short of reconfirming midpoint specifically, citing need to see Q4 unfold.

Calendar 2025 Q2

that's on building the plant and the related infrastructure also to fill up that plant? And then how should we be thinking about economics on that?

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Sheridan confirmed $365M covers cryo plant, compression, and CO2 treater. Walt declined specific returns but noted integrated value chain makes incremental volumes quite profitable.

Could you talk a little bit about your hedging strategy or how much of those margins in those blending operations are hedged as of now?

Show response

Sheridan declined specifics but confirmed hedging in line with prior year, noting synergy advantage of butane-on-demand from NGL assets enables opportunistic locking.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are you indicating that the amount of volumes that you need to fill up your facilities is something that you're already moving on your systems

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sheridan confirmed ONEOK already produces enough propane to fill the dock, currently selling into the open market but will redirect to own dock upon completion.

am I missing something that you seem to be on a pretty good track to exceed the full-year EBITDA guidance in that segment?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sheridan confirmed strong nat gas pipeline performance with 4 Bcf storage coming online, 80% subscribed, and active discussions for industrial demand in Louisiana.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Could you tell us what kind of utilization that is running at? And then the downstream of the processing plants approximately how much of the NGL volumes you control

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Sheridan noted Permian processing nearing full utilization (hence plant relocation), West Texas NGL pipeline expanded to 740,000 bpd with ample capacity.

I was kind of curious how should we think about the cadence of the stock buyback program that you have?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Walt explained buybacks will be back-weighted to later years as leverage approaches 3.5x target, with 2024 activity driven by opportunistic use of divestiture proceeds.

TRGPTarga Resources10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
TRGP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is that primarily price related? Or are there any other issues which might be causing that?

Show response

Jen said that as of early August the vast majority of price-related shut-ins are back online, with a little more still returning to add a tailwind in the third quarter.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Is there a way for us to think about the total inventory of volumes that you have or that you are building because of the virtue of the acreage dedications versus the current volumes

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kneale emphasized decades of drilling inventory on already-dedicated acreage. No need for additional commercial execution, though the commercial team continues to add. Existing contracts and AMIs necessitate the infrastructure currently being put in place.

It seems like operating costs have been trending pretty low there. I was kind of curious if there is any kind of onetime factors, which have helped you in 2025?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kneale attributed operating cost trends to volume throughput and asset timing, with lumpiness from turnaround schedules rather than one-time factors.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I think last year, your team had given a kind of a longer-term steady-state CapEx number of $1.7 billion. I was curious, where does that number stand today with the growth in the portfolio

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kneale noted the Feb 2024 framework is still helpful but mark-to-market would show modestly higher costs, a bigger footprint, and incremental residue and CCUS spending not in the original estimate. Even so, higher EBITDA base means an even stronger free cash flow profile.

it seems like there has been some growing interest among the data center community to tap on to the Permian gas. I was curious, is that something that has kind of crossed your interest?

Show response

Kneale confirmed active conversations about supplying natural gas for data centers and power generation, alongside LNG capacity doubling. Targa's Permian gas aggregation and transport position makes it well positioned for incremental demand.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how should we think about capital costs for those processing brands? Are you seeing any many meaningful change considering the inflation

Cost PressureCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kneale acknowledged costs have risen to $225-275M per plant depending on sour vs sweet but noted co-located plants share services to manage costs. Engineering team executing well.

Calendar 2025 Q1

at what kind of crude oil prices do you think there will be a response from their side in terms of change of drilling plans

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kneale declined to specify a price threshold, noting mixed bag so far: one smaller producer added a rig, one pushed completions. Larger producers unchanged with multi-year programs.

I think you said you're hedged through 2026. Have you layered on additional hedges in the recent few months

MarginMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kneale confirmed disciplined hedging approach with continuous additions. More apt to add hedges than reduce exposure, with fee floors providing additional downside protection.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how that environment you, you know, manage your returns on new investments. Are you able to pass on all this potential cost to customers

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Meloy acknowledged steel cost increases but called it a manageable headwind as steel is a modest portion of overall project cost. Working to use US steel to avoid tariffs.

the competitive landscape is heating up a bit. You obviously announced this significant expansion today

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Meloy acknowledged competition but noted Targa's team execution and volume flow from integrated system positions them well. Pryor highlighted the brownfield expansion at under $400M.

WMBWilliams Companies4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
WMB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

with all the geopolitical events happening currently, there is an increased focus on U.S. as a LNG supplier

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Zamarin confirmed Woodside on track for 2029 first cargo. WMB has 1.5 MTPA with option to hold. Wingo said they are looking to use it to attract more Haynesville volume.

I think there were some comments in the press about power trading opportunity for Williams

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Zamarin said focus is optimizing power for customer solutions, not building a speculative trading business. Capability growth aimed at flexibility for customers.

Calendar 2025 Q3

What kind of cost inflation you're seeing in your supply chains

Cloud & AICost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Zamarin acknowledged cost inflation from 25 years of underinvestment in electricity generation. Porter said focused on AA credits with hyperscalers plus attractive credit protections in contracts.

should be expect this as a kind of an opening into a bigger kind of a business for Williams

Geographic ExpansionCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Zamarin said goal is not to become international LNG marketer. Would consider similar integrated deals where small LNG position unlocks strategic pipeline and gathering growth. Not a change in strategy.

KMIKinder Morgan1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
KMI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

do you see any price sensitivity to those volumes? Or those are kind of pretty much visible

Show response

Kim said the largest Haynesville customers have hedged, so most of the expected incremental volumes should be price insensitive.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
OKE ONEOK110%none of 11 questions
TRGP Targa Resources100%none of 10 questions
WMB Williams Companies40%none of 4 questions
KMI Kinder Morgan1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • OKE
    ONEOK · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • TRGP
    Targa Resources · 10 questions
    0%none of 10 questions
  • WMB
    Williams Companies · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • KMI
    Kinder Morgan · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q440%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q230%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q360%none of 6 questions3
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions3
  1. 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  6. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand10
  • Margin6
  • Competitive Dynamics5
  • Capex Investment4
  • Cost Pressure4
  • Pricing3
  • Capital Allocation3
  • Cloud & AI3
  • Macroeconomic3
  • Revenue Growth2
Show all 14 topics
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Trade Tariffs1