Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Terence Flynn
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 77on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 6%5 of 77 questions
- Companies
- 12questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 77 of 77 questions from 12 companies
BMYBristol Myers Squibb9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
could elaborate in terms of what differential it's powered for on bleeds for superiority
Show response
Cristian declined to share specific bleed differential powering but expressed strong confidence in study design for both noninferiority and bleeding superiority.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the math that we're doing suggests kind of mid-single-digit growth year over year on the growth portfolio
Show response
David confirmed mid-single-digit growth portfolio growth but noted headwinds from Revlimid and generics impacting the portfolio in 2026.
wondering if you can speak to what you view as a clinically meaningful delta versus Eliquis that would be enough to support broader payer coverage
Show response
Cristian explained primary endpoint is non-inferiority on efficacy then superiority on bleeding. Adam noted payer discussions suggest improved benefit-risk will be a strong value proposition with multibillion-dollar potential.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What's your confidence level that FDA will actually move in that direction
Show response
Cristian noted positive MRD endpoint was discussed and agreed with FDA. Will engage multiple regulatory agencies on potential accelerated/conditional approval path.
Can you weigh in at all in terms of those, if there's any progress or any details in terms of how those might play out
Show response
Chris said too early to comment on CMMI demos. Actively monitoring and engaging but nothing new to report.
Calendar 2025 Q1
directionally, how should we think about 2026 as it seems like there are still a number of moving pieces
Show response
David declined 2026 guidance but cited productivity savings, AI automation, and portfolio prioritization as margin levers while noting continued growth investment.
I was just wondering if you could elaborate a little bit on what you're seeing with the prescriber base right now
Show response
Adam noted virtually 100% Medicare/Medicaid access, consistent trialist growth, with $27M net sales including $9M GTN Q4 true-up. Ramp expected in H2.
Calendar 2024 Q4
should we think about the run rate year-end '27 as being $15 billion
Show response
David confirmed $16B OpEx in 2025 declining to $15B by 2027 end, with full $2B incremental savings dropping to bottom line.
on iberdomide, the addition to the MRD endpoint, did FDA sign off on that
Show response
Samit confirmed FDA discussions occurred but noted regulatory outcomes depend on risk-benefit ratio and magnitude of results. PFS retained as co-primary.
PFEPfizer9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
just wondering what would have to transpire in order for you and the Board to consider a cut to the dividend.
Show response
Albert directly and firmly committed to maintaining the dividend even in stretched scenarios, addressing the cut-risk question head-on.
Calendar 2025 Q4
was wondering if you can provide any high-level details on the baseline characteristics, so either BMI or gender mix
Show response
Boshoff noted US-only population with detailed demographics at ADA; overall tolerability encouraging with GI AE distribution not alarming when switching to monthly; only one severe nausea, one severe vomiting, no severe diarrhea across program.
Calendar 2025 Q3
We noticed that MagnetisMM-5 trial was pushed out data into 2026. We know J&J had a similar trial in a similar patient population
Show response
Boshoff explained event-driven study timing can shift; fewer events potentially positive signal; expects data possibly late this year or early next year.
a clarification on Paxlovid dynamics for the quarter. It looks like by our math, price per script went up over last quarter
Show response
Denton attributed apparent price increase to channel mix differences rather than any material pricing action.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was wondering if we'll get an update from the Phase II study on PFS potentially at San Antonio later this year?
Show response
Boshoff confirmed first-line Phase III recruiting 2x faster than planned; second-line data timing not disclosed; no current adjuvant lorlatinib study planned.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you confirm if something along those lines is in the works?
Show response
Bourla said he's unaware of specific 'grand bargain' comments; current focus is on 232 process and executive order on 340B, PBM reform, pill penalty.
how that data change or impact your strategy for this drug in the frontline setting
Show response
Boshoff noted PFS met in ESR1 mutant population but not intent-to-treat; planning ASCO late-breaking oral presentation and regulatory filings; continuing CDK4 and KAT6 combination plans.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you talk about what you're seeing in terms of uptake at the academic versus community centers?
Show response
Malik confirmed growing community adoption alongside academic centers; Bourla added international momentum with rapid uptake in Japan and European markets.
can you just kind of clarify how much data you're going to share later this quarter? Will we get weight loss data?
Show response
Boshoff clarified PK data is primary, weight loss is secondary endpoint in a small in-unit study and may not be reliable for that measure.
JNJJohnson & Johnson8 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
if you could expand on what you are seeing with CARVYKTI. Obviously, some important new data has been added
Show response
Jennifer Taubert cited $260M sales, 56% growth, 29% sequential patient growth, and 25% community-site expansion.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how you're positioning that drug in the market now that have full details on the label and pricing
Show response
Jennifer Taubert detailed ICOTYDE's differentiated label as first-and-only targeted oral IL-23 peptide, day-one launch readiness, 1,500 prescriptions and 1,000+ unique prescribers. Positioned as first-choice systemic therapy.
how should we think about the ramp of reimbursement coverage there and any sampling plans
Show response
Taubert confirmed goal of early and broad payer access with positive ongoing conversations but deferred specifics on sampling plans, noting more to come.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I was wondering, post a lot of the earlier stage data, earlier line data we've seen for TechValley, if you could speak to how you're thinking about positioning here of that franchise relative to Ca...
Show response
Reed detailed complementary positioning: TekVeili+Darzalex for 70% CD38-naive/experienced community patients, TekVeili monotherapy for 30% refractory patients, CARVICTI as potential cure with OS advantage. FDA offered unsolicited priority review for MAJESTIQ-3. MRD may accelerate romantamig development.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I know at our healthcare conference you talked about some upcoming data you're going to have for your anti-tau antibody
Show response
Reed described cognitive endpoints plus neuroimaging tau PET data. Results will be go/no-go decision point. Differentiated epitope targeting vs competitors. Data sharing expected H1 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
You mentioned oncology target of $50 billion by end of the decade. It looks like that's well above consensus
Show response
Taubert cited TAR-200 as biggest consensus disconnect (3x higher internal vs Street for 2028). Confirmed RYBREVANT subcu CRL response was manufacturing-related, no additional clinical data needed.
Calendar 2025 Q1
just wondering if that's based on your impression of the most likely outcome here or that's more just your speculation or hope
Show response
Duato emphasized partnering with administration on healthcare supply chain vulnerabilities. Acknowledged their view on Section 232 scope was speculative.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how you're thinking about that, both from the bispecifics as well as CAR-T and maybe a broadening into the community setting
Show response
Taubert gave comprehensive response covering DARZALEX, CARVYKTI near $1B annual, bispecific combinations, and 5000th CARVYKTI infusion milestone. Reed added pipeline detail on frontline combinations.
ABBVAbbVie7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Maybe, Roopal, you could just speak to your confidence in that approval? Is everything on manufacturing lined up?
Show response
Roopal expressed confidence in the SKYRIZI subcutaneous Crohn's induction submission, citing very strong data on a well-characterized asset with well-understood manufacturing, and noted the review is proceeding to plan.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you see a need here to maybe be more aggressive and also push into other areas quicker than what you're currently doing
Show response
Rob emphasized operating from position of strength with clear growth visibility to 2030. Open to early, late-stage, or on-market assets in neuroscience, oncology, and obesity. Named recent deals as pipeline depth investments.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Maybe you could give us an update on your BD lens, kind of the size and risk profile of potential deals you might consider
Show response
Robert Michael confirmed willingness to pursue both early and late-stage assets; not limited to early stage. Focus on immunology, neuroscience, oncology, and building out obesity. Roopal Thakkar detailed HS strategy: Rinvoq in treatment-failure population (leveraging derm familiarity from AD/alopecia), lutikizumab in naive and experienced populations with highest Phase II efficacy reported. Positioning mirrors Skyrizi/Rinvoq IBD strategy.
Calendar 2025 Q3
would love your perspective on the potential implications for your business of the new PBM model that Cigna discussed on their earnings call yesterday
Show response
Rob Michael emphasized differentiated medicines drive performance regardless of PBM structure, citing similar strong results in non-PBM international markets. Jeff Stewart noted AbbVie operates effectively in net price, rebate, hybrid, and HTA markets globally. IRA prices not yet public; Vraylar/Linzess negotiations will not impact long-term guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q2
another solid quarter here from Skyrizi. It's annualizing at about $18 billion now. I know you have the 2027 guidance out there for over $20 billion
Show response
Rob Michael confirmed tracking well against long-term guidance, will update at appropriate time. On tariffs, insulated in 2025 via inventory management. Awaiting 232 investigation outcome. Skyrizi made in US for domestic market. Planned $10B US capital investment with 4 new sites.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Could you just elaborate a little bit more there in terms of what that means for maybe inventory and then any contemplation on any changes to IP domiciling
Show response
Rob Michael outlined near-term mitigation via supply chain actions and cost efficiencies. Scott Reents noted AbbVie's IP/tax profile is in line with peers. Roopal Thakkar discussed amylin dose escalation potential.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you tell us what the volume impacts you guys are assuming, if any, in that calculation
Show response
Scott Reents declined to quantify exact volume offset but called it modest, noting it primarily impacts the standard eligible third of the patient segment.
AMGNAmgen Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you compare and contrast the key label language differences from Repatha's?
Show response
Gordon contrasted Repatha's broad label (50,000+ patients, primary and secondary prevention) with the oral's food restrictions and adherence limits; market still underpenetrated.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how are you thinking about BD and M&A right now given your current needs, but also your strength and your balance sheet?
Show response
Bob pushed back on the word 'needs' but confirmed active BD focus on innovation areas, without specifying targets or deal size preferences.
Calendar 2025 Q4
just was wondering if you have any update in terms of how to think about the design of the Type II diabetes CVOT trial, particularly the control arm
Show response
Bradner declined to share diabetes CVOT design details but emphasized MariTide's paradigm-shifting potential with monthly dosing for diabetes. Cited JPMorgan data on Phase II Type 2 diabetes study providing experience with low BMI patients and A1c across dose range as positioning well for Phase III.
Calendar 2025 Q3
maybe you could walk us through some of the puts and takes that we should think about heading into 2026.
Show response
Griffith highlighted key growth drivers, noted no expected step-change increase in R&D going forward, and pointed to completed Phase III studies offsetting new investments. Bradner confirmed ASTRO met co-primary endpoints with mild GI side effects at acceptable rates.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how you're thinking about the design of MariTide CVOT study in type 2 diabetes in light of Eli Lilly's recent SURPASS-CVOT data
Show response
Bradner acknowledged interest in Lilly's data but declined to discuss specific diabetes CVOT design or control arm details, saying more would be shared in the fullness of time.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you could help frame for us what we should be looking for at ADA with respect to MariTide. I know it's going to be the first detailed the Phase II data.
Show response
Bradner confirmed ADA will feature Phase II Part 1 details at 52 weeks plus new mechanistic data from Nature Metabolism. Declined to share CVOT study design details but confirmed ASCVD, heart failure, CKD, sleep apnea studies planned.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I know you're doing part 2 of the Phase II to explore quarterly dosing. Just wondering if there's an interim look there so you can incorporate that schedule into the Phase III program
Show response
Bradner did not directly address whether there would be an interim look, only confirming the 52-week readout timeline. He confirmed Phase II Part 1 data will be presented at ADA in June.
GILDGilead Sciences7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you just confirm the dosing interval in the phase two trial
Show response
Berger said GS3242 is in dose escalation, confident in four-month dosing and aiming for once every six months pending higher-dose Phase 1 data.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Just on the Yes2Go launch, can you provide the latest mix of switch versus naive, buy-and-bill
Show response
Joanna provided detailed breakdown: switch share leads with thirds split across other LAI, Truvada generics, and Descovy. 95% coverage at $0 copay. Persistency data encouraging but early.
Calendar 2025 Q3
just wondering if you can comment at all high level about how we should think about overall PrEP market growth
Show response
Johanna confirmed 14-15% PrEP market growth rate is the right framework for 2026. Growth fueled by awareness efforts, social media, and direct-to-consumer advertising. Expects momentum to continue.
Calendar 2025 Q2
just wondering how durable this kind of a growth rate is given what you're seeing out there in the market
Show response
Johanna attributed Descovy strength to unrestricted access jumping to 88% of lives, $0 co-pays, and 15% PrEP market growth. Noted Descovy share may decline as Yeztugo gains traction. IQVIA directionally aligned but needs 2+ quarters to stabilize.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you added MRD negativity as a co-primary endpoint in the anetocel Phase III trial
Show response
Cindy confirmed MRD negativity allows earlier assessment of patient response. Goal is to use MRD endpoint first, followed by PFS, with regulators being engaged on correlation.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I just wanted to understand what is included, if anything at all for len for PReP in the '25 revenue guide
Show response
Andy confirmed a mid-year launch assumption but declined to quantify len PrEP contribution, instead discussing access ramp dynamics.
I'm assuming we should assume that this is kind of the steady-state level as we think about the forward into '26 as well
Show response
Andy confirmed flat expense trajectory and operating leverage model for foreseeable future. Margin expansion in 2024 carried forward into 2025 guidance.
Show 6 more companies
LLYLilly (Eli)7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I was wondering if you could provide any insight on how extensive your sampling program is
Show response
Ilya Yuffa described extensive first-30-day sampling and prescriber growth from 8,000 to 36,000, without quantifying the IQVIA effect.
Calendar 2026 Q1
as you think about the evolution, I guess, of the DTC channel, what are some of the things you're considering
Show response
Dave Ricks said consumer-driven digital health is here to stay. Lilly Direct handles about 45% of early Foundayo volume and 55% of new Zepbound starts through self-pay. Platform could extend to preventative medicines.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Just wondering if you can talk about what's embedded for Medicare volume ramp in the back half of the year and how that might drive the range we're seeing on the revenue side
Show response
Lucas expects 10-20% of current LillyDirect patients are Medicare-eligible and will convert quickly. Volume builds over time with larger 2027 opportunity. Ilya added employer space is roughly stable with new team focused on alternative access channels and third-party partnerships, with increased coverage decisions mostly for 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was surprised that it wasn't on the first list of the Commissioner's National Priority Review Voucher program. And so maybe you could just comment on kind of if you guys are seeking that voucher
Show response
Dave confirmed Lilly is pursuing all avenues to accelerate orforglipron launch, noting orforglipron checks 3-4 boxes of the voucher program criteria. Emphasized readiness to launch with package going in this quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if you can just frame expectations for us down for the upcoming ATTAIN-2 Phase III data
Show response
Ken confirmed no change in expectations for ATTAIN-2. Team full speed ahead preparing for obesity submission by year-end and potential approval next year.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you're delivering the same profile as an injectable medicine, why would you decide to price lower
Show response
Patrik deferred pricing specifics to launch. Dave added Lilly's strategy of narrowing list-to-net price gap and reducing gross-to-net spreads for more transparent pricing.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if you could maybe elaborate on your expectations for Zepbound payer dynamics and access this year, particularly the impact from the OSA label
Show response
Patrik gave specific figures on commercial coverage (87%) and employer opt-in (>50%). Anticipates some Medicare coverage by H2 2025 via OSA indication.
VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I was just wondering if you can help set expectations for the upcoming AMPLIFIED Phase II trial?
Show response
Reshma: AMPLIFIED tests inaxaplin in expanded AMKD populations (low proteinuria, diabetes); results this fall; kept separate from AMPLITUDE.
Calendar 2026 Q1
if there is a defined percentage of FSGS patients in the AMPLITUDE Phase III trial for enaxaplin
Show response
Reshma could not share baseline characteristics but reasoned that heavily proteinuric AMKD patients often have biopsies, suggesting many may be known FSGS patients. IA results expected early 2027.
just curious to know if you are seeing anything different in terms of patient mix this quarter versus prior quarters
Show response
Duncan confirmed the expected transition pattern continues: naive patients first, then discontinued, then TRIKAFTA transitions. All new patients on AlifTrack, with $1B+ cumulative milestone reached.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if you can comment at all about the blinded serious data you are seeing from the RAINIER study at this point
Show response
Reshma confirmed the independent DSMB has given RAINIER a clean bill of health with no requested changes. On the WuXi tri-specific TCE, declined to share specific indications but noted it fits the pipeline-in-a-product strategy for B cell-mediated diseases beyond IgAN, membranous, and myasthenia.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if there's any update on the NOPAIN Act and what you guys are doing on that front
Show response
Reshma said the NOPAIN Act final list was delayed by the government shutdown. Continues to advocate vigorously for JOURNAVX inclusion. Phase 4 interim data showing 90% opioid-free rates will be presented at conference this week.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if you can just confirm if there's any inventory in the second quarter that we need to think about as we do the math on a dollar per script basis
Show response
Reshma confirmed no meaningful inventory build. On VX-993 preclinical models, the Phase II data confirmed they are at the top of the NaV1.8 dose-response curve, properly training models for NaV1.7 combination work.
MRNAModerna5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
was wondering if you could provide any update in terms of your thoughts on potential pricing
Show response
Hoge called flu pricing premature pending approval and positioned mRNA-1010 in the enhanced category on relative efficacy.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Just wondering if you can be any more specific about the timing of the interim Phase III of the INT and adjuvant melanoma
Show response
Hoge confirmed 2026 readout but would not refine further. No futility assessment built in. Interim is either early success or continue to subsequent analysis. Study well powered and balanced.
Calendar 2025 Q4
just on the flu RTF, implications for the 2028 cash flow breakeven guidance, and then timing of the Type A meeting
Show response
Hoge said Type A meeting usually 30 days. CFO deferred breakeven implications citing too many variables. Noted 10 growth shots on goal and cost momentum. INT adjuvant melanoma read out this year but event-driven.
Calendar 2024 Q4
wondering if you can confirm if you still have not seen any cases of GBS with your RSV vaccine
Show response
Hoge confirmed no GBS identified for either RSV or COVID vaccines, providing important safety differentiation.
Is it only on the flu side? Or do you need vaccine efficacy for both COVID as well and kind of what level of protection you need to see
Show response
COVID efficacy already demonstrated. Flu efficacy trial ongoing with optimism for interim analysis at end of current season.
BIIBBiogen4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you remind us of the powering on the primary endpoint and what is required from the FDA to support approval
Show response
Powering withheld. Singhal did describe the 6-month biopsy-driven placebo-controlled design, the accelerated first half 2027 readout and the separate MVI trial.
Calendar 2026 Q1
just thinking through what this means for the broader commercial opportunity
Show response
Chris sized AMR at 11,000 patients with IgAN-comparable pricing ($350K/year Otsuka reference) yielding $2-3B TAM. Phase 2 showed 80% AMR resolution. MVI adds 5-6K patients. IgAN showed 18-month durability post-treatment suggesting disease modification. China is key IgAN market. Felzartamab now has worldwide rights after TJ Bio deal.
Calendar 2025 Q3
when we see that J&J data, assuming it comes before BIIB080, how should we think about read through to your ASO program
Show response
Priya noted posdinemab targets mid-domain extracellular tau via monoclonal antibody, different mechanism from BIIB080 ASO. Phase 1 showed some fluid biomarker impact but no tau PET data. If positive, would validate tau hypothesis broadly. Cautioned read-through is limited given different approaches.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you could comment high level, number one, on your interactions with FDA, and if there have been any changes to the review teams
Show response
Priya confirmed no delays in review meetings. Cited zorevunersen regulatory agreement on Phase 3 design. Chris noted encouragement from Commissioner Makary comments on ultra-rare and surrogate markers.
MRKMerck & Co., Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what you'd be most interested to see in that data set and implications for your sac-TMT development strategy?
Show response
Dean Li said AVANZAR all-comers vs biomarker-selected results will inform the need for a biomarker; declined specifics on Kelun's control arm.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you can give us any comments on the top line in terms of some of the pushes and pulls as we think about that
Show response
Caroline itemized new launches as 2026 drivers (WINREVAIR, OHTUVAYRE, CAPVAXIVE, ENFLONSIA) offset by DIFICID/BRIDION/JANUVIA LOEs and IRA pricing.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was just wondering if you could help frame for us the potential impact there
Show response
Rob deferred on 2026 guidance but said 2025 tariff impact would be minimal and Merck is well positioned for 2026 given inventory and US manufacturing shifts.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Was just wondering if the change in outer-year GARDASIL sales impacts at all how you're thinking about
Show response
Rob reiterated BD strategy unchanged, with a $0-15B sweet spot and openness to commercialized assets.
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Bayer is going to be presenting some Phase III SSP data for their oral Factor XI inhibitor, asundexian next week
Show response
Yancopoulos argued antibodies have fundamentally different specificity and efficacy profiles versus small molecule Factor XI inhibitors. Believes antibodies can deliver better anticoagulation with dramatically less bleeding risk. Some read-through but expects very different profile.
Calendar 2025 Q3
any new insights you might have learned that drove the differential outcome in the prior 2 Phase III trials
Show response
Yancopoulos declined to share insights on the AERIFY-2 failure citing competitive issues. Said they are planning to meet with FDA and that discussion will help decide strategy going forward. Complete deflection on trial design optimization.
Calendar 2025 Q2
You mentioned in the fianlimab first-line melanoma study that the event rate is slowing
Show response
Yancopoulos said they are powering for at minimum the effect competitors have shown with room for better. Declined to speculate on cause of slowing event rates. Schleifer added that this is why blinded studies exist and you just have to wait until unblinding.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you confirm that this component is something that's used in your prefilled syringe that's already approved in Europe
Show response
Schleifer confirmed identical device, design, and components already approved and in use in Europe. Expressed confidence issues should be resolvable given European approval precedent.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| BMY Bristol Myers Squibb | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
| PFE Pfizer | 9 | 22%2 of 9 questions |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| ABBV AbbVie | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| GILD Gilead Sciences | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| LLY Lilly (Eli) | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| MRNA Moderna | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| BIIB Biogen | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
- BMYBristol Myers Squibb · 9 questions11%1 of 9 questions
- PFEPfizer · 9 questions22%2 of 9 questions
- JNJJohnson & Johnson · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- ABBVAbbVie · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- AMGNAmgen Inc. · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- GILDGilead Sciences · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- LLYLilly (Eli) · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- MRNAModerna · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- BIIBBiogen · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q2 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q3 | 13 | 8%1 of 13 questions | 11 |
| 2025 Q4 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 9 |
| 2026 Q1 | 11 | 18%2 of 11 questions | 9 |
| 2026 Q2 | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions | 10 |
- 2024 Q413 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q111 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q29 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q313 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 13 questions) · 11 companies
- 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 9 companies
- 2026 Q111 questions · challenge rate 18% (2 of 11 questions) · 9 companies
- 2026 Q210 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 10 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Innovation & R&D38
- Regulation Policy21
- Product Launch18
- Demand12
- Competitive Dynamics10
- Revenue Growth8
- Pricing7
- M&A5
- Capital Allocation4
- Trade Tariffs4
Show all 14 topics
- Guidance Reliability3
- Margin3
- Cost Pressure3
- Geographic Expansion2