Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Theresa Chen
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 93on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 5%5 of 93 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 93 of 93 questions from 8 companies
OKEONEOK14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How do you see the opportunity set for exports broadly evolving from here
Show response
Swords cited strong export demand and early talks with offtakers for capacity beyond current contracts.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what kind of upside -- could you potentially furbish whether it be optimization on utilization or spot cargoes or even additional brownfield investment in Pasadena?
Show response
Sheridan confirmed increased dock utilization, room for brownfield expansion, and crude dock recontracting at favorable rates. LPG dock commercialization has accelerated, especially post-Middle East conflict.
Can you elaborate further on recent conversations with your producer customers? What are your near- and medium-term expectations for upstream activity in your areas of service?
Show response
Sheridan described producers leaning into production via faster well turnarounds, more completion crews, and DUC drawdowns. Some are looking at additional rigs, especially as the back-end curve strengthens.
Your funding say, splitter in the Gulf Coast, what utilization is that seeing currently? And what's your recontracting time line for that?
Show response
Sheridan confirmed the splitter is highly utilized with strong spreads and has been recontracted for term, providing long-duration earnings visibility.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you speak specifically on how much visibility you have in capturing these opportunities at this point
Show response
Sheridan confirmed all $150M of 2026 synergies are identified, planned, and underway, coming from same buckets shown on page 9 of the investor deck.
what is your outlook for the subsequent phases of this project? And have the expectations related to the Denver refined product system changed at all
Show response
Sheridan confirmed Denver Phase 1 fully contracted with take-or-pay, Phase 2 commercialization being pursued actively. Sunbelt had open season interest but not enough to FID; competing project also lacks sufficient commitments.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you just give us any sense of any early indications on how you expect volumes across your supply push assets to trend through the next year?
Show response
Pierce noted enough rigs running to hold crude flat, with rising GORs (Bakken at 3.1) driving continued gas/NGL growth even in flat production environment.
would you be able to provide an update on your LPG export commercialization efforts? How are those conversations going with potential customers?
Show response
Sheridan expressed satisfaction with contracting progress but declined specifics for competitive reasons, noting strong supply position continues to attract customers.
Calendar 2025 Q2
would you expand a bit more on the activity and expectations you have on G&P volume by basin and what those conversations with your producers look like
Show response
Sheridan gave detailed basin-by-basin update: Bakken steady, Oklahoma strong in Cherokee formation, Permian ramping with 1.6 Bcf in July and FID on new plant.
your largest competitor in Permian NGL infrastructure has publicly disparaged the economics of new LPG export facilities. Do you care to respond
Show response
Sheridan defended LPG dock economics citing premier location outside Houston Ship Channel, rates in line with estimated economics, and strong customer interest.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how much would you say is already underway now that we're through April? Or is there still a significant component that is still subject to execution
Show response
Sheridan confirmed substantial synergies underway, with key Easton/Gulf Coast connections completing second half 2025 and majority of synergies within ONEOK's control.
Would your CapEx plans in place for the near to medium term, how much can you flex down if things get worse?
Show response
Walt noted ~$1B of annual capital can flex naturally with producer activity, plus ability to pause larger projects as demonstrated in 2016 and 2020.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Would you be able to provide some additional details behind bridging the 2025 to 2026 guidance?
Show response
Walt explained 2026 growth driven by completion of synergy capital projects connecting Easton assets and other projects completing in late 2025/early 2026.
can you speak more to the strategic benefits behind your export JV with MPLX and how exactly will ONEOK and MPLX be competitive
Show response
Sheridan emphasized premier location (2 hours to open water), brownfield economics, connectivity to NGL storage, and expandability beyond 400,000 bpd.
VLOValero Energy14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Do you believe that the industry has structurally shifted to a higher mid-cycle refining margin environment?
Show response
Direct, with the mechanism spelled out: hydroskimming rather than cracking margins in Northwest Europe now set crack spreads.
we could get an update on your outlook for unit margins and profitability on a go-forward basis here
Show response
Direct: quantified the ethanol production tax credit path and explained why D4 values should stay above fat prices into 2027.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how should we think about the trajectory of DGD profitability going forward
Show response
Eric Fisher noted DGD mark-to-market headwind on forward feedstock positions if commodities continue rising, but RVO is strong tailwind with better 2026 outlook.
from your perspective, I'm curious as to what you think has enabled that
Show response
Homer explained proactive risk management including LIFO inventory positioning, reduced derivative exposure, and elevated cash position at $4-5B high end.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how do you view the evolution of and demand dynamics for light products and crack spreads going forward
Show response
Gary detailed Q4 inventory builds driven by high utilization not weak demand, noted 500K bpd demand growth vs 400K bpd capacity additions for 2026, and flagged execution risk on consultant assumptions about Russian capacity and new startups.
how much of this can be absorbed within your footprint over time
Show response
Randy noted historical Venezuelan heavy runs up to 240K bpd, with the new Port Arthur coker substantially increasing processing capability beyond that, plus multiple factors (OPEC increases, Kirkuk, Canada, higher freight) widening differentials.
Calendar 2025 Q3
2 major product pipeline binding open seasons that have been announced over the recent weeks to move more volumes from these regions into PADD V
Show response
Gary noted Valero prefers waterborne flexibility over pipeline commitments due to West Coast margin volatility, and already has connectivity through McKee to El Paso and Phoenix.
I'd love to get your take on what you're seeing across your domestic distribution channels
Show response
Gary reported gasoline flat/slightly down, jet up ~4% per DOE, diesel up 8% in Valero system (broader market ~2%), with transatlantic gasoline arb closed through Q1.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how is refined product demand trending across your footprint? Maybe just unpack some of Lane's opening remarks about sales across your system
Show response
Gary provided detailed demand breakdown showing gasoline flat, diesel up 3%, diesel inventories at historic lows with open export arbs, calling fundamentals very supportive.
what is your near to medium-term outlook for light-heavy differentials, taking into account the tailwind from incremental OPEC+ barrels
Show response
Gary outlined Q4 as the inflection point for wider differentials as OPEC barrels, post-summer fuel oil, Canadian recovery, and turnaround season all converge.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you see some of that supply creeping back over time, or how does this settle out
Show response
Eric explained that without the blender's tax credit, marginal BD/RD producers can't operate, and RINs need to rise 40-50 cents more to incentivize their return.
would you be able to provide an update on your suspension from the registry of importers
Show response
Gary confirmed permit was reinstated after Valero demonstrated full compliance, and noted the anti-illegal-fuel effort will positively impact their Mexico business.
Calendar 2024 Q4
would you be able to provide a little bit more color on this, what the optimization means in terms of incremental improvement
Show response
Greg explained the $230M project increases light olefin production to fill spare alkylation capacity, adding 6,000-7,000 bpd of high-octane alkylate, meeting mid-cycle return hurdles.
how are you thinking about light heavy differentials as we move through the year
Show response
Gary noted fundamental supports for heavy sour discounts (OPEC additions, Lyondell closure) but said tariff/sanctions rhetoric is dominating and muting market moves.
KMIKinder Morgan13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
would you be able to elaborate on what advantages your project brings versus other contenders along similar corridors
Show response
Sital touted Tennessee's existing four-pipe corridor and supply diversity as advantages but declined to comment directly on Boardwalk's Borealis project.
Calendar 2026 Q1
In terms of the early termination of the terminal service agreement at Pasadena in exchange for a series of some payments
Show response
Confirmed Q1 lump sum recognition but did not quantify the amount. Noted tanks were backfilled on long-term basis with rates stepping up over time, largely offsetting lost earnings.
Can you talk more about the rationale behind the Monument pipeline acquisition?
Show response
Dang detailed strategic rationale: long-term contracts, 90% utility/industrial customers, storage synergies, and expansion activity that will bring high single-digit multiple down over time.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how should we quantify the displacement of existing SFPP EBITDA
Show response
Kim said too early to discuss specifics. Still need to complete open season and negotiate details with Phillips 66 partner. Costs and contribution structure not yet finalized.
Could you provide an update on the progress of the HH conversion
Show response
Kim said Phase 1 on track for late Q1/early Q2. Sital said initial phase well contracted with volumes coming from KMI's own plants providing visibility. Phase 1 likely on the earlier side of the timeframe. Phase 2 discussions continue positively but will be monitored against macro conditions. Kim noted growing GORs in the Bakken as a positive.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you talk about your project positioning relative to 1 Oak's competing Sunbelt project
Show response
Kim said competitor only serves Phoenix while Western Gateway accesses multiple markets: new pipeline from Borger to Phoenix, reversed West line enabling California and Las Vegas access. Gives Arizona independence from declining California refining. Open season ends December 19 with targeted 2029 in-service requiring various regulatory approvals.
What has driven the seemingly improved outlook over the past few months
Show response
Kim said $10B opportunity set is mostly natural gas supporting LNG, power, Mexico exports, and industrial growth. Projects span Arizona to Florida, mostly under $250M with a few over $1B. Opportunity set comparable to when backlog was at $3B with no diminishment. Includes power demand across Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, and Florida plus egress from Haynesville and potentially Marcellus/Utica.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what is the progress on building additional natural gas infrastructure on that front
Show response
Kim confirmed Arizona demand from utilities and potential data centers. Copper State could be $4-5 billion but is a competitive process complicated by constantly changing tariffs. Smaller brownfield projects also under consideration. Must meet return thresholds.
what do you think has allowed Kinder to win many of these projects
Show response
Kim cited three factors: existing asset footprint advantage, track record of building and delivering projects on time, and customer service practices including advance maintenance notification and minimizing customer impact.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how much volumetric exposure or EBITDA could this impact for your
Show response
Sital said no impact expected. End-market demand drives pipeline throughput regardless of which refineries supply it. Waterborne barrels from Washington State or Asia can replace closed California refinery output.
asking for an update on your strategy in the Bakken on the heels of the Outrigger acquisition
Show response
Sital said integration going well with north-of-river processing complementing existing footprint. Looking at capturing more of NGL value chain but declined specifics due to competitive dynamics.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you expand a bit on the strategic rationale behind this and outlook for downstream synergies
Show response
Kim cited capital and commercial synergies with existing Bakken assets but declined to quantify them. Downstream synergies possible but not immediate. Processing north of the river opens new flexibility.
can you talk about the economic moat that you have, competitive moat that you have, the financial considerations
Show response
Kim confirmed returns are consistent with historical targets. Competitive wins on MSX and Trident demonstrate infrastructure advantage. Required returns adjust for project risk profile.
MPCMarathon Petroleum13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Would you elaborate on the economics of running WCS versus Venezuelan crude
Show response
CCO gave specific differentials and expected WCS to widen ~$2/bbl into 4Q, a feedstock tailwind.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I would love to get an update on your demand observations and outlook across the products within your footprint
Show response
Rick confirmed resilient demand with no elasticity impacts yet. West Coast wholesale volumes actually increased as competitors exited. Strong jet demand across all regions.
is the strategy or plan that you will farm that out to an off-taker to like a consumer on the other end
Show response
Rick outlined delivered and FOB mix strategy targeting Asian, European, African markets. Will retain spot market exposure. CEO confirmed this is a growth platform beyond Frac 1 and 2.
Calendar 2025 Q4
To what extent can you augment your jet yield further over time to capture this benefit?
Show response
Rick highlighted growing DOD demand in LA region and jet production upside at LAR but declined to quantify specific volume increases for competitive reasons.
what underlies your view that demand supply for the year ahead and maybe beyond is indeed going to be positive for refining economics
Show response
CEO noted ~1M bpd Indian/Asian additions but mostly petchem-oriented, with historically slower ramp; demand growth of 1-1.2M bpd annually supports enhanced mid-cycle; 2026 may be back-end loaded.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What are your expectations on how those differentials evolve from here?
Show response
Rick expects sour differentials to widen in Q1 on OPEC+/Canadian production; ASCI at 5-year weak; offshore production above 2M bpd first time since 2020; TMX demand waning from Far East.
Is the same true for PADD 4 if [ Dyno ] project -- the [ Dyno ] project goes through considering that you do also have a Salt Lake facility
Show response
Rick emphasized Salt Lake feedstock advantage with black and yellow wax crude; de minimis pipeline volumes won't affect their position; product clearing to Vegas and Arizona provides optionality.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how do you view the net capacity outlook for the global refining kit between the near to medium term
Show response
CEO outlined 1M+ bpd closures vs ~900K-1M bpd additions (Dangote, Dos Bocas) with 1-1.2M bpd demand growth; extremely constructive outlook once additions are absorbed.
What do you think is the next frontier growth for MPC?
Show response
CEO pointed to growing MPLX distributions enabling capital returns, portfolio optimization (Andersons sale as example), and LPG export marketing as near-term growth avenues.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you think the regularity of imports will cap benchmark cracks over time?
Show response
Rick argued imports create volatility not sustainability given 40+ day transit time and unpredictable pricing; MPC's cost advantage beats import economics consistently.
What is your view on pursuing infrastructure growth opportunities in dry gas production areas
Show response
CEO referenced Summit/Utica acquisition as evidence of dry gas interest but emphasized current priorities are Permian-focused; growth must meet mid-teens returns threshold.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is MPC also marketing ONEOK's portion of the terminal facility, the volumes coming out of the terminal facility, or is it just MPLX's 50% interest?
Show response
Clear answer: MPC markets only MPLX's 50% share; ONEOK markets its own 200,000 bpd allocation independently.
Can you talk about how much LPG export currently exists within your system just off of your refining assets in the Gulf Coast
Show response
Rick declined specific volume numbers but emphasized diversified go-to-market strategy (term/spot, FOB/delivered) and bullish outlook driven by Chinese PDH and global demand.
EPDEnterprise Products Partners L.P.11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Are you seeing much by the way of changes in customer behavior contracting activity or interest from individual customers
Show response
Tyler Cott said interest remains very strong, with some countries historically dependent on the Middle East now looking to shift long-term supply sourcing to the U.S.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you talk about the incremental earnings uplift or cash uplift from spot cargoes in the interim
Show response
Tyler gave commissioning timeline (May completion) but deferred on quantifying spot earnings uplift, noting they need to get through commissioning first.
how much capacity is tied to contracts with near-term expirations that could be recontracted at higher rates
Show response
Tyler Cott provided specific contract percentages and durations: 90% contracted, LPG through end of decade, ethane 10-20 years, 10% available for spot.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you expand on the cadence and ramp up of earnings contribution from these expansions
Show response
Tyler Cott detailed NRT ethane ramp through Q2 reaching full utilization, then second flex train starting propane shifting to mostly ethane by end of next year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
On the upsized buyback authorization, would you all talk about or just provide more details on the capital allocation outlook for the next couple of years
Show response
Randy outlined 2-3 year CapEx at $2-$2.5B with potential for $2.6-$2.7B. Buybacks will have both programmatic and opportunistic components.
could this lead to better utilization and/or marketing opportunities on your Texas Western product system
Show response
Justin highlighted unique Salt Lake corridor positioning and broader benefit from Mid-Continent premium pricing across both TW and TE systems.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what's your forward outlook for PDH as well as what is your view for whether it be the second half or into 2026 about the spread-based businesses
Show response
Chris noted PDH rates improved but still below expectations. Octane margins returned to historic levels from record highs. July margins improving with driving season.
What are the lessons learned from the BIS ethane incident during the second quarter? Do you think the views of your customers
Show response
Tug said Enterprise was largely unscathed due to diverse international exposure but the BIS action caused a non-Chinese company to choose naphtha over U.S. ethane.
Calendar 2025 Q1
With the return to utilization or full utilization for PDH, what is your outlook for the segment for the remainder of the year
Show response
Chris D'Anna confirmed both PDHs running, PDH-1 above nameplate. Renegotiated RGP purchase to fixed fee. Octane spreads 75% hedged for the year.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you help us think about, the path to recovery for the petchem segment? What are the puts and takes there
Show response
Chris D'Anna acknowledged global oversupply headwinds. Jim highlighted new Southeast Asian ethane contracts and potential European cracker closures.
how do you think about the potential change to export economics to competitive economics within the region
Show response
Brent Secrest highlighted EPD's brownfield capital advantage at less than one-third of greenfield costs. Jim pledged to defend the LPG export franchise.
PSXPhillips 6610 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what are your expectations at this point for third quarter capture?
Show response
Brian listed tailwinds (Russia/Mideast outages, low inventories, disciplined Chinese exports); Kevin guided Q3 capture to the historical ~95%.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what range of total CapEx and expected to build multiple on a 100% basis, can you share at this point
Show response
Mark declined to provide specific CapEx or build multiple, citing need to finalize scope and partner details. Said information would be available shortly.
can you talk about utilization and the ability to expand your path for NGL assets that are now or soon will be connected
Show response
Mark highlighted record DJ Basin volumes, recently restarted Powder River NGL pipeline for early Bakken barrels, and noted capacity expansion opportunities to fill downstream pipes from the Rockies.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how do you view the likelihood of increased ethane projection in the Permian following the start-up of multiple residue gas pipelines in 2026 and beyond?
Show response
Don sees no material change in ethane rejection or recovery with new gas pipelines. CPChem Golden Triangle coming online in 2027 adds significant ethane demand. Ethane pricing expected to balance with gas prices to maintain recovery economics.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you talk about the rationale behind this project and why it's important for Phillips 66? How does it stack up versus one of competing pipeline projects?
Show response
Brian compared PADD 5 to PADD 1 import market model. About half of volume for Phoenix, rest for California. Mark noted OneOk has different source (Gulf Coast vs Mid-Con). Constructive open season conversations.
what kind of CapEx should we anticipate for Western Gateway given the substantial greenfield component?
Show response
Don said 50-50 partnership with KMI. CapEx not disclosed as route and connection costs still being finalized. Kevin noted capital spend in 2027-2029 timeframe, no near-term impact.
Calendar 2025 Q1
There are some material circulating about a carve-out for NGLs within the Chinese reciprocal tariffs. Do you have an early view on this
Show response
Brian noted Freeport is mostly termed up with no cancellations. Mark added China has few alternatives for ethane; rational tariff discussions may be occurring.
Would you be able to quantify the cost? And is this plant the first of maybe several plants to increase the Y-Grade under your control
Show response
Don explained Iron Mesa located near Goldsmith, serving Midland and Delaware Basins. Sub-5x build multiple. With Dos Picos plants, adds ~800K bpd gas processing, producing 100K+ bpd NGLs.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Is FTC also a major concern here? Do you think that would preclude some of the more obvious opportunities along your Midstream footprint?
Show response
Mark said FTC isn't the primary filter; value creation and strategic fit drive M&A decisions. Don emphasized focus on organic growth first.
can you help us think about the path forward to achieve the below 30% net debt to capital? What time frame would you expect to get to that?
Show response
Kevin laid out $10B mid-cycle cash generation, $5B to shareholders, $2B CapEx, leaving $3B+ for debt reduction, bolt-ons, or buybacks.
Show 2 more companies
WMBWilliams Companies10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
How has the scope, criteria or strategic priorities of the BTM projects evolved since you announced the first one.
Show response
Chen asked how BTM project scope has evolved since the first announcement. Wingo explained that turbine access was initially the key differentiator but now the team's ability to design unique solutions for unique loads is becoming the bigger moat. Zamarin added hyperscalers increasingly recognize tailored power solutions are the long-term need, not a bridge.
based on your comments, would you say that permitting reform is the critical bridge to affordability in this country? And in addition to championing those efforts, what else is Williams along with ...
Show response
Chen asked whether permitting reform is the critical bridge to affordability. Zamarin responded that it is absolutely critical, noting prices hit $200/MMBtu in New England during winter storms while Pennsylvania prices were normal, framing this as an infrastructure issue not supply. He advocated for Clean Water Act 401 reform and cited an S&P study showing the Constitution pipeline would save consumers over $11B.
Calendar 2025 Q3
would you provide an update on the production activity levels in Haynesville and the Northeast
Show response
Larsen said Haynesville activity picking up with no slowdown expected into 2026 as LNG and power demand materializes. Northeast mixed with shoulder-month pricing challenges but volumes rebounding.
what is the potential or what is your target as far as an uplift in utilization or underwriting additional expansion in your pipeline assets
Show response
Zamarin said Sequent will source lowest-cost reliable gas across footprint for terminal. Expects growth in gathering, LEG, Transco, and storage connections. Wingo added Line 200 will be bidirectional for additional optimization.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you provide us an update about how you're using AI within your own organization at this point
Show response
Zamarin described AI adoption across cost efficiency and business transformation. Shared anecdote of AI modeler scoring 96% vs 10-year trader's 94% in energy marketing test. Larsen focused on data-driven maintenance and operations.
Was this the result of cash tax savings expected post OBB B? Or were there other drivers of this delta
Show response
Porter confirmed both higher EBITDA and $100M lower taxes drove AFFO increase. For 2026, cash taxes expected at or below 2025 levels. Significant deferrals expected beyond 2026 tied to power innovation CapEx.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what are you assuming at this point for annual contribution for this group of projects within guidance relative to the $300 million exit
Show response
Porter said no formal deepwater guidance number. Armstrong clarified $300 million addition run rate expected by year-end, with Whale and Ballymore performing well. Shenandoah and Salamanca timing still uncertain.
How much more capacity is there to bring on projects like Power Express? And what are the next areas of growth and development on Transco
Show response
Larson said Power Express leverages existing right-of-ways for streamlined permitting. Seeing continued growth in Virginia, Southeast, and Gulf Coast with LNG. New supply sources create additional expansion opportunities.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how much expansion capability do you have remaining across your footprint and what do the economics look like for something like this
Show response
Dunn outlined Gulf Coast and Clay Basin storage expansion opportunities with brownfield economics comparable to transmission project returns.
what is it going to take to get something like this across the finish line and beyond this opportunity, can you help us lay out the addressable market
Show response
Armstrong confirmed advanced stage but deferred specifics citing PR and government affairs groundwork needed before announcement. Zamarin added projects will be fully contracted before announcement.
TRGPTarga Resources8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
How much of this growth is a result of growing with your producers for their plans? Are there key commodity price assumptions here that underlie this range? Is it contingent upon additional commerc...
Show response
Meloy noted multiple producers revising forecasts higher, mainly on the Delaware side. Stronger Delaware outlook driving additional infrastructure. 2027 outlook now stronger than expected a year ago. Both Delaware plants and long lead items likely headed to Delaware.
how should we think about the durability of your commercial success and your ability to replicate it over time?
Show response
Meloy emphasized that existing dedicated acreage alone supports strong multi-year growth. Additional commercial success is additive, not required. Kneale added that FID decisions are based on contracts already in hand, not assumed future wins.
Calendar 2025 Q3
your recent project announcements have drawn scrutiny with some questioning why you didn't leverage or even choose to lever third-party NGL infrastructure for longer versus investing now to increas...
Show response
Kneale framed third-party offloads as a deliberate capital-efficient bridge ahead of Speedway coming online, derisking the project with already-flowing volumes. Wellhead-to-water ownership enables best-in-class service and operating leverage.
Where do you anticipate the next bottlenecks to be within the Permian?
Show response
Muraro noted residue gas takeaway is extremely tight now, with basis spiking during long-haul pipe outages. Two new pipes coming online end of 2026 with material capacity expected to be well utilized.
Calendar 2025 Q1
What percent is public versus private, majors or large independents versus smaller players
Show response
Kneale declined specifics but emphasized working with the biggest, best-capitalized producers. Majors have become more meaningful after Permian consolidation.
if there's not a carve-out for LPG amid the ongoing trade war. Can you talk about how this impacts the competitive landscape
Show response
Pryor emphasized Targa's integrated supply advantage from wellhead to water, with homegrown NGLs feeding the export dock regardless of trade dynamics.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm curious if you can quantify in any way how strong is strong growth in 2026 from a volumetric perspective as you look at your inlet volumes
Show response
Meloy declined to give specific 2026 volume guidance but confirmed higher YoY growth expected, with downstream CapEx normalizing after major projects complete.
curious to hear your view on the ebbs and flows of demand from your international customers
Show response
Pryor provided strong demand outlook: US LPG market share rose from 29% to 46%, driven by Asian demand for clean-burning mobile fuel.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| OKE ONEOK | 14 | 7%1 of 14 questions |
| VLO Valero Energy | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions |
| KMI Kinder Morgan | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| MPC Marathon Petroleum | 13 | 15%2 of 13 questions |
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| PSX Phillips 66 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| WMB Williams Companies | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| TRGP Targa Resources | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
- OKEONEOK · 14 questions7%1 of 14 questions
- VLOValero Energy · 14 questions0%none of 14 questions
- KMIKinder Morgan · 13 questions0%none of 13 questions
- MPCMarathon Petroleum · 13 questions15%2 of 13 questions
- EPDEnterprise Products Partners L.P. · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- PSXPhillips 66 · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- WMBWilliams Companies · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- TRGPTarga Resources · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 16 | 0%none of 16 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 15 | 7%1 of 15 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 12 | 17%2 of 12 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 16 | 6%1 of 16 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 14 | 7%1 of 14 questions | 8 |
| 2026 Q1 | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 6 |
- 2024 Q416 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 16 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q115 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 15 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q212 questions · challenge rate 17% (2 of 12 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q316 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 16 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q414 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 14 questions) · 8 companies
- 2026 Q113 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment31
- Demand30
- Competitive Dynamics26
- Revenue Growth14
- Supply Chain11
- Macroeconomic9
- Margin8
- Capital Allocation8
- Geographic Expansion7
- Regulation Policy7
Show all 18 topics
- Pricing7
- M&A6
- Guidance Reliability4
- Trade Tariffs4
- Product Launch2
- Innovation & R&D2
- Cloud & AI2
- Cost Pressure1