Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Tom Gallagher
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 74on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 24%18 of 74 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 74 of 74 questions from 6 companies
AFLAflac14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 4 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Was that just -- is that still just a company-imposed limit? Or was that in consultation with the FSA?
Show response
Max Broden said the move to a 30% of FSA reserves limit is internally set but shared with external constituents, and larger transactions would lower per-deal cost given a strengthening track record.
Should we expect that to be the case going forward? Or would you consider going bigger and more strategic if opportunities arise?
Show response
Dan Amos said Aflac continues to evaluate opportunities but applies a strenuous test, noting the small companies it acquired have turned around and performed better.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you talk about what does that mean for -- from an IRR perspective for Aflac when there's somewhat younger customers that are doing lapse and reissue?
Show response
Max explained that while individual lapsed policies have lower IRRs, the new policies have longer expected duration, creating a balancing effect with minimal net impact.
the number to get to flat premium growth in Japan you said would require around $90 billion of yen sales for the year. Did I understand that part correctly?
Show response
Dan confirmed the JPY 90B threshold for flat premium and offered a personal target of JPY 80B for 2026, above last year's JPY 74B, demonstrating confidence in sales momentum.
can you help quantify how much benefit you got from that external reinsurance deal? And were there any ESR headwinds
Show response
Max directly addressed that the reinsurance deal had minimal capital impact and explained ESR movement drivers including subsidiary dividends and yen rate sensitivity.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you talk about what kind of levels we're talking about here for group versus non-group sales?
Show response
Virgil confirmed traditional individual VB flat to negative while group products up 14% overall (dental +48.8%, L&D +11.3%, group VB +11.7%). Focus for 2026 on unified experience across channels and continued investment in traditional business enrollment technology.
I'm wondering if there's like explosive growth in group, what's happening to your voluntary benefits because the total sales number is still pretty low
Show response
Max explained large in-force block with 93%+ persistency means new sales are small relative to total. COVID-era sales gap still closing. Expects lapses to exceed sales in 2026 but inflection within reasonable future.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Did you say that was Miraito? And how did -- what was the difference between -- because I think you launched that in June. And so what was actually repriced in September?
Show response
Max clarified Tsumitasu was repriced, not Miraito. Moved discounted advanced premium rate from 25bp to 1%, a meaningful improvement driven by higher yields.
as you add a third, how do we think about your ability to support 3 products at once? Because I think historically, Aflac was really a one product at a time company
Show response
Koide explained new marketing/sales transformation enables concurrent 3-brand support. Dan cautioned some natural cannibalization of cancer sales when medical launches, as agents pivot to new product excitement. Koide added alliance partners sell cancer only, so won't be impacted by medical launch.
Calendar 2025 Q2
JPY 21 billion sales, that's -- if I annualize that, we're back to pre-pandemic levels now
Show response
Yoshizumi confirmed aim to recover pre-COVID sales. Dan praised the marketing/sales shift and said they are better today than in a long time. Max cautioned earned premium still guided -1% to -2%.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the volatility of capital seems kind of on the high side when they think about sensitivities to what's happened in macro recently. So just curious, are you looking maybe to change philosophy
Show response
Max firmly stated no fundamental changes to capital management or hedging philosophy. Put option program sized to cut 40-45 ESR points of FX tail risk.
why did the ESR ratio declined by so much in Q1? If I just look at the sensitivities, I think the sharp rise in Japan rates should have offset the strengthening of the Yen
Show response
Max identified dividends flowing from Japan to holding company as the missing piece that offset the benefit from higher JGB rates.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Would you anticipate getting an extraordinary dividend out of that entity? And any updated thoughts on what you might do with that much level of excess?
Show response
Max said no special dividend expected until ESR is formally implemented at end of Q1 2026, then will target 170-230% operating range.
how much of the Japan margin coming in at the low end of the guide is floating rate impact on NII and how much of it is more limited benefit ratio improvement?
Show response
Max attributed margin pressure primarily to NII headwinds from floating rate portfolio, while benefit ratio expected to decline over forecast period due to favorable third sector mix shift.
METMetLife14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 5 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Would that be an interest if those opportunities present themselves?
Show response
Khalaf declined to comment on speculation but highlighted LatAm on a path to $1 billion in earnings this year, led by Brazil.
could we see base spreads go higher just given where rates are when you think about maturing assets and new money
Show response
McCallion said changes are incremental with no quick shifts, but higher rates provide positive momentum over time.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I noticed you've been shrinking that a lot. So it looks like you're not originating as much on that side
Show response
John highlighted asset-backed financing as showing strong relative value. Noted CML new origination spreads remain tight so they are being selective. Diversified platform enables flexibility.
did you say $170 million of stat net income in 1Q? And if so, anything in particular that was weighing on that result?
Show response
John attributed the decline to seasonal U.S. entity dividend timing. Confirmed no change to capital trajectory, free cash flow ratio of 65-75%, and RBC at 379% well above 360% target.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I think the $200 million benefit that you flagged, is this a GAAP-only impact? Any expected change in statutory
Show response
John McCallion explained resegmentation created opportunity to rethink adjusted earnings reporting. Real estate depreciation exclusion better aligns with economic returns and operating cash flow. MetLife has higher real estate exposure than peers due to investment expertise.
I know that they're a partner of yours. That's part you know, you have an investment management agreement with them. Any way you can sort of frame how meaningful that could be
Show response
John McCallion highlighted diversified MIM client base with ~$150B insurance AUM. Expects to maintain and grow Brighthouse relationship. Characterized worst-case scenario as very modest EPS impact given overall diversification. Emphasized PineBridge integration momentum and strong flows.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you comment on the split between dental and disability, what you saw in Q3 and then why you're still confident that you can continue to improve into Q4?
Show response
Ramy Tadros confirmed 230bps sequential improvement driven by dental seasonal pattern and pricing action benefits, plus normalized disability with strong recoveries from multiyear capability investments. Expects further Q4 improvement from dental seasonality to reach full 400bps combined improvement.
Is that a few large deals, several smaller ones? And can you just comment on what's happening competitively in that market to allow you to have so many wins?
Show response
Ramy Tadros noted $14B+ YTD PRT with $12B in Q4 from jumbo deals. Cited balance sheet size, investment capabilities, and financial strength as competitive advantages. Takes M&A lens to capital deployment with ROEs supportive of enterprise targets. Deploying both own balance sheet and third-party capital.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the disability pressure you saw this quarter came from high net worth. Unum seemed to see something similar. Have you done any more analysis on what's going on there?
Show response
Ramy Tadros isolated the pressure to 2 long-standing specialty clients with high-value injury claims, unrelated to macro factors or mental health trends. Disability PFOs are just above 10% of total Group Benefits, dental is approximately $5B.
I noticed you did take CECL reserves for I think it was commercial mortgage loans of around $235 million this quarter
Show response
John McCallion noted $200M+ CRE reserve increase is part of orderly loan resolution, typically indicative of trough stabilization. Expects resolution to pick up and peak this year. Impact of 2-5 RBC points, within normal excess capital levels with no impact on capital management.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you comment on what your underwriting experience was like in MetLife Holdings this quarter between let's say, on the mortality side, for life insurance and then also on long-term care?
Show response
Ramy Tadros confirmed both LTC and retail life underwriting were in line with expectations in MetLife Holdings, with no notable deviations.
can you talk a bit about the way you approached it valuation-wise, I guess you're giving up 50 million roughly of net income. How much cash flow do you end up losing
Show response
Ramy Tadros explained the deal was priced through economic lens aligned with internal valuation. John McCallion noted cash flow impact is roughly the net of foregone earnings minus hedge cost savings. Transaction reduces VA balances by ~40%.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what's the thought process there? Is it, you know, just general market performance, do you have some line of visibility into Q1?
Show response
John McCallion provided detailed explanation of PE tailwinds from public equity markets and real estate stabilization driving higher VII assumptions.
Some peers have called out elevated voluntary benefit loss ratios this quarter. Did you also see that?
Show response
Ramy addressed peer concerns directly, noting no material deviations in accident health and pointing to midpoint of range for 2025.
PRUPrudential Financial14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 5 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How would you expect the capital freeing up to occur over what period of time
Show response
Sullivan said the roughly 6-7 emerging-market exits will predominantly be sales rather than shutdowns, prioritizing value maximization, and will take time to find the right buyers.
should we expect that to be kind of the level that you would probably deploy into inorganic M&A
Show response
Sullivan emphasized the capital freed up will be well north of $3 billion, targeted at PGIM, Group Insurance and European Retirement over a roughly 5-year execution horizon, with other capital sources also available.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you shed a little light on what kind of sales and lapse expectations are embedded in those numbers
Show response
Del Frias provided specific assumptions: zero sales through November 5, gradual ramp to 50% average LP productivity in 2027, elevated surrenders throughout suspension.
can you shed a little light on what is happening with that part of the business
Show response
Sullivan provided detailed breakdown of Gibraltar's diversified distribution including captive agents, independent agents, and bank channels, clarifying no systemic issues from POJ.
Calendar 2025 Q4
will you also suspend hiring new Life Planners while you shut down sales? Or are you going to continue normal course with hiring plans
Show response
Andy confirmed continued recruiting. Two retention actions: enhanced training and development during 90 days, plus financial support for longer-term retention. Also emphasized taking right actions makes employees proud to work at Prudential, aiding retention.
I had read a news report that indicated the FSA was going to conduct an on-site investigation for POJ as well and it said it was going to start in February
Show response
Andy declined to confirm or deny FSA on-site investigation. Reiterated regular weekly interactions with FSA and voluntary nature of the sales suspension decision.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I think there's some confusion around what peer targets are, how they're higher than PRU's and generally, the domestic insurers in Japan are running at around 200% plus and why 150% like a fine num...
Show response
Yanela clarified 150% is the post-stress floor, not normal operating level. Normal operations at 180-200%. Different from peers due to different business mix. Result of considerable modeling and dialogue with rating agencies. Regulators focused on 100% threshold.
you had the recent abrupt departure of your CEO in Japan. I guess my perception is it's somewhat related to some regulatory issues
Show response
Andy confirmed planned succession was accelerated due to operational/compliance considerations. Brad Hearn is 30+ year veteran who led Prudential Advisors and architected LPL relationship. Japan sales up 4% YTD with 20% from new products.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I noticed Japan premiums declined around 10% this quarter despite pretty good sales results
Show response
Yanela explained three drivers: assumption update impact on premium line (over half the change), continuing surrender impact on recurring-pay products, and product mix shift to retirement/savings booked in policy charges not premiums. Account balances up $2B sequentially.
I think Aflac has put out a range of 170% to 230%. Does that -- is that like within the ZIP code of the way you're viewing a potential range
Show response
Yanela distinguished PRU's strict JFSA specification interpretation from peers using internal models. Key sensitivity: Japanese rate increases causing lapse risk. 50bp rate rise + 10% equity decline still wouldn't make ESR binding.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Would you anticipate having to contribute capital, or do you feel like you're good enough based on at least preliminary assessment you've done
Show response
Yanela confirmed no expected change to dividend capacity from ESR. Roughly 70% of U.S. dollar liabilities in Japan already reinsured outside Japan. Product strategy influenced to be ESR-friendly.
Is that something, though, that's on the table, a much more dramatic shrink of those, whether that's through a Prismic transaction or third party
Show response
Andy reframed de-risking as continuous rather than event-based. Stated nothing currently in the pipeline worthy of discussing but signaled ongoing evaluation.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I think you used to use operating income. Now you're using net income. Is there anything to read into with the change in that conversion
Show response
Yanela explained realized gains/losses impact both GAAP and statutory, making net income a better near-term cash flow proxy.
why is 30% to 40% of that needed for growth capital when most of the businesses that I would think of requiring capital are growing sub 5%
Show response
Yanela explained near-term strain from new business distribution costs and runoff headwinds, noting 5-8% growth is achieved despite these drags.
AMPAmeriprise Financial12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
if I look at the $6.9 billion of wrap flows in the quarter, does that include
Show response
Clarified wrap flows are only one component of the $19B total client outflows but declined to break out the exact Comerica portion.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what's the scale of this activity? Is it limited enough, or you're not that worried, or is there a risk here that this starts to really become bigger
Show response
Jim explained departures are isolated, some RIA moves, some competitor checks. Net recruiting was positive last year. Departures are lumpy but not systemic. Emphasized sustainable growth from 10,000-adviser organic base.
How should I compare the HBAN deal with a normal, I'll say, 10 to 20-person adviser practice that you would hire and the type of package you give them
Show response
Walter described it as a 10-year growing deal with strong adviser base and very good IRRs within target ranges. Stability and growth potential differentiate it from one-off recruiting deals.
Calendar 2025 Q4
where do you see AWM margins going in '26? Do you think you can maintain this 29% to 30% range
Show response
Walter expressed comfort with core margin performance. Interest impact minimized by investment repositioning. Range is good barring external factors like government policy or rate changes.
How do you feel about retention of existing advisers
Show response
Jim acknowledged some losses are inevitable given competitor offers but emphasized strong adviser satisfaction. Recruits from all channels report significant growth after joining Ameriprise.
The elevated mortality in RPS this quarter, was that more a large claim volatility or higher frequency of claims
Show response
Walter attributed to both frequency and large claims, said it's within normal range with nothing exceptional. Jim confirmed no longer-term impact expected.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What about payouts on existing advisers? Have you kind of reexamined or examined your payout grid
Show response
Jim gave a noncommittal answer about payout grid, emphasizing balanced equation of support plus compensation. Not ready to discuss specifics but acknowledged periodic adjustments are normal.
Just a follow-up on the two large advisor teams that left. Will that have any tail to it
Show response
Walter confirmed some carryover into Q4 from the two departures but attrition patterns otherwise stable. No broad retention concern.
Calendar 2025 Q2
The results in the quarter looked quite strong. I guess, net investment income was up a lot sequentially
Show response
Walter attributed strength to favorable life claims. On risk transfer, bid-ask spread hasn't changed enough to justify a deal from shareholder perspective.
Would you expect to shrink overall advisers in the next year or so? Or would you still expect to be able to grow
Show response
Jim confirmed net adviser count is up. Emphasized 10,000-adviser base, productivity focus, strong profitability balance. Not looking to add headcount at any cost.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you talk about visibility for the balance of 2025? Any other like chunky or lumpy outflows to flag
Show response
Jim noted one more Limestone tranche to exit but no other large institutional losses expected. The Q1 passive repositioning was a specific international client situation.
Are you seeing a slippage in headcount? Anytime I see someone removing disclosure
Show response
Jim firmly denied any retention issues. Headcount is actually up. Highest attrition from retirements and practice transitions. Removed disclosure to match industry peers.
GLGlobe Life10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is there increased comp online competition? Do you think some direct sales are going away from you?
Show response
Darden said the DTC pressure is not carrier competition but lower paid-search volume raising cost per click; Globe Life will join AI-embedded ads without giving up margin, aided by agency lead conversion.
Where do you expect the health margin to come in 4Q? Outside of the actuarial review?
Show response
Kalmbach guided underlying health margin to about 25% in Q3 and 24% in Q4 (a 23-25% range) excluding the assumption update, a modest improvement from Q2's roughly 23%.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the long-term assumption changes that were made in 3Q, how much of a go-forward earnings boost is that -- will that result in, in terms of prospective earnings?
Show response
Normalized life margins progressed from 38% (2023) to 39.7% (2024) to 41% (2025). Q3 specifically at 41.5%. Assumption change lowered reserves, indicating improved future profit outlook. Ongoing remeasurement gains expected if recent favorable experience continues.
are there any long-term assumption change benefits embedded in your '26 guidance?
Show response
High end of 2026 range ($15.30) contemplates potential further assumption updates. Low end does not. Guidance range width reflects this scenario analysis approach.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how long do you think it would take to get up to that run rate? That's a very big percentage increase of your current free cash flow. So I mean, is these 5 years down the road? Or is it sooner than...
Show response
Estimated 3-5 year ramp to full $200M run rate. Not year-1 but not 10-year either. Final timing depends on regulatory approval and rating agency discussions to be completed Q3.
Does most of the $200 million annual improvement come from acquisition expenses or are there other components like discount rate?
Show response
Two big components: deferred acquisition cost treatment differences between GAAP and statutory, plus reserving methodology differences. Not mortality-related.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you assuming that this claims frequency issue stabilizes at current level, gets better, gets worse?
Show response
Assumes utilization stays elevated at Q1 levels but moderates slightly in H2 as deductibles are used up. Premium rate increases not reflected in Q1 obligations.
is '25 stat earnings likely to be weaker than '24
Show response
Favorable mortality helps stat results but ~$75M less benefit from reserve valuation manual changes vs 2024. $60-100M assumption update is GAAP only but favorable claims flow through stat.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I assume that means that you see this more as a sustainable kind of ongoing free cash flow benefit, not just like a one-time release
Show response
Confirmed Bermuda is a sustainable capital management strategy, not one-time. Self-funded without third-party sidecar capital.
how do I think about the timing of when the periods of repricing occur, is it most of it annual? Is it staggered throughout the year?
Show response
Annual process: Q3 determination, file with states, rates effective end-Q1/beginning-Q2 following year. Expect to catch up on utilization by 2026 assuming trends don't worsen.
PFGPrincipal Financial Group10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
1Q '25 I think you had a jumbo case that you lost. How were the jumbo case call-outs for this quarter?
Show response
Chris noted Q1 2026 benefited from strong Q4 momentum continuing with multiple large case wins versus Q1 2025 large case loss. Significant difference in transfer deposit growth. Large segment lumpy, SMB steady and strong.
3-year numbers fell across the board, though, in all 3 categories. Are you seeing any impact from the performance issues?
Show response
Kamal noted numbers exclude strong private market performance including #1 ranked real estate strategy. Core weakness in active US equities with strong long-term numbers but short-term underperformance. Non-US fixed income particularly strong. Products designed to be different from index which creates deviation in volatile markets.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what is it about your strategy? And, you know, if I just compare Principal to peers, that produces such a better free cash flow outcome
Show response
Deanna attributed to post-strategic-review focus on capital-efficient businesses with strong value of new business metrics. Joel noted normalized run rate around 85% after adjusting noncash items in denominator. Mix of business provides flexibility and optionality for capital deployment. High bar applied to both organic and inorganic deployment.
should we still expect a low to mid-seventies loss ratio in the first half of this year? Or do you think it will be improved over that driven by pricing?
Show response
Amy detailed dual drivers: dental pricing actions flowing through since late 2025, plus dental network optimization showing up in 2026. Expects loss ratio to move into very high sixties as longer-term run rate. More improvement in 2026 than full-year 2025. Bundled approach remains key to market positioning.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you think we're at a better inflection point here broadly on those issues?
Show response
Kamal cited CRE in strongest position in 3 years with improving occupancy, pricing power and capital flows. Transaction volume up 17% YTD. Managers without redemption queues will gain market share by deploying fresh capital at better valuations. Principal's institutional book and insurance alignment provide structural advantage.
Or would you consider if there were lumpy defined contribution type assets that came to the market, would you still take a hard look at those?
Show response
Deanna emphasized unchanged disciplined approach: strategic alignment, capability enhancement, financial targets met, cultural fit. Organic targets achievable without M&A. Scale recognized as critical but high bar for any capital deployment. Successfully integrated Wells Fargo acquisition and now on front foot for growth.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I believe last quarter, you mentioned that there was gonna be a focus on it. Is there more to come on that in the second half of the year, or do you feel pretty good about where you're at now?
Show response
Joel cited 140bp enterprise margin expansion year over year and 80bp on trailing twelve months. During April volatility they focused on controllable expenses. Practice of aligning expenses with revenue will continue.
I noticed the RIS account values in the spread side went down. Somewhat this quarter. It looks like it's investment only. Any color on what you expect for the balance of the year on spread balances...
Show response
Chris explained IO had more maturities in 2025 with fewer issuances but business is opportunistic. PRT was moderate at $445M due to smaller pipeline and disciplined return requirements. Full year PRT outlook dependent on second half pipeline.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you try and help us disaggregate what's going on in your 401 business by plan size?
Show response
Chris broke down SMB vs large dynamics. SMB consistently strong with 30% transfer deposit growth. Large more lumpy. Fee rate down ~3bp, 1bp from market outperformance, rest from VA mix shift.
Supplemental health seemed to slow pretty significantly. On earned premium. Any color on what was driving that?
Show response
Amy explained Q1 2024 had one-time reclassification from group disability to supplemental health. Underlying supplemental health growing at double the rate of other products.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| AFL Aflac | 14 | 29%4 of 14 questions |
| MET MetLife | 14 | 36%5 of 14 questions |
| PRU Prudential Financial | 14 | 36%5 of 14 questions |
| AMP Ameriprise Financial | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| GL Globe Life | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
| PFG Principal Financial Group | 10 | 20%2 of 10 questions |
- AFLAflac · 14 questions29%4 of 14 questions
- METMetLife · 14 questions36%5 of 14 questions
- PRUPrudential Financial · 14 questions36%5 of 14 questions
- AMPAmeriprise Financial · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- GLGlobe Life · 10 questions10%1 of 10 questions
- PFGPrincipal Financial Group · 10 questions20%2 of 10 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 25%2 of 8 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 12 | 25%3 of 12 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 11 | 36%4 of 11 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 12 | 25%3 of 12 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 11 | 18%2 of 11 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 11 | 27%3 of 11 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 5 |
- 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 25% (2 of 8 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q112 questions · challenge rate 25% (3 of 12 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q211 questions · challenge rate 36% (4 of 11 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q312 questions · challenge rate 25% (3 of 12 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q411 questions · challenge rate 18% (2 of 11 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q111 questions · challenge rate 27% (3 of 11 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q29 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capital Allocation26
- Competitive Dynamics22
- Margin19
- Demand15
- M&A9
- Regulation Policy8
- Revenue Growth6
- Pricing4
- Cost Pressure4
- Geographic Expansion3
Show all 17 topics
- Credit3
- Fx3
- Capex Investment2
- Guidance Reliability2
- Subscriber Growth2
- Product Launch2
- Macroeconomic2