Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Tommy Moll

Stephens · covers Industrials, Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
85on tracked calls
Challenge rate
8%7 of 85 questions
Companies
9questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 85 of 85 questions from 9 companies

HUBBHubbell Incorporated14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 14 challenging
HUBB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what more can you tell us about what is driving that strength, and what are you embedding for your assumption

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Bakker credited strong underlying markets plus easy comps and framed distribution as a mid single digit plus market longer term.

I also wanted to ask about the recent trends you called out in meters and AMI.

ChallengingDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Bakker tied the improvement to the prior guide, the above-1.0 book to bill, and the Aclara refocus on muni and co-op projects.

Calendar 2026 Q1

are there any elements that you're seeing unfold better versus worse than the original plan?

Show response

DMC meeting or slightly exceeding expectations. Positioned in highest-investment area (substation). Capacity expansion is the primary constraint on growth, orders fully support more output. Systems Control acquisition showing similar positive dynamics.

How much of that is price versus volume?

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Organic growth breakdown: approximately 3 points price (up from 2 points initially, 1 point added for metals inflation), remainder volume. Price contribution fades through year as prior-year actions wrap, volume contribution increases sequentially.

Calendar 2025 Q4

does it still feel like that's gonna be possible in the year ahead

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Deal multiples have increased from single digits but returns remain attractive due to higher growth rates and Hubbell's synergy capabilities. Pipeline pricing about consistent with recent deal multiples, not higher, not necessarily lower. Hubbell's portfolio complementarity enables above-average value extraction.

should we think of that as an accurate reflection of the underlying demand, or is there a little bit of help from perhaps a restock?

Show response

Mid-single-digit distribution growth is pure end demand with no restock component. Destocking fully concluded without overshoot, customers didn't run inventories too low. Confirmed through distributor conversations about target inventory days.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Is it a fair characterization that in reducing the organic guidance for this year, the revenue guidance, it was entirely within the Utility segment, but that the shape of the recovery is as expecte...

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Full-year organic growth reduction entirely within Utility segment. Recovery shape as expected but timing shifted. Distribution inflection confirmed in Q3 with similar timing comment.

Have you commented explicitly on what your organic earnings algorithm is?

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Long-term framework: 4-6% organic top line with 25-30% incrementals produces high-single-digit organic earnings growth. Inorganic contribution buttresses to double-digit sustainable earnings growth.

Calendar 2025 Q2

would you say things have gotten better, worse, same in terms of the earnings expectations for this year?

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Operationally on track with beginning-of-year promises despite overcoming new tariff costs and slightly more challenging H1 volumes. Removing tariff contingency viewed as positive uncertainty reduction.

what, if any, impact do you contemplate for this year's earnings?

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Price is the primary hedge against copper, steel, and aluminum inflation. Commodity cost considered tariff-related due to price umbrella effect. Active ongoing customer dialogue on pricing analytics.

Calendar 2025 Q1

in this particular environment, I'm just curious what your discussions look like given the uncertainty?

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

M&A pipeline remains active with no chill from macro uncertainty in Hubbell's typical deal types. GDP contraction headlines and interest rate volatility not affecting bolt-on deal activity.

my question today is whether anything has changed or whether you're learning anything

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Transmission and substation particularly strong. Distribution also seeing hardening project step-ups. Historical pattern shows peak spending tends to extend rightward when budgets are revised.

Calendar 2024 Q4

What can you tell us in general about the pipeline for this year?

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Closed a ~$70M bolt-on acquisition (AccelTex add-on for wireless network infrastructure). Pipeline active across both segments with robust dialogue on various deal sizes.

are you able to tell, let's say, in 2024, what their, I'll call it consumption rate or install rate of these SKUs was?

Show response

Management tracks install rates through CapEx/OpEx budget discussions and project pipeline visibility. Public power market grew in 2024, confirming underlying market growth.

GWWW. W. Grainger13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 13 challenging
GWW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Should we think of this as part of the regular cadence of negotiations you have with customers?

Show response

CEO: September pricing is normal-course customer discussions, not force majeure surcharges.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I think you added 110 last year across two geographies. Is that a gross or a net add number, and what do you have baked in for this year?

Labor MarketCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO confirmed 110 was net, consistent 3-4% annual Salesforce growth expected to continue. Coverage gap filling should be mostly done by 2027.

Looking ahead, are there other big geographies where you are contemplating a greenfield opportunity or a substantial increase in an existing footprint?

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO detailed Portland going live in 2026, Houston in 2028. Not missing geographies, future investments more likely expansions of existing positions.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Are you targeting different types of sellers than you have historically? And if you think about the average tenure of the folks you're hiring

Competitive DynamicsLabor MarketTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

DG said hiring profile unchanged; noted broader trend of declining mechanical talent among customers which has been good for on-site service demand.

Is the simplest answer here, not just that 400 to 500 is an average, but you're really gonna punch above that in times of stress in the market

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

DG acknowledged supply stress years helped but said it was a smaller portion of the 875bps outgrowth; expects to return to 400-500 through own execution.

Calendar 2025 Q3

The $40 million sales impact that was over what time frame? And then the 20 basis points operating margin impact

Show response

Dee confirmed $40M Q4 revenue impact from close, 20bps annualized operating margin tailwind. Deal expected to close by end of November, early December.

could we end up in a world where 2026 pricing on High-Touch is, I don't know, 4 points or better

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dee estimated ~3% wrap alone; highly likely north of 3% total pricing for 2026 with additional new-year increases.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'm just curious what went into that decision-making process. Did you consider pushing in a more real-time fashion

ChallengingPricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

DG said normal cycle decision was best for customer stability; hearing very good customer feedback on the approach.

Good update this quarter. It sounds like you did some pricing optimization and then also reduced the SKU count

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

DG explained pricing optimization in works most of the year; SKU reduction removed noisy low-volume items to improve customer experience.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how much risk to profit dollars, if any, is there to the extent you see customers, as you indicated in the example, shift away from private label

ChallengingTrade TariffsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

DG said private label impact would be modest pressure, not huge; biggest risk is supply disruption if China trade stops entirely.

are there new lanes that you're identifying where you can lean in and once again exploit some of the scale and sophistication

Competitive DynamicsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

DG said situation is more uncertain than COVID supply disruption; will let it play out a few more months but confident in share gain positioning.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I wanted to ask about what's assumed in your outlook this year on government spend

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

DG clarified majority is state/local and military, limited exposure to federal changes.

the 400 to 500, I believe, is unchanged from the prior framework. If we look at 2024, you were a little bit below the low end

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

DG explained price metric dislocation drove apparent underperformance; also slowed seller expansion pace after execution challenges.

ZBRAZebra Technologies13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
ZBRA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

a follow-up for you on the share repurchase activity, pretty robust through the first half. What can you tell us about any plans to continue to deploy capital there in second half of this year?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Winters said the balance sheet is in great shape at 1.9x leverage with $1 billion of expected cash flow. Zebra repurchased $568M through Q2 and stayed active early in Q3 given an attractive valuation. The full-year EPS guide assumes about $150M of additional buyback in the back half (roughly $700M for the year), with a more balanced approach to preserve flexibility but the option to purchase more if the stock remains attractive.

to what extent is your guidance for 3Q and the second half still constrained by that memory supply? And to what extent do you have visibility into 2027 on that improving?

Supply ChainGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Burns called memory dynamic and challenging but said the team executed well to secure supply above the top end of the Q2 guide, with demand signals running above the guidance level. Winters added they expect a modest memory increase in the second half and are working direct supplier co-planning across an 18-month pipeline, qualifying new suppliers and chip types (10 new suppliers, targeting 5-7 qualified suppliers per primary memory type) to support customers into 2027.

Calendar 2026 Q1

What were some of the favorable items you would call out that drove that outperformance in 1Q that may fall away into 2Q

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Winters attributed Q1 outperformance to productivity initiatives, favorable deal mix from manufacturing strength (print/scanning/machine vision), and FX tailwinds. Memory was a modest Q1 headwind. Q2 steps down ~2pts sequentially with ~1.5pts from higher memory costs plus normalized deal mix. Q1 operational improvements now offsetting memory headwind as planned.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Two-point, I presume you are just referencing a two percentage point hit to

Cost PressureSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Winters confirmed 2-point gross margin headwind on memory beginning Q2. Half offset by robotics exit savings, lower tariff rates, and FX. Other half from pricing realization and supply actions. Impact spreads Q2-Q4 based on inventory timing. Fully mitigated within the year per guidance.

is there any reason why you would not

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Winters targeting ~50% of $900M FCF for buybacks, front-loaded to first half. Already $100M YTD after $300M in Q4. Leverage at ~2x provides ample flexibility. $1B new authorization plus $100M remaining. Plan to be aggressive over next several months.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you quantify what you're assuming for Elo from a top line perspective in Q4? And then if we back that out, what does the sequential quarter-over-quarter look like

M&AGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Winters quantified Elo at $100M in Q4, Photoneo and FX account for ~8.5pts of total Q4 growth. Plus ~1pt from pricing. Organic demand essentially flat YoY. Year-end spend assumed at similar levels to last year. Organic growth rate held consistent with August guidance.

There's been a pretty high-profile announcement recently in the fresh category from one of the omnichannel leaders. I'm curious, are you able to comment if your business should benefit

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Burns confirmed strong RFID pipeline across retail, T&L, manufacturing, government. Fresh/grocery opportunities expanding beyond general merchandise. Customers already deployed continue expanding use cases. Zebra has broadest RFID portfolio in market across readers, mobile devices, and printing.

Calendar 2025 Q2

it's a slightly different emphasis than what you've discussed historically. So are there some things changing in that market that draw you to it

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Burns explained the modern store vision has three elements: engaged associates, inventory accuracy, and consumer-facing. Elo fills the consumer-facing gap. Android convergence across mobile and fixed devices is a key driver. Customers have requested combining these platforms.

I wanted to follow on that and ask what you're assuming on large deal conversion. Maybe just related to what you saw in the second quarter as well would be helpful

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Burns said year-end spending assumed at similar levels to last year. U.S. tax bill could help CapEx. EMEA softness is a watch item. Characterized the guide as balanced with Q3 firm and Q4 less certain but with potential upside from conservative customer behavior.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you quantify or give us any detail in any other detail on conviction level and being able to stick the full amount of the increase

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Burns expressed confidence in price stickiness, noting increases are consistent with competitors. Said they'd roll back prices if tariff situation improves.

Today, has that visibility improved at all or would you characterize it in a similar fashion

DemandMacroeconomicGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Burns distinguished between visibility (improved) and uncertainty (increased). Customer conversations dominated by tariff concerns but no mentions of budget cuts or project pullbacks.

Calendar 2024 Q4

as you look at the inventory levels with some of your key channel partners, what context can you provide there

InventorySupply ChainTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Winters confirmed channel inventory is well-balanced at appropriate days-on-hand levels, with sell-in and sell-out roughly matching throughout 2024.

as you rolled up your full year sales outlook, what kinds of assumptions were you making on large deals there

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Burns acknowledged some customers are staging deployments over longer periods due to uncertainty. Visibility is particularly tough on large orders.

FASTFastenal12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
FAST company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I am just curious for whatever thoughts you can share there. On the future of outside of North America?

Geographic ExpansionM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Watts sees international in early stages of exponential growth, favoring M&A to compress supply-chain build from about 10 years to 2-3 years.

could you help us unpack some of the items that delevered this quarter?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Max attributed the deleverage to fuel/transportation and higher performance bonuses tied to fast profit growth; called other items very small.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Contract signings have gone pretty well. Pricing discussions are behind plan. Are these two linked?

ChallengingPricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jeff clarified new business is priced correctly at signing. The pricing challenge is with existing contracts that have 30-60 day change terms. Supreme Court ruling caused many customers to push back hard on pricing conversations for existing contracts.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Are you seeing any of your large heavy manufacturing markets, let's say, stabilizing or not getting worse?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jeff said manufacturing is flat with no real decline. Someone mentioned slight economic improvement but Fastenal is not seeing it in their numbers. No declines in manufacturing year-over-year usage either.

I'm just curious to the extent you can comment on any different priorities or frameworks you might bring to the role

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Max said no adjustment to capital allocation thinking at this point but acknowledged being only two months into the role. Committed to sharing any material changes. Dan and Jeff's existing framework remains intact.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Does it seem like if we had greater policy uncertainty, there's some pent-up demand that can unlock relatively quickly

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jeff said macro tailwind is a 2026 story. Nearly all customers are saying this year is what it is but they are looking at Q1/Q2 2026 time frame. In Mexico, customers especially planning for improvement.

should this be accretive to ROIC, and what's a reasonable time frame for that to unfold?

InventoryCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dan confirmed the inventory investment is accretive to ROIC, with returns much better than company average. Better purchasing, quicker customer answers, and more captured market share. Bob Kierlin always taught them it is about returns, not P&L percentages.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if there's any way to quantify how big an opportunity you think that is to capture more of those spot buy needs

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dan estimated a potential 20% revenue lift across all customer categories from a great e-commerce strategy capturing random MRO spend currently going to competitors. Based on observation that every large customer facility has non-Fastenal boxes in receiving.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Is the driver there just the staggered dates of implementation for these increases

PricingTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Holden explained staggering reflects both implementation dates and conversation timelines, especially with 70% of business in contracts. Dan added this is heavily centered on fastener products due to 25% Section 232 steel tariffs.

Any update on that outlook? It sounds like maybe not.

Show response

Holden confirmed no change to outlook with a single-word answer. Dan then took over with philosophical comments about defending gross profit percentage while prioritizing customer optionality and doing right by all four constituencies: employees, customers, suppliers, and shareholders.

Calendar 2024 Q4

What can you do to frame for us what you view as your typical Q4 to Q1

Show response

Holden said Q1 typically increases noticeably from Q4. For full year 2025, he sees a shot at flat gross margins as fastener/safety mix gap narrows and warehousing comps get easier.

you made a comment early about e-commerce and I think a nexus there with unplanned spend and opportunity to improve

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Dan explained three aspects: deepening distribution stocking reversed a 2019 mistake, freeing up field time, better product availability on the website, and improved supplier connectivity for real-time tracking.

LIILennox International12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
LII company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I am more interested on the replacement side there what is your view on how market share has progressed?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Alok separated a small replacement share gain from a significant new construction loss and said replacement share ticked up over the past 12 months.

Alok specific to resi, it seems like there have been some different strategies year to date.

PricingTrade TariffsCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Alok said Section 232 pricing lands July 1 in line with competitors, and early tariff refunds let Lennox delay some pricing actions.

Calendar 2026 Q1

specifically emergency replacement, I think you used the word momentum earlier. What additional details can you share there? And what inning are we in

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said emergency replacement is in the second inning of a nine-inning opportunity, now covering most U.S. metro areas. Unexpected positive dividend from freeing Stuttgart to focus on configured national account products with shorter lead times.

can you give us any sense of how the volumes have progressed year-to-date, just observing other data points across the industry

Show response

CEO confirmed sequential month-over-month improvement through Q1 driven by both easier comparisons and genuine confidence returning to the channel. Two-step distributors becoming more eager to stock up ahead of summer season.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Last quarter, there was conversation about maybe a mid-single lift increase in your deal, something in the low single digits range. Is that still a reasonable bogey

Show response

CEO confirmed low-single-digit new pricing plus carryover effect from 454B mix (shifting from 60/40 to 100% 454B) combines to mid-single-digit total price/mix benefit.

it sounds like destocking is nearly entirely in the rearview mirror here. So in the Outlook you've provided for resi volumes, would one-step be implied up for the full year

Show response

CEO confirmed one-step (70% of business) expected flattish to slightly up for full year while two-step will decline due to continued destocking through Q2. Two-step could recover faster if an early strong summer arrives.

Calendar 2025 Q3

anything you can do to frame the art of the possible or what's reasonable here. Are we thinking low single digits just on a percentage

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO estimated $0.30-$0.40 EPS accretion in 2026 pending final purchase price allocation. Business has 25% EBITDA margins before PPA amortization and is accretive on both EBITDA margin and top-line growth.

Is there a finer point you can give us on the direct versus two-step expectations? It's only a quarter, but the comps there are substantially different

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO candidly acknowledged prior volume forecasts were wrong. Applied Q3 actuals for 1-step vs 2-step to Q4 guide, implying 2-step declines more. Parts and accessories growing across both channels. Three weeks of October tracking to expectations.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I think where a lot of the questions are coming from today are you raised largely on pushing through the beat in the second quarter

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO acknowledged market uncertainty as reason for maintaining $1 EPS range instead of narrowing. CFO added some conservatism in 6% cost inflation assumption where 0.5pp difference would impact EPS.

I heard you earlier say that you ended up removing all or a substantial portion of the surcharge that was, I guess, announced in second half of April

Trade TariffsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO sized current tariff impact at less than half of the original $250 million estimate. Withdrew majority of surcharge after China tariff reduction. Still watching South Korea tariffs, August 1 deadlines, and USMCA exemption status.

Calendar 2025 Q1

mentioned there were two increases effective early in the second quarter. What additional detail can you give us there

PricingTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO clarified first increase (mid-single-digit) offsets indirect tariff commodity costs with good stick rate. Second (mid-single-digit surcharge) offsets direct tariff impact, announced last week.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Are we still thinking 10% or maybe 10% plus, there's at least one OEM in the market that's less disciplined than that

PricingProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO confirmed 10% average price increase on 454B product covering 70% of HCS revenue, with about 65% of full year sales expected to be 454B, diluting to mid-single digit mix benefit.

TTTrane Technologies8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
TT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Does that assume some incremental price realization? And 26?

Show response

CFO confirmed some price assumption in flat-to-down-5% guide but declined to get specific. Noted modestly lower to flat pricing impact versus significant 2025 pricing. Later clarified decline is volume-driven, not pricing coming down.

do you think that fraction is higher, lower, about the same as today?

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO said HVAC fraction of data center spend likely stays similar but power consumed by thermal management may decrease, allowing more computing power. Trade-off between thermal system presence and power efficiency.

Calendar 2025 Q3

are there any variances to your typical planning cycle around the mid-20s conversion that are worth pointing out?

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO confirmed 25%+ leverage framework unchanged for 2026. Resi and transport expected to be tougher in H1 with growth in H2.

What's the time line look like there or when assuming continued top line progression, you can start to see some positive margin dynamics?

Show response

CFO confirmed sequential margin improvement Q3 vs Q2 as expected. M&A integration and channel investments largely anniversaried by Q4; expect margin acceleration into 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q1

To what extent are tariffs driving those conversations? Just generally, even in terms of uncertainty around what lies ahead

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said tariff uncertainty has not bubbled up as a major concern in customer conversations, citing longer-cycle nature of complex applied projects.

strategically, how does that evolve your thinking in terms of market share opportunities or threats, supply chain decision-making?

Trade TariffsCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO kept response brief, positioning in-region-for-region as both a manufacturing and organizational competitive advantage in a protectionist environment.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I wanted to ask about the comment made on some recent investments in channel

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO confirmed channel acquisitions are same long-standing strategy of buying remaining independent distributors, now 95%+ direct.

your organic growth guide looks very steady through the year, just a point less in Q1. So trying to understand

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO explained Q1 earnings front-loading at 17% vs 15-16% norm; H2 benefits from transport recovery, easier Asia comps, and residential normalization.

Show 3 more companies
CARRCarrier Global6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
CARR company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

could your volumes also not just be reflecting the fact that they've been able to take back some of that share

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Gitlin confirmed share up a few hundred basis points since spin, flat from a movement/sellout perspective in 2025. Expects to hold or increase. New products coming (new fan coil generating interest). Maintaining price discipline while defending share.

Was the down 30 in fourth quarter, is that a a volume number or a revenue number?

Show response

Gitlin clarified Q4 volume down 40%+, sales down high 30s (mid-single price/mix benefit). Movement down ~30% was volume. Movement will generally track sales in 2026 except H2 benefits from absence of destocking.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Is this participation in a demand response kind of program or what additional detail can you give particularly around the monetization opportunity

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Gitlin described partnership integrating Carrier HEMS with Google AI/cloud to manage grid peak demand from HVAC systems. Heat pumps now >40% of sales creating year-round load. Early stage but use cases encouraging. Win-win for Carrier, Google, and utilities.

the outlook was reduced pretty significantly from up low to mid singles last time we spoke, and now we're looking at down doubles

ChallengingDemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Gitlin cited small/medium business spending softness and K-12 bond funding pause. Expects Q2 down ~20%, H2 flat to slightly up. Business is ~$1.5B, high margins, came off years of phenomenal growth. Not in panic mode.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Are you able to share what the comp was last year? Or any other context that might help explain that comment

Show response

Goris provided the comp data: movement down low teens in Q4 2023, up mid-teens in Q4 2024. Gitlin added full year resi up about 9%.

has anything changed there versus what you expected a quarter a couple quarters ago

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Gitlin confirmed no change: 10% on 454B, 15-20% over two years. Built contingency into the 10% figure. Confident pricing will stick.

GNRCGenerac6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
GNRC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

you referenced the $600 million nonbonding notice to proceed, which was also discussed at the Investor Day

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Aaron characterized hyperscaler approval as 99% complete. Passing all quality, supply chain, factory audit gates. Already discussing specific 2027 site specifications. Service covered by owning 30-35% of industrial distribution network.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I wanted to ask about your progress with the hyperscalers. Just to level set, I think what I hear you saying is no orders in backlog yet

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Aaron confirmed $400M backlog is essentially all co-locators, only pilot units from hyperscalers. Deep negotiations with 2 hyperscalers; pilot completion Q1/Q2 → MSA signing → PO flow. Hyperscaler volume not in guide; could be 2026 upside.

Calendar 2025 Q3

What all have you learned thus far in terms of the competitive dynamics there, the size of the opportunity?

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Aaron confirmed no hyperscaler orders yet but very productive AVL conversations. Added as preferred supplier for 2 global co-locators. Exploring M&A for capacity/capabilities. First domestic shipments went out from Oshkosh.

Calendar 2025 Q2

on the recent entry into the data center market, it sounds like things have gone pretty well so far, but I just wanted to ask for anything else you can give us there

Product LaunchCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Aaron described structural deficit of ~5,000 machines in 2026 at ~$1M each. International shipments begin Q3, domestic late 2025. Revenue impact primarily 2026. C&I could eventually exceed rest of company.

Calendar 2025 Q1

You put out a press release earlier this month with a lot of product details, so my question is really in two parts

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Aaron explained factory customization differentiator, coast-to-coast service network leveraging telecom infrastructure, targeting both hyperscale and edge data centers.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How much of the TAM does this unlock for you, and what's the strategy to penetrate that?

Product LaunchCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Aaron provided detail on U.S. certification, global footprint advantage, long competitor lead times, and expected shipping timeline late Q4 2025.

ROKRockwell Automation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ROK company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Does it feel like anything has maybe ticked a little bit higher?

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Blake positive about returning to growth in auto with nice wins including Hyundai and Lucid. OEMs investing in line modernization and some EV work. But tariffs still jumping around so wants to see positive sentiment translate into actual orders.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated147%1 of 14 questions
GWW W. W. Grainger1315%2 of 13 questions
ZBRA Zebra Technologies130%none of 13 questions
FAST Fastenal128%1 of 12 questions
LII Lennox International128%1 of 12 questions
TT Trane Technologies80%none of 8 questions
CARR Carrier Global633%2 of 6 questions
GNRC Generac60%none of 6 questions
ROK Rockwell Automation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • HUBB
    Hubbell Incorporated · 14 questions
    7%1 of 14 questions
  • GWW
    W. W. Grainger · 13 questions
    15%2 of 13 questions
  • ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies · 13 questions
    0%none of 13 questions
  • FAST
    Fastenal · 12 questions
    8%1 of 12 questions
  • LII
    Lennox International · 12 questions
    8%1 of 12 questions
  • TT
    Trane Technologies · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • CARR
    Carrier Global · 6 questions
    33%2 of 6 questions
  • GNRC
    Generac · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • ROK
    Rockwell Automation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4140%none of 14 questions8
2025 Q11414%2 of 14 questions8
2025 Q21020%2 of 10 questions6
2025 Q3130%none of 13 questions7
2025 Q4166%1 of 16 questions9
2026 Q1911%1 of 9 questions6
2026 Q2911%1 of 9 questions5
  1. 2024 Q414 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 14 questions) · 8 companies
  2. 2025 Q114 questions · challenge rate 14% (2 of 14 questions) · 8 companies
  3. 2025 Q210 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 6 companies
  4. 2025 Q313 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 7 companies
  5. 2025 Q416 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 16 questions) · 9 companies
  6. 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
  7. 2026 Q29 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand23
  • Competitive Dynamics21
  • Pricing15
  • Revenue Growth12
  • M&A10
  • Guidance Reliability10
  • Margin9
  • Trade Tariffs8
  • Inventory8
  • Capital Allocation7
Show all 20 topics
  • Product Launch7
  • Capex Investment7
  • Cost Pressure4
  • Supply Chain4
  • Innovation & R&D4
  • Macroeconomic3
  • Cloud & AI3
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Labor Market2
  • Regulation Policy2