Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Trung Huynh
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 5).
- Questions
- 22on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 5%1 of 22 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 5with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right. See how we grade analysts on earnings-call questions.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 22 of 22 questions from 7 companies
PFEPfizer7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you've disclosed some of the TRANQUILLO 2 data there in the slides. I didn't see the TRANQUILLO 1 findings.
Show response
Chris confirmed both doses met primary and co-primary endpoints but deferred the full TRANQUILLO 1 data set to a later conference.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Does that imply you think something is going to happen this year? And if so, what's your broad assumption so we can kind of quantify that hit
Show response
Bourla confirmed active discussions at highest government levels but declined specifics citing active negotiations; Denton added underlying business strength allows absorption of range of scenarios.
how are you sizing the '25 to '26 U.S. fall season versus last year?
Show response
Management expects 65+ and at-risk populations indication, no major payer coverage changes, strong distribution capabilities; have not seen dramatic changes in intent to vaccinate.
Calendar 2025 Q1
How much of that can come out in 2025? And how should we think about the step up of cost for the rest of the year
Show response
Denton clarified $1.2B mostly 2026-2027 delivery, R&D $500M savings largely in 2025 to be reinvested in R&D.
How much is that macro environment impacting your decision in the timing of BD given the volatility and unknowns?
Show response
Baum confirmed $10-15B BD budget intact; noted sellers adjusting to lower valuations in areas with increasing therapeutic density from Chinese innovation; Bourla quoted 'never let a good crisis go to waste.'
Calendar 2024 Q4
do you have any insight if there's going to be a discussion from ACIP on revaccination or cohort expansion this year?
Show response
Malik declined to speculate on specific ACIP timing, redirecting to previously described growth catalysts.
just wondering how you're going to position this, and how quick could you penetrate this population if approved?
Show response
Boshoff outlined event-driven readout timeline by year-end, 28,000 U.S. patients tripling addressable population, and two studies for cisplatin-eligible and cisplatin-ineligible.
ABBVAbbVie5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Can you just walk us through the strategic rationale for participating there?
Show response
Rob framed the pilot as bringing transparency and accountability to curb 340B abuse but declined to size any gross-to-net benefit yet.
could you just give us an update on TrenibotE following the CRL and your just time lines for resubmission?
Show response
Roopal said the CRL was on CMC, not safety or efficacy; resubmission comes at year-end with a 6-month review pointing to a U.S. decision around the middle of next year.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you give us some help on the proportion of sales from Skyrizi in IBD now or percentage of number of scripts getting IBD induction
Show response
Scott Reents noted ~10-point differential between IQVIA data and actual volume due to induction disconnect. H1 price favorability driven by gating items and lighter-than-expected Part D redesign impact; expects neutral full-year Skyrizi pricing with negative price in H2.
Calendar 2025 Q1
did the strong performance include any notable onetime contributions, inventory build or pull forward effects
Show response
Scott Reents attributed 72% operational growth mostly to demand in the 60s with modest benefit from lack of Q4 retail inventory destocking. China tariff impact absorbed in aesthetics guidance.
Calendar 2024 Q4
did you see any notable difference in trends in stocking or gross-to-net patterns across the portfolio ahead of the changes in Part D
Show response
Scott Reents confirmed minimal stocking impact and no gross-to-net dynamics for Skyrizi and Rinvoq. Carrie Strom noted Japan as a growth market and international aesthetics share increasing.
BMYBristol Myers Squibb3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Can you perhaps walk us through your updated thoughts on the path forward for Zolacel in autoimmune
Show response
Tied the program pause to a reagent change now corrected, said the company is working with regulators to restart, and called the sepsis death the program's only grade 5 event.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are we thinking that gross-to-net increases from 35% to 40%? Are you having to be more aggressive on rebates
Show response
Adam declined to share specific rates but noted Q1 included a Q4 true-up. GTN will increase for full year due to 100% Medicaid/Medicare access.
Just what's your expectations for the bar for that study? What's a meaningful reduction in hallucinations and delusions
Show response
Samit noted placebo-controlled design with NPI hallucinations/delusions as primary endpoint. No approved drugs sets low bar. Prior xanomeline data supportive.
INSMInsmed Incorporated2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
you announced your CCO departed the company late last month. Do you anticipate naming a permanent replacement ahead of brenso's potential launch?
Show response
Search underway but no rush. Former CCO (now COO) still involved. Launch preparation began two years ago, providing continuity. TPIP database cleaning is for registrational quality, not issues.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I would love to get your thoughts and if there could be any incremental financing on the horizon
Show response
CFO described multiple financing options including equity, royalty deals, R&D funding, and debt. Line of sight to becoming self-sustaining but not yet funded through profitability.
LLYLilly (Eli)2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
how you thinking about the weight loss for orfo in the ATTAIN obesity studies?
Show response
Dan indexed ATTAIN expectations to SURMOUNT-5 semaglutide monotherapy result of ~13.7% weight loss. Noted GI events and discontinuations occurred early during dose escalation, not late.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could that be a reasonable comp for the obesity studies in '26, unlike what you flagged with ortho and diabetes?
Show response
Dan cautioned against using OA trial as comp: shorter duration (68 vs 80+ weeks), different demographics, and known efficacy diminution in OA populations. Expects better results in broader obesity.
MRKMerck & Co., Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
does this One Big Beautiful Bill update effectively shift KEYTRUDA's IRA selection from 2028 to 2029
Show response
Rob confirmed the bill would delay KEYTRUDA IRA implementation to 2029 but stressed it doesn't change Merck's focus on growing post-LOE.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you perhaps talk about your manufacturing footprint from China, Mexico and Canada
Show response
Caroline said tariff exposure is immaterial; did not directly address the transfer pricing IP question on KEYTRUDA.
Show 1 more company
AMGNAmgen Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Do you see increasing commercial competition from Leqvio in general? And going forward, there is going to be some late-stage data oral PCSK9 this year.
Show response
Gordon acknowledged Leqvio competition but emphasized class underpenetration with tens of millions of at-risk patients. Highlighted 50% of U.S. commercial patients now have no prior authorization requirement for Repatha.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| PFE Pfizer | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| ABBV AbbVie | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| BMY Bristol Myers Squibb | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| INSM Insmed Incorporated | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| LLY Lilly (Eli) | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- PFEPfizer · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- ABBVAbbVie · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- BMYBristol Myers Squibb · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- INSMInsmed Incorporated · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- LLYLilly (Eli) · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MRKMerck & Co., Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- AMGNAmgen Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2025 Q4 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2026 Q1 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q18 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q3No questions recorded
- 2025 Q4No questions recorded
- 2026 Q1No questions recorded
- 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Regulation Policy8
- Innovation & R&D5
- Pricing4
- Product Launch4
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Demand4
- Trade Tariffs3
- Revenue Growth2
- Margin2
- Cost Pressure1
Show all 14 topics
- M&A1
- Macroeconomic1
- Capital Allocation1
- Capex Investment1