Loading…
Loading…
can you just kind of give your thoughts about the state of pricing as you see it? Are you seeing anything geographically dispersion-wise
I know that there is some discussion with the peer that maybe some maintenance or stripping costs got pushed out on the weather
can you guys talk a little bit about the M&A pipeline? Does a change in the regulatory environment impact anything there
do you think that the change in the administration could be an opportunity for the ATA or really the broader LTL industry to revisit broader use of triples?
the margin guide is, call it, 32.2% based on the midpoint, which I think is 20 basis points up. But there's quite a bit going on
I'm just curious if you can talk a little bit about what you purchased with the $400 million year-to-date
Was it something like $10 million of revenue in Q1 and then $55 million in Q2 and $35 million in Q3
It does look like ES slowed down, it accelerated on the -- to the downside. Just kind of what are you seeing out there in the market
is that including the headwinds with the special, with the event-driven volumes? And then we also are going to have a fairly sizable commodity headwind
can you just kind of maybe parse out a little bit the $200 million or so reduction in the revenue guide
why ES has been a little slow? I mean, I know that the industrial market is in a malaise
can you just remind us how big your E&P business is in the U.S.
you had said last call, to expect a point, like, one point from M&A per revenue. Is that kind of number still intact
can you just talk about what it brings to the table, what exactly they do, maybe is it levered to PFAS
what are the KPIs that you're kind of looking at to assess the end market health? For that business
is there a material M&A benefit in 2025 based on what has been closed today in Q1
I'm interested in the billion dollars in acquisition commentary. I know that's not included in the guidance
is there any benefit from wildfires or hurricane cleanup in there? Is that just not material
could you kind of help bridge the three-point difference between what you reported and mix, because it seems like conceptually, you guys really benefited from storm work
you guys are guiding kind of towards the low end for the full year. Can you just talk about the trends into Q4
are you basically expecting the investments to yield, call it, slightly less than $700 million of incremental EBITDA over the time frame
is this kind of a good, call it, forward capital plan? Is there something unique in '26 that keeps the budget down
With where commodity prices are, where RINs are, do you still have that full confidence in achieving that near $800 million of total incremental by '27
just year-to-date, how much have you guys benefited from the onetime cleanup work at the landfill
can you give us any help on some of the pieces to get there
did that guidance also assume that the statutory tax rate would go back up
are you messaging that you're being a little more aggressive on price to hold churn
didn't you raise the '27 Stericycle synergies to $300 million
the 30 basis point drag in CNG, that's going to be every quarter of the year based on what we know today. Is that right
how much synergy capture was in the $95 million of reported EBITDA in Q1
Does it feel like maybe that's a little bit behind schedule in Q1
you are assuming a C&D tax credit headwind. Is that correct and is that like $60 million
is that including $100 million of realized synergies or is that a run rate
Can you talk about the core dynamics, maybe the outlook for pricing, maybe more importantly, cost inflation and productivity