Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Tyler Van Buren

TD Cowen · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).

Questions
18on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 18 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right. See how we grade analysts on earnings-call questions.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 18 of 18 questions from 3 companies

REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
REGN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

is it fair to say that Regeneron will become even more aggressive on the business development front

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Schleifer said Regeneron is stage-agnostic with the firepower for early or advanced deals but made no commitment to be more aggressive; Yancopoulos said internal programs usually win.

Calendar 2026 Q2

So can you provide additional details on the ongoing EYLEA HD prefilled syringe review

Product LaunchSupply ChainRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Schleifer conceded the missed timeline, attributed it to FDA leadership turnover, and confirmed more than two CMOs are now engaged as backups.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you discuss your willingness to work on life cycle expansion efforts within the Sanofi collaboration

Competitive DynamicsM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Schleifer acknowledged the question but remained noncommittal, thanking outgoing Sanofi CEO and welcoming new one while saying Regeneron is open-minded to deals.

Calendar 2025 Q4

would you say that these two areas, in addition to oncology, will remain a bigger focus than the three others

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Yancopoulos emphasized a genetics-driven, therapeutic-agnostic approach guided by Regeneron Genetics Center rather than fixed therapeutic area allocation. Criticized industry for pursuing me-too drugs against EYLEA and Dupixent rather than truly innovative new targets.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you elaborate on the probability of the late December decision on the RVO and every 4-week dosing filing

Regulation PolicyProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Schleifer outlined complex timeline: ideally alternate vial filler gets approved before late November PDUFA, wrapping everything up. If not, December approval of filler followed by rapid resubmission. Confirmed no outstanding review issues beyond the filler. Different filler from Libtayo adjuvant CSCC approval.

Calendar 2025 Q2

there was a great quarter-over-quarter rebound in EYLEA HD. So curious to hear what you would attribute that to

Revenue GrowthRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

McCourt attributed EYLEA HD growth to physician appreciation for clinical efficacy, safety, and durability profile. Schleifer said Catalent issues were process/procedural not structural, Novo's CEO committed to elevating standards, and expects expeditious resolution.

Calendar 2025 Q1

the EYLEA HD CRL for the pre-filled syringe, can you elaborate further on the question posed by the FDA

Regulation PolicyProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Schleifer explained CRL relates to drug master file question for a third-party component, not safety/efficacy. Supplier has expeditiously responded. FDA committed to expeditious review but timeline uncertain.

Calendar 2024 Q4

why you guys decided to institute the dividend now as opposed to when the Sanofi development balance is paid off

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Fenimore explained early dividend initiation reflects confidence in Sanofi balance paydown, adds flexibility in capital returns approach, and opens Regeneron to dividend-mandate funds.

GILDGilead Sciences7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
GILD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you help us better understand the growing delta in recent yes to Go prescription trends

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Mercier declined to comment on how IQVIA captures the data but outlined drivers: naive and switch uptake, HCP confidence, 14% prep market growth, and over 70% persistency.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you discuss what regions in the U.S. you are seeing the greatest uptake so far in the launch

Product LaunchGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Joanna described uptake strongest in established HIV markets (SF, LA, NYC, Florida) as switch market, with growing naive prescriptions in rural South areas with high HIV incidence.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you guys starting to see off-label use in the frontline in advance of formal approval given the very positive readouts and the NCCN recommendation

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Johanna confirmed spontaneous first-line use building since ASCO June presentation. No promotion in first-line, only medical education. NCCN lists Trodelvy as only ADC recommended in first-line PD-L1 positive and negative TNBC plus second-line. First-line market approximately 10,000 women, double second-line, with 9-10 month duration of treatment versus 4-5 months in second-line.

Calendar 2025 Q3

for anito-cel, could the filing happen any day or in the very near future? What is left that's required for the filing

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Cindy declined to disclose filing timeline but confirmed on track for H2 2026 launch. Data cut to be shared at ASH. Continued to be impressed with safety profile, consistent with EHA presentation.

Calendar 2025 Q2

whether you expect the early prescriptions to trend linearly from here or if it's still very early in what is expected to be a more of an exponential launch curve

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Johanna detailed 72% unaided prelaunch awareness, first script within hours, injection within days. J-code confirmed for October 1 ahead of schedule. California and Florida Medicaid on formulary August 1.

Calendar 2025 Q1

For Trodelvy, is the lower demand quarter over quarter due to bladder coming out or lower demand in breast

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Johanna clarified Q/Q decline was inventory dynamics and tough Q4 comp. YoY 5% decline was inventory and pricing, not competitive share loss. Trodelvy maintains leadership in both TNBC and HR+/HER2-.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what led to the 16% year-over-year PrEP market growth and acceleration for 2024 that you highlighted

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Johanna attributed growth to PURPOSE trial momentum and doubled-down market development efforts, expects tailwinds to carry through and potentially accelerate with lenacapavir launch.

MRNAModerna3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
MRNA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

What percentage of events for the first analysis have been observed

Show response

Berman again declined event-count specifics, reiterating only that the interim is powered for the second half.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you remind us what it is powered for? And perhaps more importantly, can you give us your latest thoughts on what constitutes success

Show response

Hoge said study well powered if Phase II hazard ratio repeats. Success range from Phase II-like result to HR of 0.8, with different data patterns all potentially meaningful. Alpha reserved for subsequent analyses if interim inconclusive.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is it still possible that a higher vaccine efficacy threshold from the first interim could still be reached with the final analysis due to a wide confidence interval

Show response

Hoge explained interim was underpowered by design; early stopping would have been an upside scenario. Final analysis is the fully powered assessment.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals80%none of 8 questions
GILD Gilead Sciences70%none of 7 questions
MRNA Moderna30%none of 3 questions
  • REGN
    Regeneron Pharmaceuticals · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • GILD
    Gilead Sciences · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • MRNA
    Moderna · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q130%none of 3 questions3
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions3
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  8. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Product Launch9
  • Demand5
  • Innovation & R&D5
  • Regulation Policy4
  • M&A2
  • Capital Allocation2
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Supply Chain1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Capex Investment1
Show all 11 topics
  • Revenue Growth1