Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Vikash Harlalka

New Street Research · covers Communication Services

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (4 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 5 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
5on tracked calls
Challenge rate
20%1 of 5 questionsLimited sample
Companies
1questioned at least once
Reporting periods
4with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 5 of 5 questions from 1 company

CHTRCharter Communications5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
CHTR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I just wanted to ask what changed in the first 6 months for you to lower your target for EBITDA.

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityMarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Fischer named both causes directly: weaker broadband subscribers and ARPU from the failed retention offers, plus controllable expense pressure.

there were some press reports mentioning that Starlink may look to partner with Charter. Any comment on that?

Competitive DynamicsM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Winfrey declined to confirm or deny, framing it as routine industry dialogue with nothing to announce.

Calendar 2026 Q1

do you think you've pulled all the levers on pricing strategy? Or are there more pricing changes to come?

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Chris said current strategy is working, no plans to change. Tried 5-year price locks in trials without seeing necessary lift. Jessica noted Internet ARPU growth for the year will be close either way, depending on offer tuning and pricing decisions not yet made.

Calendar 2025 Q4

could you just provide us any details on how your market share has trended in markets where you're competing against fiber operators for a few years now

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Chris confirmed greater penetration than fiber competitors in mature overlap areas, overbuild impact limited to few percentage points in first year of new vintage. Jessica on EBITDA ex-political: 'maybe', goal to overcome broadband sub headwind with mobile growth, Internet ARPU growth, and operational improvements.

Calendar 2025 Q3

So Chris, it seems like there's a theme at play here where you flipped the script on how you've marketed your products historically.

PricingProduct LaunchSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Chris explained video framing (same product expressed differently for over-35 vs younger audiences) and 4-line mobile offer (small audience but accretive: customers take speed upgrades, Unlimited Plus, ARPU higher than average acquisition). Jessica added that 4-line customers have very low churn and high lifetime value.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
CHTR Charter Communications520%1 of 5 questions
  • CHTR
    Charter Communications · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q310%none of 1 question1
2025 Q410%none of 1 question1
2026 Q110%none of 1 question1
2026 Q2250%1 of 2 questions1
  1. 2025 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  3. 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Margin2
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Pricing2
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Cost Pressure1
  • M&A1
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Product Launch1
  • Subscriber Growth1