Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Vince Tibone
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 13on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 15%2 of 13 questions
- Companies
- 2questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 13 of 13 questions from 2 companies
SPGSimon Property Group7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How should we think about potential upside to 2026 NOI and FFO growth from over rents
Show response
Eli said guidance effectively assumes a sales slowdown and tougher back-half comps, but the company would exceed the range if current trends hold; overage and sales-based rent are back-half weighted and they cannot control sales, hence prudent conservatism.
Calendar 2026 Q1
where purchasing vacant anchor boxes at your centers that you don't currently own rank in terms of capital priorities
Show response
Anchor box acquisition is ordinary course, evaluated on price and return. Some upcoming projects will use boxes bought at attractive prices. Patient approach with long-term view.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you just discuss the level of domestic property NOI guidance included in '26 FFO
Show response
Brian said 3% comp NOI growth. TRG is more a 2027 story given integration. Plans to buy back 5M shares issued but not yet in guidance. Other deals contributing modestly in early days.
Calendar 2025 Q3
that's more like a low 5s cap rate on a trailing 12-month basis. So I mean, is it really that much synergies
Show response
David pushed back firmly, saying cap rates were disclosed accurately. Noted TRG has growth this year and next. Criticized Green Street for undervaluing SPG assets vs competitors.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was a bit surprised Simon was not more active acquiring JCPenney boxes from Copper Property Trust
Show response
David explained complex PropCo-Catalyst structure means no direct link to SPG. Still active in buying boxes but purchase price matters. Said not to read any intent from the Copper transaction.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I'm curious if there are any specific tenants or categories that are having an outsized impact on the decline in trailing 12-month portfolio sales
Show response
David said sales relatively flat excluding two retailers and Easter timing. Malls slightly above, outlets slightly down. No major department store closures expected beyond normal pruning.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what is the expected pro-rata spend on the four to five mixed use projects to break ground in '25
Show response
David detailed $400-500M spend across all-JV projects: hotel at Roosevelt Field, residential in Brea, office at Clearfork, hotel expansion at The Domain. Typically 50-50 JVs.
PLDPrologis6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how we should think about kind of the mix of powered shell versus turnkey data centers going forward
Show response
Letter acknowledged the range is wide and declined to narrow it, saying the business is customer-led and the mix is hard to peg.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I wanted to follow up on your comment that data center suppliers are increasingly taking down logistics warehouse I just wanted to get your perspective on how material this demand driver could be
Show response
Chris confirmed it is a new structural driver, growing from <5% to 10% of new leasing with healthy lease terms and supply chain regionalization trends supporting durability.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what exactly it means to be kind of an advanced stages of procurement for power
Show response
Arndt said overall program likely 60% to 70% powered shell with some reserved for full turnkey. Even in late stages customers decide to transition from powered shell to full turnkey. Letter defined advanced stages as point when project has preliminary utility agreement signaling progress towards firm power agreement pending final design and construction with utility. Significant capital outlaid at that point with defined path. Often after twelve to twenty-four months of negotiations with utilities then typically another year to two to reach secured stage with binding energy service agreement.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how much data center development you'd be comfortable starting
Show response
Arndt said does not see a limit with 3 billion a very easy number to handle. Build-to-suit approach together with debt capacity balance sheet liquidity and takeout options being explored means not constraining themselves. Very active pursuing incredible amount of energy gathered. Volume of customer conversations very high. Volumes will come through with company prepared and ready. Letter added power will be the constraint going forward not capital.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Could you just elaborate on that remark and how you arrived at that conclusion
Show response
Moghadam cited Brexit example where UK portfolio was written off more than 100% during flight but occupancy remained 99% for ensuing 3-4 years. Supply chains optimized across Europe had to be rebuilt separately for continent and UK requiring net more space. Believes duplication of highly engineered supply chains during uncertainty leads to more inventory and therefore more space. Same dynamic playing out with tariff-driven supply chain restructuring.
Calendar 2024 Q4
could you provide how much rents increased during 2024 in your better markets and how much they fell in 2024 in your weaker markets
Show response
Caton said international markets clearly outperformed domestic including Japan Europe and Latin America. Within US dynamic of Southern California versus rest of business. SoCal rents down 25% on net basis as meaningful reset. US ex SoCal only down modestly. Best performing markets in single-digits up worst other than SoCal in single-digits down. Moghadam added immigration impact on labor supply and LA rebuilding pressure on materials and labor will drive replacement costs significantly higher likely widening the 50% spread.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| SPG Simon Property Group | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions |
| PLD Prologis | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 100%1 of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 100% (1 of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment5
- Cloud & AI4
- M&A3
- Revenue Growth2
- Demand2
- Capital Allocation2
- Pricing2
- Guidance Reliability1
- Supply Chain1
- Trade Tariffs1
Show all 13 topics
- Competitive Dynamics1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Product Launch1