Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Bill Papanastasiou

KBW · covers Financial Services

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q2 (3 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 6 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
6on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 6 questionsLimited sample
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
3with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 6 of 6 questions from 2 companies

RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
RIOT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

Is that $27 million to $30 million target for quarterly SG&A still in play? Or could we expect that to come even lower

Show response

Management maintained $30-33M run-rate guidance, noting litigation expenses (GMO case ongoing) remain unpredictable and are excluded from run-rate.

Has your assessment of these options changed since the last update? And have you been able to narrow down on selection further

Cloud & AICapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management confirmed narrowing toward build-to-suit as optimal, with options ranging from self-performed to full JV with development partner.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how the company is thinking about dilution going forward to drive a higher Bitcoin per share

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management emphasized minimal dilution as core to Bitcoin yield strategy, noting light ATM usage and focus on alternative financing sources.

can you share some more color on how the design engineering aspects of the AI/HPC data center could look like

Show response

Management cited existing expertise in power infrastructure and cooling techniques, with plans to supplement with additional internal and third-party resources.

CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
CLSK company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

how you're weighing the existing tariff environment today when it comes to future fleet expansion?

Trade TariffsCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Papanastasiou asked how tariffs affect fleet expansion; Bradford called the environment volatile and cited manufacturer onshoring as a mitigant.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how important is it in the road ahead to scale just given that all your peers are moving to AI, HPC?

Competitive DynamicsCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Zach said peers pivoting to HPC enlarges CleanSpark's share of scarce daily Bitcoin rewards, so scaling is strategic but not an end in itself, and it continues only when each exahash drops dollars to the bottom line.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
RIOT Riot Platforms, Inc.40%none of 4 questions
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • RIOT
    Riot Platforms, Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • CLSK
    CleanSpark, Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Capex Investment2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Capital Allocation2
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Competitive Dynamics1
  • Cost Pressure1