Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Will Power
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 23on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 23 questions
- Companies
- 4questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 23 of 23 questions from 4 companies
AXONAxon Enterprise Inc.8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
The five-year normalized bookings metric. Why now? It sounds like perhaps it's tied to expectation
Show response
Josh Isner explained the metric normalizes for variable contract durations (enterprise three-year, large international deals) to give a clearer read on demand.
Calendar 2026 Q1
it would be great just to get a sense for where you saw the highest levels of customer engagement and interest
Show response
CEO gave detailed color on customer reception across personas (healthcare, enterprise, prosecutors, police chiefs). Described AI adoption mindset shift from skepticism to universal acceptance.
how much of that relates to higher memory cost and inflationary pressure versus just trying to meet customer demand
Show response
CFO clarified memory is included but not the sole driver. Without inventory investments, Q1 FCF would have been positive. Comfortable with $450M full-year FCF target.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Is that something that could double this year? I mean what's kind of the -- what does the pipeline look like?
Show response
Josh said the AI opportunity is in very early innings with a lot of pipeline ahead. Opportunity to deploy more AI products into the plan every year, increasing value and attracting more customers.
I want to focus on '27 and '28 and maybe better understand the confidence and visibility to sustain similar growth rates
Show response
Josh highlighted multiple growth vectors across 4 markets and new products. Singled out Dedrone as especially exciting, opening doors into federal and international that become land-and-expand opportunities. Brittany added no major change needs to be assumed vs what was just delivered, just roll forward current trends.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if you could help us just understand kind of what really underpinned the counter-drone success
Show response
Rick cited Ukraine and Middle East drone warfare as catalyzing global demand from stadiums to nuclear facilities. Dedrone positioned as market leader. Josh added Dedrone opens international market doors.
Calendar 2024 Q4
any other color as to exactly what they're utilizing? Are they utilizing body-worn cameras? Is it Fusus, is it both?
Show response
Josh confirmed the enterprise deal landed with body cameras, Fusus, and Evidence.com. Same customer also interested in Dedrone. Expects bigger product portfolio applicability in enterprise throughout 2025.
What's the conviction confidence, visibility and agencies have enough budget to be able to adopt this at a rapid pace from here
Show response
Josh Isner framed the price increase as ROI-positive, AI tools give departments 20% more officer capacity, offsetting understaffing. Rick added examples of potential new AI services that could offload over half of administrative work.
AKAMAkamai Technologies7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
when you talk about needing additional GPUs, do you need more to satisfy the new deal, or is that more related to the building pipeline?
Show response
Ed confirmed all CapEx for the $1.8B deal is in guidance. Additional GPU purchases would be for the broader pipeline, with demand ranging from a few hundred to a thousand-plus GPUs per customer. On margins, largest cost for dedicated deals is depreciation. Cash gross margin scales well. GPU-as-a-service tends to run above company average margins. Near-term focus is capturing growth rather than margin expansion, but free cash flow margins should improve with scale over time.
Calendar 2025 Q4
It'd be great just to get a better kind of outlook since for growth expectations on those 2 pieces in 2026, how that folds in?
Show response
Ed said strong Q4 bookings for both Guardicore and API Security. Guardicore majority of revenue from new customers. API Security has less than 10% penetration of existing customers, providing enormous runway. Broad adoption across many verticals. Expects 2026 to look similar to 2025 with API and Guardicore driving majority of security growth. Tom said AI is not creating risk to security via DIY/SaaS substitution because distributed platform is essential to handle attack volume. AI-induced SaaS risk would actually be a tailwind for compute as enterprises need inference for AI applications.
Calendar 2025 Q3
this 30% adjusted operating margin level, is that kind of the right framework to think about as we kind of move into next year?
Show response
Ed deferred formal 2026 guidance to February. Attributed margin improvement to good execution: higher development productivity, better vendor pricing, back-office modernization with Oracle, and better co-location and bandwidth procurement.
Is it principally access to black well GPUs? Or are there other parameters and facets of the partnership
Show response
Tom said the key is combining distributed platform with leading GPU capability. Blackwell 6000 supports models with hundreds of billions of variables. Good relationship with NVIDIA and working together to commercialize with customers.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Nice to see the better margins in the quarter, I mean it sounds like you expect to dip back down in Q2
Show response
Ed said Q2 will have higher costs from earlier merit cycle, hiring, and event spending. Over time margins will improve as business grows. Back half potential for margin expansion if revenue hits upside.
just help distill down what's really setting you apart in that market, allowing you to take share?
Show response
Tom cited scale, ease of use with new AI-enabled interface, and trust as key differentiators. Not the lowest cost but unique for protecting critical infrastructure. Guardicore is the flagship of the combined zero trust platform.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the tone of conversations you're having, what kind of the pipeline looks like, just kind of the activity level you're seeing
Show response
Tom listed various AI use cases already on the platform but characterized it as early days. The $100M deal and AI inferencing are more 2026+ upside than 2025 contributors.
TWLOTwilio Inc.7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I guess anything in particular you'd call out that might have been an upside surprise?
Show response
Aidan saw no single surprise and described broad strength; Messaging grew about 18% ex-fees, with WhatsApp and RCS growing quickly.
Calendar 2026 Q1
as you look at guidance, I guess, Q2, it does assume a decent deceleration in growth from Q1
Show response
Aidan said the 10% to 11% Q2 organic guide matches the Q1 guide and reflects prudent planning for a usage-based business.
I just want to see if there's anything else you'd call out as to why now we're seeing this kind of inflection
Show response
Aidan said 16% organic growth reflected broad execution across Messaging, Voice, ISVs and self-serve, plus some higher seasonal volumes early in the quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I guess anything else you call out on the Q4 improvement? Is it all those same factors or anything else to note?
Show response
Aidan said reported gross margin fell 200 basis points, about 80 basis points from carrier fees and the rest from lower-margin messaging mix.
anything you could share just on the trends with ConversationRelay and Conversational Intelligence, would be great
Show response
Thomas said voice infrastructure and AI orchestration software, including ConversationRelay, are growing very fast but gave no product-level figures.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I think you talked about some real improvements in large deal traction year-over-year.
Show response
CRO said 57% growth in customers spending over $500,000 reflects platform cross-selling, with Verify, Fraud Guard and voice add-ons lifting deal sizes.
what kind of tailwind or impact does that have on guidance for the second half?
Show response
CFO said the price increase will not have a material impact at the consolidated level this year because it is North America only and mostly self-serve.
MDBMongoDB, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
I wonder if you could just touch on what you think is driving the higher interest here.
Show response
Dev cited a confluence of drivers, rising legacy costs, regulatory pressure, vendor end-of-life, and GenAI's data needs, with GenAI cutting migration time.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| AXON Axon Enterprise Inc. | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| TWLO Twilio Inc. | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand10
- Cloud & AI7
- Revenue Growth6
- Guidance Reliability5
- Margin5
- Product Launch5
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Innovation & R&D2
- Pricing2
- Capex Investment1
Show all 13 topics
- Inventory1
- Supply Chain1
- Cost Pressure1