Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Will Power

Robert W. Baird · covers Technology, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
23on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 23 questions
Companies
4questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 23 of 23 questions from 4 companies

AXONAxon Enterprise Inc.8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
AXON company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

The five-year normalized bookings metric. Why now? It sounds like perhaps it's tied to expectation

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Josh Isner explained the metric normalizes for variable contract durations (enterprise three-year, large international deals) to give a clearer read on demand.

Calendar 2026 Q1

it would be great just to get a sense for where you saw the highest levels of customer engagement and interest

Cloud & AIDemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO gave detailed color on customer reception across personas (healthcare, enterprise, prosecutors, police chiefs). Described AI adoption mindset shift from skepticism to universal acceptance.

how much of that relates to higher memory cost and inflationary pressure versus just trying to meet customer demand

InventorySupply ChainMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO clarified memory is included but not the sole driver. Without inventory investments, Q1 FCF would have been positive. Comfortable with $450M full-year FCF target.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Is that something that could double this year? I mean what's kind of the -- what does the pipeline look like?

Show response

Josh said the AI opportunity is in very early innings with a lot of pipeline ahead. Opportunity to deploy more AI products into the plan every year, increasing value and attracting more customers.

I want to focus on '27 and '28 and maybe better understand the confidence and visibility to sustain similar growth rates

DemandGuidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Josh highlighted multiple growth vectors across 4 markets and new products. Singled out Dedrone as especially exciting, opening doors into federal and international that become land-and-expand opportunities. Brittany added no major change needs to be assumed vs what was just delivered, just roll forward current trends.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if you could help us just understand kind of what really underpinned the counter-drone success

Product LaunchDemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Rick cited Ukraine and Middle East drone warfare as catalyzing global demand from stadiums to nuclear facilities. Dedrone positioned as market leader. Josh added Dedrone opens international market doors.

Calendar 2024 Q4

any other color as to exactly what they're utilizing? Are they utilizing body-worn cameras? Is it Fusus, is it both?

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Josh confirmed the enterprise deal landed with body cameras, Fusus, and Evidence.com. Same customer also interested in Dedrone. Expects bigger product portfolio applicability in enterprise throughout 2025.

What's the conviction confidence, visibility and agencies have enough budget to be able to adopt this at a rapid pace from here

Cloud & AIPricingDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Josh Isner framed the price increase as ROI-positive, AI tools give departments 20% more officer capacity, offsetting understaffing. Rick added examples of potential new AI services that could offload over half of administrative work.

AKAMAkamai Technologies7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
AKAM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

when you talk about needing additional GPUs, do you need more to satisfy the new deal, or is that more related to the building pipeline?

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ed confirmed all CapEx for the $1.8B deal is in guidance. Additional GPU purchases would be for the broader pipeline, with demand ranging from a few hundred to a thousand-plus GPUs per customer. On margins, largest cost for dedicated deals is depreciation. Cash gross margin scales well. GPU-as-a-service tends to run above company average margins. Near-term focus is capturing growth rather than margin expansion, but free cash flow margins should improve with scale over time.

Calendar 2025 Q4

It'd be great just to get a better kind of outlook since for growth expectations on those 2 pieces in 2026, how that folds in?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ed said strong Q4 bookings for both Guardicore and API Security. Guardicore majority of revenue from new customers. API Security has less than 10% penetration of existing customers, providing enormous runway. Broad adoption across many verticals. Expects 2026 to look similar to 2025 with API and Guardicore driving majority of security growth. Tom said AI is not creating risk to security via DIY/SaaS substitution because distributed platform is essential to handle attack volume. AI-induced SaaS risk would actually be a tailwind for compute as enterprises need inference for AI applications.

Calendar 2025 Q3

this 30% adjusted operating margin level, is that kind of the right framework to think about as we kind of move into next year?

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ed deferred formal 2026 guidance to February. Attributed margin improvement to good execution: higher development productivity, better vendor pricing, back-office modernization with Oracle, and better co-location and bandwidth procurement.

Is it principally access to black well GPUs? Or are there other parameters and facets of the partnership

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tom said the key is combining distributed platform with leading GPU capability. Blackwell 6000 supports models with hundreds of billions of variables. Good relationship with NVIDIA and working together to commercialize with customers.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Nice to see the better margins in the quarter, I mean it sounds like you expect to dip back down in Q2

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ed said Q2 will have higher costs from earlier merit cycle, hiring, and event spending. Over time margins will improve as business grows. Back half potential for margin expansion if revenue hits upside.

just help distill down what's really setting you apart in that market, allowing you to take share?

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Tom cited scale, ease of use with new AI-enabled interface, and trust as key differentiators. Not the lowest cost but unique for protecting critical infrastructure. Guardicore is the flagship of the combined zero trust platform.

Calendar 2024 Q4

the tone of conversations you're having, what kind of the pipeline looks like, just kind of the activity level you're seeing

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Tom listed various AI use cases already on the platform but characterized it as early days. The $100M deal and AI inferencing are more 2026+ upside than 2025 contributors.

TWLOTwilio Inc.7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
TWLO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I guess anything in particular you'd call out that might have been an upside surprise?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Aidan saw no single surprise and described broad strength; Messaging grew about 18% ex-fees, with WhatsApp and RCS growing quickly.

Calendar 2026 Q1

as you look at guidance, I guess, Q2, it does assume a decent deceleration in growth from Q1

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Aidan said the 10% to 11% Q2 organic guide matches the Q1 guide and reflects prudent planning for a usage-based business.

I just want to see if there's anything else you'd call out as to why now we're seeing this kind of inflection

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Aidan said 16% organic growth reflected broad execution across Messaging, Voice, ISVs and self-serve, plus some higher seasonal volumes early in the quarter.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I guess anything else you call out on the Q4 improvement? Is it all those same factors or anything else to note?

Show response

Aidan said reported gross margin fell 200 basis points, about 80 basis points from carrier fees and the rest from lower-margin messaging mix.

anything you could share just on the trends with ConversationRelay and Conversational Intelligence, would be great

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Thomas said voice infrastructure and AI orchestration software, including ConversationRelay, are growing very fast but gave no product-level figures.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I think you talked about some real improvements in large deal traction year-over-year.

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CRO said 57% growth in customers spending over $500,000 reflects platform cross-selling, with Verify, Fraud Guard and voice add-ons lifting deal sizes.

what kind of tailwind or impact does that have on guidance for the second half?

PricingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CFO said the price increase will not have a material impact at the consolidated level this year because it is North America only and mostly self-serve.

MDBMongoDB, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
MDB company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

I wonder if you could just touch on what you think is driving the higher interest here.

Show response

Dev cited a confluence of drivers, rising legacy costs, regulatory pressure, vendor end-of-life, and GenAI's data needs, with GenAI cutting migration time.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
AXON Axon Enterprise Inc.80%none of 8 questions
AKAM Akamai Technologies70%none of 7 questions
TWLO Twilio Inc.70%none of 7 questions
MDB MongoDB, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • AXON
    Axon Enterprise Inc. · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • AKAM
    Akamai Technologies · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • TWLO
    Twilio Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • MDB
    MongoDB, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q440%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q230%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q450%none of 5 questions3
2026 Q150%none of 5 questions3
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions2
  1. 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand10
  • Cloud & AI7
  • Revenue Growth6
  • Guidance Reliability5
  • Margin5
  • Product Launch5
  • Competitive Dynamics4
  • Innovation & R&D2
  • Pricing2
  • Capex Investment1
Show all 13 topics
  • Inventory1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Cost Pressure1