Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Adam Jonas

Morgan Stanley · covers Consumer Cyclical, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters; questions recorded in 5).

Questions
24on tracked calls
Challenge rate
25%6 of 24 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 24 of 24 questions from 7 companies

GMGeneral Motors8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
GM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you see a future for Chinese OEMs participating in the U.S. market? And if so, how do you see that evolving?

Competitive DynamicsTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mary said GM understands Chinese competitors from JV experience and benchmarking. Focused on competing with better vehicles on a level playing field. Would not speculate on Chinese OEM access to US market.

are you rolling out robotaxi? Or is it just let's do the personal first and see where it goes?

Show response

Mary confirmed focus on personal autonomy, not robotaxi fleet operations. Said people still want car ownership freedom. Super Cruise enjoying approximately 70% margins. Will share 2026 AV milestones at GM Forward Media Day and into next year.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how does GM expect to be profitable with EVs when players like Tesla are apparently cannot

ChallengingMarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mary cited brand strength, design, efficiency improvements in architecture, weight, and batteries. Paul added GM's manufacturing flexibility to switch between ICE and EV absorbs fixed costs better than pure-play EV competitors exposed to volatile demand in narrow segments.

when can investors learn more about GM's robotics chops in your in house in your in house robot facilities

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mary referenced NASA Robonaut history and GM Robotics legacy. Focused on safety, ergonomics, and difficult tasks first. Also pursuing winning-with-simplicity part design changes. Active workforce training program with community colleges for automation skills.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is GM exploring humanoids in terms of either labor substitution or even making these robots

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mary said efficiency starts with smart vehicle design for easier assembly. Already using robots and cobots for difficult jobs. Has partnerships for latest technology. New head of AI hired to drive AI across business.

can you confirm how many are on the road right now collecting data in total?

Innovation & R&DSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mary confirmed 230K Super Cruise units added YoY with 100% growth rate. Expects over 700K equipped vehicles by year-end. Catching up from semiconductor shortage period when Super Cruise was omitted from builds.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Do you see scope for GM to help your existing or even new Chinese partners kind of gain access to the U.S. using your existing onshore capacity

Trade TariffsGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mary pushed back, saying current Chinese overcapacity and subsidies don't represent a level playing field. Focused on leveraging GM's own North American capacity rather than helping Chinese partners access U.S.

Can you tell us how moving to end-to-end might change your spending? How you approach compute costs?

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mary said the $1B annualized savings from stopping robotaxi captures the compute spend needed. Super Cruise fleet expected to roughly double in 2025. Targeting $2B annual Super Cruise revenue within five years.

TSLATesla, Inc.6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
TSLA company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

is the second half of this year too soon to have an AI Day

Innovation & R&DLabor MarketTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Musk said competitors do frame-by-frame copy of AI Day slides so he is cautious, but suggested the Annual Shareholder Meeting could double as a partial AI showcase with Optimus robots onstage.

are you comfortable moving Tesla in this direction while only having a 13% stake

ChallengingCapital AllocationGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Musk confirmed this is a major concern and said he hopes it is addressed at the upcoming shareholders' meeting, framing it as a need for influence not total control.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Between China and the United States, who in your opinion is further ahead on the development of physical AI

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Musk said China dominates drones but Tesla leads humanoid robotics, with ranks 2-10 likely to be Chinese companies.

you advocated for a ramp in tariffs

Trade TariffsMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Musk distanced himself, saying he is one of many advisors to the president and the decision is the president's.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how confident are you that the US will have the manufacturing and the supply base to make good on your excitement about physical AI

Capex InvestmentMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Musk said the US needs to make manufacturing cool again and redirect talent from law and finance, but gave no quantified supply-chain plan.

So, Elon, you've said in the past about LiDAR, for AVs at least, that LiDAR is a crutch, a fool's errand

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Musk reiterated Tesla's vision-only stance, citing the road system's design around passive optical signals.

FFord Motor Company4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 3 of 4 challenging
F company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

are you seeing any signs of distress or interruption in the supply-chain following the volatility and the implementation of the import tariffs

ChallengingSupply ChainTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Galhotra flagged rare earth import complications from China as potential production disruptor, noting even a few parts shortages could halt production.

has your team explored humanoid robotics with your tech partners as many of your more tech forward automotive competition

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Galhotra said Ford is not directly pursuing humanoid robotics but deploying AI in manufacturing, PD, and quality including Boston Dynamics robots for plant monitoring.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what's the strategy around AI and autonomy really? Because I think many argue that if you're an industrial company

ChallengingCloud & AIInnovation & R&DCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Farley highlighted internal Level 2+/3 capabilities from ex-Argo talent and said Ford is closer to a Level 4 partnership decision, but did not commit to a specific strategy.

Do you think that US tariff policies will be successful in keeping Chinese EVs out of the US market long-term?

ChallengingTrade TariffsCompetitive DynamicsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Farley acknowledged Chinese subsidies and data privacy concerns but emphasized management must compete toe-to-toe on cost and product, not rely on tariff protection.

RIVNRivian Automotive, Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
RIVN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

has any of that loan been drawn?

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Claire said the DOE loan is construction/project finance requiring on-site capital deployment in Georgia, which has not yet started, but Rivian intends to draw given the attractive cost of capital.

Calendar 2025 Q1

How are you going to catch them and match them technologically with such a small fleet

ChallengingInnovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

RJ argued that high-quality data from a best-in-class multimodal sensor set, controlled triggering, and low-cost Wi-Fi data movement let Rivian offset a smaller fleet in training its end-to-end model.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how much of the forward R&D, OpEx and CapEx is allocated towards AI infrastructure and training

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

RJ explained the AI-centric autonomy architecture and said GPU access can be structured as CapEx, rented capacity or off-balance-sheet arrangements, so training capacity need not require Rivian to deploy the capital itself.

APTVAptiv1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
APTV company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

I am curious who you are winning business with, how significant is the aerospace and defense contribution today? And I am curious how big this could be.

Geographic ExpansionInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin disclosed ~$400M A&D revenue growing fast, plus energy distribution and robotics/humanoid opportunities as adjacent TAMs.

LCIDLucid Group, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
LCID company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

What is the company's AI strategy, specifically with autonomy?

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Winterhoff said shifting AI goalposts have Lucid weighing partnerships versus in-house autonomy, with a near-term hands-free rollout, but no decision yet.

Show 1 more company
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Corp.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
SPCX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

you expect to be closer to 10 gigawatts of nameplate compute by end of '27

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Elon said they are targeting far more power/cooling than GPUs, tentatively 20 GW of power and cooling by end of next year (likely ~15 GW), with a significant NVIDIA GPU allocation.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
GM General Motors813%1 of 8 questions
TSLA Tesla, Inc.617%1 of 6 questions
F Ford Motor Company475%3 of 4 questions
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc.333%1 of 3 questions
APTV Aptiv1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
LCID Lucid Group, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SPCX Space Exploration Technologies Corp.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • GM
    General Motors · 8 questions
    13%1 of 8 questions
  • TSLA
    Tesla, Inc. · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • F
    Ford Motor Company · 4 questions
    75%3 of 4 questions
  • RIVN
    Rivian Automotive, Inc. · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions
  • APTV
    Aptiv · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • LCID
    Lucid Group, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SPCX
    Space Exploration Technologies Corp. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4922%2 of 9 questions6
2025 Q1729%2 of 7 questions4
2025 Q2540%2 of 5 questions3
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q4No questions recorded——
2026 Q1No questions recorded——
2026 Q210%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
  2. 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q4No questions recorded
  6. 2026 Q1No questions recorded
  7. 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D14
  • Cloud & AI7
  • Competitive Dynamics6
  • Trade Tariffs5
  • Capex Investment4
  • Capital Allocation3
  • Macroeconomic2
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Margin1
  • Labor Market1
Show all 15 topics
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Subscriber Growth1
  • Regulation Policy1