Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Adam Jonas
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters; questions recorded in 5).
- Questions
- 24on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 25%6 of 24 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 5with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 24 of 24 questions from 7 companies
GMGeneral Motors8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you see a future for Chinese OEMs participating in the U.S. market? And if so, how do you see that evolving?
Show response
Mary said GM understands Chinese competitors from JV experience and benchmarking. Focused on competing with better vehicles on a level playing field. Would not speculate on Chinese OEM access to US market.
are you rolling out robotaxi? Or is it just let's do the personal first and see where it goes?
Show response
Mary confirmed focus on personal autonomy, not robotaxi fleet operations. Said people still want car ownership freedom. Super Cruise enjoying approximately 70% margins. Will share 2026 AV milestones at GM Forward Media Day and into next year.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how does GM expect to be profitable with EVs when players like Tesla are apparently cannot
Show response
Mary cited brand strength, design, efficiency improvements in architecture, weight, and batteries. Paul added GM's manufacturing flexibility to switch between ICE and EV absorbs fixed costs better than pure-play EV competitors exposed to volatile demand in narrow segments.
when can investors learn more about GM's robotics chops in your in house in your in house robot facilities
Show response
Mary referenced NASA Robonaut history and GM Robotics legacy. Focused on safety, ergonomics, and difficult tasks first. Also pursuing winning-with-simplicity part design changes. Active workforce training program with community colleges for automation skills.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is GM exploring humanoids in terms of either labor substitution or even making these robots
Show response
Mary said efficiency starts with smart vehicle design for easier assembly. Already using robots and cobots for difficult jobs. Has partnerships for latest technology. New head of AI hired to drive AI across business.
can you confirm how many are on the road right now collecting data in total?
Show response
Mary confirmed 230K Super Cruise units added YoY with 100% growth rate. Expects over 700K equipped vehicles by year-end. Catching up from semiconductor shortage period when Super Cruise was omitted from builds.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Do you see scope for GM to help your existing or even new Chinese partners kind of gain access to the U.S. using your existing onshore capacity
Show response
Mary pushed back, saying current Chinese overcapacity and subsidies don't represent a level playing field. Focused on leveraging GM's own North American capacity rather than helping Chinese partners access U.S.
Can you tell us how moving to end-to-end might change your spending? How you approach compute costs?
Show response
Mary said the $1B annualized savings from stopping robotaxi captures the compute spend needed. Super Cruise fleet expected to roughly double in 2025. Targeting $2B annual Super Cruise revenue within five years.
TSLATesla, Inc.6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
is the second half of this year too soon to have an AI Day
Show response
Musk said competitors do frame-by-frame copy of AI Day slides so he is cautious, but suggested the Annual Shareholder Meeting could double as a partial AI showcase with Optimus robots onstage.
are you comfortable moving Tesla in this direction while only having a 13% stake
Show response
Musk confirmed this is a major concern and said he hopes it is addressed at the upcoming shareholders' meeting, framing it as a need for influence not total control.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Between China and the United States, who in your opinion is further ahead on the development of physical AI
Show response
Musk said China dominates drones but Tesla leads humanoid robotics, with ranks 2-10 likely to be Chinese companies.
you advocated for a ramp in tariffs
Show response
Musk distanced himself, saying he is one of many advisors to the president and the decision is the president's.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how confident are you that the US will have the manufacturing and the supply base to make good on your excitement about physical AI
Show response
Musk said the US needs to make manufacturing cool again and redirect talent from law and finance, but gave no quantified supply-chain plan.
So, Elon, you've said in the past about LiDAR, for AVs at least, that LiDAR is a crutch, a fool's errand
Show response
Musk reiterated Tesla's vision-only stance, citing the road system's design around passive optical signals.
FFord Motor Company4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 3 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you seeing any signs of distress or interruption in the supply-chain following the volatility and the implementation of the import tariffs
Show response
Galhotra flagged rare earth import complications from China as potential production disruptor, noting even a few parts shortages could halt production.
has your team explored humanoid robotics with your tech partners as many of your more tech forward automotive competition
Show response
Galhotra said Ford is not directly pursuing humanoid robotics but deploying AI in manufacturing, PD, and quality including Boston Dynamics robots for plant monitoring.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what's the strategy around AI and autonomy really? Because I think many argue that if you're an industrial company
Show response
Farley highlighted internal Level 2+/3 capabilities from ex-Argo talent and said Ford is closer to a Level 4 partnership decision, but did not commit to a specific strategy.
Do you think that US tariff policies will be successful in keeping Chinese EVs out of the US market long-term?
Show response
Farley acknowledged Chinese subsidies and data privacy concerns but emphasized management must compete toe-to-toe on cost and product, not rely on tariff protection.
RIVNRivian Automotive, Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
has any of that loan been drawn?
Show response
Claire said the DOE loan is construction/project finance requiring on-site capital deployment in Georgia, which has not yet started, but Rivian intends to draw given the attractive cost of capital.
Calendar 2025 Q1
How are you going to catch them and match them technologically with such a small fleet
Show response
RJ argued that high-quality data from a best-in-class multimodal sensor set, controlled triggering, and low-cost Wi-Fi data movement let Rivian offset a smaller fleet in training its end-to-end model.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how much of the forward R&D, OpEx and CapEx is allocated towards AI infrastructure and training
Show response
RJ explained the AI-centric autonomy architecture and said GPU access can be structured as CapEx, rented capacity or off-balance-sheet arrangements, so training capacity need not require Rivian to deploy the capital itself.
APTVAptiv1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
I am curious who you are winning business with, how significant is the aerospace and defense contribution today? And I am curious how big this could be.
Show response
Kevin disclosed ~$400M A&D revenue growing fast, plus energy distribution and robotics/humanoid opportunities as adjacent TAMs.
LCIDLucid Group, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
What is the company's AI strategy, specifically with autonomy?
Show response
Winterhoff said shifting AI goalposts have Lucid weighing partnerships versus in-house autonomy, with a near-term hands-free rollout, but no decision yet.
Show 1 more company
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Corp.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you expect to be closer to 10 gigawatts of nameplate compute by end of '27
Show response
Elon said they are targeting far more power/cooling than GPUs, tentatively 20 GW of power and cooling by end of next year (likely ~15 GW), with a significant NVIDIA GPU allocation.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| GM General Motors | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| F Ford Motor Company | 4 | 75%3 of 4 questions |
| RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc. | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| APTV Aptiv | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| LCID Lucid Group, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SPCX Space Exploration Technologies Corp. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- GMGeneral Motors · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- TSLATesla, Inc. · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- FFord Motor Company · 4 questions75%3 of 4 questions
- RIVNRivian Automotive, Inc. · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- APTVAptiv · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- LCIDLucid Group, Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Corp. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 9 | 22%2 of 9 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q4 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2026 Q1 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q4No questions recorded
- 2026 Q1No questions recorded
- 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Innovation & R&D14
- Cloud & AI7
- Competitive Dynamics6
- Trade Tariffs5
- Capex Investment4
- Capital Allocation3
- Macroeconomic2
- Geographic Expansion2
- Margin1
- Labor Market1
Show all 15 topics
- Guidance Reliability1
- Supply Chain1
- Cost Pressure1
- Subscriber Growth1
- Regulation Policy1