Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Aidan Kelly

JPMorgan · covers Utilities

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q2 (6 quarters).

Questions
22on tracked calls
Challenge rate
18%4 of 22 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
6with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 22 of 22 questions from 7 companies

EIXEdison International6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 3 of 6 challenging
EIX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Could you speak to the pace of mitigation spend required across SCE's service territory

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Moss quantified the RAMP request, framed it as slightly more than a third of the GRC ask, and tied it to the published 2029 capital forecast.

wondering if there is any update on the Los Angeles County Fire Department's investigation you would be willing to share

Show response

Pizarro had no update and no visibility into timing, but gave the historical 12 to 18 month benchmark and acknowledged this fire has already run past it.

Calendar 2026 Q1

It seems there's been some recent media headlines pushing back on the information flow in court proceedings. I guess just curious if you could share some thoughts on Edison's dissemination of infor...

ChallengingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO pushed back firmly on LA Times article characterization. Explained privileged information exists on both sides in litigation. Confidentiality orders protect grid topology (federal security), customer data, and other sensitive information unrelated to the case itself.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you confirm whether the out-of-service transmission tower in Eaton is grounded or not?

ChallengingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO confirmed line was grounded at both ends but acknowledged photographic evidence of anomalies at far end grounding. Noted no common industry standard for grounding idle lines. SCE proactively changed protocols to require grounding every two miles or shorter depending on topography.

if you could elaborate a bit more on the L.A. District Attorney's investigation to determine whether criminal violations occurred

ChallengingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO acknowledged investigations are expected at this scale but noted limited visibility into timing. Reinforced confidence that SCE can show its actions were those of a reasonable utility operator.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Could you just touch a little bit more on the near-term annual 1% to 3% sales growth a bit more?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

SVP Powell broke down load growth: ~1/3 from transportation electrification (29% of Q3 new car purchases were ZEVs), residential new homes, and balanced C&I growth across defense, manufacturing, logistics. Data centers moderate, not a primary driver.

AEPAmerican Electric Power4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
AEP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

could you just explain if that is more so driven by the generation and marketing segment?

Guidance ReliabilityRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Trevor attributed the $0.10 raise to first half outperformance, a historically strong Q3, and regulatory uplift in AEP Ohio, SWEPCO Texas and PSO rather than generation and marketing.

is there any way how we should be thinking about translating that figure into annual bill mitigation

PricingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Trevor scoped the $16 billion to vertically integrated utilities under ESAs without giving an annual bill figure; Kate Dixon pointed to rate decreases already filed in Ohio and planned in Indiana.

Calendar 2025 Q1

How do you reconcile, like the sales trends we've seen this quarter against your 2025 forecast, would this imply a strong pickup later in the year?

ChallengingDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mihalik explained near-term earnings impact is muted by lower C&I margins vs residential. The rapid load addition creates headroom and enhances customer affordability over time.

Could you just walk through the puts and takes, from shifting away from ESPs into NYPs and to what extent does this impact your regulatory strategy

Show response

Fehrman called HB15 highly constructive: multi-year forward test year with true-up, seamless ESP transition, Bloom contracts grandfathered. OVEC impact manageable at ~$10M earnings.

DTEDTE Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
DTE company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

is the right math to think about like 2026 high end and then growing 8% off that until 2030? Or should we think about the EPS CAGR kind of being based off the midpoint each year?

Guidance ReliabilityCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO clarified growth is guided off midpoint with 45Z credits providing flexibility to reach high end each year through 2029.

how much should we think about like the load is needed to trigger a new gas plant versus just more energy storage at this point?

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO outlined threshold: ~1 GW of new load requires CCGT; smaller loads can be served with combination of smaller CCGT, renewables, and batteries. Resource mix to be determined in next year's IRP.

Calendar 2025 Q2

curious to see if you could offer any like confidence level for the 3 gigawatts of hyperscaler load coming online as well as the 4 gigawatts

Show response

COO confirmed active negotiations with hyperscaler principals, exchanging terms with feedback, feeling fairly confident about closing before year-end.

for that 1 gigawatt of data center, presumably could be matched with energy storage. Like would that be over like a 1-, 3- or 5-year time frame

Capex InvestmentCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

COO quantified storage at ~$1B/GW, construction starting 2026, online in 2027 increments; combined cycle plant needed toward tail end of plan.

AWKAmerican Water Works2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
AWK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what is required to get it through? Do you need full approval across Pennsylvania, Texas, North Carolina, New Jersey, Illinois and Virginia

Show response

John Griffith confirmed all 7 state PUC approvals are required. Kentucky approved, Virginia and Illinois decisions expected this year.

will be curious if you could provide any more insight on if you assume ROE increases, especially in PA

Regulation PolicyMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

John Griffith expressed confidence in PA case fundamentals citing PFAS, lead and copper investment needs, and broad stakeholder understanding of required water infrastructure investment.

CMSCMS Energy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
CMS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

What is the level of understanding from the candidates over the possibility that utilities could lower rates with new data center load

Regulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Garrick said CMS meets with all gubernatorial candidates as a solution provider. Three leading candidates support data centers thoughtfully. Affordability remains a key governor in financial planning. Rejji added CMS self-funds two-thirds to three-quarters of rate base growth, keeping bills in low single-digit growth.

could you remind us what underlies the "1 gigawatt equals $2 billion to $5 billion of CapEx" sensitivity

Show response

Rejji said low end ($2B) assumes storage, simple-cycle gas, and basic infrastructure. High end ($5B) includes combined-cycle gas for higher conversion success, additional substations and wires, plus incremental clean energy law compliance as sales grow.

PCGPG&E Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
PCG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

how comfortable are you with 2026 EPS guidance before you have a resolution on the cost of capital proceeding

Regulation PolicyMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO pointed to pattern of conservative planning and consistent delivery through choppy year. Confident in delivering under variety of cost of capital scenarios.

to what extent do you see this project as like a blueprint for other high-risk communities

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO confirmed other communities being prepared for similar microgrid installations. Goal is to make PSPS outages invisible to customers while maintaining safety.

Show 1 more company
SRESempra2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
SRE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you remind us of the expectations for ROE by year as far as what you contemplate in the plan

Regulation PolicyRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Martin noted earned ROEs were below 8% just 18 months ago. UTM plus rate case are expected to move earned ROE much closer to the 9.75% authorized. Nye said UTM hearing set for August 20 with rates expected in 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I am curious if you could share any thoughts on what form of commitments are being made there. I guess any insight on the amount that are, like, LOAs versus not

Show response

Allen detailed the evolution from high-confidence load/officer letters to interim FEAs ($6.5M collateral each) to the current RTP 2026 criteria (five factors including financial commitment, site control, ERCOT study funding, generation disclosure, reliability impact), with $3.5B total collateral held versus $200M in 2018.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
EIX Edison International650%3 of 6 questions
AEP American Electric Power425%1 of 4 questions
DTE DTE Energy40%none of 4 questions
AWK American Water Works2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
CMS CMS Energy2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
PCG PG&E Corporation2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SRE Sempra2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • EIX
    Edison International · 6 questions
    50%3 of 6 questions
  • AEP
    American Electric Power · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • DTE
    DTE Energy · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • AWK
    American Water Works · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • CMS
    CMS Energy · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • PCG
    PG&E Corporation · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SRE
    Sempra · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q1250%1 of 2 questions1
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q350%none of 5 questions3
2025 Q4367%2 of 3 questions2
2026 Q1617%1 of 6 questions4
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions2
  1. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 67% (2 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  6. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Regulation Policy12
  • Capex Investment5
  • Cloud & AI4
  • Demand4
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Margin2
  • Pricing1
  • M&A1
  • Competitive Dynamics1
Show all 12 topics
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Innovation & R&D1