Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Alex Hess
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 29on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 10%3 of 29 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 29 of 29 questions from 6 companies
FICOFair Isaac11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
of classic FICO versus Vantage and whether or not there is a meaningful coupon differential
Show response
Restated the 30 basis point theoretical estimate but deferred to the analyst's own MBS traders, conceding signal is limited today.
how are you thinking about the, the next leg or future legs of monetization for Scores holistically?
Show response
Named UltraFICO with Plaid, UltraFICO 3 and FICO 11 in development, and flagged a four-year adoption curve for new scores.
Calendar 2026 Q1
if you could just talk about your investments in innovation in the Scores business and how that sort of benefits the franchise
Show response
Lansing said innovation spend is modest but constant, with UltraFICO likely to be a significant factor in the Scores business, with plans to be detailed at FICO World.
were there any prior year pricing adjustments have feathered into the present fiscal year
Show response
Weber said the growth is primarily from the new rack rate plus volume, with some customers having been on lighter rates in the prior year now at full rate.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how much of the improvement that you've seen to the degree that there is any, is really industry-wide versus FICO innovation led?
Show response
Weber said positive volumes across all three underwriting lines are encouraging but mostly macro-driven rather than FICO innovation-led, with some marginal innovation contribution.
Can you maybe provide a comment on what platform features, functions, use cases are really driving that recent momentum
Show response
Lansing said customers still come for traditional risk use cases (originations, customer management, fraud) but the platform enables much broader decisioning innovation on the expand side.
Can you maybe pivot that conversation to prepayments? And do you have a view on will 10T be more predictive on prepayments than rival Scores?
Show response
Lansing argued credit defaults and prepayments are related (a default functions as a prepayment for paper holders), so 10T's superior default prediction should also improve prepayment prediction.
Calendar 2025 Q3
your guidance that you don't expect any loss of market share or any significant volume changes in auto, card and personal loan originations
Show response
Lansing expressed minimal market share concern, noted rate-driven volume increases are not built into guidance consistent with multi-year conservatism on rates.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are you guys, for some reason, hesitant to provide that data to the banks? Or is the FHFA -- is there some sort of negotiating with the FHFA on what that looks like
Show response
Lansing gave a very brief answer confirming they're working with FHFA on data release, without explaining the delay.
Can you sort of give us a sense of how many scores are being generated on an annualized basis now and where you've seen particularly strong adoption in volumes
Show response
Lansing highlighted expanding use cases including BNPL, telco/utility data scores, and account management, noting scores volume growth beyond just GDP correlation.
Calendar 2024 Q4
outside of mortgage price, are there any new revenue streams that you would call out?
Show response
Weber pointed to easier volume comps and multiple areas of confidence without detailing specific new streams.
MSCIMSCI9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you give any color on pricing dynamics year to date and maybe what you expect prospectively
Show response
Andy said the price-increase contribution to new recurring sales has been relatively stable, with MSCI taking a measured, long-term approach.
what is your AUM level to end the quarter in non-ETF products?
Show response
Andy said non-ETF passive AUM was around $5 trillion as of June 30 and described growing traction with active-ETF managers via a new licensing product.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Hi, guys. I want to jump into the active ETF business. It seems like, from our data, there was some pickup in active ETFs more broadly, and they seem to be doing pretty well as a category.
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
Calendar 2025 Q4
First of all, Baer, congratulations on your retirement. And yes, congratulations again.
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I just want to touch briefly on the non-ETF and the fixed income businesses. On the non-ETF side, there's been pretty rapid growth in the ETF revenues, I think, about 19% year-to-date.
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Hey, everybody. Maybe you could just help us puzzle in the various moving pieces here and understand a bit more, especially with Henry's comments to lead off the call.
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Hi, everybody. Baer, Andy, could you potentially comment on how AUM has trended in the non-ETF part of your business overall? I saw that was at some pretty healthy growth in the quarter.
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Yes. Hi, there's a lot of discussion on today's call about product innovation and product rollouts and your products, but maybe on the inorganic side, how do you assess the M&A opportunity
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
Yes. Hi everybody. Just to go back to the sort of the overall discussion of the trends in the subscription business as it stands, organic subscription run rate growth of 8% in the quarter,
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
CTASCintas5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Could you maybe outline, you guys talk about supply chain excellence a lot, but what that sort of looks like in practice
Show response
Todd cited multi-vendor, geographically diverse sourcing and confirmed the incremental margin comparison is adjusted-to-adjusted; direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
First is the recently announced 3-way contract with you guys, Ford and Carhartt, and the second being the launch of what I think is a new personalized Apparel+ program on your website
Show response
Carhartt/Ford partnership about branded garments employees want to wear. Trades are underpenetrated opportunity. Apparel+ reflects innovation culture, outfit any job across North America.
Maybe you can just highlight one on Fire, the progress and prospective benefits, but also just sort of learnings from running that ERP implementation successfully over the years
Show response
SAP Fire brings standardization, better customer and employee experiences. Good muscle memory from Rental and First Aid rollouts. Highly positioned to do same for UniFirst post-close.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if we are at something like trough unemployment or trough non-farm payroll growth and that reaccelerates, maybe helping us think to where you guys can go from here
Show response
Not forecasting employment improvement. Guide reflects attractive growth without favorable employment. Inventory injection reflects strong growth across all three route-based businesses.
I wanted to start with the comment about -- to refocus on this of the customer base being steady or if anything, improving slightly. When you guys make that call out, like what are you actually loo...
Show response
Management pivoted to cross-selling example: manufacturing customer expanding facilities led to adding rental, facility services, First Aid, and Fire to new building. Trusted resource relationship drives expansion.
IRMIron Mountain2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How do you think about further cross-selling, further service penetration, mining the seams
Show response
Meaney described the cradle-to-grave hyperscaler relationship, from leasing to decommissioning, driving 88% ALM growth; Barry added Iron Mountain is the only end-to-end lifecycle provider.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you highlight for us just sort of where you feel you were positioned in today's ecosystem, where you're advantaged
Show response
Bill differentiated IRM's focus on inference and cloud build-out vs LLM campuses. 500MW of available power is key competitive advantage.
MCOMoody's Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you walk us through your assumptions around what acquisitions were included in the prior guidance versus now?
Show response
Noémie confirmed CAPE Analytics was already included in prior MA guidance with no change to M&A assumptions.
SPGIS&P Global1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Could you elaborate as to what organic ACV growth was in the fourth quarter in MI?
Show response
Eric confirmed ACV acceleration from 6-6.5% in H1 to 6.5-7% in H2. Described $5B buybacks in 2025, targeting ~$1B in Q1 2026 alone (up from $650M last Q1) given stock price levels. Funded partially via commercial paper.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| FICO Fair Isaac | 11 | 27%3 of 11 questions |
| MSCI MSCI | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| CTAS Cintas | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| IRM Iron Mountain | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MCO Moody's Corporation | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SPGI S&P Global | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- FICOFair Isaac · 11 questions27%3 of 11 questions
- MSCIMSCI · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- CTASCintas · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- IRMIron Mountain · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MCOMoody's Corporation · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SPGIS&P Global · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth10
- Demand8
- Product Launch7
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Innovation & R&D4
- M&A3
- Pricing2
- Cloud & AI2
- Guidance Reliability2
- Supply Chain1
Show all 16 topics
- Margin1
- Credit1
- Cost Pressure1
- Capital Allocation1
- Regulation Policy1
- Subscriber Growth1