Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Ananda Baruah

Loop Capital · covers Technology, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
59on tracked calls
Challenge rate
3%2 of 59 questions
Companies
10questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 59 of 59 questions from 10 companies

SMCISupermicro16 questions · 8 reporting periods · 2 of 16 challenging
SMCI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what's a good way to think about what fiscal year '27 gross margins can be?

Show response

Charles gave qualitative mix commentary and a directional 'consistently grow' answer but no specific FY27 gross margin figure.

any update on the Board investigation? The Board inquiry, I assume it's coming close to completion

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

David deflected, saying only that an update would come shortly and that nothing more could be shared on the call.

Calendar 2026 Q1

could you give us an update on the indictment? Any more insight to any company employee involvement? Do you think you'll have to restate earnings

Show response

David confirmed no additional company employees involved beyond those named. No restatement expected. 10-Q filing being prepared. Independent investigation ongoing with Munger Tolles & Olson and AlixPartners.

is there a potential for customers to get a little skittish and move away to other server vendors

ChallengingDemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Charles reported no negative customer sentiment from the indictment based on direct communications. Customer base continues to grow with more large and mid-sized customers.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Do you still think that things progress expansive from here, Charles, you made some comments around customer mix

Show response

Charles confirmed margin improvement expected quarter-over-quarter from maturing GP300 production, reduced expedite costs, improving tariff impact, and growing DCBBS contribution.

is the company entering a period of not only gross margin expansion, but OpEx dollar leverage as well structurally

MarginCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Charles confirmed economies of scale will drive both gross and operating margin improvement. DCBBS software and infrastructure services add positive margin mix.

Calendar 2025 Q3

are you being conservative? Is there conservatism baked in to the implied March and June quarters

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Charles confirmed the $36B guide is conservative. First time achieving $10B+ quarterly revenue and capacity is now scaled globally to support higher volumes.

should we anticipate this kind of strength without giving me a guide, but could the strength continue through the balance of the calendar year

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Charles expressed confidence in continued growth through the calendar year, citing scaled capacity and market leadership in both technology and market share.

is that to say that December quarter is the low watermark gross margin quarter for the fiscal year

Show response

David confirmed Q2 is expected to be the gross margin low point for FY2026, attributing it to the unprecedented revenue doubling and new platform ramp-up costs.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are we still not yet to normalize customer decision-making cycles

ChallengingDemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Charles acknowledged ongoing product transition dynamics with multiple NVIDIA product lines but positioned SMCI's breadth as an advantage rather than directly addressing whether cycles have normalized.

any context you can give us guys around the comment of large-scale data center customers expanding to 6 to 8 in fiscal '26

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Charles did not specify customer types or domains. Gave a generic response about strong CSP demand and improved cash flow readiness.

Calendar 2025 Q1

should we assume that that means September quarter looks up sequentially from the June quarter

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Charles expressed hope for sequential growth trajectory similar to Hopper cycle but stopped short of firm commitment.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what's a good way to think about June Q gross margins in the context of your guide

MarginProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

David referenced historical H100 cycle margin improvement to 18.8% as precedent. Still targeting 14-17% but acknowledged competition will influence Blackwell margins.

the at least $40 billion for fiscal 2026 would tend to suggest maybe at least $12 billion on average the March and June quarters

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Charles framed the $40B target as conservative without directly confirming the quarterly math or customer composition.

Calendar 2024 Q3

how would you like the investment community to think about the access to capital situation as we go forward

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

David noted $4B in working capital raised over 8-9 months. Company does not believe it will have impediments to raising working capital.

Dave, should we still expect it to improve as we go through the fiscal year as you were previously anticipating

Show response

David confirmed they are still targeting margin improvement and guiding conservatively. Charles added competition is putting some pressure.

NTAPNetApp9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
NTAP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

you expect next year public cloud, xSpot, to see accelerating revenue growth

Show response

George said 1P and marketplace storage continue to grow above the cloud portfolio; Wissam cited the 80-85% target and mix tailwind.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how do you see the rise of AI agents impacting, first off, your AI business?

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

George outlined two agentic AI opportunities: AIDE (AI Data Engine) addresses data preparation, guardrails, and enforcement requirements; AFX and caching technologies optimize recursive data access patterns used by reasoning agents. More innovation in pipeline.

Calendar 2025 Q4

anything notable or interesting on video that you saw over the last ninety days that you're seeing emerge?

Show response

George cited semiconductor equipment manufacturer unifying millions of documents for AI, content production house using AI for digital experiences, multimodal applications growing, and video analytics in weather forecasting. No dramatic inflection yet but multimodal demand growing with more complex model support.

Is that consistent relatively speaking with what your customer base is looking for also?

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

George confirmed customers want areal density improvements. NetApp qualifies different media sizes and density points following customer demand. Performance, cost, and density are key drivers of new silicon adoption.

Calendar 2025 Q3

it sounds like you might be expanding your TAM when you talked about reference designs with the hyperscalers as well. So are you seeing TAM expansion here?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

George confirmed sovereign cloud providers expanding from enterprise cloud to AI-as-a-service, with NetApp NVIDIA cloud partner certification enabling multi-tenancy and model training for sovereign models. Still believes enterprise inferencing is primary TAM but being opportunistic in other use cases.

are you seeing reasoning agents, you know, impact the RAG pipeline? Is it helping, is it seemingly with growing the TAM?

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

George highlighted two opportunities: data organization tools (tagging, vectorization, graphs, RAG readiness) to monetize massive unstructured data install base, and reasoning model optimization capabilities that reduce repeated data source access. More details coming at Insight user conference.

Calendar 2025 Q2

hyperscale data centers, GenAI adoption, and video just because I know it's very compute-intensive. How might that and it requires a lot of storage. How might that impact your software business there?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

George cited unique hybrid cloud positioning to bring enterprise data to hyperscaler platforms. Shared gaming company AI win using on-prem plus cloud. Noted vectorization and multimodal datasets driving data growth, though early to quantify. Proof of concepts showing clear data growth indication.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Does what is going on this quarter and next quarter, does that impact that target at all yet

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mike reaffirmed Investor Day targets for mid-to-upper single-digit growth and margins through FY27.

Calendar 2024 Q4

the new high-end ASA products, how -- how important is that to the ASA product line

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

George explained midrange brings new logos while high-end ASA expands wallet share with existing customers.

WDCWestern Digital9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
WDC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what's a useful way to think about sort of the China hyperscale and the China AI lab opportunity going forward

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Irving framed Asia and open-source frontier models positively, arguing more models drive compounding storage demand.

Calendar 2025 Q4

do you think that cost down, I think it's classically been about 10% year-over-year. Do you think that can increase in coming years, cost out increasing per exabyte ship

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kris confirmed ~10% cost/TB reduction as baseline, with potential to accelerate if roadmaps advance faster. Driven by continued innovation, higher capacity drives, UltraSMR upshift, and manufacturing efficiencies.

how far up the areal density stack do you think you can get CMR and UltraSMR before you really get HAMR going

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Irving deferred to Innovation Day the following week. Did not provide specific capacity ceiling for ePMR/UltraSMR before HAMR crossover.

Calendar 2025 Q2

could you remind us of the aerial density road map from here until HAMR? And where do you think HAMR -- where do you think you come out aerial density-wise

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Irving laid out roadmap: current 26/32TB ePMR → next-gen 28/36TB ePMR (qual H1 2026) → HAMR 38/44TB (qual H2 2026, ramp H1 2027). HAMR crossover at 4TB per platter.

Are those the neo cloud? Is that what you're talking about? And then how many of those -- like -- and if yes, like what's a useful way to think about

Show response

Irving confirmed one large cloud provider and significant Storage-as-a-Service providers using platforms. Neo clouds focused on compute first; storage follows as seen in mainstream cloud AI adoption.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Does that create new any new architectural realities inside the data center with what can be mixed and matched

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Irving acknowledged HAMR requires rack-level and software changes similar to Ultra SMR adoption. Sophisticated customers are familiar with needed architectural adjustments.

does that actually mean that the normal the structural margin is actually set up higher than what you guys reported

MarginProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Don confirmed faster-than-expected 11-disc platform ramp with high quality, reliability, and yields was key driver of gross margin beating guidance.

Calendar 2024 Q4

would love to get your or any of your view on sort of Flash, the role of Flash in hyperscale storage

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

David maintained stable Flash/HDD mix view, noting AI training favors Flash but data generation flows back to HDD. Both businesses benefit from AI demand.

Calendar 2024 Q3

can you refresh our memory on what your conventional technology aerial density road map looks like kind of up until HAMR.

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Asked about the areal-density roadmap ahead of HAMR; management detailed the bridge on the current platform before HAMR is introduced, direct.

STXSeagate Technology Holdings8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
STX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what you guys see as the more prominent applications driving demand right now?

Show response

Dave pointed to unstructured video and sensor data across enterprises and the edge, not only hyperscalers, as the applications driving storage demand today.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is Mozaic 4, is that sort of the model that gets you to go down to 20 terabyte HAMR

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Mosley confirmed 20TB HAMR on Mozaic 4 is technically possible but high-end demand is too strong to divert volume. Romano agreed demand too strong in public cloud. Mozaic 5 may enable addressing lower-capacity markets later.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what kind of activity are you seeing at sort of the so-called warm tier of storage

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Mosley pushed back on the warm-tier-becoming-NAND narrative, noting HDDs work 24/7 in optimized streaming workloads and the architectural tier for mass data storage will remain constant for the next decade.

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you think that we'll see folks look to mix up faster than historical?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mosley noted customer pull for higher capacity points is much stronger than prior PMR transitions due to compelling TCO benefits. Human creativity driving video demand also fueling the pull.

Calendar 2025 Q2

did you actually make mention that you're seeing multiple types of AI video drivers?

Show response

Mosley identified three video demand types: existing video properties, unstructured data processing, and emerging AI-generated video content creation.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is there a decent way to think about sort of typical storage consumption into a Gen AI data center relative to like a classic cloud data center

Show response

Mosley acknowledged difficulty predicting GenAI data center storage but noted disaggregated storage as an interesting trend that could benefit HDDs.

Calendar 2024 Q4

at what point are the HAMR margins accretive? And then, Dave, I guess for you in that question, I was going to ask, like how to think about the pacing of volume

MarginProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mosley confirmed HAMR is currently accretive to gross margins even at today's elevated PMR margin levels, and Seagate will ship as much HAMR as possible while navigating customer qualification timelines.

Calendar 2024 Q3

you just mentioned long lead times? What is that process? Can you give us some sense of what that process

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Asked what adding capacity would look like if demand outstrips HAMR/areal-density gains; Dave explained that pushing areal density frees components to build more drives efficiently.

LITELumentum Holdings Inc.6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
LITE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

is it also incremental to the revenue projections that you gave at OFC, so could you clarify that

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CEO confirmed Greensboro capacity is incremental to existing targets, representing over $5 billion of potential additional revenue. Fab expected to come online in early 2028, roughly 6 quarters away.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Just wanted to sort of get his context about how noticeable it could be over time

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Michael sees OCS as multi-hundred-million-dollar opportunity coming sooner rather than later. No specific timeframe but increasingly clear on the trajectory.

Is there a sort of theoretical mix of transceivers of the modules relative to the components that you think about

Cloud & AIMarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Michael expects cloud modules at roughly 30% GM at asymptote, a drag on corporate margins. Wajid sized it at 15-20% of revenue at $600M. Components and DCI will be larger contributors.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you give us some sense of time frame when you think that it hits run rate and or any context around what run rate

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Alan said first new customer reaches full motion by end of CY2025 with second product. Third customer starts fiscal Q4 and hits run rate by Sep-Oct. No conflict between external EML sales and internal use, won't reduce external supply.

Calendar 2024 Q3

Would just love to get your thoughts, Alan, on how to think about tariff positioning, tariff risk

Trade TariffsSupply ChainGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Alan emphasized U.S. headquarters, Thailand manufacturing, laser chips from U.S./U.K./Japan. Strategy unchanged regardless of administration. Resonates with customers wanting supply chain resilience.

given this constrained position, is there any, I guess, pricing power that you guys have or that you're using

PricingSupply ChainMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Alan acknowledged pricing leverage in constrained EML market, noting need to fund capacity additions. Discussed on portfolio basis rather than specific figures.

HPQHP Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
HPQ company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

is there more appetite, natural appetite for higher pricing

DemandPricingCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

PS head said customers are naturally choosing higher-configuration products to run AI at the edge, driven by token costs, cybersecurity, privacy and latency needs, and to govern agents securely as they deploy them more broadly.

Calendar 2026 Q2

what is the useful way to think about how you are feeling about fiscal 27 since it begins not so long from now

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

PS head confirmed the same procurement playbook will apply for FY27, including qualifying new suppliers and accelerating component quality checks across the portfolio.

Calendar 2026 Q1

is the 35% -- is it 35% of the 2/3 that's the PC BOM? Or is it 35% of the entire GP dollar basket

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Karen clarified 35% is of PC BOM specifically. One-third of PS margins come from businesses not reliant on memory including higher-margin attached business, Workforce Solutions, and hybrid systems.

would just love to get any context that you guys can share on the CEO search, what types of folks you're looking for

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bruce outlined search committee established ~3 weeks ago. Seeking proven shareholder value track record, ability to navigate complex environments, and global multi-segment business experience. Board taking broad view including candidates outside PC/print industry.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you give us a sense of what you're thinking for commercial relative to consumer

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Enrique outlined consumer continuing to decline, transactional office declining, contractual office performing better (opportunity for share gain), industrial growth continuing.

Show 4 more companies
ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
ALAB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

What's a useful way to think about the contribution that the China hyperscale can make across the portfolio

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sanjay said China revenue grows in absolute terms but stays in single digits as a percent of total, with open protocols (PCIe, Ethernet, NVLink) the main opportunity.

Calendar 2026 Q1

should we expect Scorpio X and Scorpio P switches to continue to increase the lane count?

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management said lane count and radix are tuned closely with customers, and future switches add optical (NPO then CPO).

HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
HPE company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is it reasonable to anticipate higher highs, increased highs in both systems revenue over time. And in backlog as well as we go through the cycle

Cloud & AIDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Neri confirmed pipeline deals shifting from GB200 to GB300 with training/inferencing use case differentiation. Noted GB300 availability at scale in back half 2025 or early 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q1

any context on how much of what you're looking at in the in the backlog pipeline. Would go into GreenLake, versus the revenues in the traditional sales

Cloud & AIDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Neri explained the model: enterprise AI = GreenLake subscription + CapEx infrastructure, while service provider/model builder = pure CapEx. ARR now over $2 billion growing from enterprise AI adoption.

DELLDell Technologies1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
DELL company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

Could you talk to, Jeff, how you guys are thinking about the server refresh durability? I believe after last call, you talked about part of the current catalyst

DemandCloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jeff expects 9 quarters of server growth driven by 13G/14G replacement. Storage attach driven by data proximity needs, PowerScale, and Project Lightning parallel file system.

VRTVertiv Holdings Co1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
VRT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

For 800 V, how broadly throughout the marketplace are you expecting the next couple of years, the technology be adopted?

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Gio expects gradual 800 V adoption, said Vertiv is flexible and resilient across architectures, and declined to comment on rumors.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
SMCI Supermicro1613%2 of 16 questions
NTAP NetApp90%none of 9 questions
WDC Western Digital90%none of 9 questions
STX Seagate Technology Holdings80%none of 8 questions
LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc.60%none of 6 questions
HPQ HP Inc.50%none of 5 questions
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
DELL Dell Technologies1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • SMCI
    Supermicro · 16 questions
    13%2 of 16 questions
  • NTAP
    NetApp · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • WDC
    Western Digital · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • STX
    Seagate Technology Holdings · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • LITE
    Lumentum Holdings Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • HPQ
    HP Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • ALAB
    Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • HPE
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • DELL
    Dell Technologies · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • VRT
    Vertiv Holdings Co · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q360%none of 6 questions4
2024 Q470%none of 7 questions6
2025 Q170%none of 7 questions6
2025 Q2911%1 of 9 questions6
2025 Q360%none of 6 questions3
2025 Q470%none of 7 questions4
2026 Q1813%1 of 8 questions6
2026 Q280%none of 8 questions7
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  2. 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
  3. 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
  4. 2025 Q29 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
  5. 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  7. 2026 Q18 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 6 companies
  8. 2026 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 7 companies
  9. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand22
  • Cloud & AI20
  • Revenue Growth16
  • Margin13
  • Product Launch12
  • Innovation & R&D10
  • Guidance Reliability4
  • Supply Chain4
  • Competitive Dynamics4
  • Geographic Expansion3
Show all 16 topics
  • Capex Investment3
  • Cost Pressure3
  • Pricing2
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Capital Allocation1