Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Andrew DeGasperi
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 23on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 9%2 of 23 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 23 of 23 questions from 7 companies
VEEVVeeva Systems Inc.8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I just wanted to understand how is that going.
Show response
Peter said both Veeva and IQVIA are very happy with the partnership, customers appreciate the reduced hassle, and he feels far better about the relationship than two years ago.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Do you think it could potentially cannibalize some of the revenue that you get from those customers?
Show response
Peter said Falcon is fully accretive as it addresses a labor market Veeva does not serve today and still requires a system of record.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how firm are those commitments
Show response
Paul said commitments are firm based on 140 live customers and 2 top 20 live in major markets. Greater risk is Salesforce custom builds failing and coming back to Veeva. Peter added all 10 Veeva projects are started and going to a stable product. Brian confirmed services guidance accounts for top 20 projects at various phases.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I was just wondering why is that the case
Show response
Brian cited overall CRM health beyond top 20, win-back potential, and business diversity with 80% of revenue outside CRM growing well. Always multiple paths to 2030. Peter added Crossix could be as large as CRM suite by 2030.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you comment at any potential verbal commitments on EDC
Show response
Peter said they do not disclose EDC verbal commitments; CRM verbal updates are shared due to the competitive dynamic during the Salesforce transition. Brian said Generation Veeva hiring was larger class in Q2 but in line with expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q2
have those investments been made in terms of people and headcount? Is that already in place
Show response
Peter said the core team is in place and will grow incrementally over two to four years. On M&A, keeping a wide aperture for synergistic acquisitions, most likely in horizontal applications. Very disciplined approach.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is that part of what's giving you confidence in terms of the R&D growth for the year
Show response
Paul said clinical trial starts don't drive R&D confidence since most contracts are enterprise license agreements unaffected by trial volume fluctuations.
Calendar 2024 Q4
do we start seeing an impact to gross margin? In other words, that royalty that you paid for Salesforce for Veeva CRM
Show response
Brian noted secular margin improvement from platform shift but said it will take time and be spread between now and 2030 as migrations are long-range.
CDNSCadence Design Systems3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
marquee AI infrastructure company expanded the use of signoff solutions. I just want to clarify
Show response
Devgan confirmed the customer is an AI infrastructure/ASIC company without naming them specifically. Noted Innovus and signoff solutions gaining share at TSMC and other foundries.
does this mean that, that physical AI time line has been brought forward?
Show response
Devgan said labor productivity TAM expansion from agentic AI plus add-on capabilities could accelerate monetization beyond original 2 contract cycle estimate.
Calendar 2025 Q4
You mentioned several times in the prepared remarks about taking share across the board. And I was just curious, is this kind of a change relative to previous quarters?
Show response
Anirudh confirmed competitive position improved. Share gains in hardware, IP, EDA, 3D-IC. Holding strong position in analog, gaining in digital and verification. R&D investments paying off with broader flow adoption.
DDOGDatadog3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I was wondering, did you see rising demand for the AI monitoring tool, particularly with open source tools being deployed across enterprises?
Show response
Olivier said AI/LLM monitoring volume has rapidly accelerated over the past couple of quarters from a very small base a year ago, spanning both traditional companies and newer AI natives, while noting the category is still very early and likely to change.
Calendar 2025 Q2
should we expect the number of the attach rates in terms of the 3 or 4 more products per customer sort of accelerate at this level
Show response
Obstler expected continuation of land-and-expand trends. Pomel added that balancing upsell incentives with new customer acquisition is a constant focus of territory management and sales planning.
would you say that's been broad-based in terms of the productivity across both international and domestic
Show response
Obstler detailed higher international investment intensity in markets like Brazil, India, APJ, and Middle East, driven by bottoms-up TAM and coverage analysis, while North America still has plenty of opportunity.
IOTSamsara Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is there a difference in the economics that is software only versus a more traditional sale that includes hardware?
Show response
Dominic confirmed software-only deals are gross-margin accretive since hardware amortization is a top COGS line, and expects more software-only products.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I noticed it slowed down slightly. Just wondering, is this a function of the fact that you're landing larger customers?
Show response
Dominic reframed to ARR mix and growth, the cohort up 35% year over year, now 59% of ARR vs 57% a year ago, plus a record number of $1M+ additions.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I'm just wondering, do you have any data that would indicate that, look, you're not as exposed to any tariff blowbacks
Show response
Sanjit had no cross-border data on hand but said most customers run domestic operations (food & beverage, construction), implying limited direct tariff exposure.
ZSZscaler3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
are you considering potentially doing the same maybe at the same time next year
Show response
Kevin noted the earlier price increase had no negative impact and pricing is reviewed dynamically. Jay attributed the cost pressure to AI data center demand creating component shortages, calling it a fairly unique situation.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I think on the last earnings call, you said that we're contributing about half of the $140 million of ARR. I think now you're saying it's about $95 million
Show response
Kevin clarified prior call discussed expected ARR at close (not full-year). Recognized $83M at close, guiding $95M for FY2026 assuming low double-digit growth. Taking prudent approach given MDR providers' historically higher churn.
Calendar 2025 Q2
our checks found that Zscaler could benefit greatly from the federal business, and I know it's not a big contributor of revenue today
Show response
Jay said federal in line with expectations. Cost reduction push in government works in Zscaler's favor vs legacy firewall vendors. Remo added not expecting significant Fed strength in Q4 guide. Well-positioned in 14 of 15 cabinet agencies.
SNPSSynopsys2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I just want to ask a question on the organic revenue for the quarter
Show response
Shelagh addressed the channel accounting mechanics but largely confirmed the analyst's 3-4% organic estimate, noting timing of upfront hardware revenue between Q3 and Q4.
you mentioned about the leading HPC provider successfully taping out the next generation of AI accelerator
Show response
Sassine confirmed this is not the first hyperscaler tapeout and emphasized universal adoption of the full Synopsys portfolio across all COT hyperscaler programs, highlighting IP customization opportunity.
Show 1 more company
PTCPTC Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
has something changed in the market that has led you to win that deal?
Show response
Barua gave a quantified answer, saying displacement value has doubled year-over-year and crediting vertical expertise and the AI road map.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| VEEV Veeva Systems Inc. | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| DDOG Datadog | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| IOT Samsara Inc. | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| ZS Zscaler | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| SNPS Synopsys | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| PTC PTC Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- VEEVVeeva Systems Inc. · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- CDNSCadence Design Systems · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- DDOGDatadog · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- IOTSamsara Inc. · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- ZSZscaler · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- SNPSSynopsys · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- PTCPTC Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 67%2 of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 67% (2 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Competitive Dynamics9
- Revenue Growth9
- Demand8
- Cloud & AI4
- M&A3
- Product Launch3
- Capex Investment3
- Margin2
- Cost Pressure1
- Pricing1
Show all 14 topics
- Trade Tariffs1
- Macroeconomic1
- Regulation Policy1
- Subscriber Growth1