Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Andrew Mok
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 69on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 22%15 of 69 questions
- Companies
- 9questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 69 of 69 questions from 9 companies
DVADaVita15 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 15 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Despite the growth in treatments, U.S. Dialysis OI was relatively flat year over year
Show response
Joel put enterprise operating income up about 5% and pointed to elevated cost per treatment and G&A growth as offsets to the treatment gains, but did not fully bridge the flat U.S. Dialysis line.
Is it your sense that industry volumes were negative or did smaller chains take market share?
Show response
Javier declined to characterize industry volumes, attributing DaVita's growth to clinical outcomes and mortality improvement rather than share gains.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Hoping you could provide more color on what you're doing to position yourself to capture market share
Show response
CEO noted Fresenius closures involve small centers where Fresenius will try to retain patients in their network. DaVita is making sure the market knows about share availability and physician access. Patients and physicians ultimately choose.
any color on the underlying mortality performance would be helpful considering that's an important metric for building consensus on volumes for the balance of the year?
Show response
CFO acknowledged mortality improved but said changes are small and not yet a significant trend. CEO added that there are multiple small variables (seasonality, mortality, admissions, missed treatments, transfers) and the raised volume range handicaps all of them.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you give us more detail on how you expect the ACA headwind to play out this year from a cadence perspective?
Show response
CEO confirmed $40M year 1, $70M year 2, $10M year 3 phasing. Open enrollment was more resilient than expected but payment yield is unknown. ESKD patients are sophisticated about insurance needs and more likely to retain coverage; CKD patients who lose coverage create a delayed impact as they eventually enter as Medicare.
Can you help us understand how missed treatments and mortality trended throughout the fourth quarter?
Show response
CFO noted Q4 missed treatments were elevated but consistent with Q4 2024 on a year-over-year basis. Clinical team sees correlation between missed treatment rate and mortality with some lag.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is it fair to think of that as a reasonable starting point as we contemplate potential growth for next year?
Show response
CFO translated the 75-100bps headwind removal to 50-75bps structural YoY improvement after accounting for day mix headwind. CEO walked through the bridge: starting from -100bps in 2025, improving by 50-75bps yields an adjusted starting point of -25 to -50bps.
I think the last estimate of the headwind you gave was $120 million over 3 years. Is that still a good number to think about?
Show response
CEO confirmed $120M cumulative estimate unchanged, phased ~$40M year 1, ~$70M year 2, ~$10M year 3. Explained lumpiness: existing ESKD patients likely retain coverage; CKD patients who lose coverage would enter as Medicare when kidneys fail, creating a delayed payer mix impact.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you give us the phosphate binder contribution to RPT and CPT in the quarter? And why was the dispensing volumes lower in the quarter?
Show response
Lower volume was due to reduced scripts from adherence issues, patients getting binders through other means, and reliance on over-the-counter solutions. Not a mix issue.
Can you give us a sense for how census and treatments track following the cyber attack and how you're thinking about volumes in the back half?
Show response
CFO explained the missed treatment spike in April/May drove the revision. Changed back-half assumption to flat vs 2024 rather than declining. Entire 25-50bps volume revision is about higher missed treatments.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you provide a bit more color on what you saw in the quarter with respect to uptake and drug mix?
Show response
CEO noted higher-than-expected iron-based binder prescriptions drove mix to upper end. Physicians appear satisfied with current mix based on conversations.
Are you going to adjust that out of earnings, or will you be incurring those costs and absorbing that into guidance?
Show response
CFO separated costs into two buckets: direct costs will be non-GAAPed and likely insured; indirect costs flow through P&L and are included in guidance.
can you help us understand how much of that was attributable to flu in the first quarter and how much of that is attributable to the cyberattack?
Show response
CFO broke down the 50bps revision: flu census decline was slightly more than half, with the remainder split roughly equally between mistreatment rate and ~500 lost cyber-related admissions.
Calendar 2024 Q4
that feels a little bit light versus what CMS quantified today in the final rate. So just trying to understand the absolute dollars on the Medicare patients specifically
Show response
CFO clarified the per-Medicare-patient amount is $10-$15, with the blended RPT impact of $7.80 reflecting that not all patients are eligible or take the medication.
G&A per treatment, I think that was up 6% sequentially and 11% year over year. That looks like a big acceleration
Show response
CEO explained G&A is roughly half traditional inflationary costs and half investment portfolio (IT, revenue operations) that drives benefits on other cost and revenue lines.
UHSUniversal Health Services9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
it looks like underlying EBITDA growth accelerates several hundred basis points in the back half
Show response
Filton enumerated four drivers: new bed capacity, Cedar Hill improvement, moderating behavioral labor costs, and easier Nevada comparisons.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you comment on volume progression throughout the quarter in each segment, including exit rates in March and April?
Show response
Filton confirmed flu and weather concentrated in January-February. March volumes showed more normative YoY increase as seasonal headwinds cleared, supporting back-half acceleration expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you give us a bit more detail on the nature of the headwind and help us understand why the headwind from the midyear implementation wouldn't annualize into a larger run rate headwind?
Show response
Filton explained headcount is adequate but requires shifting to more RNs. 2026 includes one-time startup costs (recruiting, training, potential short-term volume disruption) that won't repeat. Once fully staffed, ongoing annual cost approximately $30M versus $35M partial-year 2026 impact.
Calendar 2025 Q2
outside of the discrete items related to state directed payments in Cedar Hill, the EBITDA guidance looks largely unchanged. One, do I have that right?
Show response
Filton confirmed the bridge: +$185M new DPP revenues, -$50M Cedar Hill drag, and a further offset from scaled-back behavioral volume projections.
You called out $25 million of start-up losses in the quarter. Can you update us on the latest accreditation status of that hospital?
Show response
Filton admitted they were too optimistic on certification timing. Joint Commission survey expected imminently. $25M drag in Q2, another $25M in H2. Expects facility on track to divisional profitability by 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you seeing any changes in your behavioral referral patterns or willingness of JV partners to work with UHS
Show response
Filton confirmed no structural changes in referral patterns. Volume weakness attributed solely to weather impacts on outpatient and child/adolescent populations.
Can you help us understand what actions you're taking now to prepare for potential tariffs? And what your GPO has communicated to you thus far?
Show response
Filton said ~75% of purchases insulated from tariffs. Rejecting vendor attempts to add fees on fixed contracts. Monitoring for product availability issues but no significant pressure yet.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the guidance range, I think, is $127 million wide, which is higher than previous years despite better operations and visibility
Show response
Filton attributed the wider range to uncertainty around government reimbursement changes, acknowledging conservatism in guidance.
The 2025 EBITDA guidance is up 5% to 11%, which is higher than typical growth rates this despite state supplemental payments forecasted to be down year over year
Show response
Filton explained growth is driven by core volume/pricing recovery to historical norms plus malpractice reserve non-recurrence and interest expense reduction.
CNCCentene Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you share how you're thinking about pricing for 2027 and the balance between further margin recovery
Show response
London stated the margin-first priority but said it was too early in the pricing process, deferring competitive positioning and market growth detail to the Q3 call.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you help us understand why you believe you attracted that higher acuity cohort for this year
Show response
Sarah explained eAPTC expiry drove Silver-to-Bronze shift market-wide, concentrating higher acuity members in Silver. Centene's intentional decision not to pursue aggressive bronze strategy retained more Silver members. Risk adjustment mechanism specifically designed to counteract adverse selection. Full risk adjustment range wraps around original 4% target and higher at top end, but guidance only reflects partial offset at 3% pretax pending June Wakely.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the guide seems to imply incremental pressure within Medicare Advantage beyond the PDP reset
Show response
Drew clarified MA HBR actually expected to improve in 2026. The apparent Medicare segment pressure is mathematical: PDP margin stepping from 3%+ to 2% plus direct subsidy increase from $143 to $200 driving higher premium and pharmacy expense with zero incremental admin, creating mechanical HBR increase within the 35bps segment impact on consolidated HBR.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Now it sounds like you're not expecting much improvement in Medicaid profitability
Show response
Sarah clarified the flat Medicaid profitability assumption reflects prudence given limited 1/1 rate visibility and elevated trend, not changed conviction. Starting from better-than-expected trajectory of 93.7% full year.
Calendar 2025 Q2
help clarify and level set the expectations for margin improvement next year
Show response
Sarah confirmed pricing to return marketplace to profitability in 2026 but said too early to specify target margin range. View gets clearer after rate filings, state certifications in August, and landscape file in September.
Calendar 2025 Q1
You help us understand how the risk corridor actually works? Is that applied at the contract level or plan level
Show response
Drew explained risk corridor triggers at 2.5% above bid assumption with 50/50 split. Making up in SG&A to still hit 1% pretax margin. Cannot assume same corridor level in 2026 bids.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I wanted to revisit your assumption that ACA membership could be down 20% to 30% if enhanced APTCs expire. Are buydowns contemplated within that assumption
Show response
Sarah confirmed 20-30% is without major mitigation. Team has run numerous scenarios on caps, buydowns, and product design across FPL continuum, including potentially filing two sets of bids.
CVSCVS Health7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is this driven by claims penetration, manufacturer contracting or reimbursement changes?
Show response
Prem attributed 340B pressure to manufacturer restrictions on covered entities and specialty-to-generic conversion; Brian declined to size the headwind, deferring to the Q3 and Q4 calls.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you help us understand the level and pace of AI investments you're making this year
Show response
Management described AI as transformative and strategic across enterprise but did not quantify investment levels or provide specific P&L inflection timeline; share repo not in 2026 guide but evaluating.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Your medical membership was revised up 200,000 members, even though AEP results were described as being consistent
Show response
Nelson attributed growth to better-than-expected retention and innovative products resonating with sophisticated purchasers. Fully insured pressured by pricing discipline but offset by self-funded growth.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I wanted to ask about the recontracting efforts at Oak Street and understand the room for improvement there
Show response
Newman declined to share pretax loss but confirmed impairment driven by slowed clinic growth. Shah outlined four focus areas but would not comment on specific payer contracts.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you help reconcile your favorable Medicare results in the HCB segment with the unfavorable results you're seeing at Oak Street
Show response
Newman explained different populations and that Aetna members are still minority of Oak Street patients. Shah outlined four focus areas: leadership, technology, clinical solutions, thoughtful expansion.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Wanted to follow up on your comments at Oak Street, where you noted some early signs of pressure. Can you elaborate on the nature and timing
Show response
Shah acknowledged Oak Street pressure but called it very immature and offset by favorability elsewhere in healthcare delivery. Did not directly address D-SNP year two operational question.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you also took aggressive actions on the individual ACA business, so was hoping you could elaborate on those actions
Show response
Cowhey detailed IFP membership expected to shrink from 1.85M to sub-1M. Nelson highlighted geographic/product mix changes and improved risk adjustment capabilities.
ELVElevance Health7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
You called out $0.25 of favorability this quarter, which grew sequentially from $0.15 in the first quarter.
Show response
Mark explained ~$0.50 operating outperformance split between MA and ACA and framed non-extrapolation as prudence for the second half.
Calendar 2026 Q1
have you observed any impact from higher gas prices or broader macro pressures on health care utilization
Show response
Morgan discussed employer alignment with affordability strategy and fee-based funding shift but did not directly address gas prices or macro impact on utilization. Mark noted ACA bronze shift in line with expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Your 2026 membership declines generally came in larger than expected, especially on the Medicare side. Can you walk us through what played out during AEP
Show response
Felicia confirmed membership high teens decline but consistent with deliberate strategy. Attrition concentrated in PPO and unmatched HMO geographies. Positioned to deliver Medicare margin at least 2% in 2026. Mark added employer group risk declining high single-digit percent from deliberate pricing on sub-threshold margin accounts.
Calendar 2025 Q3
You commented that you now expect Medicare operating margins to increase slightly in '25, but I think it was unclear if that was a year-over-year comment or a positive revision to this year's outlook
Show response
Mark provided comprehensive segment-level update: Medicaid below breakeven, ACA margins declining high single-digit percent but some favorability, Medicare margins slightly improving supported by retention and cost management, commercial group consistent with expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you help delineate the pressure you're seeing in that business between unit cost trends and shifts in the risk pool
Show response
Mark decomposed ACA pressure: 70% from risk pool acuity/morbidity shift, 30% from utilization including ER visits, behavioral health, and aggressive IDR/coding practices.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you help us understand what developed favorably in the back half of March to drive that better MLR performance
Show response
Mark attributed the BER variance to a Medicaid state premium tax that reduced BER but increased OpEx with no material impact on operating earnings. Plus Part D IRA seasonality.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was hoping you could clear some of this up and tell us what your actual AEP growth is, and how much of that accounts for the full year outlook
Show response
Felicia confirmed strong AEP driven by a large group MA conversion. Gail clarified minimal additional growth expected rest of year beyond strong retention.
HCAHCA Healthcare7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 4 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you clarify how many quarters worth of Florida DPP were recognized in the quarter itself?
Show response
Marks explicitly stated 21 months of benefit booked in the quarter, explained the accrual rationale and noted cash was being received against the approval in July.
Calendar 2026 Q1
which states you're seeing that slow down, whether you view that as a temporary or issue or durable trend
Show response
Mike attributed slowdown to immigration-related concerns reducing willingness to file applications. Did not specify states. Said it's too early to call sustained vs temporary.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Outpatient surgery declined year over year on a negative comp and moderated from the previous quarter. Can you elaborate on what you saw there?
Show response
Mike broke out outpatient surgery: hospitals flat, ASCs down ~1.5%. Payer mix soft driven by Medicaid decline. Lower-intensity cases like ENT declining. Sam noted ~100 outpatient units added in 2025, pipeline accelerating for 2026-27.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Last quarter, you called out a few underperforming regions outside the hurricane markets. Can you give us an update on those markets
Show response
Sam confirmed one of two underperforming divisions recovered in Q3. Second still working through challenges but confident in 2026 recovery. Portfolio diversification absorbs individual division weakness.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you give us the latest quote on ACA revenue and admissions? And maybe just a question on the hurricane performance
Show response
Mike detailed hurricane recovery: $100M better than flat guidance. Largo earnings growing YoY, NC still negative in Q2 with recovery expected Q4. Sam noted NC seeing greater demand but tighter labor requiring more contract labor.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I'm not 100% I understand that because you have two markets that were hurricane impaired in Q1 this year. That were not impaired at this time last year
Show response
Mike clarified that Largo improvement and North Carolina lingering effects offset each other as guided, producing flat year-over-year earnings in hurricane markets.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Hoping you could spike out the performance of Mission Hospital in the quarter and help us understand what impacts that had on same-store volumes in the quarter
Show response
Mike detailed volume drags from respiratory season (1pt admissions, 2pt ER visits) and hurricanes (20-40 bps). Confirmed Largo and NC expected to offset in 2025 guidance.
Show 3 more companies
HUMHumana6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
would love to hear your perspective on the recent litigation outcomes around the MA Stars program
Show response
Declined the litigation question outright and redirected to a general statement that the Stars program needs to be stable.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you plan to exercise your June call options for the first 2 clinic cohorts?
Show response
Celeste said decision needed mid-year, will be mindful of cash position and balance sheet. If Welsh Carson puts the 2025 cohort, approximately $1-1.5 billion obligation in 2027. Both cohorts together also $1-1.5 billion. All outflows included in funding plan.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was hoping you'd be able to offer a framework for the level of new growth that you're comfortable with before it starts to impact your operational capacity
Show response
David Dintenfass introduced LTV/NPV framework. Emphasized stable margins across all products, appropriate pricing for risk, and dynamic operational capacity management.
Calendar 2025 Q2
One of your peers noted a pretty meaningful pullback in the individual PPO market next year. Just curious how you're thinking about the implications
Show response
James framed HUM's 2-year head start on benefit cuts vs peers. George detailed significant gap to peers in benefit value, 40% recapture rate of exited members, and stable-to-invested 2026 benefits.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you provide more color on your experience in Part D relative to expectations? And specifically, can you comment on the pace that seniors are tracking
Show response
Celeste confirmed mid-single digit medical and low double digit pharmacy trends both in line. Oncology trends elevated as expected.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you share the splits of the incremental STARS investments across the MLR and OpEx line?
Show response
Celeste deferred Stars investment allocation detail to later quarters. James confirmed group contract crosswalk decision not yet made, needed by late summer/early autumn.
UNHUnitedHealth Group Incorporated6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Optum Health's EBIT guidance still appears to imply a meaningfully negative fourth quarter.
Show response
Krista Nelson attributed the fourth quarter to normal risk seasonality plus clinician workflow and AI investments, but did not quantify the investments.
Calendar 2026 Q2
The IDR process has been in place for a number of years now. Can you help us understand why costs are accelerating now?
Show response
Kueter gave specific data on dispute concentration and arbiter payouts at 11 times Medicare, directly explaining the acceleration and calling for reform.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Could you help us unpack what's driving the outperformance in Optum Health this quarter?
Show response
Krista Nelson attributed outperformance to two drivers: favorable prior period medical restating concentrated in markets with focused clinical management, and continued operating cost improvement including 12% increase in patient-facing hours. Hemsley summarized as mostly utilization and management.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you elaborate on your experience with the co-pay structure in 2025? And what drove that decision to change the benefit structure in 2026?
Show response
Hunter explained multiyear metered benefit approach managing V28 dynamics plus uncertainty around demo program continuation into 2026. Took cautious approach with coinsurance on Tier 3. Feels aligned to industry on benefit design. No concerns around MAPD selection or mix given deductible structures. No material PDP risk to outlook.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you compare the relative margin profiles and different paths of margin recovery for each including which population is most addressable near term
Show response
Hunter said group MA most pressured but reprices annually. D-SNP and C-SNP growth accretive to enterprise. Retail side addressed through aggressive 2026 repricing and plan exits of 600,000+ members predominantly in PPO with roughly a third being full market or submarket exits.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I was hoping to get your thoughts on the risks and implications of tariffs, particularly around the impact of pharmaceutical tariffs
Show response
Witty acknowledged dynamic situation with administration still in analysis phase. Cited preexisting contractual price protection mechanisms and legislation limiting manufacturer ability to pass through increases. Said should not be significant exposure this year.
CICigna5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 3 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
The operating cash flow and CapEx guidance implies less than 80% free cash flow conversion on your pretax income, which is below recent history
Show response
Ann attributed ~$600M cash flow decline to lower PBS contribution from large client renewals and investments. Brian confirmed rebate-free model will not impact 2026 cash flow outlook, with working capital impacts to be addressed closer to 2027-2028 implementation.
Calendar 2025 Q3
My understanding was that some of those large contracts were only modestly profitable, and now you're talking about lower profitability on those contracts
Show response
Brian confirmed contracts not running at a loss but at lower margin profile compared to overall portfolio. David emphasized these were proactively pursued as strategically important. Brian noted relationships often deepen over time with specialty, home delivery, and care services.
Calendar 2025 Q2
There's been a lot of developments in the GLP-1 market, including your announced partnerships with Lilly and Novo this quarter
Show response
Brian said GLP-1 contributions to Evernorth broadly in line with expectations, with decelerating script growth but still strong YoY. New $200/month patient cap program launched in May with positive early feedback but adoption more likely at renewals. Client adoption rates flattish 2024 to 2025.
Calendar 2025 Q1
As the Part D market evolves alongside the IRA, curious to hear what your experience has been on the EverNorth side of the business
Show response
Brian noted Medicare specialty scripts growing considerably faster than commercial/Medicaid. Not 100% clear if driven by IRA out-of-pocket caps or manufacturer marketing to prescribers.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if you're seeing pressure in that part of the business related to higher specialty cost trends, I'm a little confused why you are not seeing that pressure on the fully insured
Show response
Brian explained total costs in line but MIX shifted toward high-cost claimants. Non-stop-loss 60% of book ran at 80% MCR as expected. Stop loss 15% bore disproportionate impact.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| DVA DaVita | 15 | 13%2 of 15 questions |
| UHS Universal Health Services | 9 | 22%2 of 9 questions |
| CNC Centene Corporation | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| CVS CVS Health | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| ELV Elevance Health | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| HCA HCA Healthcare | 7 | 57%4 of 7 questions |
| HUM Humana | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| CI Cigna | 5 | 60%3 of 5 questions |
- DVADaVita · 15 questions13%2 of 15 questions
- UHSUniversal Health Services · 9 questions22%2 of 9 questions
- CNCCentene Corporation · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- CVSCVS Health · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- ELVElevance Health · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- HCAHCA Healthcare · 7 questions57%4 of 7 questions
- HUMHumana · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- UNHUnitedHealth Group Incorporated · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- CICigna · 5 questions60%3 of 5 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 10 | 30%3 of 10 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q2 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9 | 22%2 of 9 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 8 | 38%3 of 8 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q1 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 9 | 44%4 of 9 questions | 8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q410 questions · challenge rate 30% (3 of 10 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q112 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q211 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q48 questions · challenge rate 38% (3 of 8 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
- 2026 Q29 questions · challenge rate 44% (4 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin21
- Regulation Policy18
- Demand17
- Cost Pressure16
- Competitive Dynamics14
- Subscriber Growth11
- Guidance Reliability9
- Pricing7
- Revenue Growth6
- Capital Allocation3
Show all 19 topics
- Capex Investment3
- Trade Tariffs2
- Cloud & AI1
- Macroeconomic1
- M&A1
- Labor Market1
- Product Launch1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Supply Chain1