Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Andy Nowinski

Wells Fargo · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2025 Q3 (5 quarters).

Questions
27on tracked calls
Challenge rate
11%3 of 27 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 27 of 27 questions from 7 companies

GENGen Digital8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
GEN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

I was wondering if you could just give any color on how to think about the growth rates of those two segments going forward?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Natalie guided Cyber Safety Platform to sustainable mid-single-digit growth and Trust-Based Solutions to an accelerating double-digit growth rate as MoneyLion integrates and financial wellness scales. Together, that drives the increased revenue guidance.

I'm wondering if you could provide any more color on really what drove that strength in Q1 because it -- maintaining that same growth rate was pretty impressive

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Natalie pointed to the sustainable mid-single-digit growth trajectory set at Investor Day 2 years ago, driven by cross-sell, upsell, partner diversification, and strong retention. Employee benefits momentum carried forward, and customer service effectiveness improvements are refining conversion.

Calendar 2025 Q1

How much visibility do you have in that segment relative to your cyber safety platform?

Show response

Vincent explained guidance assumes mid-single-digit cyber safety growth plus MoneyLion (grew ~24-25% last calendar year), with adjustments for partial year, cross-sell focus, and transition from transactional to subscription model.

How are you thinking about sharing purchases this year while you're balancing the dividend and driving down the net leverage ratio?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Natalie confirmed resuming balanced capital allocation after being paused during the acquisition, continuing the historical mix of debt paydown and opportunistic buybacks.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'm just wondering if you could just help us understand where you see the synergies between the two businesses?

Show response

Vincent outlined two synergy layers: (1) MoneyLion's PFM backend powering financial wellness features white-labeled into Norton/LifeLock/Avast, and (2) embedded marketplace for financial decisions. Later, protection offered back to MoneyLion customers.

was that deceleration just entirely due to that onetime bump from the National Public Data Breach you saw last quarter?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Natalie confirmed they attributed approximately one point of Q2 bookings acceleration to the NPD breach, explaining the sequential deceleration while noting ongoing tailwind benefits from increased awareness.

Calendar 2024 Q3

do you think the net adds will improve, particularly in the US going forward? Because I think you said it was more influenced by the international growth this quarter?

Subscriber GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Vincent confirmed broad-based growth across brands and geographies, noting identity demand was more pronounced in the US due to the NPD breach. Direct and transparent answer.

did you see an improvement in the LifeLock attach rate or customers upgrading to that higher-end membership that includes LifeLock this quarter, given all the breach activity?

Subscriber GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Natalie confirmed improvements across LifeLock acquisition, upsell into identity memberships, and higher-tier LifeLock adoption, especially fueled by the NPD breach demand.

NETCloudflare, Inc.5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
NET company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

we saw in the news how Cloudflare blocked a number of record-breaking DDoS attacks this quarter

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Prince detailed architectural advantage: no separate scrubbing centers, every server runs every function. DDoS attacks don't increase bandwidth costs due to cashing proxy outbound traffic model.

you're still on track to reach that $5 billion target in FY '28. I'm just wondering if you could talk about the path you're on relative to your expectations

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Seifert confirmed tracking well to expectations. Progress with large customers, pool of funds, variable revenue, and go-to-market improvements provide confidence in reacceleration.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm wondering if you could just expand on the traction you're seeing in the broader government sector?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Prince noted government Zero Trust mandates driving adoption. Cloudflare wins on broad platform across application services and SASE for critical services worldwide.

I'm just wondering if you could double-click on the trends that you're seeing in the SASE market and why is kind of winning more of these larger deals

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Prince cited feature parity with first-gen vendors plus superior performance from every-server-everywhere architecture. Bundling reverse and forward proxy in one solution is key differentiator.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'm just trying to parse out maybe how much of your SaaS wins are coming from the overall market inflecting higher

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Prince noted most big Zero Trust wins are displacements of first-generation vendors, won on fastest network, comprehensive platform, and higher ROI from bundled solutions.

CRWDCrowdStrike4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
CRWD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

if the partner rebate program you talked about last quarter you know, remains in effect for the remainder of the year

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Podbere confirmed CCP partner program impact of $10-15M/quarter through Q4, emphasized ARR as best leading indicator, and noted back half net new ARR growth of at least 40% YoY.

Calendar 2025 Q2

when a customer burns through their contracted credits faster than they expected and they reflex, does that overage flow into your subscription revenue

Revenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Podbere confirmed reflexes flow into net new ARR when customers re-contract after burning through initial flex subscription, but did not fully address revenue timing mechanics.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how much the Adaptive Shield acquisition contributed this quarter in Q4, and then if, you know, if you add back the $56 million you talked about in CCP

Show response

Podbere confirmed Adaptive Shield ARR was very small, CCP churn was de minimis, and overall churn/contraction was in line with historical norms.

Calendar 2024 Q4

am I thinking about that correctly in terms of customer retention, and are you factoring in any improvement to ARR due to Falcon Flex going forward?

Subscriber GrowthRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

George confirmed Flex drives stickiness through higher module adoption (9-14 modules), creating opportunity to top up Flex pools. Used Adaptive Shield as example of frictionless new module adoption.

MDBMongoDB, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
MDB company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

whether MQL might be simply maybe more difficult for a developer to use versus SQL

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dev reframed the question, attributing Postgres interest to relational consolidation and arguing JSON support on relational DBs is a tacit admission of architectural limits.

can you just provide any more color on sort of the mechanics of growth in that consumption segment?

ChallengingDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike explained the guide bakes in the same monthly pattern (April soft, May rebound) and macro caution, so Q1 upside was not extrapolated to the full year.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how long was that customer using Postgres before they decided to make a change to Mongo

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dev couldn't give specifics but framed Postgres migrations as a genuine trend, citing relational databases' inflexibility.

PANWPalo Alto Networks3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
PANW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

is there any way to look at the percentage of ARR that those platform customers account for

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Nikesh disclosed platform customers should account for 60-70% of the $15B NGS ARR target at 2,500-3,500 platformizations. Math implies ~$3-4M average ARR per platform customer.

Calendar 2025 Q1

it looks like your net new ARR declined on a year-over-year basis for last two consecutive quarters

ChallengingRevenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dipak explained prior-year boost from subscription transitions is lapping. Nikesh pivoted to the absolute growth story from zero to $5 billion NGS ARR. Partially addressed the concern.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was wondering if you could provide an update on the growth of ARR from that solution, whether those new customers you're bringing into Palo Alto onto the platform, are coming at the expense of ot...

Subscriber GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Nikesh confirmed a mix of network transformation, competitor displacement, and VPN-to-SASE conversions. 40% are net-new logos, SASE deals over $1M up 40% in Q1, with PANW established as a top-three SASE player.

ZSZscaler3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
ZS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

those products go hand in hand with Zero Trust Everywhere solution. So I'm just wondering if you're seeing customers possibly buying both solutions

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jay confirmed data security bought with ZTE and independently. 8 modules available; only 30% have 3+ modules, 10% have 4+, showing large upsell runway. Data security ARR at $425M would be one of the largest standalone data security companies.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'm wondering what's making up the difference between the $1 billion and the new growth categories they are you generated versus the $2.9 billion in total

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jay detailed three categories: Zero Trust Everywhere (210 enterprises, 60% QoQ growth), Data Security (crossed $350M ARR, growing faster than company), and Agentic Operations (ZDX Advanced Plus 70% YoY, SecOps ACV 120% YoY). Combined approaching $1B.

Calendar 2024 Q4

could provide some more color on how you're helping -- how they're helping you bring more customers -- help more customers roll-out Copilot

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jay explained unique inline advantage for Copilot security. Cited seven-figure G2K deal driven by data protection for Microsoft Copilot. Working with Microsoft orgs.

Show 1 more company
FTNTFortinet1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
FTNT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

still a little bit unclear on why services revenue growth is decelerating so much. Looking back over the last, call it, 4 quarters?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Christiane attributed service decel to COVID-era deferred revenue normalization and noted unified SaaS ARR was flat sequentially because some products within the category declined while SSE growth offset them.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
GEN Gen Digital80%none of 8 questions
NET Cloudflare, Inc.50%none of 5 questions
CRWD CrowdStrike40%none of 4 questions
MDB MongoDB, Inc.333%1 of 3 questions
PANW Palo Alto Networks333%1 of 3 questions
ZS Zscaler30%none of 3 questions
FTNT Fortinet1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • GEN
    Gen Digital · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • NET
    Cloudflare, Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • CRWD
    CrowdStrike · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • MDB
    MongoDB, Inc. · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions
  • PANW
    Palo Alto Networks · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions
  • ZS
    Zscaler · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • FTNT
    Fortinet · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q470%none of 7 questions6
2025 Q1617%1 of 6 questions4
2025 Q21020%2 of 10 questions7
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions2
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
  3. 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q210 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 7 companies
  5. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth14
  • Competitive Dynamics9
  • Demand8
  • Subscriber Growth5
  • Product Launch4
  • M&A3
  • Pricing2
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Capital Allocation1
Show all 12 topics
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Regulation Policy1