Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Bascome Majors

Stephens · covers Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 7).

Questions
50on tracked calls
Challenge rate
12%6 of 50 questions
Companies
9questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 50 of 50 questions from 9 companies

WABWabtec12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 12 challenging
WAB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Can you update us on the regulatory framework and review of Zero-to-Zero?

Regulation PolicyProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Santana said FRA approval is expected but gave no timing or revenue framing.

Specific to the North American Class I's, can you give us any sense on visibility into that market and coverage

Show response

Santana called fleet renewal a growth opportunity not in guidance, but again gave no coverage figure for Class I customers.

do you see more opportunity to gradually accelerate the organic growth trajectory of the business

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Santana said both, citing wins, backlog quality, technology-driven fleet modernization and an M&A pipeline.

Can you talk about the pipeline specific to North American Class I? What coverage do you have into next year?

Show response

Santana cited record coverage and international pipeline but gave no Class I-specific visibility, prompting a follow-up.

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you just give us an update on how the product is resonating with the Class I railroads in North America

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Rafael confirmed the first North America EVO Advantage order landed in Q2, consistent with expectations; broad conversion still ahead.

Calendar 2025 Q3

you said new locos and mods, expect units to be up again next year. Was that a North America comment or a global comment?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Rafael confirmed total global comment, with stronger variation between new and mods occurring in North America. Backlog supports both 12-month and longer lead-time growth.

release and the deck talk a bit about tariff pressure on cash flow as it seems to be flowing into inventory

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

John detailed tariff cash-first-then-P&L cadence with two to four quarter inventory flow-through. Four-pronged mitigation: USMCA exemptions, supply chain moves, customer cost-sharing, enterprise cost discipline.

Calendar 2025 Q2

two of your largest MOD customers are 6 months from the expiration of their long-term contracts in North America

ChallengingDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Rafael noted greater interest in new locomotives vs prior quarters. Aging fleet drives demand regardless; confident pipeline will convert to backlog growth with visibility into 2026+.

Can you talk a little bit about maybe the differences across the different rails without necessarily specifying which does which?

Competitive DynamicsM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Rafael declined customer specifics but emphasized strong partnerships with both highlighted railroads. Past mergers have been positive for Wabtec and expects same outcome.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how much of that content do you support with, you know, kits and engine and other key components? Shipped out of the US

Supply ChainTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Rafael described largely localized NA operations with USMCA balance. International supply chains mix local fabrication with concentrated critical components like engines and controls. Minimal retaliatory tariffs seen outside China.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you roughly break us out what that looks like between pricing units and how each are growing this year?

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management declined to break out unit vs price but confirmed combined high-single-digit growth. Active discussions on NA contracts for both new units and mods.

where are you in the testing? How are the results? And when do you expect to launch that fully as a commercial product?

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Rafael confirmed EVO modernization in testing, expanding units, targeting full commercialization by end of 2025 with up to 7% fuel efficiency gain.

JBHTJ.B. Hunt7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
JBHT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

frame where you feel your customers are on what they've converted and what they have left to potentially convert

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Simpson cited 7 million to 11 million convertible highway shipments; Field said a discount to highway below 15% would slow conversion and JBHT will not chase non-sticky volume.

Calendar 2026 Q2

how prevalent the multi-year price agreements are with Intermodal customers today compared to prior cycles

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Darren declined to quantify the multi-year mix but emphasized record volumes of pricing/bid opportunities coming in the door.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how has the rapid escalation in the spot rates in purchase transportation calls, you know, maybe changed the way around the edges that you're approaching this year

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Nick Hobbs said spot loads going up as they pursue opportunities. Spencer emphasized say-do culture of honoring customer commitments creates share gain opportunities when routing guides fail. Nick added mini-bids are active and provide different pricing opportunities to capture current market conditions.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you talk a little bit about some of the higher visibility big-ticket cost items in the budget, be it health and welfare or insurance

Cost PressurePricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Brad Delco identified group medical, insurance renewals, and wages as key inflationary pressures. Said industry needs mid-single-digit rate increases to reach reinvestable levels. Internal cost target exceeds $100M but conservative say-do culture guided the public commitment.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is there maybe a structural rethinking about how to use cash with the buyback versus other uses longer term

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

John Kulow said no structural change; buybacks are opportunistic driven by valuation metrics. Free cash flow is strong with pre-funded CapEx needs; senior notes due early next year being planned for.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how have those bid conversations evolved in the last two weeks? And not just specifically to pricing

Trade TariffsCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Spencer noted customer compliance has been strong and improving across all services. Customers have not altered demand forecasts despite tariff uncertainty.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how much visibility and conviction you have into the churn really giving way after the second quarter

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Brad Hicks detailed three loss categories: customer demand reductions, bankruptcies, and competitive rebids. All three have decelerated through 2024, supporting net positive fleet growth in 2025.

ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
ODFL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

If we look back, I think this is the first time the capital envelope has gone up since the beginning of 24

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Framed the raise as strategic real estate and equipment purchases plus pull-forward from 2027, not a capacity need; network still has north of 35% excess capacity.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what is the point in this sort of new weaker, more competitive paradigm where you really think about the balance of service, price and volume growth

ChallengingPricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Adam argued competitors operating at 90%+ OR will need to raise prices, closing the price gap. Lower CapEx ahead will reduce overhead pressure. Confident in long-term market share opportunities.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you remind us of typical revenue and margin seasonality for the fourth quarter?

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Q4 seasonality: rev per day down 0.3%, OR up 200-250bp. Long-term incremental margin of 35%. Early-cycle recovery could deliver 35-40% incrementals given current cost structure.

Calendar 2025 Q1

With the UPS leaning more into the lower weight kind of tweener freight parcel shipments, is that business that you or any of your peers are really that interested in

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Industrial is 55-60% of business, outperformed retail in Q1. 3PL business also performing better. UPS hundredweight not a needle mover. Modal substitution between LTL and truckload is bigger factor.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How do you make sure you retain your talent as they're looking for new leadership?

Labor MarketCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Marty emphasized OD family culture, good pay, and quarterly incentives. Not concerned about talent retention risk.

what segments of the market you think are gaining and losing share now that we've kind of settled out from all the noise of the yellow redeployment

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Adam noted retail outperformed industrial historically but industrial improving. 3PL business performing better recently with higher weight per shipment.

CHRWC.H. Robinson5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
CHRW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what metrics or performance or market conditions are we looking for to get to the point where volume becomes

Show response

Damon confirmed both segments are now above mid-cycle margin targets, giving NAST optionality to pursue volume when freight conditions justify aggressive pricing.

Calendar 2025 Q4

How do you think somewhere between that, how does it feel in '26 right now, the balance of margin expansion and you potentially seeking more share growth

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO said once 40% NAST and 30% GF thresholds achieved, nothing left to prove on quality of earnings. Beyond that, will supercharge outgrowth, thinks they can beat 1000bps CAS outperformance by investing margin into profitable growth. CEO reinforced disciplined and measured approach.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you talk in a little more length about how you stay ahead of sort of copycat strategies

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO emphasized three pillars: people, technology, operating model. CFO described multiple moats: strategy of outgrowth AND margin expansion, operating model driving tech needs, 450 in-house engineers with domain expertise, startup mentality with investment-grade balance sheet. CTO added proprietary data set and owned technology driving scalability.

Calendar 2025 Q1

What inning or other analogy are you are on some of those projects

Innovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Arun said 30%+ productivity delivered over two years; won't sustain double-digit pace but expect evergreen improvement. Runway extends through 2026 Investor Day targets and beyond.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Just curious if you could walk through some of the cyclical puts and takes on the path to '26 as you feel today

Guidance ReliabilityMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO confirmed no pivot from December Investor Day position; feel good about targets and delivery path, with range provided to account for market uncertainty.

CSXCSX Corporation5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
CSX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Where do you still think there is a lot of opportunity to do things differently in old economy established industry.

Show response

Steve, 10 months in, said there is opportunity to improve everything, especially operations and pricing where the team is building price-management capability, and flagged AI-enabled pricing analytics.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you talk a little bit more tactically about how you and the board have talked about changing the incentives for senior management

Labor MarketMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Steve outlined the new incentive framework: operating margins, operating income dollars, and safety for annual metrics. Long-term metrics focused on return on capital and total shareholder return versus S&P 500 industrials.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what do you think the right annual and long term incentive structures are? For senior management

Labor MarketMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Steve outlined his compensation philosophy: profitability and margins for annual incentives, safety and customer service as explicit metrics, and return on capital as the key long-term measure drawing on his Linde experience.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is 2026 the year that investors should judge the financial output of your strategy, or do you think it makes more sense to look to 2027

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Joe cited 40% rail margins in 2023 (best in industry) and 39% in 2024 (second best). Said 2026-2027 is the growth story but near-term must demonstrate network recovery to build investor confidence.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you talk a little bit about the regulatory opportunity under the new regime, either at the FRA and the STB

Regulation PolicyInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Joe highlighted waivers for inspection technology already advancing, supportive STB Chair Patrick Fuchs and FRA leadership David Fink who understands railroad operations. Multi-year tailwind expected.

FDXFedEx4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
FDX company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

UPS potentially gets some competitive advantages back with the relationship with the postal service

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Carere dismissed UPS-USPS relationship as a competitive threat since FedEx growth is in high-value B2B, home delivery, and ground commercial, services that couldn't be served by the postal service.

Calendar 2025 Q3

particularly where you're talking about finding new revenue models to monetize that part of the FedEx story

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Subramaniam outlined three data value layers: operations (Network 2.0, deep learning), differentiation (Surround platform, 40% of healthcare wins), and new revenue models (FDX commerce platform, HS classification GenAI). More details at February Investor Day.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how much CapEx is in the freight segment for last year? And how is that anticipated to trend in the budget for this year

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Dietrich initially deferred but returned with $437M for FedEx Freight CapEx in FY25. Did not provide the FY26 trend within the $4.5B total.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you talk about where you are in the build-out of the dedicated sales force? I think you said 300 with the

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Carere confirmed VP is in place with hiring underway, focused on LTL expertise and small/medium customer coverage. Hiring will continue through next fiscal year with emphasis on revenue quality.

Show 3 more companies
NSCNorfolk Southern Railway4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
NSC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

where the merch plan compliance dropped about points or so quarter-per-quarter over-quarter

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Mark George detailed service-metric moves and specific terminal actions (e.g., Chattanooga) improving dwell and originations.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you talk about where you see maybe more tactical opportunities where there are some potential wins in the merchandise portfolio

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CMO highlighted automotive, non-petroleum chemicals, energy, and waste markets as growth areas. Automotive strength driven by network fluidity enabling customer confidence in higher volume commitments. Utility coal expected strong. Intermodal recovery depends on demand returning after 4.5-year freight recession.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what conviction do you have that some of what's happening in intermodal doesn't bleed into the carload side of the business?

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CMO defended carload stickiness via strong service consistency and deep customer relationships built over time. Industrial customers are curious about the merger but confident in NSC. Acknowledged competitive landscape but believes relationship business plus service quality provides strong defense.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you talk a little bit about the Board dynamics, where everyone is clearly aligned

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO described unified Board with majority of members new in past 18 months, focused on supporting management's strategy execution with coaching and guidance.

UNPUnion Pacific Corporation4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
UNP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Where do you think we land on in the procedural schedule where we get to the point

Regulation PolicyM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Vena said the statute gives the STB a one-year clock from application acceptance and welcomed the comment period.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how do you think about sort of hedging your bets on managing the balance sheet for that capital need between now and in 2027

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jennifer outlined plans to pay down debt as it matures, explore interest rate hedging, establish credit facilities for deal closing, and structure debt to enable share repurchase resumption by 2028.

Calendar 2025 Q2

As that agreement, which I believe predated your arrival, Jim, comes to an end here in the next couple of quarters, how do you feel about the fleet today

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Eric outlined three ongoing fleet investment pillars, modernization, overhaul, and daily modifications, emphasizing all remain critical for service delivery.

Calendar 2024 Q4

this week, we also had Patrick Fuchs take over as STB, Chairman. Can you talk about that side of the regulatory fence

Show response

Jim Vena was cautiously optimistic about STB leadership, emphasizing shared goals of service quality and quicker regulatory decisions.

UPSUnited Parcel Service3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
UPS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

it still looks like the consolidated operating profit in the second half versus first half is a bit more

ChallengingMarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dykes isolated the second-half step-up to International: Asia volume momentum plus the September de minimis wrap. Domestic and SCS follow normal seasonality.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how you feel about dealing with that uptick in labor inflation in the U.S. in the second half of next year?

Labor MarketCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Carol emphasized automation progress ahead of plan and 40,000+ headcount reduction absorbs contractual wage increases. Brian added the network will have different revenue characteristics with premium mix so incremental labor cost will not turn customer ORs upside down. Strategy is less labor-intensive, more nimble, more profitable network.

Calendar 2024 Q4

do you think that we've seen the last of the big shoes to drop on some of the changes to the competitive landscape, cost structures

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Carol discussed generative AI productivity opportunities, changing trade lanes from tariffs, and differentiated complex logistics as sources of competitive moat and customer stickiness.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
WAB Wabtec1217%2 of 12 questions
JBHT J.B. Hunt70%none of 7 questions
ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line617%1 of 6 questions
CHRW C.H. Robinson50%none of 5 questions
CSX CSX Corporation520%1 of 5 questions
FDX FedEx40%none of 4 questions
NSC Norfolk Southern Railway425%1 of 4 questions
UNP Union Pacific Corporation40%none of 4 questions
UPS United Parcel Service333%1 of 3 questions
  • WAB
    Wabtec · 12 questions
    17%2 of 12 questions
  • JBHT
    J.B. Hunt · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • ODFL
    Old Dominion Freight Line · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • CHRW
    C.H. Robinson · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • CSX
    CSX Corporation · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions
  • FDX
    FedEx · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • NSC
    Norfolk Southern Railway · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • UNP
    Union Pacific Corporation · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • UPS
    United Parcel Service · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4100%none of 10 questions8
2025 Q1617%1 of 6 questions6
2025 Q2617%1 of 6 questions5
2025 Q3922%2 of 9 questions8
2025 Q460%none of 6 questions6
2026 Q1No questions recorded——
2026 Q2813%1 of 8 questions8
2026 Q3520%1 of 5 questions2
  1. 2024 Q410 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 8 companies
  2. 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
  3. 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies
  4. 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
  5. 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 6 companies
  6. 2026 Q1No questions recorded
  7. 2026 Q28 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 8 companies
  8. 2026 Q35 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Competitive Dynamics18
  • Demand11
  • Margin10
  • Revenue Growth8
  • Innovation & R&D8
  • Pricing6
  • Regulation Policy4
  • Capital Allocation4
  • Guidance Reliability4
  • Labor Market4
Show all 18 topics
  • Product Launch3
  • Capex Investment3
  • M&A3
  • Cost Pressure3
  • Trade Tariffs3
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Macroeconomic1