Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Blayne Curtis
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 75on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 8%6 of 75 questions
- Companies
- 16questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 75 of 75 questions from 16 companies
MCHPMicrochip Technology15 questions · 8 reporting periods · 2 of 15 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is there any way to think about what pricing was as a tailwind in September?
Show response
Steve said the September pricing impact is small because increases take effect late in the quarter and customers pulled orders forward; the full effect lands in December.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I am curious how to think about OpEx for the fiscal year.
Show response
Eric said OpEx rises ~$15M sequentially at the guidance midpoint as quarterly employee bonus programs return in the upcycle, but plans can be modulated each quarter.
is that the kind of growth you are seeing? And is there any headwind still in that segment that are going down?
Show response
Eric and Brian declined to give data center percentages but cited huge YoY growth in the Data Center Solutions unit and strong digital power-control demand.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the other product revenue was up 18% sequentially. I think you said in the filing, was a license sale
Show response
Steve highlighted memory strength as serial EEPROM competitors shift capacity to flash/NAND. Microchip gaining share with internally produced EEPROM. FPGA strong from A&D and industrial. Eric clarified licensing benefit won't repeat in March but still guiding 6.2% growth.
you are guiding kind of flat. I think if you calculate the inventory write-offs, like, five percentage points of a headwind
Show response
Eric explained the 100% gross margin licensing revenue not repeating in March is a headwind that offsets expected inventory reserve decline. Despite this, midpoint guidance shows improvement from 60.5% to 61%.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is that the right way to kind of add back that 4%, 5% headwind to the 58% that you just guided to
Show response
Steve confirmed the framework: as charges decline, gross margin improves dollar for dollar. Product gross margin at 67.4% is ahead of long-term 65% target. Eric noted inventory reserves never go to zero and there will eventually be a benefit from selling through previously written-off inventory.
I thought that the inventory charges were supposed to go away pretty sharply into the end of the fiscal year
Show response
Steve explained charges persist because year-over-year sales have been negative, keeping the trailing 18-month sales comparator low. Starting December quarter, YoY growth turns positive, which should accelerate write-off reductions. The weak December quarter delayed progress.
Calendar 2025 Q2
You talked about lead times extending from 48%, 6% to 10%, 8% to 12%. Is that now or is that where you expect it to go
Show response
Steve clarified lead time extensions are already occurring in pockets where lead frames, substrates, or subcontractor capacity are constrained. He urged customers to maintain 12-16 weeks of backlog.
Is the -- when you look at how you set the guide. Is it the level of turns you're looking for in the quarter the same? Or is it different
Show response
Steve confirmed September backlog started higher than June and turns requirement is roughly the same, supporting confidence in guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I'm just kind of curious your perspective if you think that's the right move or the wrong move
Show response
Steve explained the China-for-China strategy needs rework because rules changed from assembly-based to fab-based origin. Communicating to Trump administration that rules incentivize moving out of U.S.
when things normalize, do you expect to get back to where you were pre-pandemic
Show response
Steve argued competitors are closer to full recovery so Microchip should be gaining share from here. Expressed confidence in share gains.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you walk us through the gross margin a bit? Because I think it stepped down more
Show response
Steve highlighted 53% trough gross margin is still above many competitors. Deferred detailed inventory depletion modeling to March 3 investor call.
when you said the company can outgrow the market, is that going to be a work in progress
Show response
Steve cited megatrend design wins outpacing non-megatrend and noted customer engineers are back to new designs after two years focused on shortage mitigation.
Calendar 2024 Q3
it sounded like last quarter you were hopeful of some green shoots. You said they were uneven
Show response
Ganesh identified A&D and AI data center as consistent areas of strength while noting December quarter headwinds from holidays and extended customer shutdowns.
on OpEx over the next couple of quarters here. I had thought that you had some pay cuts that would kind of come back in
Show response
Eric confirmed salary restoration adding ~$8M sequentially and expects further increase in March from full-quarter effect.
ONON Semiconductor9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you mentioned lead times were extending. I was wondering if you could kind of give us a context of what that means.
Show response
Thad quantified lead times extending from ~27 to ~32 weeks with orders inside lead time and escalations, signaling a healthy demand environment.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you're walking away from $90 million a quarter over two quarters. Is that a positive or a negative for gross margin?
Show response
Trent said exits are neutral to gross margin today since business is near corporate average. Exiting because of margin pressure and pricing pressure ahead. No headwind to utilization.
Thoughts about growth in that segment for '26.
Show response
El-Khoury bullish on AI DC but not guiding specifically. Trent added Q1 AI DC revenue expected to grow high teens percentage-wise, indicating trajectory.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is there a way to think about as we try to layer on that growth, how it impacts those two buckets?
Show response
Trent clarified AI data center inside four walls is in Other. Energy storage and infrastructure supporting data centers is in Industrial.
how you're thinking about this guide, which is down 1%. Do you feel like that is a more normal range for you? Or do you think you're undershipping the market?
Show response
Trent said Q4 guide is in line with normal seasonality. Auto and industrial both down low single digits. Other bucket up mid-to-high single digits. Seasonal patterns are positive sign.
Calendar 2025 Q2
it kind of came in the high end of the range in June, kind of what's your expectation for [ disti ] in the September guide?
Show response
Trent expects disti inventory to stay around 10 weeks, within 9-11 week sweet spot. No material change expected.
I thought you said the 5% was the end-of-life products, and that's what you've been saying for a while. So maybe you could just walk me through
Show response
El-Khoury said ISG shifting from volume human-vision to high-value machine vision for ADAS. Trent clarified $50-100M ISG exit is inclusive of 5% total, not incremental.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm just kind of curious if you can just talk about March demand by geography and auto?
Show response
El-Khoury said all regions expected down, with Q4 growth driven by China. Recovery depends on consumer confidence after Chinese New Year vehicle inventory clears.
how much of that is in terms of the guidance for March, are you planning on some of that delta coming out in March
Show response
Trent clarified exit would happen gradually over multiple quarters, market-dependent. Would keep the business if margins remain healthy.
ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you could talk about the drivers within Aries, and then as you look to kind of the next generations of AI servers
Show response
Management credited Gen 5 durability plus Gen 6 higher attach at 64 Gbps and new inference use cases, and expects the retimer cycle to continue into Gen 7.
Calendar 2026 Q1
in terms of the Scorpio ramp, I know last quarter you talked about it being 20% of revenue.
Show response
CFO said Scorpio becomes the largest product line by year-end with high-radix configs layering in the second half and X exceeding P.
Calendar 2025 Q4
one of the biggest debates still is the acceptance of UA Link for these next-gen designs.
Show response
Management cited AWS and AMD public UA Link endorsements for 2027 and framed NVLink Fusion revenue as comparable to a switch opportunity.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you give us a little bit more color as to what drove the beat and what changed during the quarter?
Show response
CFO attributed the beat to breadth across all three product lines and successful customer deployments versus conservative guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q2
as you look to September, you have $15 million of growth, how to think about areas for Scorpio
Show response
CFO said P-Series volume launched ahead of plan and continues to grow, with X-Series high-volume in 2026, exceeding 10% of revenue for the year.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you walk us through the progression of scale up in your participation and kind of can you maybe set some timing?
Show response
Management framed scale-up as a rich near-term Aries/Scorpio X opportunity dovetailing into a multibillion-dollar UALink opportunity.
Calendar 2024 Q4
as Scorpio ramps, how that mix shifts and what the impacts are shape of gross margins for this year
Show response
CFO gave a clear margin path, ~74% in H1 trending toward the 70% long-term model depending on hardware mix.
LRCXLam Research7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I'm kind of just curious what you're seeing like for like pricing, in the industry and you.
Show response
Explicitly refused the like-for-like pricing question and redirected to the general gross margin driver list.
in terms of just your CapEx plans and in terms of adding this back-end capacity
Show response
Gave a specific CapEx intensity range and emphasised lab investment and footprint densification over raw capacity adds.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to just understand the strength in Reliant, you know, with China down. Is that multinational?
Show response
Tim confirmed Reliant strength came from both multinational and China customers. On NAND shape, Doug said it's probably a little bit second-half weighted.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Maybe I had it wrong. I was you didn't really answer last quarter, but I thought the strength that you highlighted for September was going to be multinational spending in China.
Show response
Doug clarified that September China strength was driven by domestic Chinese customers while multinationals stayed relatively steady quarter-over-quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Obviously, AI is super strong. I think there's a lot of concerns about maybe some inventory in the HPM side.
Show response
Tim cited only 7% of DRAM bits being HBM in 2025 as evidence of a long runway, with Akara conductor etch winning in an expanding DRAM market.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Just kind of curious your conversation with customers. I mean, there's some sense people think, hey. They'll pull in ahead of tariffs.
Show response
Tim said customers are not rethinking plans given the short timeframe since tariff announcements, with most investments being multiyear technology-driven commitments.
Calendar 2024 Q3
Just kind of curious the timing that you'll see those upgrades.
Show response
Management framed the NAND upgrade tailwind as a 2025 story without pinning timing within the year, pending better visibility early next year.
AVGOBroadcom Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
has any XPUs decided to use your Singapore capacity? And how does that fit into that supply picture you put together?
Show response
Hock confirmed the Singapore substrate fab deploys starting fiscal 2027 and addresses a key supply bottleneck, but the answer was brief.
Calendar 2026 Q2
I think there is a lot of concern about share within that customer.
Show response
Hock affirmed a very substantial dollar commitment and conceded some source diversity at Google, but gave no specific value.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Just clarification, Hock, on the greater than $100 billion. I think you said AI chips. I just want to make sure you're clarifying the difference between the ASICs and networking
Show response
Hock confirmed >$100B refers to silicon content, XPUs, switch chips, DSPs, in 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I just wanted to with the follow-on order as well as the fifth customer, can you just maybe describe how you're gonna deliver those? Is it an XPU, or is it a rack?
Show response
Hock confirmed customer four (Anthropic) is a full system sale including Broadcom's networking components, certified final system, not chip-only.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'm just kind of curious your visibility or the timing in terms of when you might be shipping a switched Ethernet scale-up network to your customers?
Show response
Hock said scale-up is rapidly standardizing on Ethernet for Broadcom's hyperscale customers.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I thought I heard you say that AI networking revenue was 76% of networking. I just couldn't get that math right
Show response
Hock confirmed both XPUs and networking were growing, with networking stronger in H2 FY2024 and new 3nm XPUs ramping in H2 FY2025.
COHRCoherent, Inc.5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you just talk about where you are seeing the demand, how broad that is?
Show response
Jim said OCS applications are widening from scale-out to scale-up, which led Coherent to double its TAM to over $4 billion, with demand stronger than 6-12 months ago.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I just want to better understand the tailwinds. You called out 6-inch as being the biggest driver
Show response
Anderson confirmed more of the 6-inch benefit is ahead, and that 1.6T is also beneficial to gross margin as new data rates typically carry better margins early in lifecycle.
I wanted to ask about scale-across just becoming a big talking point. You called it out in the comm business
Show response
Anderson described broad-based demand across pump lasers, ZR/ZR+ transceivers, line cards, amplifiers, and systems, with LTAs in place. Multi-rail expected to layer on top starting first half calendar 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there a way to think about how much that is still capacity constrained? And is there anything beyond EMLs that is constrained
Show response
Jim confirmed EMLs are primary constraint. Significant improvement Q1 to Q2 with still some constraint. InP supply expected to improve sequentially throughout next calendar year from both internal and external sources.
you're doubling capacity, but it takes time to get your lasers in and qualified. So -- is there a way to think about the timing?
Show response
Jim clarified all InP is for internal consumption, not sold externally. Qualification for line expansion is straightforward once initial production qualified. Customers motivated to accelerate qualification.
Show 10 more companies
MRVLMarvell Technology5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I wanted to ask about specifically the CXL opportunity alongside accelerators. How real is that opportunity
Show response
Murphy confirmed CXL is a real and growing opportunity, with XPU-attach on track to exceed $1B; noted memory architecture concerns driving additional CXL adoption beyond original forecasts.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is that custom business growing 30% this year? I just want to figure out the base that you're going to double. And can you talk about that second major XPU customer
Show response
Murphy clarified FY2027 custom growth is above the 20% prior guide but not significantly enough to give a new number. Confidence in second XPU customer driven by product milestone visibility, detailed manufacturing plan alignment, and capacity corridor reserved for FY2028 that is materially higher than indicated. Called the plug very reasonable with significant upward bias.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you did file an 8-K and it says you graded Amazon a warrant for 1 million shares to buy photonic fabric
Show response
Murphy confirmed AWS warrant extension adds photonic fabric as new product category alongside AI custom and networking. Highlighted $2 billion earnout target through end of FY2029 and strong AWS support in acquisition press release.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'm curious if that's still the right level. And when you look at these next generations, I'm glad you're involved with all those
Show response
Murphy confirmed custom gross margins in expected range. Higher-IP products outside XPU carry higher margins. Meintjes emphasized all programs driving accretive operating margin with significant leverage.
Calendar 2024 Q4
You've talked in the past, I think, about getting back to maybe $2 billion-plus run rate
Show response
Confirmed $2B run rate goal with recovery accelerating faster than expected. Combined enterprise/carrier grew 4% in Q3, guided mid-teens in Q4 vs prior expectation of double-digits. Carrier growth driven by new base station L2 processor socket. Still shipping below end market consumption.
KLACKLA Corporation4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
from a supply chain perspective, how long would it take to Prep for a $300 billion WFP market? And can you just talk
Show response
CEO named optical components as the gating item and gave a concrete 12 to 24 month capacity lead time, plus 2029-and-beyond supplier agreements.
just talking about visibility, I know you do not give RPO anymore. I am just kind of curious if there is a way you
Show response
Disclosed a specific backlog figure ahead of the 10-Q and tied it to the second-half and 2027 outlook.
Calendar 2025 Q3
was that always the plan to have DRAM up this much? Or have things been pulled in?
Show response
Bren confirmed increased urgency from DRAM customers on timing driven by HBM pricing dynamics, with all top 3 customers expected to increase investment. Rick added memory may now be the component in shortest supply after packaging was addressed.
Calendar 2024 Q3
a low single-digit growth, it just seems low. So, I'm just kind of curious, one, I think your numbers
Show response
Higgins clarified KLA has not issued a 2025 WFE forecast, only updated its 2024 WFE view to the high-$90 billion range from the mid-90s.
AMATApplied Materials3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I want to ask on NAND. It doubled in the quarter, obviously off small base.
Show response
Brice confirmed strong percentage NAND growth off a small base this year, but said NAND will be a slower grower in the out year versus logic, DRAM and packaging.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I think you said 54% for systems, I mean, it had kind of popped up to that level
Show response
Brice confirmed modest overall gross margin improvement driven by an increasingly valuable product portfolio, tempered by customer mix headwinds as China share declines.
I'm just kind of curious on OpEx, obviously, you're seeing a bigger growth path. So I would expect you to ramp up OpEx
Show response
Brice highlighted controlled Q1 OpEx with ~6% sequential growth in Q2 as they fund EPIC-related projects, but committed to growing spending more slowly than revenue.
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 2 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you think that the older products will stay around longer?
Show response
Lisa explained Turin crossed 50% of revenue, Genoa still strong but Milan declining. Customers prefer newer products for performance, cost, and power efficiency.
I was a little surprised that SG&A is kind of outpacing R&D. I was just kind of curious
Show response
Jean confirmed R&D will grow faster than SG&A for the full year. Lisa added that SG&A investments in enterprise servers, commercial PCs, and mid-market are paying off with share gains.
Calendar 2024 Q4
it seems for your commentary kind of the sequential growth kind of slows for the next kind of three quarters. So I just want to understand the why.
Show response
Lisa Su framed the 1H pause as a product transition, with MI350 driving the re-acceleration; said training is the next priority beyond AMD's strong inference position, with ASIC discussions ongoing.
ADIAnalog Devices2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
curious how to frame the opportunity for ATE, and I don't know if you're willing to break out how big that was.
Show response
Jeff Ambrosi said ATE plus data center is 20% of ADI with strong multiyear tailwind, but declined to break out the ATE dollar figure.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I actually kind of wanted to ask about the plans outsourced versus in-source. So obviously, pre-pandemic, you're leaning more towards external
Show response
Vince explained 2x+ internal capacity expansion focused on 180nm+ nodes for industrial/auto, with external foundry partnerships for finer nodes, and new 300mm capacity at TSMC Japan.
CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I just wanted to ask about the timing on 1.6T SerDes, but also just the design traction
Show response
Bill framed AECs as part of the pluggable transceiver market and set 1.6T timing: some 2H FY27 contribution, larger in FY28; no specific figures.
Calendar 2026 Q2
maybe just speak to some of the lumpiness that you have seen in the past
Show response
CFO gave the Q4 mix (34%/27%/16%/10%), said this quarter's variability was not huge, and reiterated expectations for increasing diversification in FY27.
INTCIntel Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
When you say yields are in a good spot and improving, is there a way to think about where those 18A yields are versus the successful product that you've seen in your history
Show response
Dave said 18A yields adequate for supply but not yet accretive to cost structure, needs all of 2026 to reach margin-accretive levels. 14A off to even better start than 18A at same maturity point in terms of performance and yield.
I had 2. Just on the CapEx, I think you reiterated $18 billion, but I think you spent, I guess, less than I was modeling in Q3. So is that really still the number?
Show response
Dave confirmed $18B with small error bar. 18A not at peak supply until end of decade, a long-lived node with continued investment over time. No significant near-term capacity increases expected.
NXPINXP Semiconductors2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
is the cyclical tailwind slowing? And I guess maybe you can look at the different markets and if you feel differently about them
Show response
Rafael acknowledged Industrial and IoT was above robust seasonality, auto slightly better. Sees elements of a soft up cycle from inventory normalization and company-specific drivers. Slightly more optimistic than last quarter.
it might be a record. I'm just kind of curious the drivers behind that
Show response
Rafael attributed mobile strength to seasonal moves (Q3+Q4 together) and customer-specific strength in secure wallet and custom analog.
SNDKSandisk Corporation2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Any perspective on where high bandwidth flash fits into that?
Show response
Goeckeler clarified HBF is not a substitute for enterprise SSDs but a way to bring more to inference differently. Tiering architecture from a quarter ago is being deployed.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how you're gonna handle OpEx. You know, I think the percentage of revenue is now in half
Show response
CFO confirmed 75% of OpEx is R&D, current OpEx levels are sustainable, with tax rate expected to hover around 14-15% on an ongoing basis as Malaysian loss carryforwards are consumed.
TXNTexas Instruments1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is this now the way to think about it? You'll keep it flat until you see a more robust recovery in the top line
Show response
Rafael confirmed flat to down inventory target at $4.8B with very low obsolescence risk. Comfortable with levels but focused on sustainability of capital allocation.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| MCHP Microchip Technology | 15 | 13%2 of 15 questions |
| ON ON Semiconductor | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
| ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| LRCX Lam Research | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| MRVL Marvell Technology | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| AMAT Applied Materials | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 3 | 67%2 of 3 questions |
- MCHPMicrochip Technology · 15 questions13%2 of 15 questions
- ONON Semiconductor · 9 questions11%1 of 9 questions
- ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- LRCXLam Research · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- AVGOBroadcom Inc. · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- COHRCoherent, Inc. · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- MRVLMarvell Technology · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- KLACKLA Corporation · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- AMATApplied Materials · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. · 3 questions67%2 of 3 questions
Show all 16 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ADI Analog Devices | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| INTC Intel Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SNDK Sandisk Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| TXN Texas Instruments | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- ADIAnalog Devices · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- INTCIntel Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- NXPINXP Semiconductors · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SNDKSandisk Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- TXNTexas Instruments · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q3 | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q1 | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions | 8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 9 |
| 2026 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q29 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q314 questions · challenge rate 14% (2 of 14 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q112 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 12 questions) · 8 companies
- 2026 Q211 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 9 companies
- 2026 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand29
- Revenue Growth24
- Margin15
- Cloud & AI15
- Competitive Dynamics13
- Innovation & R&D10
- Product Launch9
- Capex Investment9
- Supply Chain8
- Cost Pressure6
Show all 17 topics
- Guidance Reliability5
- Inventory4
- Pricing2
- Regulation Policy2
- Trade Tariffs2
- Capital Allocation1
- Geographic Expansion1