Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Bob Brackett

Bernstein · covers Energy, Basic Materials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 7).

Questions
40on tracked calls
Challenge rate
3%1 of 40 questions
Companies
8questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right. See how we grade analysts on earnings-call questions.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 40 of 40 questions from 8 companies

FCXFreeport-McMoRan10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
FCX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

it feels like the slower of the two initiatives you've slipped a little. Should we interpret that as a good thing

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Mark said the delay came from poor ground in the drift, now resolved, and that dry El Nino conditions have helped.

Should we think about a 6- to 12-month trial so that perhaps this time next year we'll know whether it's go or no go

Show response

Kathleen accepted the timeframe and promised quarterly updates.

Calendar 2026 Q2

I am impressed by the Morenci mine rate being up 30% in the second quarter.

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Attributed the roughly 900k tpd material moved to years of equipment-health work, higher availabilities and a transition to 400-ton trucks.

Calendar 2026 Q1

What's the philosophy of those patents? Are they sort of defensive to make sure you can execute on your inventory

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Quirk said the primary focus is recovering copper from 40B+ lb stockpiles, with secondary potential to partner or leverage technology in M&A. Stevens noted 42 billion pounds in stockpiles plus additional below-cut-off-grade material.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Should I interpret that to mean that your level of conviction in the 600 million pounds target has increased over the last year or so?

Innovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Quirk confirmed increased conviction. Additives moved from lab to field deployment in 2025. Heat injection trials at Morenci and El Abra in 2026 will be pivotal for scaling path.

how do you focus on this target in light of what copper tariffs could be going forward? Is that driving this production or just the unit economics in any world driving this production target?

Trade TariffsCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Quirk emphasized leach economics stand on their own at very low incremental cost without significant capital. Baghdad requires roughly $4 copper price to justify investment, not tariff support.

Calendar 2025 Q3

You mentioned hammer drilling with the ability to drill 200 meters a day. If I think about the total vertical relief between sort of haulage and the pit, that is a couple hundred meters. Some of th...

Innovation & R&DSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mark Johnson explained drilling from approximately 400 meters below pit surface. Hammer drills well-proven in similar dewatering applications, first drill expected running in May.

Has that made any adjustments to, say, the pattern by which you would bring PB1N into operations or even PB4 through 7?

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mark Johnson confirmed only PB1 sequencing is affected, PB4+ unaffected. New cave management techniques will apply mine-wide for robustness and safety but won't change the sequence of mining.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Doesn't that just make it more and more obvious that Baghdad two x is going to move forward?

ChallengingCapex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Quirk clarified current spending is principally tailings infrastructure needed regardless of expansion. Not part of the $3.5B project budget. Timing is discretionary.

Calendar 2024 Q4

the Lone Star oxide expansion, for example, where has that moved in terms of discretional capital projects

Innovation & R&DCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Quirk confirmed Safford oxide project essentially complete with strong performance. Jetti trial had mixed results but internal additive work using AI models advancing to commercial pilot at Morenci.

CVXChevron Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
CVX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Does it allow you to take more risk? Does it drive you to increase your exploration budget?

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Nelson said exploration spend rises 50% on the stronger opportunity set, with about 20 wells a year split between infrastructure-led and frontier. Answered.

Calendar 2026 Q2

Are there additional opportunities to create value given that you're sitting there in county with plenty of acres

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Gustavson noted possible Kilby expansion with Microsoft and a broader scalable, disciplined power business. Answered directly.

Calendar 2026 Q1

What policies are helpful during a supply shock, and which are perhaps unhelpful

Regulation PolicyMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Wirth praised strategic reserve releases, Jones Act waivers, Defense Production Act. Criticized price caps, export bans, and windfall taxes as counterproductive. Noted broad portfolio limits exposure to any single bad policy.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Do you have a sense of how much heavy from Venezuela could be absorbed by The US without impacting heavy light dips or without backing up Canadian heavy

PricingMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Wirth deferred detailed market modeling to analysts, noting barrels will redistribute globally and a new equilibrium will establish across flows and differentials. Did not provide specific absorption estimates or rules of thumb.

Calendar 2025 Q3

What's the state of the Permian today? And how would you forecast that, say, into next year?

Competitive DynamicsMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Wirth noted ~250 rigs near multiyear lows, probably sufficient to maintain production. Most operators guiding to flat/reduced CapEx. Basin likely plateauing but remains dynamic and responsive.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Question around the tariff situation and how it might impact either CapEx or projects. What are some of the things you can do to adjust to tariffs

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Wirth quantified limited exposure: 80% of spend on services, strong domestic sourcing. Estimated ~1% impact on shale well cost. Active mitigation with suppliers underway.

Calendar 2024 Q4

What are you seeing there in terms of discipline from the other operators? And is it a trend that's going to continue?

Competitive DynamicsCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Wirth noted CVX has position in one out of every five Permian wells. Observes operators sticking with disciplined, return-oriented strategies, no return to growth-at-all-costs.

FANGDiamondback Energy7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
FANG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Do you think that that horizon works as you move toward the shelf edge?

Show response

Partial: credited resource quality and higher bottom-hole pressure in a deep area, without saying whether the play works toward the shelf edge.

Can you talk about the time horizon over which you see this potential demand pull

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Direct: not near term; over the next decade LNG and Texas demand should pull on Permian gas and raise its value.

Calendar 2025 Q4

One of your peers had talked last week about international opportunities. I'm curious where do international opportunities sit on your list

Competitive DynamicsGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kaes said FANG studied global opportunities to understand cost curve positioning but concluded Permian inventory plus emerging zones strongly favor staying domestic.

the top of the Wolfcamp versus the top of the Barnett are a couple of thousand feet apart. So not a whole lot of vertical depth. what's timing the drilling down there

Cost PressureInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Danny explained different resource requires oil-based mud, extra casing string, larger frac jobs (4 wells/section), and only 1-2 well pads so far. Development-mode techniques will close the gap.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Liberation Day was new. It was very kind of unusual strange environment. And right now, we're just kind of in a normal typical oil down cycle, and therefore, you have more confidence

MacroeconomicCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kaes agreed, Liberation Day was unexpected and raised demand shock fears that didn't materialize; the current debate is about supply, which feels more normal and manageable.

Is that a development strategy or an exploration strategy, if I can sort of crudely contrast

Innovation & R&DCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kaes said Upper Spraberry and Wolfcamp D are moving into development, while Barnett and Woodford are still in delineation with exciting results pending publication.

Calendar 2025 Q1

To what degree are those real levers where you're making choices, or are those most of the crews are about the same and most of the locations are about the same

Competitive DynamicsCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Travis and Kaes explained that the inventory quality is already top-quartile so there's minimal high-grading opportunity, a benefit of having outstanding inventory.

XOMExxonMobil6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
XOM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

What have you learned from Train 1? And how should we think about the pace of ramp of Train 2 and 3?

Show response

Gave Train 2 substantial completion by December and Train 3 mechanical completion in mid-2027.

Calendar 2026 Q2

how did you decide around scheduled maintenance and choices around deferring scheduled maintenance

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Hansen said maintenance was safely deferred given the margin environment, and completed turnarounds ran 30% cheaper and 60% faster than prior cycles.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I'm drawn to your Exhibit 5 where you show March 2026 refining margins

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Darren highlighted record Gulf Coast utilization, 200K bbl/d increase from Feb to Mar, expedited maintenance. Neil noted Energy Products earned $2.8B, up $2B YoY. Comprehensive answer with concrete operational detail.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is there a requirement that assets you add to the portfolio have to be quote unquote advantaged assets

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Woods clarified advantage derives from what ExxonMobil brings to development not necessarily the resource itself. Bringing unique capabilities that deliver more than market or competitors. Not going to change. Convinced there is upside to advantages they can bring going forward. Centralized technology organization means innovation flows freely to highest value opportunity unlike competitors. Also challenged organization on going back to improve recovery from already played-out resources. Mikells added five-year ROCE averaged 11% two percentage points above closest peer demonstrating disciplined capital deployment.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what exactly you acquired from them

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Woods said they developed a unique carbon molecule to graphitize for battery anodes demonstrating 30% faster charging, 30% more range, and four times battery life cycle. Superior Graphite had technology and assets to adapt for fundamentally revolutionized graphitization process versus industry norm dating to 1800s that takes close to a month. Purchased key assets with technology rights. Will work to convert and scale technology for much higher rate and lower cost production. Very focused on outcompeting the Chinese who dominate this market. Must be on very low end of cost of supply curve for long run competitiveness.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how should we think about moving modules, equipment into maybe U.S. projects

Trade TariffsCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Woods said for in-flight contracted FID-ed projects the contracts and positioning provide pretty good shielding from tariff impacts. More exposure on new things coming down the pipe. Organization has many levers to pull to manage impact. Sensitivity exists from Trump administration and governments worldwide to not severely impact energy sector. Governments recognize critical role of energy products in their economies. In discussions around world governments want to understand implications and are taking them into consideration. Company not immune but well positioned to manage and not forecasting significant issues or impact to date.

COPConocoPhillips3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
COP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

One is price realization 101, especially as it pertains to timing given the very sharp moves in crude price we have seen

PricingSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Andy explained the ANS/Dated Brent/WTI split and cash vs earnings timing lag. Ryan addressed subsurface shut-in risks, noting high-quality reservoirs should come back to full capacity.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you talk about what macro world you envision or which you plan for that we're going to see next year

MacroeconomicPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ryan Lance acknowledged some downside pressure near-term but constructive medium-term with 1M bbl/d demand growth continuing. Portfolio has flex both directions.

Calendar 2024 Q4

your strategy clearly has been a more global LNG approach. Can you talk about comparing and contrasting those strategies

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ryan Lance acknowledged inbounds on power deals, noted large gas production, commercial power desk, and Permian land position as natural advantages.

EQTEQT Corporation3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
EQT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is there a limit to growth there where effectively the stage length gets too long

Innovation & R&DCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Rice said EQT will likely raise normal lateral lengths toward 15 thousand feet, balanced against acreage recovery constraints, with records showing what's possible.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you talk about what might be inbounds and out of bounds for the source of capital projects you've put to work to attract that demand

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Toby defined in-bounds as leveraging the existing 3,000+ mile pipeline base with extensions to new demand hubs; cup is full with current opportunity set.

Calendar 2025 Q3

What's your appetite to explore some of those adjacencies, and maybe what time frame

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jeremy drew a clear line, no speculative trading, focus on production optimization; minimum 4 MTPA of LNG capacity needed to be competitive internationally, which they now have.

Show 2 more companies
APAAPA Corporation2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
APA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you talk about maybe the size of prospects and maybe the chance of success

Geographic ExpansionCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Tracey described Cretaceous targets and the Namibia conjugate-margin analog; specifics pending work with ENI.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you talk to your exploration philosophy for gas out there? Is it efficient from the peer? Or is there some appetite to step out

Geographic ExpansionInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Christmann described a regional approach: moved from low-hanging fruit near infrastructure to deeper gas-prone structures historically avoided. Henderson added teams stood up specifically for gas portfolio, reprocessed seismic data, and are building longer-term gas exploration inventory.

NEMNewmont2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
NEM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

third-party intervention, would that be arbitration or litigation?

Show response

CLO gave a deliberately vague answer on the dispute resolution mechanism, leaving open whether arbitration or litigation would be pursued if the iterative process with Barrick fails.

there was an identified event of default related to evidence of mismanagement, diversion of resources at the JV

Show response

CLO acknowledged the range of remedies from cure to more consequential outcomes but declined to discuss specifics, expressing hope for a meeting of the minds without third-party intervention.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
FCX Freeport-McMoRan1010%1 of 10 questions
CVX Chevron Corporation70%none of 7 questions
FANG Diamondback Energy70%none of 7 questions
XOM ExxonMobil60%none of 6 questions
COP ConocoPhillips30%none of 3 questions
EQT EQT Corporation30%none of 3 questions
APA APA Corporation2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
NEM Newmont2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • FCX
    Freeport-McMoRan · 10 questions
    10%1 of 10 questions
  • CVX
    Chevron Corporation · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • FANG
    Diamondback Energy · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • XOM
    ExxonMobil · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • COP
    ConocoPhillips · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • EQT
    EQT Corporation · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • APA
    APA Corporation · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • NEM
    Newmont · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q1425%1 of 4 questions4
2025 Q2No questions recorded——
2025 Q380%none of 8 questions6
2025 Q470%none of 7 questions5
2026 Q170%none of 7 questions6
2026 Q250%none of 5 questions5
2026 Q360%none of 6 questions4
  1. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q2No questions recorded
  4. 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 6 companies
  5. 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
  6. 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
  7. 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
  8. 2026 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D14
  • Capex Investment13
  • Competitive Dynamics9
  • Macroeconomic6
  • Pricing4
  • Demand3
  • Geographic Expansion3
  • Capital Allocation3
  • Margin3
  • Cost Pressure3
Show all 16 topics
  • Supply Chain3
  • Regulation Policy3
  • Trade Tariffs3
  • Revenue Growth2
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • M&A1