Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Brandon Bingham
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q1 (6 quarters).
- Questions
- 32on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 32 questions
- Companies
- 5questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 6with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 32 of 32 questions from 5 companies
EPDEnterprise Products Partners L.P.9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
what you guys are seeing for refined products and crude and what that might mean for your export business
Show response
Jay quantified crude export volume growth of 70K bbl/d in Q4 and another 70K in Q1, with potential to exceed 1 million barrels a day including SPR flows.
what you think the go-forward cadence should be for Permian processing capacity
Show response
Natalie confirmed EPD trending to two Permian processing plants per year, driven by increasing gas-to-oil ratios.
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you see any potential for more of the same types of deals on the horizon given this recent M and A news
Show response
Jim characterized the M&A landscape as less target-rich than before, implying fewer attractive gathering system acquisitions available.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there a chance that some of these projects get sidelined? Or maybe conversely, do you think there is a chance that Permian growth actually accelerates
Show response
Natalie said 4.5 Bcf/day coming online but won't fully feel it until late 2026. Tony reiterated additional takeaway is healthy for the basin.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could you remind us how much is currently committed? And then where do you see the most pressing need to deploy capital
Show response
Jim cited $2.2B committed for 2026 and highlighted ethylene distribution/export as exciting growth area with per-pound rather than per-gallon fees.
would you consider maybe increasing activity and equity investments potentially into areas where you currently do not participate or operate any assets maybe like in LNG
Show response
Randy's terse response made clear EPD will not make passive equity investments in LNG or other non-core areas.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you see maybe a growing opportunity to capitalize on some of these defers prices
Show response
Jim emphasized fit with existing system is paramount. Everything acquired or built extends what they already have.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you just talk about what margins were baked into that $200 million number and how those compare to what you're currently seeing
Show response
Chris confirmed PDH margins are formulaic cost-plus toll-based. The $200M target is incremental EBITDA from higher utilization in 2025 vs 2024.
how sticky those volumes are and kind of how you see that progressing throughout 2025
Show response
Jim explained volumes are sticky as they reflect wellhead growth flowing through the integrated value chain from processing to fractionation to export.
TRGPTarga Resources8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how much opportunity is there to continue that trend of plants in service early
Show response
Jen explained conservative initial dates allow for pull-forwards, with teams constantly challenged to accelerate while maintaining quality.
Is there potential for something more than just a modest pulling forward of incremental pads thinking '27, '28 and beyond
Show response
Jen highlighted multiple plant adds through 2027 and the largest system positioning Targa to handle growth above expectations. Very bullish on 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if you could maybe break that out between oil, NGLs and gas, especially you have a dollar budgeted for 2026 for Waha prices
Show response
Kneale noted well-hedged equity volumes. More direct exposure to NGL prices than gas. Below fee floors for the vast majority of last 2 years, higher prices would be upside. Gas marketing has been strongest contributor to outsized gains in 2024-2025. NGL contango could unlock storage optionality at Mont Belvieu.
Just wondering what it would take to see you come in at the higher end and what you kind of see as some of the various puts and takes there
Show response
Kneale identified two biggest upside variables: stronger-than-expected volume growth (faster wells, more gas per well) and marketing gains across NGL, gas, and exports beyond the conservative assumptions in guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q3
just how we can maybe think about the payout target of 40% to 50% and how that might shape up through that point
Show response
Meloy noted the 40-50% target is a multi-year average, with some years above and below. Post-2027, priorities include continued dividend increases, opportunistic buybacks, and potential leverage reduction, with strong positioning to pursue all simultaneously.
is it just possible that maybe some of those illustrative plans outlined in the slides starting in 2028 could be pulled forward into earlier years? Or is maybe they're a way to, instead of a 1 to 2...
Show response
Kneale tied the cadence to producer activity and commercial execution. Incremental commercial success already caused some accelerations. Whether growth is low double-digit or high single-digit will dictate medium-term plant additions.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if there's been any discussions with customers or if there's any contemplations within the development schedules that you're getting for delineation efforts on deeper benches
Show response
McDonie confirmed early-stage deeper zone interest (Woodford Barnett) in both basins, with good economics expected though still in initial testing phase.
if you might consider any other alternative levers like a special dividend or something
Show response
Kneale reiterated the all-of-the-above framework: growing dividend, opportunistic buybacks, strong balance sheet. No indication of special dividends.
OKEONEOK6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Could you help frame up how the new volumes expectations compared to maybe the various midpoints within the businesses?
Show response
Walt said the guidance increase was balanced across segments. Stronger Q1 volumes projected forward, with potential for additional upside from higher commodity-driven producer activity.
I wanted to maybe talk about your Permian processing capacity portfolio and how you see that sort of evolving in light of all this resilient gas production?
Show response
Sheridan detailed the Shaderfax relocation, 110M/day Delaware expansion, and 300M/day Bighorn plant. In active RFP discussions for additional Delaware capacity, with more expansions likely in 2027+.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I was just wondering what you guys are assuming price-wise within each of those buckets and how that might compare to current strip prices
Show response
Sheridan noted spreads widen with higher crude, commodity exposure mainly in G&P with systematic hedging leaving only ~25% open. Higher crude prices from the $55-$60 base would provide upside on spread business.
Just curious if you have anything to share. What is kind of the latest and greatest there
Show response
Sheridan confirmed construction on track, strong commercial momentum with substantial customer interest, and excellent collaboration with MPLX at multiple organizational levels.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if there's any maybe more singles, doubles, things that aren't being highlighted that you're seeing could kind of stack up
Show response
Sheridan detailed numerous small optimizations: redirecting trucks between EnLink/Medallion terminals, buying more product on Medallion system, connecting Mid-Con G&P systems.
how much of that, if any, is going to be hitting 2025? And then just kind of how we should think about '26 versus '25 growth spend?
Show response
Walt confirmed minimal 2025 Big Horn spend, with larger projects rolling off in 2026 and CapEx trending downward.
KMIKinder Morgan5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
talk a little more thematically about some of the dynamics you're seeing in the refined products market
Show response
Dang explained Western Gateway as a solution for California and Arizona to access domestic supply instead of relying on international markets as California refining capacity decreases.
Is any of that tied to the dynamics created by the Iranian conflict?
Show response
Dang characterized impact as limited: modest crude price benefit on 10% unhedged barrels in CO2 segment. No demand impact seen yet. Long-term LNG demand boost possible.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what you guys think the longer-term market dynamics are in California for the refined products market
Show response
Sital declined to speculate on California refining market but noted the West line reversal creates capacity that can grow with changes in California refining. Also provides access to Las Vegas via Calnev line.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Could you maybe discuss some of the incremental opportunities you see maybe outside the Haynesville
Show response
Sital listed lean Eagle Ford (low nitrogen benefits for LNG efficiency), Permian, and potential Utica/Marcellus volumes via Tennessee network. Emphasized all-of-the-above basin approach since LNG, power, and organic LDC demand all compete for molecules. Bakken egress on residue side also comes into play as demand matures.
Could you discuss some of the areas you see outperforming expectations in 2H
Show response
David cited natural gas capacity sales, Outrigger contribution, parking/loan services, and Jones Act tankers as H2 outperformance drivers, consistent with H1 trends. Some timing between Q1 and Q2 affected H1 appearance.
WMBWilliams Companies4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
deals announced recently for gas pipeline assets, and the chatter suggests the marks were quite healthy
Show response
Porter redirected focus to PI partnerships rather than pipeline asset sales. Said PI projects are highly attractive to potential partners.
Wondering what some of the latest and greatest commentary you're hearing from producer customers in that basin
Show response
Larsen said producers are cautious near-term but recognize huge demand pull coming. Zamarin added Haynesville rig counts are up and DUCs are building.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if you could provide some detail around some of the drivers behind it, activity schedules or just. Whatever you're seeing baked into that outlook
Show response
Armstrong said supply must match LNG export doubling and power/industrial demand growth. Haynesville needs approximately 10 Bcf/day of growth over next 8 years to balance the market.
if you could maybe provide some incremental detail about the 30 or so projects in the backlog
Show response
Porter said projects cover industrial, power, and LNG customers with consistent track record of converting backlog to guidance. Each project has individual probability weighting.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| TRGP Targa Resources | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| OKE ONEOK | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| KMI Kinder Morgan | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| WMB Williams Companies | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 5 |
- 2024 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q110 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 5 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand15
- Capex Investment9
- Revenue Growth6
- Capital Allocation6
- M&A5
- Macroeconomic4
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Margin4
- Guidance Reliability3
- Supply Chain2
Show all 13 topics
- Pricing2
- Geographic Expansion1
- Innovation & R&D1