Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Brent Bracelin

Piper Sandler · covers Technology, Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q3 (4 quarters).

Questions
15on tracked calls
Challenge rate
13%2 of 15 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
4with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 15 of 15 questions from 7 companies

VEEVVeeva Systems Inc.6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
VEEV company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

we'd love to get your thoughts on one, what's been the initial customer reaction feedback to the news

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Peter said customers had needed Band-Aids to make IQVIA and Veeva work together. Now they can explore new possibilities. IQVIA no longer a CRM competitor. Healthy competition remains in reference data, Open Data, and Compass.

What drove the momentum in my side in R&D this quarter

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Brian cited broad-based execution in a stable environment. Pipeline firming up for Q3 and Q4. No specific product or deal called out.

Calendar 2025 Q2

What's unique about horizontal CRM that gets you excited about what Veeva is thinking about here

ChallengingProduct LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Peter said Veeva is more expert at large enterprises, sees the market as needing innovation, and is excited about fundamental technology breakthroughs and the PBC differentiation.

Any other drivers you would flag? I know data cloud's early, but is there a contribution there

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Brian noted broad-based execution with strong R&D growth at 19% guidance. Crossix outperformance was predominantly from usage-based business, which can be lumpy quarter to quarter.

Calendar 2025 Q1

What's the momentum you're seeing on the expand side? Are you seeing larger seven-figure deals

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Peter said Data Cloud interest has increased significantly in six months but Compass is still brand-by-brand, with enterprise ELAs about a year out.

Calendar 2024 Q4

something reads and feels a little different relative to the top 20 appetite to lean into the broader Veeva portfolio here

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Peter confirmed a bit more appetite in Development Cloud for comprehensive portfolio adoption, driven by more mature products and another year of track record.

MDBMongoDB, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
MDB company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

do you see an opportunity to maybe get a little more aggressive on M&A, small tech tuck-ins

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike said the focus is organic growth and the buyback; small tuck-ins or roadmap accelerations are optional given the cash-rich balance sheet.

This was the first quarter where we actually saw Atlas growth reaccelerate.

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dev touted 26% Atlas growth at scale and strong customer adds but declined to call a bottom, saying 'Our guide is our guide.'

Calendar 2025 Q1

it does look like normalized growth after accounting for the unused credits last year is decelerating a little bit more

ChallengingRevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Serge reiterated expected stable Atlas consumption growth in FY26 and walked through the puts and takes, noting the exit rate matters more than the average.

SNOWSnowflake Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
SNOW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

How much of the acceleration here in Q2 and surprise was driven by higher consumption in the core

Revenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Mike said the core drove the upside, with meaningful contribution from newer workloads and a bit from Crunchy.

Calendar 2025 Q1

The guide implies an acceleration for the first time into the second half in 3.5 years. What's driving the optimism on acceleration?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mike cited both a strong core and new products going into production, plus new-customer acquisition momentum.

ADBEAdobe Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ADBE company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

I wanted to double-click into the demand linearity you saw in the quarter

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

David detailed broad-based demand consistent with historical patterns. Acrobat MAU up 23%, Express 10x engagement from Acrobat, AI Assistant 2x QoQ usage growth.

CRMSalesforce, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
CRM company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

I wanted to ask about the new foundations offering. This seems like a new strategic approach to multi-cloud packaging

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Benioff explained Foundations gives all customers access to the full product suite, noting many Sales Cloud customers lack Service Cloud and vice versa. Strategy aims to drive cross-cloud adoption.

FIGFigma, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
FIG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

I was hoping you could maybe help size the prototyping market that it addresses

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dylan reframed Make as prompt-to-shipped-app expanding creation personas, without sizing the market.

Show 1 more company
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
MSFT company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

Commercial RPO, I think, increased 39 billion sequentially

Revenue GrowthDemandCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Hood confirmed a large OpenAI Azure commitment was a major driver but also cited broad core motions: renewals, E5 expansion, and additional new/existing Azure commitments.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
VEEV Veeva Systems Inc.617%1 of 6 questions
MDB MongoDB, Inc.333%1 of 3 questions
SNOW Snowflake Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ADBE Adobe Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
CRM Salesforce, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
FIG Figma, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
MSFT Microsoft Corporation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • VEEV
    Veeva Systems Inc. · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • MDB
    MongoDB, Inc. · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions
  • SNOW
    Snowflake Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ADBE
    Adobe Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • CRM
    Salesforce, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • FIG
    Figma, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • MSFT
    Microsoft Corporation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q1425%1 of 4 questions4
2025 Q2520%1 of 5 questions3
2025 Q330%none of 3 questions2
  1. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth11
  • Demand9
  • Cloud & AI3
  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • Product Launch2
  • M&A1
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Guidance Reliability1