Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Brian Meredith
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 112on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 16%18 of 112 questions
- Companies
- 13questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 112 of 112 questions from 13 companies
KMPRKemper Corporation14 questions · 5 reporting periods · 6 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
you continue to have adverse reserve development on there. Maybe you can talk to me a little bit about what's going on there?
Show response
CFO contextualized adverse development as within normal reserving range (50-55%), improving from prior quarters, concentrated in older accident years 2022-2023 now 3.5-4 years developed.
I noticed you're now down to a 225% RBC ratio. You've only got $80 million of holdco liquidity
Show response
CFO noted RBC within 225-300% operating range, reminded that entity-level RBC doesn't reflect full ecosystem capital at holdco. $750M total liquidity. Expects results to improve and grow capital.
The technology initiatives you're doing, is any of that on pricing and underwriting? Or is it all more agency and process productivity?
Show response
President detailed investments across data infrastructure, new BVP product with advanced pricing, digital agent/customer capabilities for efficiency. CFO added cloud migration and process improvements.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm wondering if you could tell us what the profitability kind of breakdown is between California and then Florida, Texas
Show response
President of Kemper Auto gave clear state-by-state breakdown: California ~105%, Florida and Texas both in target 95-97% range. Profit issues driven predominantly by California.
why are you shrinking in the other states right now if your profitability is fine?
Show response
President explained deliberate wait-and-see on Florida tort reform durability plus need for expense efficiency to improve product competitiveness. Stabilized PIF in Florida, sequential growth in Texas.
given the consistent adverse development you've been seeing, how comfortable are you with current year profitability
Show response
President detailed focus on artisan contractors and small businesses, avoiding nuclear verdict segments. Current year pricing adequate, opportunistically strengthening BI rate.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the software write-off in the quarter, what is that exactly related to? And does that have any effect or a part of your, call it, specialty business?
Show response
CFO clearly separated the $22M software write-off as Kemper Preferred runoff business (90% complete), no relation to specialty auto. Remaining policies predominantly in New York.
What's the run rate underlying loss ratio right now in the third quarter ex kind of current year development?
Show response
CFO detailed mixed development: favorable on comp/collision metals coverages, adverse on current year BI even in current accident year. No significant current year adjustments in CV or PPA.
I meant more about process right underlying process or changes that maybe the changes within claims or systems processes
Show response
President described end-to-end cost management focus shifting from material damage to liability side, accelerating data science into claims, leveraging AI for next-best-action automation.
Calendar 2025 Q1
What are your thoughts now with respect to M&A? And is there any kind of opportunities out there given somewhat dissettled environment
Show response
CEO declined specific M&A commentary but reiterated capital priorities: organic growth first, then inorganic if it makes franchise better. Signaled offensive posture.
Joe, I'm just curious, what was the benefit in the quarter? Maybe talk about a little bit going forward of the increase in the California minimum limits on written premium growth
Show response
CEO clarified California minimum limits added 6-7 points to written premium growth. Guided written premium growth to normalize to high teens going forward.
Calendar 2024 Q4
some adverse development on the commercial auto line. I know you've got a different commercial auto book than your typical kind of commercial auto book
Show response
CFO explained $1.9M total adverse development was end-of-year cleanup with bolstering on commercial side for extra contractual obligations. No significant change in trends.
longer term, how wise is it to have California being 50%, 51% of your overall business mix?
Show response
CEO provided comprehensive response showing California declining from 90% pre-Infinity to ~50%, with new business volumes already at lower California share. Systematic diversification underway.
Any way to quantify the lift we'll see on that billion aid of California auto premium from these minimum limits as we look into 2025?
Show response
Management clarified that minimum limit policies represent 90%+ of California book and saw ~30% premium increase on liability side, but noted this does not meaningfully change margin.
HIGHartford (The)13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Maybe give us what the impact of the fire loss were year-over-year so we can get kind of a baseline
Show response
Beth declined to give a precise fire-loss figure but framed MLC's YTD 93.3 combined ratio and expected roughly a point of improvement in H2.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is business kind of flowing back to the standard markets from the E&S markets at this point in the cycle? Are we kind of heading in that position
Show response
Chris characterized as stable. Moe split: binding E&S flow still strong with no MGA impact; Global Specialty brokerage sees some flow back to admitted in larger risk space and persistent MGA impact in capacity-building areas.
Are we getting to a point where maybe we're going to see some leveling out in comp and maybe some improvement
Show response
Chris bluntly said no to pricing improvement. Pricing relatively flat Q4 to Q1. California is outlier. Medical severity 3-3.5% within 5% assumption. Book behaving well so no rate increase expected soon. Moe confirmed top and bottom line exactly on expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q4
What impact do you think that could potentially have as this unemployment picture looks a little bit more challenging here going forward on group disability loss ratios
Show response
Chris noted diversified national book across industries including growing healthcare and tech sectors. Renewing 40% of book provides opportunity to reprice if trends change. High confidence in team's ability to manage through any cycle.
your expense ratio is a couple of 100 basis points higher than your big peers. When are we gonna start seeing some of that technology stuff manifest itself
Show response
Chris provided specific targets: BI below 30% by end of 2027, PI below 25% same timeframe, Benefits to 25% range. Driven by market share growth operating leverage plus AI/technology investments creating durable differentiation.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Do you expect that trend to continue here? And do you think there'll be at a point here in the next, call it, 12 to 18 months where maybe rate there is in line with trend
Show response
Chris characterized pricing move as minimal (slight negative to slight positive). No meaningful 2026 rate filings expected given profitable line with stable trends. Reserve releases steady and predictable over 3 years.
if I think about the other lines of business, you talk about rate has been in excess of trend and pricing has been excess trend for a long time. Are you holding those picks kind of constant right now
Show response
Chris provided detailed attribution: 0.5pt difference driven by higher incentive comp (expense not loss), national account mix (higher UCR), and slight prior year non-CAT property favorability. Expects full year slightly below 88.6%.
Calendar 2025 Q2
There's been a lot of discussion on calls already this quarter about big price decreases, 10%, 15%. It doesn't necessarily mean it's unprofitable down 10%, 15%
Show response
Chris gave detailed property pricing breakdown: BOP property +14.7%, general industry 6.1%, large/wholesale declining but adequate margins and <10% of total BI property. Moe confirmed rates holding up in core small/middle.
Are you seeing a little more appetite admitted versus E&S? And then also on that topic, we've been hearing some complaints about some MGAs
Show response
Moe confirmed E&S flow still strong, no major pivot back to admitted. MGA disruption felt in financial lines and specialty pockets but not core admitted retail small/middle space.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Renewal written price increases in small business, they jump around a little bit. But we saw it go from 7.4% to 6.2%. Is that a mix issue
Show response
Chris clarified comp mix effect in Q1 weighting. Ex-comp small business pricing at 12.9%. Moe added E&S binding marginally down but BOP and auto strong.
could you talk a little bit about what tariffs could potentially mean for lost costs as you think about it in auto insurance and any area in commercial insurance
Show response
Chris provided comprehensive response covering one-time step change expectation, prudent Q1 loss picks with conservatism, reaction time in file/use vs prior approval states, and rate filing readiness.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is it possible to give us a little more color on perhaps exposure to the LA wildfires here kind of what your share in the area is
Show response
Beth provided detailed reinsurance program structure. Personal lines share less than 1% in California. Commercial exposure larger through Middle Market and BOP.
what was the kind of favorable non-cat kind of property loss? And then, any current year development when you increase at IBNR
Show response
Chris provided specific non-cat property benefit of 0.9 points vs prior year and 1.5 points better than expectations. Direct answer.
EGEverest Group12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
should we be expecting more of this volatility in excess non-cat weather kind of like you reported
Show response
Williamson pushed back, citing a long track record in the products and reduced severe convective storm exposure over time.
What do you think the impact has been in the reinsurance marketplace, call it, midyear renewals
Show response
Williamson framed third-party capital as growing only on the margins relative to total industry capitalization and expects no major dislocation.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Thinking about 2026 here and kind of what's going on with property cat. Property pro rata, what's kind of the appetite
Show response
Jim said the pro rata team has done an outstanding job, event limits minimize cat exposure, but rising underlying property insurance rate softness is being watched carefully.
we're seeing a lot of M&A happening right now in the P&C industry, and it's pretty typical for this part of the cycle
Show response
Jim said M&A would have to clear the buyback hurdle, be small, on-strategy, low risk, and add capabilities or distribution EG couldn't build organically.
Calendar 2025 Q3
why is that important? And why not just kind of stick with your kind of core competencies here right now
Show response
Jim said diversification comes via Global Specialties growth, Asia expansion, and the new Global W&S division under Jason Keen; bolt-on M&A is possible but only with modest execution risk.
any way you can provide maybe some details on how you think the ADC reinsurers arrived at the attachment point?
Show response
Jim highlighted Longtail Re's credibility and the no-loss-corridor feature, saying the stronger reserve base was a precursor to getting $1.2B of cover above carry without a corridor.
Calendar 2025 Q2
where you did see some meaningful increase in exposure was kind of at the 1 in 20 and 1 in 50 year
Show response
Jim said 1-in-20 to 1-in-50 is the heart of current cat programs, not 'down low'; that's been EG's consistent sweet spot for two years and helps rate achievement.
have you made any changes as far as the build-out of the, call it, European or International Insurance
Show response
Jim said the main strategic shift was doubling down in existing 12 markets rather than opening new ones; business is approaching $2B premium and now turning an underwriting profit.
Calendar 2025 Q1
would you say that the returns on capital in your business are getting better, getting worse, or staying the same?
Show response
Jim said economic return on capital is improving in both divisions, driven by market opportunities and mix fundamentals.
any changes you're anticipating or seeing with terms and conditions on any of the property reinsurance
Show response
Jim said terms and conditions remain disciplined, hours clauses, attachment points, other contractual terms holding firm at midyear.
Calendar 2024 Q4
any updates on what you think the tax rate will look like in 2025?
Show response
Mark guided a 17%-18% effective tax rate for 2025, up from 11%-12%, reflecting the 15% Bermuda rate.
any thoughts on what cash flow could look like this year given some of the actions you're taking with the portfolio?
Show response
Mark expects cash flow in a similar range to 2024, with natural catastrophes as the biggest swing factor around the ~$5B baseline.
ACGLArch Capital Group10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
ex the program business that I know you are intentionally running off, how has the growth been?
Show response
Papadopoulo said retention beat expectations through the Allianz systems migration but gave no growth or retention figures.
I mean, typically, we have seen as the market rolls into a soft market, M&A actually picks up.
Show response
Papadopoulo was direct: M&A is strategic build-versus-buy rather than a capital alternative, and current prices are expensive.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I noticed your PMLs did not decline. That kind of stayed the same at 4.1% versus your 1/1 disclosure, but you're declining property cut and everything.
Show response
Francois explained 4/1 renewal has limited impact on peak zone (Florida Tri-County). Expects more meaningful PML changes at 6/1 and 7/1 renewals. At 1/1, held onto most business and grew slightly, gave up rate but found returns still attractive. Nicolas confirmed Florida is still green, so they maintained and tried to grow at the margin.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the underlying loss ratio improvement in insurance, is that a direct result of some of the actions being taken there? Is that something else?
Show response
Francois clarified insurance loss ratio improvement was NOT from MCE non-renewals (not yet earned). Improvement came from other factors. Program non-renewal benefits should come through as they earn in, providing stable-to-improving loss ratios.
I wonder if you could talk a little bit about the substance base tax credits that Bermuda came out with
Show response
Francois said consultation paper out with comments submitted. Biggest unknown is transition credit pace. Expects clarity and near-finality by first half of December, must be enacted before year-end for 2025 financials. Expected to be substantial. Would reduce operating expenses across all segments, investment income, and corporate, not the tax rate.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could you give maybe an update on where we stand with Bermuda tax credits, not the DTA stuff, but the credits that I know the Bermuda Monetary Authority has been talking about providing?
Show response
Francois said no official news yet. Optimistic about outcome. Involves negotiation with Bermuda government and OECD oversight. Expected developments in late Q3 with actionable items in Q4. Would come through as reduction to operating expenses across all segments, investment income, and corporate, not a tax rate impact.
Can you scale how much business is that? And did you just start nonrenewing? I was surprised you said it's another 12 to 18 months before we're going to see the benefits
Show response
Nicolas said ~1/3 of MidCorp was program business, not the reason for the acquisition. Underwriting actions taken, MGA notifications given. Effects start 2026 on earned basis. Francois clarified written basis changes beginning H2 2025, but earned basis takes the full 12-18 months.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How are you thinking about the potential impact of tariffs on your business?
Show response
Francois said tariffs have no significant direct impact since insurance is transacted locally. Possible indirect impact on trade volumes affecting investments, but too early to tell.
Y'all have typically done a reasonable amount of structured in your reinsurance. You're you're good at that surplus fleet, that kind of stuff. Are you seeing how much opportunity here
Show response
Nicolas said structured reinsurance is opportunistic, not targeted. Some traditional capacity returning. Arch benefits from multi-line relationships that generate opportunities organically.
what are you assuming right now in your reserving and pricing with respect to GL, call it, loss trend?
Show response
Francois gave specific loss trend assumptions: 12-14% for excess casualty, ~5-6% for primary E&S and low-limit casualty.
CBChubb Limited10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
about admitted markets getting call it, more competitive in taking business back from the E&S
Show response
Greenberg sees some migration back to admitted, classic softening pattern. Notes admitted markets show much more discipline than E&S, especially on property side.
could talk about terms and conditions. hearing a little bit more about some softening terms and conditions from people
Show response
Greenberg said T&C changes are marginal so far. Noted Chubb values T&C changes in pricing, deductibles, BI waiting periods, CPI adjustments are not treated as side items.
Calendar 2025 Q4
looking at the U.S. commercial lines, North American commercial lines business. Your underlying margins have been incredibly consistent
Show response
Evan declined forward guidance but gave confidence around underwriting income growth contribution to EPS. Mix changes mitigate lines where price lags loss cost.
there's been some press and some regulators talking about excess profit laws and implementing them. I'm just curious your thoughts
Show response
Evan pushed back, homeowners loss costs rising 7.5-8%, liability inflation 7-9% multiples of CPI. Politicizing affordability creates availability problems that exacerbate the issue.
Calendar 2025 Q3
give us a little update on the global A&H business. Kind of what's the outlook there
Show response
Evan: one-off large NA customer non-renewal; international A&H +7.5%, Asia/LatAm strong, travel and digital direct-to-consumer (Nubank, Grab, ByteDance) driving growth.
you could talk a little bit about the reinsurance business. Obviously, a big decline in premium this quarter
Show response
Evan: reinsurance is opportunistic trade; won't chase property cat unless priced adequately; disciplined on pricing models; shrinks when inadequate.
Calendar 2025 Q2
we're seeing written pricing, call it, below loss trend, it looks like -- are we at a period now for that business
Show response
Evan pushed back, headline oversimplifies. Casualty ahead of trend, property repricing, financial lines firming, comp improving. Puts and takes; no deterioration envisioned.
a number of large health care insurance companies have had some issues with medical cost inflation
Show response
Evan: comp medical trends driven by different factors than health insurers; Chubb books conservative reserves ahead of observed trends; not seeing the spillover.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how do you think about allocating capital into areas that maybe the kind of political
Show response
Evan affirmed steady-as-she-goes global strategy; explicitly said no additional capital being deployed to China, 'our exposure is our exposure.'
Calendar 2024 Q4
Evan, I’m wondering if you can dig into a little bit the Cal fire loss estimate that you’ve given out there
Show response
Evan directly answered: ground-up adjusters' estimate, includes FAIR plan assessment, excludes subrogation credit. No deflection.
TRVThe Travelers Companies, Inc.10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
workers' compensation insurance, we've seen some reports out there about maybe longer recovery times happening
Show response
Dan said recent PYD shows no severity pressure and that reserves still assume reversion to a higher long-term severity trend; Alan added economic activity is built into assumptions.
how reasonable is to think that growth is going to actually pick up there, given just the competitive dynamics?
Show response
Michael acknowledged rate is broadly decreasing in personal auto and framed strategy as matching price to risk rather than cutting price, without committing to a growth outcome.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Anything positive that's developing here that maybe curves that kind of loss trend on tort inflation?
Show response
Alan said the tort environment remains very challenging but more states are reacting to it and third-party litigation financing disclosure requirements are spreading, both modest positive developments.
what is gonna enable, you know, Travelers to actually maybe recoup some of the market share you've lost over the
Show response
Michael cited three competitive advantages in the IA channel: durable agent relationships, digitization investments for ease of doing business, and the package value proposition; Dan added that Travelers auto PIF is higher than five years ago.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How do you think about kind of the effect of tort inflation and kind of what that's doing with your underlying
Show response
Alan confirmed tort inflation remains elevated and baked into loss picks and pricing across the market.
Do you expect kind of retention to kind of trend back towards, call it, the mid-eighties?
Show response
Michael said Travelers expected retention to recover toward an 84 but the competitive auto environment has kept it a couple of points below the historical run rate, though focus remains on both new business and retention improvement.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Surety bond growth, you know, given what we're seeing, you know, potential for economic activity
Show response
Jeff acknowledged a government component in large projects but said Travelers' high-credit-quality contractor book and long-term infrastructure bond demand leaves the surety business well positioned.
is it fair to just assume whatever the cat losses were in the quarter and the remainder up to $4 billion
Show response
Dan clarified the cat program mechanics: each event has a $100M Travelers retention before any dollar goes toward the $4B aggregate attachment on the cat treaty.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the underlying combined ratios is as good as it's been in 20-years. I'm just curious, in your thoughts, are we
Show response
Alan declined to forecast BI margins but noted Travelers loves the business, pricing, stability and retention, and said RPC near double digits is near the highest it's been over a long period of time.
I'm curious your comments and thoughts on the tort environment right now. I always appreciate your comments on it.
Show response
Alan said tort is front and center for Travelers with growing recognition of the burden on businesses and consumers; some states have reacted with reforms and third-party litigation financing disclosure, which are positive developments.
Show 7 more companies
AIGAmerican International Group9 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Do you think maybe look more towards inorganic versus organic?
Show response
Eric Andersen said organic versus strategic-transaction growth is increasingly hard to distinguish as underwriters take a client view, citing 9% growth in the quarter and 13% in the first half. He said AIG will keep pursuing strategic opportunities that deliver the right returns and bring new talent and broader client relationships.
What is the impact that's having on your core loss ratios?
Show response
Eric Andersen and Keith Walsh explained that pulling back in property and growing casualty lifts both the acquisition ratio and the loss ratio, but stressed that accident year combined ratio adjusted margins have largely held as strong personal-insurance results and expense-ratio progress offset commercial loss-ratio pressure.
Calendar 2026 Q1
your thoughts on deploying that excess capital, thoughts on M&A and maybe how to increase the operating leverage
Show response
Andersen focused on executing existing strategy over the next 12-24 months rather than signaling new M&A. Zaffino added that they worked hard to build capital position for option value, and as the market gets complicated, opportunity comes with it.
Got you. Got you. And in terms and conditions, anything you can say there?
Show response
Zaffino acknowledged some softening in terms and conditions in competitive markets but characterized it as not concerning or representing a trend across the portfolio. Noted it depends on industry group, size and class.
we've also heard from some companies, you're starting to see some cracks in Casualty, maybe some moderation in pricing rates
Show response
Zaffino differentiated large account E&S (contracting due to pricing pressure) from middle market (strong submission flow, AI-enabled growth opportunity). Acknowledged Casualty is under some rate pressure but said returns are still good and not in the same bucket as Property.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is that 30% just kind of a starting point? And is there meaningfully more -- we could see improvement in that ratio?
Show response
Zaffino declined to set new expense ratio target below 30% but outlined multiple tailwinds: GenAI operational efficiency, Everest conversion operating leverage, Convex quota share, organic growth. Will revisit after achieving 30%.
what's kind of the minimum level of holdco liquidity you want to keep on your balance sheet?
Show response
Walsh confirmed $5.3B liquidity at Q3 end; will maintain several billion minimum. Sold another ~32M Corebridge shares for ~$1B to fund acquisitions and continued capital management. Run rate share repurchase ~$1B for 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Any updated thoughts on what casualty loss trend is looking like here? A couple of positive developments, I think in Georgia and some areas as far as legislation goes
Show response
Zaffino noted no changes to casualty loss cost assumptions despite positive legislative developments. Will reassess at mid-year, cautious approach consistent with reserving philosophy.
Is it possible to get maybe what gross written premiums growth was there? Just try to understand the impact of the ceded reinsurance on the growth rate
Show response
Zaffino clarified property reinsurance benefit was the main gross-to-net difference; casualty and programs grew similarly on gross and net basis. Bailey confirmed underlying portfolio is strong with double-digit net growth.
MRSHMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 2 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Were there any kind of onetime success fees? Or is this AI related? Is it the big organic revenue growth in the quarter?
Show response
Moynihan attributed the 13% underlying growth to broad-based demand across all regions and most business lines, with Quotient AI advisory strongest, plus M&A pre-deal work and private equity capital deployment.
As we look out second half of the year, do you expect maybe a pickup here maybe as bid-ask spreads, call it, narrow?
Show response
Doyle said M&A closings were slower in the first half as bid-ask gaps widened and some assets left the market, but cited pending Baltimore and closed Asterra deals and raised full-year capital deployment to $5.5 billion.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how much of the productivity gains is Marsh going to be able to keep and see a benefit from a margin perspective versus protects being competed away or giving back to clients
Show response
Doyle noted efficiency, productivity, and new revenue generation opportunities. Nobody better positioned to capitalize. Not a discounted insurance broker, delivers much more than price procurement. Feels good about positioning.
given the level of rate decreases that we're seeing out there. What are you seeing with respect to client demand at Marsh
Show response
Doyle emphasized cost of risk rising at approximately 2x GDP from liability, medical cost, cyber, and extreme weather inflation. Studer cited double-digit new business growth in U.S., strong growth at Marsh Agency and specialties. Klisura reported record new business with double-digit growth in every region, 7 cat bonds in Q1, $2B new third-party capital in casualty sidecars.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm hearing some things in the marketplace that for the management consulting business, formerly Oliver Wyman, that there could be some project-related stuff that actually goes the way of AI
Show response
Studer reported 75% growth over five years. Three of best-ever sales months in last five months. AI has had significantly positive effect on productivity. About 30% of work draws on advanced analytics/AI. Quotient platform is fastest-growing practice. Expects to hire same or more junior staff. No revenue headwinds from AI currently.
What are clients' insurance budgets looking like in 2026? Are they looking to maybe increase the amount of coverage they're buying given some of the price breaks they're getting
Show response
Doyle noted U.S. growth ex-digital infrastructure is not inspiring. Cost of risk continuing to rise, excess casualty, extreme weather, healthcare costs. Advising clients to buy more excess liability coverage but many harvesting savings instead.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What does organic look like at right now? And is it similar to what's going on in the Marsh U.S./Canada business
Show response
Declined to report McGriff organic separately. Acknowledged typical post-acquisition slowdown from system changes and integration distractions. MMA had good Q3 and expects continued momentum.
are you seeing bid-ask spreads continue to narrow? And then maybe on that as well, we're kind of almost a year into the McGriff
Show response
Doyle noted bid-ask spreads may be widening as PE buyers pay higher multiples than strategics. Very active in market, more likely to continue string of pearls. Capacity for larger deals exists.
WTWWillis Towers Watson8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I'm wondering if you maybe you can frame how much of your business is actually exposed to this Middle East conflict?
Show response
Lucy confirmed Middle East is one of WTW's smallest geographies, not expected to have major impact despite being called out as risk factor.
maybe you can frame kind of your capacity for share buyback this year? I know you said it's going to be greater than $1 billion
Show response
Andrew maintained $1B+ guidance, noted regular review of cash position and willingness to lean in on timing and absolute dollars when appropriate. Did not commit to increased amount despite stock decline.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you maybe talk a little bit about what the impact of any PRT work was in the fourth quarter? What's your outlook is for 2026, particularly in light of some of these lawsuits
Show response
Julie reported 35% US PRT market share, increasing derisking readiness work. LifeSight live in 12 countries, AUM grew from $36B to over $46B during 2025 with $3B more contracted. Cushion acquisition targets fast-growing UK DC mid-market.
do you anticipate any headwinds in any of your businesses as a result of AI?
Show response
Carl distinguished WTW's regulatory-driven, recurring consulting services from management consulting. Noted prior years' portfolio focus on areas with most long-term demand. Views AI as opportunity rather than threat.
Calendar 2025 Q2
some other brokers in the quarter have talked about the impact of the rate environment, particularly large ticket property business on growth this quarter. I'm curious, was there any impact on CRB?
Show response
Lucy provided detailed pricing landscape: large/complex property most affected, NA casualty/excess/umbrella/auto still hardening. WTW ~50/50 property/casualty, skews middle market (less large/complex exposure), good balance commission/fees. Rate is moderate headwind but does not rely on pricing to drive growth.
I wonder if you could just remind us of kind of your view with respect to inorganic growth. And I know you talked about strategic acquisitions
Show response
Carl outlined three M&A criteria: increase broking/wealth mix, expand insurance value chain, enhance margins/FCF. Open to larger opportunities beyond bolt-ons to enhance geographic/segment presence. Won't discuss hypotheticals on size. Emphasized cultural fit and execution confidence requirements.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you remind us how big is the transactional business as a part of your overall business? And is that going to be a headwind at all
Show response
Lucy declined to size the transactional business but said no major impact expected for rest of year.
I would have thought with you know, the correction your stock had post fourth quarter results you've been a little bit more aggressive with with share buyback
Show response
Andrew redirected to full-year $1.5B commitment and noted pacing flexibility to lean in depending on market conditions. Didn't directly explain Q1 restraint.
BROBrown & Brown7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
on the litigation-impacted revenues, you know, obviously popped up again this quarter.
Show response
Confirmed the $50 to $60 million figure is a full-year cap on current information and said teammate retention is otherwise strong.
any thoughts on, um, the reauthorization of the NFIP, um, program in September?
Show response
CEO acknowledged he had no additional information beyond expecting another short-term extension.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Do you think it has any effect on kind of the long-term commission rates or what you charge your clients
Show response
Powell viewed downward commission-rate pressure from AI as possible but not highly probable, and noted overall technology costs will likely rise.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is there likely to be maybe potential pressure on margins, not only Brown & Brown for the industry
Show response
Powell conceded talent competition could pressure industry margins. Andy noted the industry has always been competitive and BRO's equity-based compensation helps create long-term wealth for teammates.
Maybe you can quantify that. And is that going to continue to be a headwind in 2026?
Show response
Andy declined to separately quantify multiyear policy impact, noting these headwinds reverse when policies come up for renewal.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Do you think that is continuing here for a while? Or do you think maybe we start to see some of that slow at some point from a carrier appetite perspective
Show response
Powell emphasized carriers want quality MGA partnerships and expects continued or increased carrier appetite driven by improved underwriting quality.
I know there's some legislation actually in Florida trying to turn back some of the reforms that happened
Show response
Powell dismissed the legislative risk, indicating no political appetite in Florida to reverse tort reforms.
WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Are you starting to see terms and conditions loosen up? Are you thinking about loosening terms and conditions as well?
Show response
Management said terms and conditions remain intact in its book and the softening is a rate conversation, not a T&C one.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Is any of that related to perhaps your incubator type businesses transitioning in the segments
Show response
New ventures including Berkley Edge are progressing well from a standing start but not yet large enough to move the needle for the overall group. Growth opportunity will come from contributions across many businesses.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to dive into your comment about maybe laying off rate a little bit, but keeping margins, I think, is what you also said.
Show response
Rob said recent accident-year early returns look comfortable enough that WRB can ease rate pressure selectively but will still look to preserve margins to the best of its ability.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I recall Bill saying that one of his biggest regrets from the last hard market was starting to pull back too early.
Show response
Bill Berkley said the current market still offers opportunity and doesn't require running away yet, though the turn could be shorter this time because of litigation-driven loss development.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the competitive dynamics are like right now in the private client business. Are there more opportunities there
Show response
Rob said WRB is gaining traction in the private client space through its team's expertise and value delivered rather than price, differentiating from brand-coattail competitors.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Just curious, Bill. During the 1970s, we had stagflation. Maybe give us tell us what that kinda means
Show response
Bill Berkley recalled that stagflation was a tough pricing period but the industry kept up through rate, favored larger and mid-size disciplined carriers, and eventually gave way to improved conditions.
Calendar 2024 Q4
standard commercial carriers have talked about and granted still small, growing in the E&S market
Show response
Rob dismissed the notion that standard carriers' E&S expansion is a meaningful competitive threat, 'we don't see them' in the marketplace.
AIZAssurant2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
placement rates keep picking up here. And I'm assuming that's still a function of the tight homeowners market
Show response
Demmings noted no evidence of voluntary market shifting away from hard conditions, with California and Texas driving roughly half of sequential growth and Florida stable.
from a productivity perspective, how you're kind of approaching it and is there any kind of KPIs or something we look at
Show response
Meier pointed to housing expense leverage (expenses +2% vs revenue +11%) as a concrete metric, while Demmings highlighted customer experience improvement, talent upskilling, and robotics in facilities.
PGRProgressive Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
is that something you're anticipating? Is that your margins will compress here in personal auto insurance going forward here closer to the target level?
Show response
Tricia said Progressive will trade some margin for unit growth if the exchange rate is favorable, consistent with the decades-old grow-as-fast-as-we-can-at-96 operating goal.
is it mix driven this quarter that's kind of dropping everything? Or is it kind of across all the cohorts that you're seeing the drops in PLE?
Show response
Pat Callahan clarified the PLE drop is broad-based, with Sams price-sensitivity and household cost pressure on one end and deliberate Robinsons redistribution at some agencies on the other.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| KMPR Kemper Corporation | 14 | 43%6 of 14 questions |
| HIG Hartford (The) | 13 | 15%2 of 13 questions |
| EG Everest Group | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| ACGL Arch Capital Group | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
| CB Chubb Limited | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
| TRV The Travelers Companies, Inc. | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
| AIG American International Group | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
| MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 8 | 25%2 of 8 questions |
| WTW Willis Towers Watson | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| BRO Brown & Brown | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
- KMPRKemper Corporation · 14 questions43%6 of 14 questions
- HIGHartford (The) · 13 questions15%2 of 13 questions
- EGEverest Group · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- ACGLArch Capital Group · 10 questions10%1 of 10 questions
- CBChubb Limited · 10 questions10%1 of 10 questions
- TRVThe Travelers Companies, Inc. · 10 questions10%1 of 10 questions
- AIGAmerican International Group · 9 questions11%1 of 9 questions
- MRSHMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. · 8 questions25%2 of 8 questions
- WTWWillis Towers Watson · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- BROBrown & Brown · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q1 | 16 | 6%1 of 16 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q2 | 13 | 8%1 of 13 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q3 | 18 | 6%1 of 18 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q4 | 18 | 28%5 of 18 questions | 9 |
| 2026 Q1 | 19 | 32%6 of 19 questions | 10 |
| 2026 Q2 | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions | 8 |
- 2024 Q414 questions · challenge rate 14% (2 of 14 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q116 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 16 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q213 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 13 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q318 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 18 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q418 questions · challenge rate 28% (5 of 18 questions) · 9 companies
- 2026 Q119 questions · challenge rate 32% (6 of 19 questions) · 10 companies
- 2026 Q214 questions · challenge rate 14% (2 of 14 questions) · 8 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Pricing33
- Competitive Dynamics32
- Margin32
- Capital Allocation17
- Revenue Growth16
- Cost Pressure14
- Regulation Policy14
- M&A10
- Demand10
- Macroeconomic9
Show all 19 topics
- Cloud & AI6
- Innovation & R&D5
- Credit4
- Geographic Expansion4
- Labor Market3
- Capex Investment2
- Trade Tariffs2
- Product Launch1
- Subscriber Growth1