Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Brian Ossenbeck
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 48on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 17%8 of 48 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 48 of 48 questions from 8 companies
CSXCSX Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is this really affecting pricing renewals, the service looks at least a little challenged in some areas?
Show response
Mike acknowledged service metrics below target, blamed stronger-than-expected demand and crew tightness, and called it non-structural with sequential improvement expected.
Calendar 2026 Q1
some of the areas are up quite a bit in terms of the dwell time
Show response
Mike acknowledged elevated dwell as trade-off from engineering productivity initiatives but emphasized focus on bringing metrics back in line.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you give us some qualification how much of that you think is already baked in based on some of the the onetime items or the things you know are rolling off
Show response
Kevin quantified $150M of non-recurring 2025 items rolling off. Inflation expected at 3-3.5% range with labor side consistent to slightly higher than prior year and non-labor lower. Productivity step-up is the key incremental driver.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how do you believe the company's positioned versus your peers, obviously, pursuing a TransCon merger
Show response
Steve drew parallels to his decade running Praxair before the Linde merger, emphasizing patience and running the franchise well as positioning for future opportunities. Did not directly address merger mandate.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what are some of the pinch points or the benefits you think that potential consolidation transcontinental as we've all seen, could bring
Show response
Joe declined to speculate on merger specifics, instead reiterating the thesis that improved customer service and ease of doing business are paramount. Said CSX is open to all possibilities.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is that still sitting there that you can go after again and just wasn't readily picked up on service, or did you potentially lose it
Show response
Kevin said some revenue was perishable but big Q2 opportunity exists. Sean declined to update specific 2025 EBIT guidance citing uncertainty but reiterated 3-year targets remain intact.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Should we expect as this tunnel project gets underway, there are going to be some meaningful deterioration or adjustments that we're going to see in some of the service metrics
Show response
Mike said traffic already rerouted in Q4 so no further service deterioration expected. Added headcount is stable and productivity improvements within reach once weather events subside.
FDXFedEx7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Maybe you can give us an update on utilization across the network.
Show response
Carere said US utilization stays high with total volume up despite ground economy declines, and cited mid-90s renewal rates supporting share retention.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I just want to make sure I understand what's in and what's out and what's increasing here. And then maybe just
Show response
Marshall Witt clarified GAAP costs include IT and talent separation investments. Non-GAAP $700M includes technology platforms and professional fees. Dietrich noted the incremental $100M is acceleration of investment, not incremental to total project. John Smith confirmed Freight fuel surcharge updates weekly and is typically a net positive above cost of fuel.
Calendar 2025 Q4
are those separate from the spin-off costs which are included or excluded rather from the EPS guide
Show response
Dietrich confirmed separation costs are in reported earnings, not the $600M non-GAAP spin costs. MD-11s expected back in Q4, with substantial majority of remaining $175M cost in Q3 given peak season outsourced lift expense.
Calendar 2025 Q3
maybe you can separate just how much of the peak strength is FedEx related versus what you see in the underlying market
Show response
Carere said peak volume growth is significantly driven by prior customer acquisition (lapping benefit), not market growth. ADV growth modest but total volume up from extra day. Freight yields expected to improve in back half with disciplined execution.
Calendar 2025 Q2
it sounded like the pricing environment is actually improving. So you can give us a sense as to what changed
Show response
Carere confirmed pricing environment improvement, highlighted large package strategy, rural coverage monetization, and 2% fuel surcharge change. Best YoY yield improvement for home delivery and ground commercial in Q4.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you just talk about the ability to keep pushing price in a sort of environment? We're seeing surcharges increase
Show response
Carere highlighted seven consecutive quarters of European share gains with improving service and productivity. On pricing, noted discipline on surcharges, large packages, and rural markets; expects some base yield pressure lapping in FY26.
Calendar 2024 Q4
It sounds like the demand surcharge is sticking, but what about the other ones that you've put into place
Show response
Brie acknowledged base rate pressure from the economy but highlighted discipline on surcharges, peak, large package, dimensional pricing, and rural surcharges all contributing.
JBHTJ.B. Hunt7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
if you're already at the top end of productivity, maybe that becomes a little bit more of a challenge
Show response
Darren acknowledged driver-supply pressure but framed insourced drayage as an advantage that speeds customer intermodal conversion.
Calendar 2026 Q1
coming back to your comment on transcon competition was a little bit tougher than you expect
Show response
Darren said surprise is that despite depressed industry margins, transcon pricing remains competitive. Every headhaul segment positive but not covering inflation. Backhaul repriced negative. Nick said enforcement continuing state by state; May Roadcheck will be a big test focusing on ELDs and load securement. Brad Hicks added truck driving school shutdowns and ELD provider removals will further constrain new industry entrants.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if you can just fill in some more comments on what you mean by the freight market's gradual
Show response
Shelley said small demand upticks could create a meaningfully different environment given limited supply elasticity. Spencer added demand is solid across all services in first two weeks of January, and customer retention was highest since 2017. Customers consolidating logistics providers to fewer high-performing partners.
Calendar 2025 Q3
hoping you can kind of run through what you're expecting across the different modes
Show response
Nick Hobbs clarified ICS bid awards were low-to-mid single digit rate increases on recent wins, not a next-year forecast. Brad Delco described internal cost target as far greater than $100M but shared the conservative figure to maintain say-do credibility.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How much of this is volume dependent, of any bigger buckets that you can kind of point to from a headcount perspective
Show response
John Kulow said most savings are structural, not volume-dependent. Darren described creative equipment uses: replacing leased DCS trailers, cross-division sharing, and working with BNSF on storage costs.
Calendar 2025 Q1
we've seen record volumes the last three quarters, but per load is one of the lowest on record
Show response
Darren Field acknowledged margin dissatisfaction. Highway capacity and excess equipment are the main headwinds. Spencer added that road-to-rail conversion remains the top customer topic.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I believe you mentioned modest year-over-year growth in both op income and revenue
Show response
Brad Hicks confirmed fleet losses largely behind by Q2. Brad Delco explained new fleet startups are breakeven through first 6 months, so 2025 growth benefits 2026 earnings.
NSCNorfolk Southern Railway7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
looking at the RPU ex fuel, not a whole lot of movement of our in the quarter
Show response
Ed Elkins explained the lag from spot to contract pricing and expressed optimism about upward pressure flowing through.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what you're seeing and feeling in there that gives you the confidence to move those up a notch on your rating scale
Show response
Ed walked through optimism across segments: utility coal restocking, export coal from Iran disruption, domestic intermodal benefiting from higher truck fuel, and industrial development pipeline moving.
can you give us the fuel and weather-related costs into the quarter?
Show response
Jason quantified fuel at $31M above prior year from price, with March alone $40M above expectations. Storm costs were $10-15M in the quarter. Fuel headwinds continuing into April.
Calendar 2025 Q4
How much retention expense do you have in your OpEx guide?
Show response
CFO confirmed retention costs are in merger-related expenses excluded from adjusted results, not in the $8.2-$8.4B guide. COO argued strong service performance moots reciprocal switching arguments, noting US market differs from Canadian precedent with more competitive options.
Calendar 2025 Q3
When you think about fuel efficiency, I mean we've always heard it was going to be a challenge at Norfolk because of length of haul and mix and a bunch of other things, weight, but it looks like yo...
Show response
COO described fuel management as integral to train service plan optimization, with product-level approach to fuel consumption. CEO added AC locomotive fleet approaching 80% (from high teens 6 years ago) as structural driver. Running 23% less horsepower per ton versus 2019. COO sees no end in sight to fuel efficiency gains.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the network performance looks like it's bouncing back pretty well in terms of resiliency
Show response
COO detailed rapid storm recovery through strategic locomotive and car deployment, with 40 locomotives returned to storage post-surge. Zero-Based plan accelerating 600+ customer last-mile improvements.
Calendar 2024 Q4
pricing to the value of the service as it improves here and remains more consistent
Show response
CMO emphasized wallet share expansion with existing and adjacent supply chain customers. CEO confirmed both pricing leverage and volume share recapture from service improvement.
UNPUnion Pacific Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the comp per head up 6%. I mean, typically, you have good visibility on that to start the year.
Show response
Hamann attributed the higher comp per employee to wage inflation and hotter-than-expected health and welfare costs.
Calendar 2026 Q1
are you still assuming first half of '27 approval, and it doesn't sound like it, but I just wanted to confirm
Show response
Jim confirmed Q2 2027 expected approval timeline. Eric outlined phased integration approach with day-1 independent operations, leveraging successful NetControl technology transition experience.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I just want to hear maybe a little bit more especially I think you have zero furloughs
Show response
Jim revealed UP carries extra employees with guarantee payments rather than furloughs, providing buffer capacity. On the red line, Jim expressed frustration but accepted it as process, noting he doesn't see its relevance to merger merits but will comply.
Calendar 2025 Q3
it looks like there's some share shift between yourself and other Western competitor
Show response
Kenny acknowledged market degradation but emphasized pricing discipline reflecting service and infrastructure investments. Jim dismissed chemical association opposition, noting they haven't seen the merger application yet. On the 15-20% speed claim, Jim explained it comes from removing yard touch points averaging 19.9 hours each.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what's your view on just conceptually the reciprocal switching, open access, giving shippers more options
Show response
Jim deflected regulatory specifics, arguing that superior service is the path to winning customers regardless of regulatory structure.
Calendar 2025 Q1
does seem like there there will be something on the section 301 related to China ship loading, and now they're talking about removing the harbor maintenance tax
Show response
Kenny noted customers need more certainty before making port or traffic flow changes, while highlighting grain export flexibility to Gulf and Mexico routes.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I guess there's a second Brakeperson rules. Wanted to hear a little bit more about that because you mentioned there was one earlier
Show response
Eric explained the Brakeperson deal enables more efficient crew handling as technology reduces need, with 20 of 28 engineer hubs already cut over to new schedules.
UPSUnited Parcel Service6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Just thinking about the 2Q to 3Q bridge for U.S. domestic. I was thinking maybe it might be a little bit better
Show response
Dykes explained the fuel asymmetry and added Middle East block hours and lease aircraft costs; kept the 3Q bridge at normal seasonality.
Calendar 2026 Q1
it looks like B2B volume in absolute was down 5%. I don't know if you can provide some color as to why that occurred
Show response
Brian explained B2B decline was driven by Amazon AFN exits to commercial addresses and Chinese e-commerce returns. Will cycle through in Q2. Underlying B2B business showing strength through capability wins.
maybe not everything went back to them in terms of final mile delivery. Can you give a little bit more color on that
Show response
Carol said Q1 tendered 977,000 ADV to USPS (44% of ground saver), ramping to ~$1.5M in Q2. USPS fuel surcharge seen as positive for industry pricing as it sets a floor for economy products.
Calendar 2025 Q3
In the last quarter, Carol, you called out some density headwinds. It sounds like those were probably still present here in 3Q
Show response
Carol confirmed Ground Saver density remains a challenge at ~$100M cost drag in Q3, driving excitement about USPS renewed relationship. Brian guided Q4 RPP slightly above 6%, above full-year 6% target. Less mix improvement expected in Q4 as Chinese e-commerce shipper exits begin to lap.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how quickly do you think the supply chain can really do that, especially with some of the SMBs
Show response
Kate confirmed Europe-to-U.S. exports growing high single digits and Asia nearshoring markets near double digits. Brian noted 2.26x debt-to-EBITDA, $5B cash, restructuring charges ~60% cash.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you talk about the broader implications for the network for peak season, I know you can give us more update in April
Show response
Nando explained peak season variable costs (rental equipment, temporary facilities, leased aircraft) will decrease significantly with lower Amazon volume.
Show 2 more companies
ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Obviously, the fringe benefit was a pretty big increase. I would assume, in the comp per employee.
Show response
Confirmed a September 1 wage increase but declined to quantify it, then pivoted to driver school readiness and flat headcount through the balance of the year.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is there anything else that you can call out we should be aware of from a cost per shipment perspective you already have line of sight to?
Show response
Adam cited fringe benefit headwind and fuel-related costs but noted G&A improvement expected from Q1 levels and depreciation leverage from lower CapEx plan, partially offsetting headwinds.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Inflation you're expecting this year, is it still 3.5% to 4%?
Show response
Cost inflation guided at 5-5.5% for 2026, above historical average. Driven by employee benefits, group health/dental, equipment, and insurance. Fuel currently lower YoY. Private carriers absorbed many Yellow service centers but overall industry capacity still down 6%. Capacity constraints expected when demand recovers.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the length of haul was coming down a good amount here. I don't know if you can put some context around that
Show response
Shorter length of haul reflects regionalism and e-commerce trends. 70% of revenue is next-day/second-day. ODFL does not use dynamic pricing. Retail outperformed industrial in Q3.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the NMSTA, they're working through some changes to the class system. The proposal was out late last week
Show response
Marty dismissed concerns about NMFTA classification changes. Said shippers don't have to adopt overnight and carriers would benefit from better cost-based rating.
CHRWC.H. Robinson2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Just can you give us any sense of what April looks like so far? I know you typically don't do that, but we're obviously not in a really typical sort of market
Show response
Management noted Q2 typically 5% stronger sequentially. April sequential decline from March was less than last year. Still seeing capacity exits but no true market inflection.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you just give us some color if you can about maybe demand or indications of demand across any particular verticals
Show response
Management noted high route guide adherence and competitive transactional space. Contractual wins are solid but not seeing demand uptick in RFPs heading into Q1.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| CSX CSX Corporation | 7 | 43%3 of 7 questions |
| FDX FedEx | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| JBHT J.B. Hunt | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Railway | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions |
| UPS United Parcel Service | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| CHRW C.H. Robinson | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- CSXCSX Corporation · 7 questions43%3 of 7 questions
- FDXFedEx · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- JBHTJ.B. Hunt · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- NSCNorfolk Southern Railway · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- UNPUnion Pacific Corporation · 7 questions29%2 of 7 questions
- UPSUnited Parcel Service · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- CHRWC.H. Robinson · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q2 | 7 | 57%4 of 7 questions | 7 |
- 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 57% (4 of 7 questions) · 7 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Cost Pressure16
- Competitive Dynamics14
- Pricing13
- Demand10
- Labor Market7
- Supply Chain6
- M&A6
- Margin4
- Regulation Policy4
- Capex Investment3
Show all 17 topics
- Revenue Growth3
- Innovation & R&D3
- Capital Allocation2
- Macroeconomic1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Guidance Reliability1
- Trade Tariffs1