Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Charles Meade
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 29on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 29 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 29 of 29 questions from 6 companies
EXEExpand Energy10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
one of the biggest tangible pieces, it seems to me, is this 44 Bcf of storage
Show response
Mike said they valued storage by the earnings and repeatability it generates, not the asset in isolation.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is that just some activity sliding from 1Q into 2Q?
Show response
Josh explained Q2 is CapEx peak due to slightly front-loaded D&C activity, leasehold acquisition closings, and seasonal workover ramp. Appalachia rigs come out in second half, moderating activity. Production grows modestly in Q3 and Q4 assuming market supports. Full year unchanged at 7.5 Bcf per day and $2.85 billion.
how you evaluate looking at signing up for capacity versus buying equity stakes?
Show response
Mike said first threshold is strategic fit, then financial discipline with nonnegotiable accretion requirement. NG3 ownership, FT commitments, and storage equity stakes all evaluated on long-term value accretion basis. Approach has not fundamentally changed.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you elaborate on what that is and how big the upside might be?
Show response
Josh described the sub-location program as having significant upside. Teams have been working on it and waiting for the right economic environment. Will leverage Haynesville deep gas drilling learnings. Expects highly profitable development but will require some infrastructure investment for processing.
Can you talk about the nature of those assets and what the trajectory has been for building that position?
Show response
Dan Turco explained storage added 3.5 Bcf in Q4 on top of 1.5 Bcf existing. Being actively used for volatility management with money already made. Would like to grow but market is highly competitive with demand outpacing capacity.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I believe I heard you say in your prepared comments that your -- I think it was your company-wide breakeven is now $2.75
Show response
Josh clarified $2.75 is Haynesville-specific annual free cash flow breakeven including corporate items like dividend. Represents approximately $0.25 improvement from initial February guidance of approximately $3, reflecting drilling and productivity gains across 2025.
can you give us some framework for what success would look like there?
Show response
Josh said first priority is fine-tuning drilling operations in the area, then assessing early-time productivity and longer-term flow characteristics. Declined to speculate on 2026 plans until first well results are evaluated.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Have you guys seen anything that surprised you either positive or negatively as you brought on these deferred TILs
Show response
Josh reported 130 wells brought online over the last two quarters with no performance degradation from deferred timing. Natural variability across zones but overall execution very strong.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you share what you think that is and where Expand sits vis-a-vis the industry on that marginal breakeven
Show response
Nick pegged industry marginal breakeven loosely at mid-$3s and positioned Expand at the lower end, citing low-cost Marcellus inventory and best-in-class Haynesville capital efficiency.
this is trying to describe the dynamics around the baseline kind of scenario that you're outlining on Page 9
Show response
Nick explained the framework as allowing production to fall below and rise above a target midpoint based on near-term market conditions, independent of the multiyear capital allocation decisions.
FANGDiamondback Energy6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
are you anticipating that there's been some structural changes in the oil market that even if we do get these agreements
Show response
Kaes declined to opine on geopolitics, describing the market as a volatile sine wave and anchoring on inventories.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you give us kind of an inside baseball account of how that how you came to that decision?
Show response
CEO cited Jamie Dimon advice on board communication. Sent 3-4 notes to board in March during crisis. Simple meeting ahead of earnings with resounding support for growth plan.
Calendar 2025 Q4
it sounds like maybe you guys are landing in the Woodford and trying to frac up into the Barnett
Show response
Al explained the Barnett and Woodford are distinct reservoirs separated by Miss Lime. Where Miss Lime is thin (basin center), they target lower Barnett and drain through to the Woodford.
Does that mean that the green light scenario is closer than the red light? Or is it closer than before
Show response
Kaes said there were periods closer to red light in the past 6 months but oversupply hasn't materialized as aggressively; investors support flat production and max FCF while waiting for green.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you give us an update on what the green light conditions would be in your metaphor to reaccelerate
Show response
Kaes said the green light triggers when OPEC barrels are absorbed and U.S. production starts struggling; cautiously optimistic about 2026 but hunkering down for rest of 2025.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are there other audiences you had in mind as you penned that letter
Show response
Travis stated the letter was for stockholders but acknowledged awareness it would be widely read beyond that audience.
APAAPA Corporation4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
could you add to the picture about what's available on these 2 million acres
Show response
Christmann said acreage fits with existing footprint, most can tie into infrastructure. Both oil and gas prospectivity. Low-hanging fruit being pursued. Riney added acreage is spread out (not one big chunk), ranging from simple step-outs to new play concepts.
what mid-cycle Brent, what your assumption there is and also what the -- what parity means
Show response
Riney explained fixed new gas price makes drilling economics equivalent to $75-80 Brent oil. Rising blended price over time as old PDP declines and new volumes come on. Analysis includes potential new infrastructure requirements.
Calendar 2024 Q4
where in Howard County, what more specifically you're seeing with these with the higher productivity
Show response
Christmann confirmed fantastic results in northern Howard County with wider spacing. Plans to return with tighter spacing to increase inventory counts but declined to give specifics citing competitive sensitivity.
can you give us an update on what's going on in Alaska, specifically with the Sockeye exploration well
Show response
Christmann said operations are going well but declined to share results since they haven't reached pay zones yet. Noted things are 'on track' and 'very smooth.'
COPConocoPhillips4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Give us an update on on how this season's costs at Willow are tracking versus the updated assumptions you guys gave us last quarter
Show response
Kirk Johnson confirmed costs tracking to guidance. D26 rig incident had no impact, backfilled with active rig from existing units. Exploration and Willow predrill programs unaffected. Winter construction started early, nearing 50% complete. Permanent camp operational.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how you think differently about those two pieces of the business, how they complement each other, and perhaps how they compete with each other
Show response
Andy O'Brien contrasted traditional stranded-gas model with Lower 48 commercial strategy connecting 2+ Bcf/d to TTF/JKM pricing, serving as natural hedge to US gas exposure.
Calendar 2025 Q2
If you could perhaps give us a bit of a preview for what -- when you do get back to work there on the ground in the winter season
Show response
Kirk Johnson detailed transition to year-round construction, Gulf Coast module fabrication continuing, 90-95% of contracts secured by year-end providing cost certainty.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you tell us, is that gonna be of a magnitude that we're gonna be able to observe the effect of that in your in your one q and two q volumes
Show response
Kirk Johnson detailed Nuna as first new pad in a decade, first oil in December, 8 more wells planned in 2025, expected to more than offset Alaska decline.
EOGEOG Resources4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Were both of those wells testing the same concept and the same geologic setting?
Show response
Keith said the two 1-mile wells tested the same zone and that future wells will test different landing zones across the concession.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you give a broad outline of how you guys plan to share results and what the consequent decisions to either ramp activity or curtail it would be
Show response
Ezra drew parallel to Oman exit where EOG was transparent about results. Exploration phase has defined terms leading to declaration of commerciality and production license. Strong conviction in UAE oil and Bahrain gas opportunities. Interested in adding additional Gulf gas projects under right terms.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are there other deals like this out there?
Show response
Keith said this was the largest remaining undeveloped core Eagle Ford block. Always looking for bolt-ons but they must compete on returns. Unlikely to find another block this large and undeveloped.
I wonder if you could talk more about how this 125 feet that you saw came in versus pre-drill
Show response
Jeff said discovery is early stage with reservoir model refinement ongoing. Platform specs and completion design in progress. Economics justify setting a platform. Engaging partners toward FID but declined to size production potential.
DVNDevon Energy1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
how you chose that new level. It's a big bump. And what the thought process is there to arrive at 31.5% is the right number?
Show response
Clay explained $0.315 dividend aligns with Coterra's existing rate; combined with substantial share repurchase program for comprehensive returns.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| EXE Expand Energy | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| FANG Diamondback Energy | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| APA APA Corporation | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| EOG EOG Resources | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| DVN Devon Energy | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- EXEExpand Energy · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- FANGDiamondback Energy · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- APAAPA Corporation · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- COPConocoPhillips · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- EOGEOG Resources · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- DVNDevon Energy · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment9
- Geographic Expansion8
- Innovation & R&D7
- Capital Allocation5
- Macroeconomic5
- M&A2
- Supply Chain2
- Revenue Growth2
- Competitive Dynamics2
- Guidance Reliability2
Show all 14 topics
- Pricing2
- Demand1
- Cost Pressure1
- Regulation Policy1