Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Chris Rolland

Susquehanna · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
65on tracked calls
Challenge rate
14%9 of 65 questions
Companies
10questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 65 of 65 questions from 10 companies

SWKSSkyworks Solutions12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
SWKS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

CapEx was a little bit higher this I don’t know if this is a new level or not

Capex InvestmentInventorySupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CFO tied both to the September mobile ramp and internal capacity expansion, noting $1 billion inventory is within normal range.

do you guys have some sort of end market or just broad product category that that you would be considering

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Deflected to closing the current deal first and explicitly declined to name target categories or discuss valuations.

Calendar 2026 Q1

maybe if you could elaborate there and also how it might play into pricing

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Phil described very dynamic supply environment with broad-based input price increases. Sharing costs selectively with customers in a balanced way. Philip Carter added they can increase prices on long-life products and reaffirmed long-term 50-55% gross margin target post-Qorvo.

talk about how you got that win, how this product is differentiated in terms of getting the pricing that you want

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Phil described offering a technology-advantaged solution with multigenerational commitment that enables engineering focus. Win based on technology differentiation and sustained value generation. Will continue pursuing economically attractive opportunities but remains financially disciplined.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I believe last call, you provided a color. It was a little less than $100 million. So any update to that revenue

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Philip Carter confirmed Android down sequentially from prior quarter's ~$100M level. Expects double-digit growth from Q1 to Q2 but growth to moderate through the year as company remains selective on devices.

are there any gross margin puts and takes we should consider just given the memory dynamics

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Philip Carter attributed Q2 margin decline of 160bps to typical mobile seasonality, lower volume, and slightly higher Android mix. Also noted three consecutive quarters of exceeding guidance has driven some expedite fees. Nothing abnormal from typical seasonality.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Does the kind of forward outlook, has it changed at all? Are you perhaps a little bit more optimistic on addressing Android in the future?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Phil clarified Android strength is concentrated in Google where Skyworks has a strong footprint. Strategy remains focused on premium segment that values integration and performance. Deliberately defocusing from lower-end commodity space.

are there still opportunities even when this is pending to do either mergers and divestitures

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Phil pushed back on characterization of Qorvo deal as doubling down rather than diversifying. Argued deal reduces customer concentration and represents concentration in wireless not just handsets. Would not expect major transformational activities while deal is pending.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are there any economics attached with closing the Woburn facility or consolidating that?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Phil confirmed Woburn closure is a tailwind across utilization, CapEx, OpEx, and fixed costs but declined to provide specific numbers. Rob noted 16% FY25 OpEx growth reflects timing and targeted R&D investments, expects discipline in FY26.

have you kind of solidified your view on the importance of diversification beyond handset?

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Phil acknowledged customer concentration suppresses valuation multiples. Priorities for diversification: gross margin accretive, stickier revenue, longer time constant to balance handset volatility. Must walk and chew gum, maintain focus on largest customer while pursuing growth.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Could that be an adjacency for you, whether it's cellular or unlicensed?

Innovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Phil declined to comment on specific adjacencies but highlighted wide range of core technologies. Confirmed BAW remains a critical cornerstone of investment with robust roadmap.

Calendar 2024 Q4

it sounds like you're sharing a socket instead of sole sourced. I'm assuming that would be the rumor

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kris confirmed all content loss stems from the single socket share loss. Won back slots elsewhere. 20-25% range depends on mix between new vs legacy product and SKU mix.

ONON Semiconductor11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
ON company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you talk about that increase in the TAM and what from a product basis is expanding that almost fourfold

Show response

Hassane attributed the AI DC TAM jump to gigawatt-scale data center buildout projected to 2030 plus new products expanding content per rack.

Calendar 2026 Q1

it looked like EU and Japan bounced back a little bit here. Maybe you could just talk about what you are seeing geographically

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

El-Khoury said trends are market-dependent by region. China strong in auto, North America strong in AI and industrial. Europe auto going sideways. Industrial better than expected. Energy storage resuming aggressive growth in NA and China.

Is this like a vertical power delivery or VRMs or VCORE solutions? Or is it something else?

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

El-Khoury said wins span from SPS at XPU level through medium/high-voltage discrete at rack, to SiC MOSFET/JFET at power boxes. Hyperscaler architecturally defined with power rack suppliers like FlexPower across all hyperscalers.

Calendar 2025 Q4

does this compel potentially an acquisition on your part? Or push you even more towards doing a deal

Competitive DynamicsCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

El-Khoury said ON does M&A for strategic portfolio reasons, not fab fill. Treo already provides embedded compute capability. Always looking for value and complementary opportunities for margin or market expansion.

if you could give us an update, particularly geographically, you know, how that business is progressing

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

El-Khoury said SiC share strong in China 800V market, gaining in North America, proliferating in Europe. SiC JFET growing in AI DC. Not converting to 300mm. 8-inch in production at 350-micron.

Calendar 2025 Q3

perhaps you can talk about some of the moving parts like geographically or even across industries. And lastly, do you have the ability to convert to 300-millimeter wafers?

Product LaunchGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

El-Khoury said SiC expanding into new applications like AI data center and plug-in hybrids. Geographic outlook matches EV and AI deployment: strong in China and US. 300mm too early. 8-inch in production at 350-micron, shipping in 2026.

could you do things like solid-state transformers? It sounds like you're in the PSU 48-volt bus converters. I guess the last one would be hot swaps as well.

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

El-Khoury confirmed ON addresses all mentioned applications today. The ability to address the full power tree is the differentiation. Will continue to expand portfolio as share is gained.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is there a change in strategy here? Or is it just a reflection of the softer outlook?

Show response

El-Khoury said weeks are at target sweet spot of 9-11. Dollar amounts will increase as sustainable recovery materializes. Inventory management is disciplined, not strategic drain.

How do you serve China without these reciprocal tariffs? And do you increase a fabless relationship in country?

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

El-Khoury said ON has manufacturing in China plus foundry relationships. 19 global factories with most products qualified at multiple sites. No need for reactive footprint changes.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Could this have been related to your emphasis on LTSAs? And with auto down, I imagine everyone's complying with LTSAs

Show response

El-Khoury said LTSA renegotiations are not new, have been ongoing throughout 2024. Not related to the Q1 demand drop.

How would you classify image sensors overall?

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

El-Khoury said image sensors are stable, refocusing on machine vision where image quality adds value. Ramping 8-megapixel sensor.

CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
CRDO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

if you could talk maybe a little bit more about your 2 dust wins. Do they include DSP integration?

Show response

Bill confirmed the two initial Dust design wins do NOT yet include the Credo DSP, framing DSP+PIC co-attach as long-term upside.

Calendar 2026 Q1

if you could talk about where you think you're being used in terms of front end versus scale out, scale up

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Bill said Credo is strongest in scale-out, with front-end coming along and a couple of customers now deploying in switch racks and disaggregated chassis.

Calendar 2025 Q4

do you think that we could grow at a rate similar to the Street where it was?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dan reiterated the mid-single-digit sequential growth framework through fiscal 27, set 3-4 quarters ago and consistently outperformed since.

So a pretty big guided bump for next quarter. Maybe talk about that.

Show response

Dan said Q3 OpEx of ~$70 million sets a new base (up 22% sequentially), reflecting project spend and hiring including Hyperlume, for ~50% year-over-year OpEx growth.

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you think that these optical constraints could actually accelerate your AEC business

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Asked whether emerging 1.6T optical and laser supply constraints hurt the DSP outlook or accelerate AECs; Brennan said constraints do not slow optical growth and customers will use AECs wherever they can.

Any more color on when the fifth could be a a 10 percenter? And then I know we're running out of hyperscalers

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Asked when a fifth hyperscaler could become a 10% customer; Brennan said first traction is expected toward the end of the fiscal year and all hyperscalers have the ability to reach 10%, but declined to commit on branded cables for the large GPU vendor.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how would you view your total product mix AECs versus optical versus, let's say, Retimers for scale-up versus other?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Brennan said copper stays large but the biggest investments are in optical, expects optical above 10% over time, and sees a growing IC opportunity in AI inference.

Calendar 2025 Q1

should we be expecting these customers, for example, in this case, a pretty strong hand off in the next few quarters

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Bill pushed back on the air-pocket/handoff framing, describing diversification of shipments across customers through fiscal '26 rather than project cliffs.

LITELumentum Holdings Inc.8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 5 of 8 challenging
LITE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

in your press release, it sounds like you were selling not just ELS lasers, perhaps ELS modules as well

Product LaunchMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Michael confirmed a first ELS module order at meaningfully higher ASP but slightly lower (above-corporate) margins, trading some margin for revenue.

Calendar 2026 Q1

there were some Chinese competitors showing off some OCS boxes. I was wondering if you could speak to competition there

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CEO acknowledged OCS ramp as their tightest rope alongside pump lasers and CPO. Assessed competitive position as very strong for the next year but noted it will not last forever. Working on cost reduction and innovative MEMS solutions.

Are there any other adjacencies or components that you may be able to absorb or organically create

Innovation & R&DM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CEO confirmed road maps contemplating PICs, photodiodes, laser drivers, and vertically integrated ELS modules. Described ELS as a shorter path to market than supplying lasers alone.

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you think we might end up in an overcapacity situation, particularly when we -- competitors ramp and eventually we move to SiPho and CW

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsSupply ChainInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Michael said capacity improvements came from yield/throughput on 4-inch wafers, not heavy CapEx. Both CW and EML will ramp with 1.6T. Completely sold out for next 6 quarters with LTA protection. Wupen added that fab capacity is interchangeable between lasers and EMLs.

are you going to strategically use your -- what seems like market-limited EML supply to drive new customers and new qualifications on the transceiver side

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Michael explained they are consolidating customer base rather than expanding it, signing multi-year LTAs with strategic partners. Wupen noted 200G EML applications exist today with 2 customers not dependent on 102.4T switches.

Calendar 2024 Q3

why are we talking about 40%? Like why aren't we talking about like 100% or even more here

ChallengingCapex InvestmentSupply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Alan cited 18-month lead times for capital equipment and qualification. Repurposed Japanese wafer fab that was slated for closure. Adding capacity beyond 40% after June quarter. Barriers to entry protect long-term position.

You said it mostly didn't change. I wanted to know what actually did change there

ChallengingMarginSupply ChainInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Alan explained vertical integration deferred because EML capacity is more valuable serving external chip customers than converting to CW lasers for internal use. EML-based transceiver designs coming in second half CY2025.

why don't you use your limited EML capacity to bring new cloud-like customers online? It seems like that would be two birds stone

ChallengingCloud & AIInnovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Alan noted different transceiver architectures suit different applications. EML advantage most pronounced at 1.6T and higher speeds with multi-wavelength. 200G EMLs will differentiate from competitors and drive higher margins.

MCHPMicrochip Technology8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
MCHP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is this going to be an area of focus that you guys may be looking to bolster, either organically from here

M&ACloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Steve ruled out large M&A but cited the small Hailo acquisition (AI at the edge) as advancing the roadmap by about five years.

My question is just about serviceability of upside, both external and internal

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Steve said constraint means they could use more capacity than allocated, not that growth is capped; ruled out an internal 300mm fab.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if you guys had an dates on the percentage or the dollars contributed from AI

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Rich noted FPGA usage in AI vision/detection and factory inspection is the fastest growing AI area. Declined to provide specific AI revenue breakdown. AI coding assistant launched in February showing 40% productivity improvement.

typical seasonality for December and March? I know it changed since the addition of Atmel

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Eric corrected market estimate: typical December seasonality is down a couple percent, March up 2-3%. Steve expects above-seasonal performance in both quarters without quantifying.

Calendar 2025 Q1

AI as a percentage of revenue and you had a bunch of new looks like AI product announcements

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Eric confirmed AI grew from 4% to over 6% of sales. Created a dedicated AIML product group to coordinate AI accelerators across eight business units.

How do you see market share dynamics in Microchip, the actual MCU market playing out? Do you see China taking share

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Steve expressed strong conviction in MCU share gains, citing customers returning from inventory depletion and June quarter guidance at upper end of industry.

Calendar 2024 Q3

is there a home run product amongst this group? Is this outgrowing, I would assume, the rest of your other end markets

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ganesh noted AI-driven data center (~30% of total DC revenue) is growing while non-AI budgets are squeezed. Confident in long-term opportunity.

CapEx, it seems like you guys paused your silicon. I was wondering longer term, how should we be thinking about CapEx

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Eric said FY25 CapEx ~$150M with FY26 even lower. Ganesh noted CHIPS Act negotiations progressing, expects final agreement by end of December.

COHRCoherent, Inc.7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
COHR company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

could you talk about that Vietnam facility and your plans for silicon carbide as well moving forward?

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim confirmed Vietnam facility for materials/SiC business providing geographic flexibility. SiC demand stabilized after FY25 headwind, expecting some growth in FY26.

how do you view Coherent market share as we progress to 800 and eventually 1.6 pricing pressure from this Chinese dynamic

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim confirmed share gains in FY25 per third-party data, with pricing as expected and no unusual pressure. Ramping capacity across assembly, InP, EMLs, and CW lasers.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Do you have the capacity to serve American customers via Malaysia or how is China involved in that?

Supply ChainTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jim confirmed U.S. hyperscaler customers served almost entirely from Malaysia today. Internal EMLs are majority of EML-based transceivers but external partners also used.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'm just wondering if you're seeing anything in terms of transceiver pricing, pressure on your own gross margins in this area?

ChallengingPricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim reported stable transceiver pricing, confirmed more product cost work ahead including yields and input costs across the company.

Do you think that impacts connectivity at all, the outlook for it? And then perhaps there are pushouts of key AI products?

Show response

Jim confirmed no changes in customer orders or forecasts from DeepSeek, views efficiency improvements as long-term positive for AI adoption. No impact on 800G/1.6T timeline.

Calendar 2024 Q3

do you think there is sizable room here to expand margins on the transceiver side, which is a big chunk of your data comp business

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jim acknowledged limited pricing upside in transceivers vs industrial, but confirmed sizable product cost opportunity particularly through yield improvements.

Are you guys going to be commercially shipping your own EMLs into either 800 and 1.6 next year?

Supply ChainProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jim confirmed dual-source EML strategy (internal + partners) for 800G/1.6T, noted no major capacity constraints so far thanks to production team's strong execution.

Show 4 more companies
AVGOBroadcom Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
AVGO company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

if I understand you correctly, Hock, I think you were saying that OpenAI would be a general agreement so it's not binding maybe similar to the agreements with both NVIDIA and AMD

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityCloud & AIDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Hock framed the 10GW OpenAI deal as an alignment agreement separate from the XPU program. On non-AI, said AI is 'sucking the oxygen out of enterprise spending', stable but no sharp recovery.

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you view any competition on the ASIC side, particularly from US or Asian vendors, or do you think the is decreasing? And on the networking side, do you think UA link or PCIe even has a chance of...

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Hock argued Ethernet is the logical choice given 25-year track record; on ASIC, said Broadcom must out-invest and out-innovate and is doing a decent job.

Calendar 2025 Q2

do you think that this acceleration is because of a marked improvement in ASICs or XPUs closing the gap on the software side at your customers?

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Hock said the driver is that hyperscalers/LLMs must monetize training via inference to justify training ROI, driving use-case explosion and XPU demand.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'd love to know just because you have kind of the complete connectivity portfolio, how you see new greenfield scale-up opportunities playing out here between you know, could be optical or copper o...

Innovation & R&DCloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Hock said networking/connectivity mix within AI revenue typically 20-30%, XPUs 70%. Q1 surge to 40% networking was temporary. Broadcom offers full copper/optical/VCSEL/EML stack.

MRVLMarvell Technology3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
MRVL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Perhaps if you could describe what it looks like, what it looks like for Marvell? But also in your prepared remarks, you talked about integrating Celestial

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Murphy confirmed CPO deployment limited in scale-out relative to pluggable transceivers. Scale-up is the primary CPO use case with Celestial technology. FY2028 shipments will serve scale-up application integrated into both XPU and switch side. Strong interest from broad customer base for CPO scale-up beyond initial customer. Copper-based switching will coexist for some time.

Calendar 2025 Q4

might you be moving to systems and then perhaps even rack-level solutions as well? And do you have the capabilities to do that

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Murphy confirmed rack-level vision spanning AECs, DSPs, retimers, LPOs, photonic fabrics, scale-up/scale-out switches, and XPU attach. No system-level revenues in near-term forecast but strategic imperative to go to market comprehensively.

Calendar 2025 Q1

where do you think your biggest opportunities are? And when might we see some of these wins

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Murphy emphasized scale-up opportunity is incremental TAM, not cannibalization of existing DSP/pluggable revenue. Programs underway across CPO, LPO, active copper, and NVLink alternatives.

ADIAnalog Devices2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
ADI company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

One is optical connectivity, and then the other is AI power. If you have any developments in those products or markets, would love to know those

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Vince detailed 1.6 terabit electro-optical benchmark throughput, vertical power going to production H2 with a hyperscaler, and additional designs expected in 2026.

Are there any new other new products to call out? New customers? New end markets, any of these kind of free options

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Vince highlighted healthcare-consumer convergence including continuous glucose monitoring, and early-stage quantum computing control systems as emerging opportunities.

QCOMQualcomm2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
QCOM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

do you think there’s still that link more AI, more NPU, more ASP? Or is this an upgrade cycle that’s really taken place

Show response

Cristiano drew parallel to feature-phone-to-smartphone transition. Phone AI use cases clear and driving ASP. PC AI at earlier stage but smaller models will drive NPU demand.

if you guys could address maybe competition, whether you guys are seeing either more or less pressure, particularly at the high end

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Cristiano stated no changes in competitive landscape. Samsung baseline share now ~75% vs prior 50%. China competition remains two-player between QCOM and MediaTek.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
SWKS Skyworks Solutions128%1 of 12 questions
ON ON Semiconductor110%none of 11 questions
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd80%none of 8 questions
LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc.863%5 of 8 questions
MCHP Microchip Technology80%none of 8 questions
COHR Coherent, Inc.729%2 of 7 questions
AVGO Broadcom Inc.425%1 of 4 questions
MRVL Marvell Technology30%none of 3 questions
ADI Analog Devices2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
QCOM Qualcomm2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • SWKS
    Skyworks Solutions · 12 questions
    8%1 of 12 questions
  • ON
    ON Semiconductor · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • CRDO
    Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • LITE
    Lumentum Holdings Inc. · 8 questions
    63%5 of 8 questions
  • MCHP
    Microchip Technology · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • COHR
    Coherent, Inc. · 7 questions
    29%2 of 7 questions
  • AVGO
    Broadcom Inc. · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • MRVL
    Marvell Technology · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • ADI
    Analog Devices · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • QCOM
    Qualcomm · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q3743%3 of 7 questions3
2024 Q4540%2 of 5 questions3
2025 Q1130%none of 13 questions9
2025 Q2813%1 of 8 questions5
2025 Q3911%1 of 9 questions5
2025 Q4813%1 of 8 questions5
2026 Q1813%1 of 8 questions5
2026 Q260%none of 6 questions4
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q37 questions · challenge rate 43% (3 of 7 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q113 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 9 companies
  4. 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  5. 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  6. 2025 Q48 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  7. 2026 Q18 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  8. 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  9. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Competitive Dynamics20
  • Cloud & AI19
  • Demand15
  • Innovation & R&D14
  • Product Launch11
  • Supply Chain11
  • Revenue Growth11
  • M&A7
  • Margin6
  • Pricing5
Show all 18 topics
  • Capex Investment4
  • Capital Allocation4
  • Cost Pressure4
  • Geographic Expansion3
  • Inventory2
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Trade Tariffs2
  • Regulation Policy1