Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
CJ Muse
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 151on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 9%14 of 151 questions
- Companies
- 18questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 151 of 151 questions from 18 companies
KLACKLA Corporation14 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
First question on gross margins, hoping to kind of hear how you are thinking about the additional supply you are
Show response
CFO quantified the memory headwind at roughly 100 basis points, said it likely persists into 2027, and pointed to the 60% to 65% incremental gross margin model.
it looks like service is on track to grow about 20% for some reason. Just curious how to think about 2027. Are there
Show response
Answered with the target model, current position in the range, and the contract-based revenue anchor supporting visibility.
Calendar 2026 Q1
as you think about the sequential going to the high teens in the second half
Show response
CFO confirmed the ~$15B revenue framework for calendar 2026 is the right way to think about it, with 15% to 20% second-half sequential growth over first half.
I would love to dig a little bit deeper in terms of your extended lead times and visibility into '27
Show response
Management confirmed broad-based backlog building with very high order flow and strong customer engagement around slot planning for 2027, driven by greenfield opportunities.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how do you see that share kind of progressing in 2026 and 2027?
Show response
Rick cited reduced redundancy tolerance, more metallization layers requiring more inspection, and increased EUV usage driving intensity up. Bren added the inability to bin HBM devices drives tighter specs and creates service growth opportunities.
are your thoughts around 2027 and the ability to kind of pass along the higher DRAM cost
Show response
Bren guided margins trending north through 2026 from mix and volume scale benefits, maintaining confidence in the 63%+ long-term gross margin model with normalization in cost areas expected.
Calendar 2025 Q3
should we be thinking that you're at the higher end of that range given kind of greater contribution from the higher-margin silicon?
Show response
Bren confirmed the guide-down is mix-related with consistent tariff headwind of 50-100 bps, and framed incremental operating margins as middle of 40-50% at trend-line growth, outperforming above trend.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how those conversations are going, and what needs to happen to have firm conviction on growth in '26?
Show response
Bren outlined constructive leading-edge demand with potential broadening, strong DRAM/HBM, improving flash, and bottoming legacy. China expected down in 2026 after elevated 2023-2024 investment.
as three regions, Wuhan, Shanghai, Beijing are competing for supremacy, and we've now gone from four to six large kind of players
Show response
Bren noted it's too early to quantify 2026 China decline but expects headwinds from investment normalization, while non-China business is strengthening.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is that a function of perhaps less memory exposure, sustainable foundry or greater seasonality from PCB in the second half
Show response
Bren noted fairly stable half-on-half mix with memory potentially ticking up slightly and foundry/logic ticking down, but no major moving parts.
Can you speak to kind of the work you're doing on HBM, how you're thinking about insertions?
Show response
Bren noted increasing HBM momentum with higher chip stacks creating incremental opportunity, with technology transitions and hybrid bonding expected to drive further insertions.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Rick, you talked about share gain. Can you elaborate on that? And then my second question would be on service
Show response
Rick cited optical inspection, e-beam, and packaging as share gain areas. Services growth expected high single digits in 2025, below long-term model due to China fab access loss.
beyond the rising process control intensity at 2 nanometer and HBM, are there other drivers? Are those the two principal ones we should be thinking about?
Show response
Bren confirmed N2 intensity and HBM are the two principal drivers, with Rick adding reticle verification and optical inspection momentum as contributing factors.
Calendar 2024 Q3
can you speak to perhaps the breadth of foundry logic that you're seeing early 2025
Show response
Higgins expected leading-edge foundry ramp to ship in volume in the first part of 2025 per the normal schedule, but gave no specifics.
TERTeradyne14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
And then perhaps more importantly, how are you thinking about memory into 2027?
Show response
Gregory said DDR is stronger than expected, NAND pull is beginning to inflect, and 2027 should not be lumpy given customer capacity add plans.
if you could speak to gross margin in the guide and driving-- what is driving kind of the 130 bps headwind.
Show response
Michelle cited normal quarter-on-quarter variability, non-recurring first-half benefits, product mix and new product introduction, landing full-year right around the 59%.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what is precisely driving that downtick in June and how should we be thinking about modeling the second half of the year?
Show response
Michelle explained the 240bp sequential step-down: half from non-recurring operational benefits rolling off, half from mix normalization. First-half overall margins around 59.7%, within target model range.
congrats on your first merchant GPU win. Curious how to think about the follow-through there?
Show response
Greg outlined multi-year trajectory from qualification to fast follower phase, expecting it will take a few years to move from low single digits to the 30-70% dual-source range.
Calendar 2025 Q4
curious how to think about perhaps the overall revenue growth rate or thinking about June so we can size it. Will you grow above the high end of kind of the revenue target range of 25%?
Show response
Strong backlog entering 2026 with better H1 fidelity than prior year. But cautioned against extrapolating Q1 run rate for full year. Michelle noted inverse H1/H2 split expected vs 2025. Greg flagged potential digestion period after surge.
implicit in your new target model is a vision for your share of [ AAT ] to grow from about 25% to 46%
Show response
Share calculation moderated slightly below 46%. Compute share gains from low base, mobile TAM expected at 1.5x current with maintained share, memory share gains across newly entered segments. IST broadening helps but is outside ATE TAM.
Calendar 2025 Q3
roughly $150 million upside versus consensus for December. And I would be curious if you could kind of share how much of that upside is versus what you thought maybe 3 months ago is driven by HBM, ...
Show response
Q4 upside is roughly 2/3 compute and 1/3 memory. HBM strongly represented in the memory increase. Rest of company relatively unchanged Q/Q.
How are you thinking about compute intensity? How are you thinking about increased test insertions?
Show response
Multiple tailwinds: larger dies increase test intensity, chiplet designs escalate scrap costs driving shift-left testing, data centers require near-zero latent defects across massive GPU clusters. Dual-sourcing trends also favor Teradyne from lower share position.
Calendar 2025 Q2
As you look to 2026, is there a framework for thinking about AI contributions to you
Show response
Memory expected 85-95% DRAM-driven by cloud compute AI. VIP and networking strength continuing. Merchant GPU is an opportunity, not yet banked.
is that a reflection of a pickup in business that you're seeing today in the second half?
Show response
H2 confidence driven by AI compute uptick in SOC and Memory. Q3/Q4 split uncertain due to customer ramp timing. Wins mostly from 2024 now ramping.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how are you thinking about kind of what the new gross margin range would look like for the full calendar year?
Show response
Not guiding full-year gross margin due to top-line uncertainty. First half roughly in line with expectations. Greg added historical context: 2022-2023 downturn moved margins in a narrow 57-59% range.
I was hoping you could speak to the SLT wins that you highlighted in your prepared remarks
Show response
Clarified mobile SLT wins and 2nm tailwind are separate points. SLT for AI accelerators addresses high failure rates in server assembly; expects 100% SLT for next-gen devices.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was hoping you could spend a little bit of time expanding on your outlook for low single-digit share growth in Semi Test
Show response
Management walked through share drivers across SOC, Memory, Mobile and Auto/Industrial segments with specific TAM and share color.
On the Robotics side, you're restructuring that business once again. Obviously, I think you had multiple kind of paths
Show response
Cited outperformance vs peers, strong R&D output, OEM channel growth, and MiR large account progress as confidence factors.
WDCWestern Digital13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
It's hard not to compare your results with your main competitor, where they're seeing better sequential top-line
Show response
Irving cited LTA pricing timing, next-gen platforms, and operational efficiency as GM drivers but gave no firm GM acceleration commitment.
how has your visibility improved, and how do you think it could improve further as you start signing contracts
Show response
Irving described strong, increasingly customer-driven visibility with LTA discussions extending to 2031.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Curious on the remaining SanDisk position now that it is beyond 12 months. Is that now taxable
Show response
Kris confirmed intent to monetize remaining 1.7M SanDisk shares via tax-free equity-for-equity transaction before end of CY2026.
how should we think about pricing and what is embedded inside there? Is there a fixed-versus-variable construct
Show response
Irving provided high-level LTA framework but limited detail on specific fixed-vs-variable terms. Noted pricing adjustments tied to new capacity points and capabilities.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you talk about your plans thereafter? Are you going to focus more so on share repurchase or other
Show response
Kris confirmed $1.3B of $2B buyback authorization already used (13M shares repurchased). No hesitation to continue program.
could you speak to how customer engagement and contracts are evolving in this very tight environment
Show response
Irving described customer-centric pivot with dedicated teams per hyperscaler, deepening relationships on technology roadmaps and demand visibility. Results in longer-term LTAs with fair value exchange and predictable pricing, reducing volatility concerns.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how should we think about incremental gross margins from here? Is there a framework that we should use
Show response
Kris confirmed Q1 incremental margin was ~75%, Q2 guiding ~65% incremental, and going forward comfortable at ~50% sequential incremental margins.
how do you plan to meet rising customer demand while keeping supply/demand in balance
Show response
Irving detailed five levers: higher capacity drives (2.2M to 3M+ units), UltraSMR at 50% mix, areal density investment, manufacturing throughput via AI/automation, and new test labs.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I was hoping you could speak a bit about supply and what kind of exabyte growth you can get just from delivering higher capacity drives
Show response
Irving confirmed technology-driven exabyte growth without capacity investment. Don added managing CapEx at low end of 4-6% guidance range in uncertain environment.
is there still kind of a fixed cost benefit that would arise, or is it really all about higher capacity drives delivering higher ASPs
Show response
Irving confirmed margin expansion driven by technology value and TCO benefits to customers, not fixed cost leverage since supply is tightly managed.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what gives you the confidence that this is just a mid-cycle pause and then within the spin of the NAND asset
Show response
David explained NAND volume remains solid with bits up 9%, demand pushed right in PC/smartphone, and supply actions will accelerate rebalancing.
you talked about a sequential decline for the March quarter. Curious, is that a function of simply lower client and consumer units
Show response
Irving directly addressed that the decline is timing-related, not a demand issue, citing five quarters of growth and healthy outlook.
Calendar 2024 Q3
you raised your enterprise SSD as part of the mix to 15%, which I think is a pretty important inflection
Show response
Asked about the enterprise SSD mix raise; management confirmed the 15-20% range and doubling qualifications, answering directly.
AMATApplied Materials12 questions · 8 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
you talked about like-for-like pricing pushing higher. So could you speak maybe directly to that
Show response
Brice attributed ~300bps of 3-year GM gains to value-based pricing on every tool and expects continued improvement, already over 55% at semi systems.
A quarter ago, you quantified Semi Systems growth of 30-plus percent.
Show response
Brice said demand strengthened again and the >30% outlook is now higher, but declined to quantify the out-quarter; framed 2027 as another strong year.
Calendar 2026 Q2
how that might be causing order patterns to change, perhaps upfront payments, a change in the pricing environment
Show response
Brice explained pricing model is project-based 2-3 year contracts with gradual portfolio enrichment driving margin improvement. Gary added Applied's leadership in AI computing creates tailwinds for value capture.
How should we think about gross margins beyond the July quarter, particularly, as it appears as silicon will continue to grow
Show response
Brice confirmed Semi Systems gross margin at 54.8% with gradual improvement expected from new equipment launches. Guided 50.1% company-level gross margin for Q3.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I know you don't like to guide to WFE, but how does your view stand for 2026 versus these comments?
Show response
Gary provided comprehensive breakdown of growth drivers across logic, DRAM, HBM, and advanced packaging, confirming >20% H2-weighted growth and strong 2027 setup.
how are you thinking about your gross margins into the up cycle particularly when we consider rising volumes
Show response
Gary emphasized 700bp margin improvement and confidence in sustainable margin growth through higher-value products and EPIC co-innovation, with Brice noting 54%+ equipment gross margin.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how your conversations have evolved in the last few months? How has your visibility changed?
Show response
Gary reported dramatic improvement in customer demand visibility post-Asia trip, with some customers providing 2-year visibility to ensure supply chains are ready for significant H2 2026 ramps in advanced factories.
Calendar 2025 Q3
why your shipments could be so robust through July, but now in October, licenses are now the challenge
Show response
Brice clarified the Q4 guide includes zero revenue from pending export license applications (a large and growing backlog). On leading-edge, the ramp assumed linear progression but reality is more uneven due to market concentration and customer scheduling.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I wanted to focus on gross margins. I think a quarter ago, you talked about 48.2% as kind of floor
Show response
Brice confirmed low-48s as normalized margin floor with Q2 at 49.2% from favorable mix. Tariff impact was modest due to inventory positions and flexible global manufacturing. Expects continued improvement from value-based pricing and cost management.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I was hoping you could speak a bit to gross margins. You talked about base pricing starting to come in in the January quarter
Show response
Brice reiterated 48% as the normalized gross margin floor, noted Q1's 48.9% and Q2's 48.4% guide reflect favorable mix. Described pricing efforts as 'third inning' with room for further improvement.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the 48% now as a floor is fairly pretty good accomplishment. So, would love to hear kind of how you got there
Show response
Brice declined to call 48% a floor but won't call it peak either, with Q1 mix-driven 48.4% and ongoing cost and pricing improvements expected.
How are you thinking about 2024, 2025 more importantly, growth?
Show response
Gary noted five consecutive years of WFE growth and leading-edge acceleration but declined to make a specific FY2025 WFE forecast or speculate on administration changes.
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How do you see kind of the revenue cadence, first half, second half?
Show response
Su suggested the implied data center AI number is too low, reiterating well over 100% 2027 growth; Hu deferred specific 2027 Instinct margin guidance.
Calendar 2026 Q1
this would be a place where you could look to drive your Instinct margins closer to your corporate average
Show response
Jean acknowledged margin improvement opportunity but emphasized current priority is driving topline growth. Noted opportunities to improve margin on both ASP and cost side as the business scales.
I was hoping to speak a bit more about client for all of calendar '26
Show response
Lisa noted client was stronger than expected in Q1, with commercial PC and premium notebook mix shifts positive. Planning for some second-half demand impact from memory pricing but still expects to outperform market.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if you could kind of touch on gross margins through the year and as you balance kind of strengthening service CPU with, you know, perhaps greater you know, GPU accelerating in the second half.
Show response
Jean Hu cited favorable product mix across data center, client moving up the stack, commercial momentum and embedded recovery as drivers; MI450 ramp will drive mix dynamics in Q4 with more color later.
given the dramatic tightness, curious your ability to source incremental capacity from TSMC and elsewhere.
Show response
Lisa Su said server CPU TAM should grow strong double digits in 2026, AMD has been increasing supply capacity for several quarters enabling the stronger Q1 server guide, and is working with supply chain partners to expand further.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how you're thinking about OpenAI and other large customers and how we should be thinking about the breadth of your customer kind of penetration
Show response
Lisa Su said OpenAI is a key anchor but multiple large customers will have significant MI450 scale, including OCI and two DOE supercomputing systems, with supply chain dimensioned accordingly.
is there a framework that we should be thinking about for gross margins throughout calendar '26?
Show response
Jean Hu declined to guide 2026 but said new product generations typically show a transition-period margin dip followed by normalization, with top-line growth and gross margin dollars the priority.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how are you thinking about the use of proceeds? Is there saving for a rainy day or bolt-on acquisitions, perhaps more aggressive share buyback?
Show response
Jean Hu said the capital allocation priority is reinvestment in AI opportunities followed by share repurchase, noting $1.2B returned in first half and no change to the framework.
How are you thinking about the timing of the handoff, 350 to 400? How are you thinking about Helios' contributions?
Show response
Lisa Su said MI355 ramps through 1H 2026 before Helios MI400 takes over, with hyperscalers and neoclouds leading the initial MI400 ramp and sovereign customers ramping slightly later.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how should we think about traditional seasonality into the second half particularly with the potential of some pulling here
Show response
Lisa Su said internal planning assumes sub-seasonal second half; gaming CPU upgrade cycle is driving desktop sellout with Q1 patterns continuing four weeks into Q2.
can you talk about 400 series and rack level solution, go-to-market strategy?
Show response
Lisa Su emphasized early co-design with hyperscale and OEM partners to get ahead of the rackscale learning curve, noting MI350 focus is not primarily rackscale.
INTCIntel Corporation11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how we should be thinking about shape of the server kind of revenue recovery here
Show response
Zinsner keyed the server ramp to Intel 3 capacity for Granite Rapids and ASP uplift from higher core counts, calling growth well north of a double-digit CAGR.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was hoping you could walk through how you're planning to drive increased output through the second half of the year
Show response
Dave outlined three vectors: increased wafer starts across all nodes, yield and throughput improvements driven by Lip-Bu, and flexing external foundry partners including TSMC.
I would love to kind of level set where we are on the advanced packaging front. You talked about rising backlog
Show response
Dave disclosed that packaging demand is at billions per year, exceeding initial expectations of hundreds of millions. Expected at or above foundry average gross margins.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is that something you're still contemplating for 14A? Or is that more of a 10A adoption?
Show response
Dave confirmed High NA EUV will be part of 14A process with different variants.
Do you worry that if you wait for late 2026 to place orders that the lead times then might be longer than you thought? And as part of that, why wouldn't you look to be more aggressive today?
Show response
Dave clarified: aggressively adding tools on existing nodes (7/10, 3, 18A). 14A specifically gated by customer commitments, discipline to not build out capacity without demand. Short-term supply gains from yield and cycle time improvements require no CapEx.
Calendar 2025 Q3
with that improved cash position and liquidity, how has your thinking evolved in terms of investments in either CapEx or other investments in your product businesses
Show response
Dave said first priority is deleveraging, repaid $4.3B debt in Q3, all 2026 maturities will be repaid. CapEx remains disciplined and demand-driven. $16B OpEx target for 2026 maintained but mix being optimized for growth and returns.
Curious if that's a comment largely focused on server or also including clients and I guess depending on your thoughts there. How should we be thinking about Q1 trends versus normal seasonality
Show response
Dave confirmed constraints span both server and client. Yielding some small-core client to prioritize server. Q1 may be peak shortage as inventory buffers are depleted; improvements expected through rest of year.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do those numbers fully contemplate the headcount reductions that you are planning? Or, you know, over time, could we see additional savings?
Show response
Dave said headcount details not finalized yet, will update in July earnings. The $16B 2026 target is confident, but freed-up investment may go to areas Lip Bu wants to invest in.
Is the plan here to reinvent x86 to succeed in the AI world or perhaps a broader portfolio, including ARM?
Show response
Lip Bu broadly described exploring new architectures for edge and inference with low-power focus but said details would come later. Didn't directly address ARM question.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I would be curious to hear how your strategy has potentially evolved specifically for IFS
Show response
Dave emphasized more conservative capital deployment, wanting to exceed promises to all stakeholders. World-class foundry goal unchanged but with better ROIC discipline.
can you kind of walk through how you are thinking about the path to turning free cash flow positive?
Show response
Dave declined to give a specific FCF number for 2025 but cited working capital focus, lower CapEx, expected offsets over $10B, and potential Altera monetization.
Show 12 more companies
LRCXLam Research10 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Just curious, how do you think about the growth rate beyond 2026 into 2027?
Show response
Pointed back to the Investor Day framework and flagged upside, but declined to update the CSBG growth rate numerically.
could you speak to perhaps new entrants or more meaningful spending from historically larger spenders on the logic front
Show response
Confirmed engagement with a new U.S. logic customer but gave no sizing or timing; Archer added only qualitative share-opportunity framing.
Calendar 2026 Q1
if kind of the upgrade business that you're seeing is sustainable
Show response
Doug indicated CSBG should sustain near March record levels through remaining quarters, supported by high utilization and Equipment Intelligence innovation.
whether you're starting to see real slotting and desire to lock in time frames for delivery
Show response
Tim confirmed active 2027 conversations and planning discussions extending to 2028 fab openings, with longer visibility improving supply chain readiness.
Calendar 2025 Q4
could you speak a bit about the work you're doing with the supply chain, bringing on ramping Malaysia, and how we should think about that in the context of gross margins as revenues ramp in the '26...
Show response
Doug said Malaysia is their biggest location and they are expanding globally, but customer and product mix will matter more for gross margins than volume ramp in the near term.
Calendar 2025 Q3
over the last six, eight weeks, would love to hear how your conversations with customers have progressed. Are you seeing expedited meetings?
Show response
Tim distinguished near-term equipment demands for enterprise SSDs and HBM from longer-term data center announcements, describing both as along the same technology transitions.
Calendar 2025 Q2
your tool business is likely growing 3x the growth rate of WFE here in calendar '25, and you indicated expectations for relative outperformance to continue
Show response
Tim cited foundry/logic moly, gate-all-around, backside power, advanced packaging expansion across device types, and NAND layer scaling as key drivers.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I was hoping to hit on the NAND upgrade. So the biggest growth driver into the June quarter. We'd love to hear your thoughts around the sustainability
Show response
Tim explained two-thirds of bits remain at 1XX layers, creating a multi-year upgrade runway for moly, carbon gapfill, and new tools needed above 200 layers.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you speak to if you had to rank order by product or upgrade or whatnot, how we should be thinking
Show response
Tim ranked NAND upgrades as the biggest year-on-year change, pointing to two-thirds of bits still on sub-200-layer nodes and strength in gate-all-around and advanced packaging.
Calendar 2024 Q3
are you at the stage where you are funding what you need to fund?
Show response
Management said it funded its priorities and still delivered over a point of operating margin leverage, hoping to continue leverage in 2025.
MUMicron Technology, Inc.9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
When you think about these cash deposits, do you view that as fungible cash and used for CapEx?
Show response
Mark said deposits are unrestricted but did not change near-term gross-cash needs; Micron will hold liquidity for operations and investment.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I am curious if you could discuss the breadth of the different customers that you are speaking with
Show response
Sanjay confirmed SCA discussions span multiple customers across multiple markets (not just hyperscale), while declining to comment on specific CapEx or ROIC tie-ins.
Has that number changed
Show response
Sanjay confirmed non-HBM margins now exceed HBM margins but said HBM demand continues to be strong, did not update the prior HBM TAM outlook, and emphasized Micron's portfolio approach across HBM, LP, SoC-M, DDR5, and SSDs.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how should we think about cost down across both DRAM and NAND
Show response
Mark declined to guide costs beyond Q2 but said 1-gamma DRAM and G9 NAND ramps are a cost tailwind, while new fab startup costs starting 2026–2027 are a relatively small impact at these margin levels.
the relative growth seems very conservative in the backdrop that we are in
Show response
Mark acknowledged the entire industry will be short to demand, said Micron has pulled in tools and accelerated Idaho construction, and noted the company is only able to meet 50-66% of several key customers' medium-term demand.
Calendar 2025 Q3
it appears net CapEx implied $18 billion versus $13.8 billion last year
Show response
Mark confirmed the ~$18B net CapEx framework, said the vast majority will be DRAM (node transitions plus greenfield construction), and declined to give gross vs net split for fiscal 2026.
it certainly feels like in the last month or two, there's been an inflection in DRAM demand led by inference hyperscalers
Show response
Sanjay declined to give F2Q guidance but framed the demand broadening across AI servers, traditional servers, smartphones and PCs alongside tight supply as a healthy setup for calendar 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was hoping to revisit your comments on HBM. So you're talking 23%, 24% market share
Show response
Sanjay said Micron is already at a $6B+ HBM run rate and may reach industry-share parity earlier than year-end, while deferring specific 2026 share guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is there a point where we're thinking about the underutilization charges and the period cost
Show response
Mark explained that structurally lower NAND capacity shifts more underutilization into inventory rather than period costs, and flagged rising Idaho start-up costs through 2026.
NVDANVIDIA Corporation8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Can you speak to the evolving workloads you’re seeing with agentic AI?
Show response
Jensen walked through the four AI lifecycle phases and the rising revenue opportunity per gigawatt, positioning Groq for high-interactivity workloads.
Calendar 2026 Q2
how do you see Vera Rubin in your extreme co engineering impacting your share of the inference market
Show response
Jensen highlighted growing inference share via Anthropic partnership expanding from near-zero coverage, every frontier model company expected to adopt Vera Rubin from launch.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Curious how we should think about your future road map
Show response
Jensen emphasized Grace Blackwell and Rubin's use of giant reticle-limited dies and architecture compatibility, and said Grok will extend NVIDIA's architecture similar to Mellanox.
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you see a realistic path for supply to catch up with demand over the next twelve to eighteen months
Show response
Jensen framed supply planning as well underway and reiterated the three platform-shift thesis (accelerated computing, generative AI, agentic AI) driving compounding demand.
Calendar 2025 Q3
speak to, you know, your vision for growth into 2026
Show response
Jensen framed the growth runway as a $3-4T AI infrastructure opportunity over five years, citing doubled hyperscaler CapEx to ~$600B and agentic AI driving orders-of-magnitude compute needs.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Saudi Arabia, the UAE
Show response
Jensen said orders have grown since GTC, referenced 800 AI factories in planning, and framed intelligence as essential infrastructure like electricity, asserting there will be many more announcements ahead.
Calendar 2025 Q1
as test time compute and reinforcement learning shows such promise
Show response
Jensen walked through pretrain, post-train and test-time compute as three scaling laws, said test-time compute is already 100x one-shot and could reach millions of times more, and argued Blackwell's fungible architecture is why the industry is consolidating on it.
Calendar 2024 Q4
just a question for you on the debate around whether scaling for large language models have stalled
Show response
Jensen directly addressed the scaling debate, explaining three scaling methods (pre-training, post-training, inference time) are all active, driving demand across the stack.
STXSeagate Technology Holdings8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
if you could speak to how we should be thinking about contracts rolling off renegotiating of existing contracts
Show response
Dave explained upside exabytes are sold above contract price as yields improve; Gianluca said the LTA renegotiation trend is unchanged and pricing keeps pushing higher.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is this changing perhaps your product structure roadmap. I know you announced a partnership with NVIDIA
Show response
Mosley confirmed aerial density remains the primary focus. Acknowledged performance tier conversations happening and prior stacked actuator designs could be revisited, but highest capacity per drive is top priority.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Do you see a world where pricing could flat or even move positive year-over-year?
Show response
Mosley suggested flat to slightly up pricing per exabyte is possible given strong demand. Romano confirmed they are executing better than the 50% incremental margin model from the Analyst Day.
Calendar 2025 Q3
your customers are turning to SSDs, given the tremendous tightness on the HDD side. Curious your thoughts around that cannibalization
Show response
Mosley pushed back firmly on SSD cannibalization, saying architectures are well-set for years. Romano noted the gap between supply and demand is actually getting bigger each quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q2
for the September quarter, you're guiding up 2%. You have an extra week, but you talked about select HAMR bits going to qualification
Show response
Mosley explained revenue growth is dictated by BTO commitments set 6-9 months prior and capacity additions come via technology transitions. Romano confirmed the low to mid-teens growth trajectory is on track.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how is your visibility improved? What kind of sense of urgency are you getting from your customers?
Show response
Mosley noted BTO visibility extends into calendar 2026, and pricing adjustments are factored into forward agreements as Seagate continues product transitions.
Calendar 2024 Q4
On the $200 million for March, is that completely traded away or are you expecting partial part of that business in the June quarter?
Show response
Mosley noted the supply hole won't fully transfer to June but demand remains strong. Highlighted video as a major demand driver across cloud and edge with AI creation tools expanding content.
Calendar 2024 Q3
So I was hoping you could kind of speak to where your visibility is today for nearline?
Show response
Asked about nearline demand visibility and March seasonality; Dave said mass-capacity visibility extends ~nine months on the build-to-order model, and Gianluca noted March seasonality in legacy and VIA.
ASMLASML Holding7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 3 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
should we be thinking that this 60% incremental op margin is the target that you're going after
Show response
Roger declined to quantify a target but said disciplined R&D and SG&A management should drive improving operating leverage in coming years.
Calendar 2025 Q2
where 90 days ago, you talked about growth and now greater uncertainty. I would think on the tariff front, there would be more certainty. And so curious why that has gotten worse
Show response
Roger said customer concern has intensified with no line of sight on the 232 review, full-battle-mode tariff daily updates, and customers delaying confirmation of demand, which is why 2026 has become less certain.
I wanted to revisit the first question, Roger, where you guys have kind of reduced your outlook for EUV revenues from 50% to 30%
Show response
Roger pushed back on the 50% framing, said the original was ~40% growth, and explained the step-down by the shift of tool-productivity revenue from system sales into upgrade/installed-base plus the 3800-heavy tool mix delivering the same capacity with fewer units.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how we should be thinking about the overall implications to litho intensity
Show response
Christophe said single-expose conversion will happen gradually as productivity and cost-of-technology gains compound, particularly visible in DRAM given its higher multi-patterning baseline.
would love to hear the visibility you have today, the conversations you're having with your customers today as it pertains to 2026, 2027?
Show response
Christophe said committed AI investments create a high bar for customers to change behavior and reaffirmed 2025 and 2026 as growth years, but said 2027 visibility is still limited.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you comment on kind of what you're seeing in terms of EUV layer counts, whether it's A16 or whether it's going HBM3, HBM4, etcetera?
Show response
Christophe pointed back to the Investor Day framing, AI chips require more advanced nodes, driving acceleration of Moore's Law and historically more advanced-litho exposures, but declined to share specific layer-count data by node.
I would have thought you would have completely derisked other markets. So can you touch on the level of derisking embedded in your assumptions for those customers where you've seen pushouts to 2026?
Show response
Christophe said most of the EUV pushout risk is already reflected in the guide and that the high-end scenario is tied to securing additional clean-room space at customer fabs, an active conversation.
AVGOBroadcom Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
we are seeing many kind of XPU attached derivatives across interconnect storage, other.
Show response
Hock reaffirmed the focused chip model, XPUs plus clustering/networking components, and the new XPU platform vehicle to fund frontier-lab compute.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how are you thinking about the move to disaggregate prefill and decode from the GPU ecosystem and the impact to custom silicon demand?
Show response
Hock said workload-specific XPUs (prefill/decode/MoE) are diverging from GPU designs, with LLM customers building two parallel chip tracks.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to talk about custom silicon and maybe speak to how you expect content to grow for broad generation to generation
Show response
Hock said mature customers are now designing parallel training + inference chips, with further variations for prefill vs decode, providing substantial per-customer content growth.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I understand that the guide down 70 bps, particularly with software lower sequentially. And greater contributions from wireless and XPU. But to to hit that 77 spot seven
Show response
Kirsten confirmed XPU and wireless lower-margin mix partially offset by rising software revenue; no detail on semiconductor margin trajectory.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you discuss workloads that are optimal that you're seeing for custom silicon? And that over time, what percentage of your XPU business could be inference versus training?
Show response
Hock said there's no inference vs training differentiation in custom vs merchant; value is in end-to-end co-optimization of hardware and software over multiple generations.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how you're expanding your portfolio now to six mega scale kind of frontier models. Will enable you to, you know, a more plush, you know, share tremendous information, but at the same time, a world ...
Show response
Hock said Broadcom provides base semiconductor technology and optimizes ~5 degrees of freedom (compute, bandwidth, memory capacity/bandwidth, latency, power) but customers own their models and algorithms.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was hoping you could speak to the mix you see there between XPU and networking
Show response
Hock clarified the $60-90B SAM covers only three hyperscale customers and is a Serviceable Addressable Market, with AI connectivity at approximately 15-20% of dollar content.
SNDKSandisk Corporation7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
with pricing up modestly sequentially, can you help me understand why gross margins are guided lower
Show response
Goeckeler tied the mid-80s margin guide to prioritizing durability and fair returns over maximizing a single quarter, with Visoso adding prudent component-cost assumptions.
Calendar 2026 Q1
you are now no debt, $3.7 billion cash. What do you think you need to retain given your view today and the new contracts
Show response
Visoso pointed to the $6B buyback announcement but did not specify target cash balance, saying they will update as execution proceeds.
Curious to get your thoughts around supply-demand going forward for NAND
Show response
Goeckeler said data center growth keeps accelerating, mid-to-high-teens bit growth achievable through nodal transitions with declining CapEx as percent of revenue.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is there a way to quantify incremental demand for NAND related to AI infrastructure build-out?
Show response
CEO highlighted data center exabyte demand forecasts have jumped from mid-20s to mid-40s to high 60% growth in successive quarters, almost all AI-driven.
when you're in a completely, you know, cash position. You know, how should we think about, you know, capital return
Show response
CFO confirmed debt reduced from $2 billion to $600 million, with priorities to continue investing in business and building prudent cash reserves before discussing shareholder returns.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how are you thinking about your bit shipment growth opportunities here in calendar '25, '26?
Show response
Management confirmed plans to grow in line with market at mid-to-high-teens bit growth, with upside from BiCS8 productivity gains enabling more bits without additional wafers.
are you seeing similar trends emerge here in NAND? How does your visibility extend?
Show response
Management confirmed multi-quarter deals emerging and customers providing demand visibility into 2027, signaling structural shift from quarterly negotiations.
NXPINXP Semiconductors6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
speak to maybe the near term, the next 6 to 9 months within the kind of structure of 57% to 63% target model
Show response
Bill cited channel refill opportunity and ongoing cost efficiencies as near-term gross margin levers beyond utilization improvement.
I was hoping perhaps you could be a little more specific within your key growth drivers and the trends you're seeing there, both from a China and kind of non- China perspective
Show response
Kurt confirmed all accelerated growth drivers on track to Investor Day targets. Auto revenue guided for Q3 is only 4% below the Q4 2023 peak.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how much of these acquisitions are defensive in terms of a world where MCU discrete purchases probably decrease and focus on software is more important
Show response
Kurt framed all three acquisitions as offensive moves to enhance differentiation in compute and SDV, not just defensive against China competition.
when you now expect excess inventory to be digested and how are you thinking from a geographic perspective
Show response
Kurt highlighted Q2 auto flat YoY as a turning point after five quarters of decline, driven by stabilizing direct orders and slower Western Tier 1 inventory digestion.
Calendar 2024 Q4
would be curious if you think we're set up for normal seasonal trends into Q2 and beyond
Show response
Kurt provided soft Q2 guidance of flat to slightly up but heavily caveated the limited visibility. Acknowledged Q1 is on the lower bound of seasonal.
Our gross margins, given where we are in the cycle, 56.3% is spectacular. Would love to hear kind of how you see a recovery playing out
Show response
Bill confirmed gross margins would stay at current levels plus or minus 50bps until revenue growth returns, with utilization in low 70s providing upside lever.
QCOMQualcomm6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
curious how you're planning for you know, a situation where this could be sustained. Are your Chinese customers looking to design in CXMT?
Show response
Cristiano clarified QCOM doesn't buy memory directly. Qualified with every memory provider including CXMT. Multi-generation memory controller provides flexibility. Full fiscal year handset market sized by DRAM availability.
if we do see a mix shift higher Snapdragon but, you know, unit volume's lower, how should we think about that impacting your QCT EBT margins?
Show response
Akash confirmed premium tier mix shift is a margin benefit. Higher-value chips in constrained environment should support margin mix.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there an update in terms of how we should model that for calendar '26?
Show response
Akash confirmed no change to Apple share assumptions vs prior guidance.
revenues grew 5% year-on-year, yet margins were down 100-plus bps. And I'm curious, is that a function of mix?
Show response
Akash attributed margin decline to incremental data center investment, which is additive to the normal OpEx reallocation framework used in prior years.
Calendar 2024 Q3
pretty much every other company that I've come across is seeing challenges there
Show response
Palkhiwala pointed to consumer strength from new XR/PC launches and said the industrial market is at an inflection point with rising demand for AI-ready solutions.
in your 10-K, you talked about a large customer potentially going internal as a next several quarter risk.
Show response
Palkhiwala reiterated the known planning assumption of the large customer's share ramping to 20% for the 2026 launch with the agreement ending after, and said there was no new information.
TXNTexas Instruments4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
could you speak to your plans for utilization? Are there any sort of changes in mix?
Show response
Rafael confirmed flat loadings for Q3, inventory growing at a slower rate, and reiterated 75-85% long-term fall-through framework.
With the ITC going from 25% to 35%, curious if you can comment on your thoughts on impact to your net CapEx into '26, '27
Show response
Rafael detailed the tax law provisions (ITC increase, R&D expensing, permanent FDII) and noted significantly lower cash tax rates expected for several years, though not yet reflected in financials.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if we do assume normal seasonal pattern for your top-line into Q2, Q3, should we assume that loadings would move higher in Q2
Show response
Rafael declined to forecast Q2 specifically but signaled inventory levels should hold at $4.5B, implying loadings would adjust with revenue rather than drain inventory.
I was hoping you could give us a framework for thinking about gross margins beyond the March quarter. You just gave us the depreciation
Show response
Rafael provided the 75-85% fall-through framework plus depreciation guidance and explained factory loadings impact. Comprehensive long-term model guidance.
ADIAnalog Devices2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
is there kind of a percentage of mix that we should be thinking about that should be growing significantly faster than the rest of your business?
Show response
Vince quantified data center at $1B run rate (grew 50% in FY25) and ATE at $800M run rate (grew 40%), both expected to see double-digit growth over the next few years. Vertical power at the knee of the curve.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you talked about a number of company-specific drivers that should allow you to outperform in calendar 2025
Show response
Vince ranked recovery by segment: industrial led by healthy inventories and AI/defense, then consumer, comms (wireline), and automotive last. Thorough end-market outlook.
MRVLMarvell Technology2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how is this backdrop, particularly in light of where memory pricing is today, support your new design wins?
Show response
Murphy agreed with NVIDIA's fungibility thesis, saying Marvell's ability to quickly execute custom and semi-custom designs amid supply, power, and architectural constraints is a key advantage, with the shift from training to inference monetization driving broad pickup across custom, optics, and memory.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Where are we in terms of the total business versus just AI custom silicon?
Show response
Confirmed vast majority of custom silicon is AI for both this year and next. Other programs have come in but AI magnitude has outpaced. Declined to break out non-AI/AI growth rates but noted custom will grow faster due to lower base and ongoing ramp.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions |
| TER Teradyne | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions |
| WDC Western Digital | 13 | 8%1 of 13 questions |
| AMAT Applied Materials | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| INTC Intel Corporation | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| LRCX Lam Research | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| STX Seagate Technology Holdings | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
- KLACKLA Corporation · 14 questions0%none of 14 questions
- TERTeradyne · 14 questions14%2 of 14 questions
- WDCWestern Digital · 13 questions8%1 of 13 questions
- AMATApplied Materials · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- INTCIntel Corporation · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- LRCXLam Research · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- MUMicron Technology, Inc. · 9 questions11%1 of 9 questions
- NVDANVIDIA Corporation · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- STXSeagate Technology Holdings · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
Show all 18 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ASML ASML Holding | 7 | 43%3 of 7 questions |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| SNDK Sandisk Corporation | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| QCOM Qualcomm | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| TXN Texas Instruments | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| ADI Analog Devices | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MRVL Marvell Technology | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- ASMLASML Holding · 7 questions43%3 of 7 questions
- AVGOBroadcom Inc. · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- SNDKSandisk Corporation · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- NXPINXP Semiconductors · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- QCOMQualcomm · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- TXNTexas Instruments · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- ADIAnalog Devices · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MRVLMarvell Technology · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2024 Q4 | 22 | 9%2 of 22 questions | 14 |
| 2025 Q1 | 20 | 0%none of 20 questions | 13 |
| 2025 Q2 | 18 | 17%3 of 18 questions | 12 |
| 2025 Q3 | 20 | 15%3 of 20 questions | 13 |
| 2025 Q4 | 22 | 14%3 of 22 questions | 14 |
| 2026 Q1 | 21 | 0%none of 21 questions | 12 |
| 2026 Q2 | 18 | 17%3 of 18 questions | 13 |
| 2026 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2024 Q422 questions · challenge rate 9% (2 of 22 questions) · 14 companies
- 2025 Q120 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 20 questions) · 13 companies
- 2025 Q218 questions · challenge rate 17% (3 of 18 questions) · 12 companies
- 2025 Q320 questions · challenge rate 15% (3 of 20 questions) · 13 companies
- 2025 Q422 questions · challenge rate 14% (3 of 22 questions) · 14 companies
- 2026 Q121 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 21 questions) · 12 companies
- 2026 Q218 questions · challenge rate 17% (3 of 18 questions) · 13 companies
- 2026 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand55
- Margin35
- Cloud & AI34
- Revenue Growth33
- Competitive Dynamics31
- Innovation & R&D21
- Capex Investment21
- Pricing19
- Supply Chain18
- Capital Allocation11
Show all 19 topics
- Product Launch10
- Guidance Reliability9
- Cost Pressure5
- Inventory4
- Trade Tariffs3
- M&A2
- Regulation Policy2
- Geographic Expansion1
- Macroeconomic1