Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Dan Arias

Stifel · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
56on tracked calls
Challenge rate
5%3 of 56 questions
Companies
9questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 56 of 56 questions from 9 companies

MTDMettler Toledo13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 13 challenging
MTD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you just dive into the acceleration a bit? What does the momentum there look like

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management directly attributed China's strength to industrial double-digit growth, with lab expected to improve in H2.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you maybe talk about cost management in the current environment

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Shawn emphasized agility on cost and pricing mitigation, with tariff benefits and inflation headwinds roughly offsetting.

can you just maybe pinpoint where it is that you found yourself needing to adjust the outlook?

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Shawn said the changes were mostly rounding, with better China momentum offset modestly by softer Western markets.

Calendar 2025 Q4

food retail was pretty strong here. Is something picking up? Or is that just sort of the inherent lumpiness of that business

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Patrick attributed retail strength to project timing and innovation, not market recovery. Q1 guided high single digit but FY2026 flattish due to tough comps. Two years of new product introductions competing very well.

how would you characterize the pharmacopeia opportunity over there that you talked about a little bit last quarter just in terms of what might be tangible

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Patrick described pharmacopeia as continuous upgrade opportunity supporting lab growth, not a step change. Good customer engagement in Q3-Q4. Involves minimum weight requirements and ultrapure water quality monitoring compliance.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you maybe just compare what you expect on the lab/biopharma side versus more of the industrial side

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Shawn guided both China lab and industrial to low single digit for 2026. China Pharmacopoeia update and GLP-1 investments as lab upside. Industrial had first growth in 2 years in Q3. Team visit 1.5 months ago was encouraging.

to what extent do you think onshoring demand can work itself into the picture for 2026 versus 2027 and beyond

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Patrick said MTD well positioned with 50% production/QA/QC sales exposure. Moderate 2026 impact, more in 2027. Currently in planning phase with key accounts on pharma and semiconductor reshoring.

Calendar 2025 Q2

that sounds like it's now functionally $0.40 lower. Does that include some offset activities? Or is that the gross impact

Trade TariffsGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Shawn confirmed $0.40 is gross headwind. No Q3 impact due to inventory levels. Q4 has limited mitigation time. Already have straw man for 2026 full offset.

does visibility into demand look like it's changing at all or at least stabilizing in some way, such that a forecast one way or another has more confidence behind it

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Shawn noted increasingly positive trends before Swiss announcement. Industrial was a highlight. Patrick added China came in better than guided in Q2, second half expected flattish.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if you were to get some de-escalation here, like, it's possible do you see the chance for some stickiness that could kind of leave the door open for a benefit

PricingTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Shawn acknowledged surcharges would need to be pulled back if rates change but noted supply chain investments in Mexico are permanent competitive advantages.

The capabilities in Mexico, I think that's through Biokix, if I remember right. It used to be Pipette tips and life sciences reagents

Supply ChainTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Shawn confirmed Mexico now produces lab, industrial, and food retail products after facility expansion. Significantly broader than original pipette/reagent scope.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is there any change in the way that you're feeling about industrial this year? I mean, to Patrick's point, it does seem like there's some good overall momentum in product inspection

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Shawn confirmed core Industrial still cautious but product inspection tracking to high single-digit in Q1 on momentum carry-forward.

I just want to understand the assumptions on biopharma, which looks like it's gradually recovering here

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Shawn confirmed bioprocessing improvement affirmed in Q4 but noted biotech/liquid handling still mixed. Lab guided mid- to high single-digit ex-delays.

TECHBio-Techne9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
TECH company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

does that assume that both academic and biotech are growing at that point? Or is it what gets you there really just continued pharma strength

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jim indicated mid-single-digit Q4 growth achievable largely on easier comps without significant biotech or academic step up, though improvement in those could be upside.

on consumables, how are you thinking about the pull-through rate for LUNIPOR this year? Is that something that you think can grow as an average?

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kim confirmed current pull-through at $45K per instrument per year with target of $90K as multiomics adoption scales. Broadening antibody portfolio for spatial and expanding RNA probe capabilities. Described as multi-quarter or more than a year play.

Calendar 2025 Q3

plus 1% organic this quarter, ex the GMP customers and you're expecting the same thing next quarter ex those accounts, 3% without them

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jim confirmed the math: Q1 was +1% ex-2 customers, Q2 guide implies +3% ex-2 customers, demonstrating meaningful underlying acceleration despite total growth remaining roughly flat.

what kind of 80-20 type rule exists when it comes to these cell therapy accounts?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kim declined to quantify individual customer concentration citing high variability in order sizes by indication and clinical phase. Emphasized the 700-customer pipeline total as evidence of diversification beyond the two Fast Track customers.

Calendar 2025 Q2

the EBITDA threshold could be managed to, especially since I think that's the one that's actually closer to hitting the target

Show response

Kim confirmed EBITDA threshold is close and could be triggered with a little business tailwind, potentially allowing earlier acquisition than the December 2027 backstop date.

Can you expand on where the funding is coming from for the 2/3 of the academic customers that aren't tied to the NIH?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim explained that approximately 50-55% of US academic funding comes from federal sources, with roughly 50% of federal from NIH specifically. Combined with 12% US academic revenue share, total NIH exposure is less than one-third of academic.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if the budget over the next couple of years is down 20%, 30%, 40%, which is in line with the proposal for 2026, is the idea that you can still get back to double-digits

ChallengingRegulation PolicyRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jim confirmed that even modeling a 40% academic revenue cut with gradual recovery to 3-5% historical growth, the company would still achieve double-digit growth over a five-year period given academic was never the key growth driver in the strategic plan.

Is there a growth rate for the quarter? And just given what we're talking about, about some of the fluctuations in pharma ordering patterns

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kim provided TTM growth of a little over 30% but deflected quarterly specifics citing lumpiness from Phase III ordering patterns. Noted quarterly swings of 90%, 60%, 10% across recent quarters.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what kind of growth expectations do you have for that piece next quarter?

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim declined specific Q3 guidance for GMP reagents but noted TTM ~40% growth. Called GMP reagents the second most profitable product line, very close to core RUO reagents in profitability.

TMOThermo Fisher Scientific9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
TMO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

you called out Chemical Analysis is doing well. That's been one of the areas that people have just had some concern broadly across the space.

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Marc cited higher commodity prices and increased safety and security demand as the growth drivers.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I'm curious if you think there's anything that's sort of an offset there that maybe 90 days later, you're feeling a little bit better about

Guidance ReliabilityMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Marc framed Q1 in-line performance as risk retirement, noted customer sentiment is strong particularly in pharma/biotech, and explained the inflation cushion as prudent given uncertainty.

I think that there might have been also some phasing in pharma services that was material. Is that a quantifiable amount?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jim quantified Q1 organic growth headwinds as ~1pp from selling days and ~1pp from pharma services phasing, confirming normalized Q1 growth closer to 3%.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you finding that that's actually translating the spending plans

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Casper said pharma customers have good confidence navigating government policies with excitement around their pipelines, and biotech funding sentiment is incredibly positive though there is a spending lag.

Is mid singles plus the right way to think about things

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Casper confirmed mid-single-digit plus is the right framing for 2026 biopharma growth, with different paths to reach the 3-4% total organic target.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what are you seeing on the research and industrial side? Is that fluid in a way that you think introduces some additional risk

PricingGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Casper said China pricing pressure is less pronounced in industrial and pharma vs diagnostics, with pharma and biotech growing modestly in the quarter.

I'm just curious whether demand from small and emerging biotech is getting any better from where you sit

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Casper saw nice momentum from biotech with strong clinical research activity, pharma services early traction, and M&A transactions helping the broader ecosystem.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you just maybe expand on the extent to which it feels like the spending decisions are being influenced by the macro factors at play

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Casper said mid-single-digit pharma growth was the best in 9 quarters with broad strength, and customer tone from both small biotech and large pharma is incredibly positive.

just given the moving parts on the hardware side, it would be helpful to know how you see growth there in the back half

Revenue GrowthTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Williamson noted positive book-to-bill but said tariff guidance assumptions for H2 remain pessimistic on China demand; improvement there would help.

RVTYRevvity8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
RVTY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you finding that some of the early uptick signals that you're talking about are they coming from the companies that have successfully raised money?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Prahlad attributed improvement to combination of funding, M&A activity, and greater policy/regulatory clarity. Noted need to see durability over longer period before calling true uptake.

Can you just sort of refresh us on the timing of coming to market and then what your uptake trajectory might be?

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Prahlad highlighted Signals is in its most significant NPI phase ever (Biodesign, Synthetica, Labgistics). Reiterated aspiration to double software revenue in 4-5 years (~15% organic CAGR).

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you elaborate a little bit on the biotech element and just how much of the incremental enthusiasm that you might be pointing to is due to some of the larger biotech companies versus some of the...

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Prahlad specified activity is concentrated in large and mid-sized biotech, which are traditional RVTY customers. Smaller/emerging biotech conversations ongoing but at lower activity levels.

on the GEL contributions, which I think you've kind of pointed to as being heavily weighted in in 4Q for $10 million or so, how should we model that sequentially in the quarters after that?

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Max clarified $10M was full H2 contribution (started modestly in Q3, picks up in Q4). Q4 run rate becomes consistent quarterly baseline for FY26.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you just help us with what the ramp-up periods look like for volumes?

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Max confirmed ~$10M in H2 for Genomics England, mostly in Q4, with strong early visibility from first month of operations.

Can you just sort of explicitly update us on the confidence that you have in that business not getting caught up there?

Regulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Prahlad maintained VBP hasn't impacted RVTY but acknowledged government's broader cost-reduction focus across DRG, Sunshine Act, and VBP.

Calendar 2025 Q1

What kind of step down should we assume in the back half of the year? It seems like you're north of 20% for the first half

Revenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Max guided Signals to upper-teens for full year with strong double-digit H2, maintaining confidence in LRP targets.

Do you see yourself as being potentially acquisitive and particularly on something larger than maybe a bolt-on over the next 12 months to 18 months?

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Prahlad declined to comment on specific deals but emphasized strong organic profile post-transformation, active but not M&A-dependent.

WATWaters Corporation6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
WAT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Is there a margin impact that we should be mindful of there? I know in the early days, there can actually be some downward pressure

MarginProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO noted chemistry and software launches are margin-accretive, offsetting initial instrument launch costs; value engineering underway on Alliance iS/TQ.

to what extent do you see [ pill ] count increases underpinning that such that you can think about an incrementally larger opportunity

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management framed biosimilars as significant volume growth opportunity with lower prices driving higher penetration and access.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you just touch on TA for the quarter, 1% growth was a bit lower than I think where the Street was

Show response

Management attributed TA softness to U.S. order timing, with strong China battery testing partially offsetting.

is there anything that you can say about mass spec in biopharma? And the reason I asked just because very clear that PFAS is helping LC-MS pretty significantly

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management acknowledged early traction in drug metabolism (DMPK) but declined to elaborate further for competitive reasons.

Calendar 2024 Q4

to what extent do you feel like the uptake there is partly a function of or being helped by the LC replacement cycle

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO clarified MS growth is driven by its own innovation across PFAS, clinical and bioanalytical characterization, not LC replacement.

to what extent do you still see there being additional capacity needs in the lab based on the water testing side, in the US

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management described the PFAS opportunity as still in early innings, with multiple testing layers from academic to remediation.

TEMTempus AI, Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
TEM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is that 25% that you're talking about inclusive of some ASP increase?

PricingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Eric said the durable 25% growth reflects many levers; Jim said nothing is implied on volume.

Calendar 2025 Q3

to the extent that, that involves R&D, is there data next year that we should look out for?

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Eric expects tumor-naive data in lung and CRC next year, possibly bleeding into 2027.

Calendar 2025 Q2

on data, can you just maybe orient us on expectations for the back half year.

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim guided data growth to around 30% for the year, declining to give quarterly unit-level guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q1

What's gone the way that you expected within your program? What's been a bit of a surprise?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Eric said MRD demand is strong across naive and informed, with volumes gated pending reimbursement.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Is there an implicit ASP assumption that you can share maybe not necessarily the exact dollar amount per se

PricingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jim declined to give exact Ambry ASPs but attributed the 2024 accelerant to higher cash collections.

Show 3 more companies
ILMNIllumina, Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
ILMN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

What is the cost per G or the cost per genome that you guys are going to quote to these folks

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jacob framed pricing as an elasticity game (e.g., exome-to-genome 15x intensity) and deferred 35B pricing until closer to launch.

Calendar 2025 Q4

when and where should we look to see that in action? Will you be able to lay out for people

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jacob pointed to AGBT and examples like Constellation MAP Reads and SomaLogic cost-per-sample to demonstrate total-workflow economics.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you just talk a little bit about Gb growth from here and high throughput?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ankur expected Gb output to stay above 30%, led by clinical and MRD, with proteomics as incremental; Jacob framed the long-term opportunity as very strong.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how much of what you saw as an opportunity when you showed up to Illumina did you tackle and capture in 2024

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ankur detailed Singapore and India footprint moves and framed multi-year cost-structure opportunity through 2026.

AAgilent Technologies1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
A company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Is that more of a placement comment or a pull-through comment? Where do you think the opportunity is strongest there?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Simon confirmed double-digit YoY growth in Omnis instrument placements. Menu expansion is key development initiative over next 12-24 months. Durable mid-to-high single-digit growth expected from portfolio investments and strong macros.

DHRDanaher Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
DHR company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

does that assume the full $150 million of cost savings is captured this year

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Matt explained $50M captured in Q1 is in the guide; remaining ~$100M is held as cushion against macro uncertainty. Layers in evenly across remaining quarters, with perhaps slightly more in Q3.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
MTD Mettler Toledo138%1 of 13 questions
TECH Bio-Techne911%1 of 9 questions
TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific90%none of 9 questions
RVTY Revvity80%none of 8 questions
WAT Waters Corporation617%1 of 6 questions
TEM Tempus AI, Inc.50%none of 5 questions
ILMN Illumina, Inc.40%none of 4 questions
A Agilent Technologies1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
DHR Danaher Corporation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • MTD
    Mettler Toledo · 13 questions
    8%1 of 13 questions
  • TECH
    Bio-Techne · 9 questions
    11%1 of 9 questions
  • TMO
    Thermo Fisher Scientific · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • RVTY
    Revvity · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • WAT
    Waters Corporation · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • TEM
    Tempus AI, Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • ILMN
    Illumina, Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • A
    Agilent Technologies · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • DHR
    Danaher Corporation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q470%none of 7 questions5
2025 Q11020%2 of 10 questions6
2025 Q2100%none of 10 questions6
2025 Q3110%none of 11 questions6
2025 Q4100%none of 10 questions6
2026 Q1617%1 of 6 questions4
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions2
  1. 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
  2. 2025 Q110 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 6 companies
  3. 2025 Q210 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 6 companies
  4. 2025 Q311 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 6 companies
  5. 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 6 companies
  6. 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  7. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand27
  • Revenue Growth19
  • Product Launch10
  • Guidance Reliability8
  • Regulation Policy7
  • Macroeconomic5
  • Pricing5
  • Competitive Dynamics5
  • Margin5
  • Geographic Expansion4
Show all 18 topics
  • Trade Tariffs4
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Cost Pressure3
  • Cloud & AI2
  • M&A2
  • Capex Investment1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Capital Allocation1