Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Dan Jester

BMO Capital Markets · covers Industrials, Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
29on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 29 questions
Companies
6questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 29 of 29 questions from 6 companies

ADPADP9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
ADP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

And as we think about fiscal 2027, should we expect 100% penetration? Or how should we expect the ramp?

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Gave the FY2027 target explicitly (broad deployment across sales and the U.S. service population) without committing to a 100% figure.

Has this translated to a change yet in terms of how you are thinking about headcount investment?

Labor MarketCost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Direct: headcount flat at 67,000 year over year, adds in sales and product offset by service and operations efficiencies, no formal headcount target.

Calendar 2026 Q1

maybe just philosophically, maybe give us an update on sort of partner versus build it yourself for these third-party agents

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Maria emphasized client-first philosophy. Marketplace has 800+ integrated solutions globally. New AI agent section launched with curated third-party agents aligned with ADP's responsible AI principles.

Have you made any comments about sort of uptake repeat usage, engagement levels with the customers that have access to it

Show response

Maria confirmed strong uptake with clients returning repeatedly to AI tools. Value shared through value-based pricing, margin efficiency, and bookings/retention rather than discrete per-usage fees.

Calendar 2025 Q4

as you think about the larger part of the enterprise for Lyric, do you have critical mass now in terms of reference customers

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Maria said Lyric wins are driven by CHROs seeking flexibility, AI built into the core, and human-centric design. Building critical mass now but these are large deals that take time to convert to revenue.

I would love you to compare and contrast that with sort of the retention commentary that it just kind of came in line with your expectations

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Maria explained the slight retention decline is from anticipated normalization of small business out-of-business rates, not from client dissatisfaction. Peter noted they're talking about 10-30bps against a very high 92.1% base.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Anything that you'd call out with regards to the difference between sort of the U.S. and international markets

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Maria described international bookings as inherently lumpy with large complex deals. Q1 softer after strong Q4 finish, but pipeline is solid and team remains focused on reaccelerating growth.

For the 20% of new bookings who choose not to take it, is there any commonalities in terms of why that is

Show response

Maria said the 20% are mostly knockouts from clients adding locations or companies to existing portfolios who need consistency. Won't reach 100% by fiscal year end due to these structural reasons.

Calendar 2025 Q2

If you think about maybe some of the other puts and takes on margin, it looks like maybe you're maybe lapping some of the investments and integration of WorkForce Software

Show response

Peter noted WorkForce Software product investment will continue beyond FY26 but amortization/interest expense is lapping. FX is a revenue tailwind but margin headwind. Margin story driven by client fund interest, productivity gains, offset by strategic investments in Lyric, WorkForce, and AI.

PAYXPaychex6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
PAYX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Are you actually seeing an improvement in your win rate or your seller productivity?

Show response

John cited heavy internal adoption (2,000+ agents, 20% payroll-process reductions) as proof points but said the customer-facing product rollout is still early.

Calendar 2026 Q2

is there any way to think about how that cross sell could progress next year or the opportunity

Show response

Gibson and Schrader said synergies were exceeded and expect even stronger contribution next year and beyond; answered.

Calendar 2026 Q1

going back to the mention of a reacceleration of referrals and bookings to pre-acquisition levels. Can you add any incremental detail on specific areas of momentum there

Revenue GrowthM&ADemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Follow-up on PEO revenue timing quantification and Paycor synergy momentum.

It sounds like that was mostly concentrated in PEO. Is there any way you can size how large that was, and looking forward, can sequential growth in PEO specifically continue into the fourth quarter...

Revenue GrowthM&ADemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Management addressed PEO revenue timing quantification and Paycor synergy momentum.

Calendar 2025 Q3

on the revenue synergies, you know, holding them consistent with what you shared last quarter, I guess, you be able to provide any color on sort of the learnings that you've had?

Geographic ExpansionCloud & AIM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Follow-up on Agentic AI productivity pilots and revenue synergy learnings.

To go back to the comment in the prepared remarks about piloting some agentic AI inside your own organization. I guess, I know it's early days, but any sense about how much you would expect product...

Geographic ExpansionCloud & AIM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management addressed Agentic AI productivity pilots and revenue synergy learnings.

IOTSamsara Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
IOT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

it'd be helpful to get an update in terms of how AI is helping you scale the business internally

Cloud & AILabor MarketTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Sanjit and Dominic said internal AI use (engineering coding agents, G&A automation) is driving productivity, with non-go-to-market headcount expected to stay flat or smaller.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you just expand on the value of the preinstallation and what kind of maybe, competitive moats that that provides

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sanjit said factory-installed devices remove a major operational headache for large fleets and ensure day-one readiness at scale, a program they're expanding with OEMs.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how much of that has just been from you building sales capacity in those regions

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Sanjit credited multi-year investment and product-market fit, not a new regulatory tailwind, for Europe's 18% net-new-ACV contribution.

Calendar 2025 Q1

with regards to tariffs and your own supply chain, things like gateways and cameras and asset tags

Supply ChainTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Dominic said Samsara has no concentrated single-country import exposure for devices, has mitigation strategies factored into guidance, and expects FCF margin at least flat with FY25.

Calendar 2024 Q4

So I wanted to ask about the public sector and the strength that you called out this quarter

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dominic attributed public-sector strength to sustained investment and long deal cycles, citing a record 16 deals over $100,000.

PTCPTC Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
PTC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Maybe we can just spend a moment hearing the feedback that your customers had on some of the new products

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Barua described enthusiasm around Jetstream, Orbit and the AI releases but offered no adoption or pipeline metrics from the event.

Calendar 2026 Q1

that gap seems to be narrowing. And so with the new sort of portfolio mix in PLM and sort of all the product innovation coming and the macro perspective, maybe it would be helpful just to get a per...

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Barua redirected from backward-looking ARR to forward indicators: demand capture, renewal rates, pipeline growth all showing strong PLM momentum led by Windchill, Codebeamer, and Creo. CAD strength in Onshape and Creo but those markets grow at different rates. Deferred ARR flowing into P&L will shift the segment growth charts over coming quarters.

Calendar 2025 Q4

last year was maybe a little bit of a tougher year for ServiceMax. And so maybe just an update about what we're what we're seeing there

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Barua acknowledged residual churn still hitting Q1, expects to work through it by end of Q2. Cited green shoots with strong demand capture including 7-figure competitive displacements. AI agent strategy differentiating ServiceMax. Dahdah added comp plan incentives aligned to drive ServiceMax cross-sell.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how you constructed the downside scenario for the 7% ARR? Any additional color about what that assumes from a macro perspective or deal size delay

Guidance ReliabilityMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Barua gave thorough two-part answer: bottoms-up pipeline analysis by end market and renewal status, plus tops-down historical comparison to 2009 and pandemic crises. Said 7% requires significant deterioration beyond current conditions. Noted 20-30% conversion rate reduction in prior crises as benchmark.

Calendar 2024 Q3

maybe variation in terms of performance of the business and maybe double-click on ServiceMax and Codebeamer

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Barua gave concrete examples for both products. Codebeamer expanding at 2 of 10 largest auto OEMs; ServiceMax won crane manufacturer deal via Windchill integration.

INTUIntuit3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
INTU company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

on the 600 service centers and the in-person opportunity in tax, maybe how are you judging the success of that?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sasan cited 5M+ visitors through early Feb vs 4.2M all of last season. Centers enable local search visibility and customer confidence, with majority of engagement being virtual. All tech-driven for traffic generation.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is that something that could be accomplished solely through middle market improvement, or does this have to broaden out

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Sandeep confirmed both segments needed. Mid-market sales team scaled with strong momentum. Product and onboarding improvements plus marketing ramp for small business. Solid read expected by early calendar year/springtime.

Calendar 2025 Q2

In terms of IES, where do we stand in terms of maturing your go-to-market motion there?

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sasan acknowledged still early days and not yet a finely tuned machine. Accountants driven approximately 15% of all IES deals. Ashley Still joining to lead mid-market with single-threaded focus.

ROPRoper Technologies1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ROP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how much potential monetization uplift from AI is coming in the pipeline?

Show response

Neil detailed the subscription-plus-tiered-consumption monetization model but declined to size 2027 given uncertain adoption pace.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ADP ADP90%none of 9 questions
PAYX Paychex60%none of 6 questions
IOT Samsara Inc.50%none of 5 questions
PTC PTC Inc.50%none of 5 questions
INTU Intuit30%none of 3 questions
ROP Roper Technologies1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • ADP
    ADP · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • PAYX
    Paychex · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • IOT
    Samsara Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • PTC
    PTC Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • INTU
    Intuit · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • ROP
    Roper Technologies · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q230%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q350%none of 5 questions3
2025 Q440%none of 4 questions3
2026 Q160%none of 6 questions4
2026 Q260%none of 6 questions5
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  8. 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
  9. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand9
  • Product Launch8
  • Cloud & AI7
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • M&A6
  • Revenue Growth5
  • Geographic Expansion5
  • Labor Market2
  • Innovation & R&D2
  • Margin2
Show all 16 topics
  • Pricing2
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Macroeconomic1