Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Daniel Markowitz
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q2 (6 quarters).
- Questions
- 17on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 12%2 of 17 questions
- Companies
- 3questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 6with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 17 of 17 questions from 3 companies
WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you give some color on what the margins were in that business and help us understand the impact that divestiture
Show response
Bob confirmed SmartDose 3.5 was dilutive and its exit adds 50 basis points of margin for the full year, 100 basis points in the second half.
Assumed in the guide, it seems to imply a steep drop-off in the second half versus the first half.
Show response
Bob said it is prudence rather than a real slowdown, with GLP-1 news constructive and OUS generics more of a 2027-plus driver.
Calendar 2026 Q1
called out NovaPure as a positive for the first time in a while. And backing up, I think mix shift is such an awesome part of the story
Show response
Eric attributed NovaPure strength to demand for commercialized molecules plus continued pipeline feeding. Bob confirmed very nice NovaPure year-on-year growth with ongoing momentum.
the full year now looks more first half weighted versus what's typical. Is there anything to call out that's causing a decel in the back half
Show response
Bob attributed first-half weighting to CGM contract $40M headwind unchanged from original guidance plus beginning-of-year prudence. Emphasized ongoing momentum in the business.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you talk about what you are hearing in customer conversations that suggest it could be a greater area of focus for customers going forward
Show response
Eric cited regulatory audits and contamination control inspections driving accelerated customer interest. Bob noted opportunity could be larger than 6B units due to reshoring and customer desire to standardize specs globally.
you mentioned that demand outstripped supply.
Show response
Bob declined to quantify the gap but confirmed European capacity grew substantially Q4 to Q1 while demand grew faster. Eric confirmed non-GLP-1 HVP expected to grow high single to low double digits in 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I had a 2-parter for you. First, I'm curious on high-level headwinds and tailwinds to high-value components in 2026 as you see it today
Show response
Eric confirmed tailwinds from destock comp, GLP-1, Annex-1, and resolution of one-off customer constraint. Noted timing of new drug approvals and Annex-1 project rolloff as variables. Bob confirmed GLP-1 growth broadly in line with end market growth.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was curious if you could tell us the contribution in the quarter. I think it was 200 basis points in the first quarter
Show response
Eric declined to give Q2-specific contribution, reiterating the 150 basis point full-year target. Noted project count is not a direct proxy due to variability in complexity and timing across projects.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you discuss the potential upside you could continue to see from AnnexOne over coming quarters and years?
Show response
Eric emphasized AnnexOne is long-term, not a one-or-two year event, with projects spanning pharma and generics shifting from standard to HVP products.
TECHBio-Techne7 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Have these customers who received FDA Fast Track already placed orders for their Phase III clinical trials and you've already recognized revenues
Show response
Kim confirmed these customers front-loaded raw material purchases for Phase III completion. Next demand inflection will come from commercialization and manufacturing validation processes, which Bio-Techne assumes is still to come.
it's impressive you're able to deliver on margins and EPS despite the customer timing in a very high-margin business
Show response
Jim cited new streamlining activities initiated during Q1 plus some timing of strategic investments pushed to later in the year, providing confidence in full-year 100bp expansion target with potential upside.
you mentioned promotional activity in Protein Sciences when talking about the margins there. Can you talk about these activities?
Show response
Jim described strategic promotional spending to support academic and biotech customers during challenging times including heavier discounting and solution support. Kim added grant programs and early-project seeding ensure Bio-Techne maintains funnel position for when markets recover.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is the plan to toggle the amount of ExoDx reinvestments depending on top line? Or would any upside to the organic top line lead to upside to margin expansion
Show response
Jim explained the company is managing to low-single-digit growth with productivity actions, using ExoDx savings plus cost cuts to reinvest while expanding margins. When markets return, will reassess balance between reinvestment and incremental margin.
Was that similar growth profile across the rest of the cell and gene portfolio?
Show response
Kim confirmed cell and gene therapy growth was almost identical across the portfolio, not just Wilson Wolf.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is it fair to assume that fiscal '26 margins at that 4Q exit rate of about 32% makes sense?
Show response
Jim declined to provide FY2026 margin commentary but noted Q3 demonstrated the company is positioning extremely well for whatever FY2026 brings from an end market perspective.
just using peer comments, it implies that the US academic and government end market could see like 10% to 15% incremental headwinds in calendar 2025
Show response
Jim noted current spending is from already-approved grants so real impact is calendar 2026+. Referenced Trump first term where proposed NIH cuts were overturned by bipartisan Congress. Kim added 80% of academic revenue is consumables with low-ASP instruments around 0,000.
DXCMDexCom1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Is there anything you are doing to the organization or the salesforce in order to prepare for this market unlock
Show response
Jake described evolving product portfolio, service, and field team approach. Using advanced tools to analyze data and target patients and prescribers. Primary care is main location for NIT2 patients, which drove 2024 salesforce expansion. Physician education around existing coverage is priority.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| WST West Pharmaceutical Services | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
| TECH Bio-Techne | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| DXCM DexCom | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand8
- Revenue Growth7
- Margin5
- Regulation Policy4
- Guidance Reliability3
- Competitive Dynamics2
- Capital Allocation2
- M&A1
- Cost Pressure1
- Supply Chain1