Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Darren Aftahi

Lucid Capital Markets · covers Technology, Financial Services

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
25on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 25 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right. See how we grade analysts on earnings-call questions.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 25 of 25 questions from 3 companies

APLDApplied Digital Corp.11 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
APLD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

is there any way, Wes, you can elaborate on how much power initially is going to be at the site?

Geographic ExpansionRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Wes covered initial power (100 MW in 2028) and positive local receptivity but did not say whether a customer was in mind.

Calendar 2026 Q2

on Base Electron, can you just give us a general sense for when that capacity might come online?

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Wes put Base Electron's initial capacity at 2029-2030, ramping after; other regional transmission/generation projects fill 2026-2028 to keep expanding the ND campuses.

Calendar 2026 Q1

your commentary about potentially being operational mid-2027. I guess what does that say or infer about when a lease effectively needs to be signed?

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Wes said he expects a Delta Forge 1 lease in the near term to hit the RFS date, and confirmed they still have 3 sites in exclusivity with a hyperscaler after pausing the South Dakota campus over a missing tax exemption.

Calendar 2025 Q4

But like what does that say about your confidence when you're progressing on sites where you don't have signed leases?

Capital AllocationDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Wes said the evergreen Macquarie facility funds groundwork ahead of leases; construction on a new campus starts by end of January on high confidence of a new hyperscaler lease.

can you just talk generally about the landscape for leases and how pricing may have changed over the last 6 months?

Show response

Wes said pricing has been stable to slightly better with extraordinarily robust demand, and contract terms (make-whole, transferability) have grown more favorable.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is that an aggressive time frame? And if there's any slippage? Are you penalized in terms of a credit against the lease?

Show response

Management said Building 2 is designed for about half of Building 1's build time and confirmed standard late-delivery penalties apply.

Calendar 2025 Q1

has disposition about data center build change at all just given kind of the current macro environment

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Direct, said hyperscaler demand is at least steady to higher versus three months ago, though it rotates between players and hasn't shifted in recent weeks.

moving from a single-tenant to multi-tenant and the technical issues, was that a prior inter-quarter in the February

Show response

Direct, confirmed the multi-tenant technical issues were resolved in early March and should be behind them for most of the May quarter.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Is there a scenario where that 400 megawatts in Ellendale be a split amongst 2?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Wes declined to detail the deal timing but said he strongly expects a single customer to take the entire 400 MW campus.

Calendar 2024 Q3

when you talk on yield on cost on the second one, is there a target range that you guys are looking at in terms of that?

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Partial: declined to give yield targets (called it premature) but reaffirmed the economics fit the long-stated model and that buildings 2-3 won't see major CapEx before a lease is signed.

is the lease just for 100 megawatts? Or do they -- is that hyperscaler have options on additional capacity

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Direct: initial 100MW lease plus a reservation on the remaining 300MW, with the single tenant expected to take the whole campus across two leases.

IRENIREN Limited8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
IREN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

economics on colo have continue to creep up. I know you guys initially signed this cloud deal with Microsoft.

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management favors AI cloud for higher dollars per megawatt but stays open to compelling colo deals.

There's a lot of noise around ERCOT. I'm sure people on the phone kind of want to know.

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kent confirmed Sweetwater is likely in batch 0, securing the full 2 GW of power.

Calendar 2025 Q3

with Microsoft, was colocation ever on the table with them? Did they come to you asking for AI cloud?

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dan said the Microsoft talks evolved over time and IREN chose to focus on cloud; hinted hyperscalers may prefer colo but declined specifics on Microsoft's preference.

Calendar 2025 Q2

you kind of left the door open that there may be other uses. So I'm kind of curious on strategic thinking there

Capital AllocationCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Daniel Roberts explained Horizon can be monetized via cloud (own/operate) or colocation, that reconfiguring for lower rack densities widens GPU flexibility, and displacing mining is an accepted cost of business.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how are you able to kind of reach that CapEx spend when it seems like it's kind of below market?

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kent answered directly, attributing below-market build cost to seven years of power-dense design experience and reuse of existing shells/electrical infrastructure rather than concrete new-builds.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what calculus you kind of went through with Horizon 1 in terms of kind of reducing the 5 exahash

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dan framed the decision as strategic rather than pure ROI, deliberately not projecting numbers, arguing the platform value from a signed liquid-cooled design unlocks Sweetwater conversations.

what's the strategic benefit of you guys announcing Sweetwater 2? Is this more customer focus?

Geographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dan said disclosing the late-stage project gives investors context on the Sweetwater 1 single-site strategy and the West Texas multi-gigawatt thematic, despite its unsigned status.

Calendar 2024 Q3

walk through just the mindset of accelerating the 50 exahash in the context of maybe looking at opportunity costs

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management said building out Bitcoin mining remains the preferred use of capital, weighing each AI/colocation pathway as an opportunity cost while keeping optionality.

RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
RIOT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

how critical is that master site design in terms of their willingness to kind of continue negotiating

Show response

Management emphasized flexibility across customer types and described the basis of design as essential for serious counterparties to advance discussions substantially.

can you just give us some general long-term thoughts on what that campus potentially could be used for other than Bitcoin mining

Show response

Management prioritized Corsicana for initial data center buildout but confirmed Rockdale remains in the pipeline for future transition, with Bitcoin mining monetizing power in the interim.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what's the capacity theoretically for HPC there? And then I guess, what steps have to be taken to kind of make that other piece of land

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management estimated 100-200 MW on existing pad with higher density possible at higher CapEx, with additional phases requiring civil and electrical work.

what's the feasibility that that could be used for something other than Bitcoin

Show response

Management ruled out retrofitting the existing building but noted potential for new data center development on surrounding land using Rhodium's power capacity.

Calendar 2024 Q4

you talked about procuring additional land, any kind of indulgence on how large of an additional plot that would be

Show response

Jason Chung declined to give a specific acreage figure but confirmed procurement in the hundreds of acres to maximize optionality.

Is there a scenario analysis economically where you would flip the switch and completely make that an HPC campus

Show response

Jason Chung confirmed willingness to convert Rockdale fully if economics support it, noting 1.7 GW would represent about 5% of hyperscaler demand.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
APLD Applied Digital Corp.110%none of 11 questions
IREN IREN Limited80%none of 8 questions
RIOT Riot Platforms, Inc.60%none of 6 questions
  • APLD
    Applied Digital Corp. · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • IREN
    IREN Limited · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • RIOT
    Riot Platforms, Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q330%none of 3 questions2
2024 Q450%none of 5 questions3
2025 Q150%none of 5 questions3
2025 Q240%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q310%none of 1 question1
2025 Q440%none of 4 questions2
2026 Q110%none of 1 question1
2026 Q210%none of 1 question1
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  6. 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  8. 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  9. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Capex Investment10
  • Cloud & AI9
  • Demand6
  • Capital Allocation4
  • Geographic Expansion3
  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Margin2
  • Pricing1
  • Macroeconomic1