Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
David Deckelbaum
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q3 (4 quarters).
- Questions
- 37on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 37 questions
- Companies
- 9questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 4with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 37 of 37 questions from 9 companies
ALBAlbemarle Corporation8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
how much capital you'd be saving on the CapEx side, '26 just from divesting those assets
Show response
Sheorey said Ketjen represents ~10% of CapEx. Proceeds will be deployed toward deleveraging and other capital priorities once the transaction closes.
should that be a credible tailwind going into '26 in your view?
Show response
Sheorey said Talison dividends will depend on CGP3 ramp speed and spodumene pricing. All JV partners are interested in dividends as the investment phase concludes.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Should volume growth, is it solely going to be coming from Greenbushes in '26 as you think of like the broader corporate portfolio?
Show response
Masters said CGP3 is the biggest piece but also expects contributions from Wodgina, Salar yield project, and productivity gains across all assets.
How should we think about how you're approaching the balance sheet in '26 is considering the cash balance that you have
Show response
Sheorey said deleveraging is a top capital allocation priority and they're studying additional actions beyond the November eurobond repayment.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what is sort of the incentive price for Albemarle to begin spending growth CapEx again?
Show response
Masters declined to give a specific incentive price, saying each project differs. Emphasized balance sheet repair as the current priority over growth investment.
How do you sort of think of the normalized EBITDA margin for the Energy Storage business exiting this year in sort of a $9 a kilo world?
Show response
Sheorey outlined multiple margin tailwinds for 2026: further asset ramp, CGP3 volumes, and full-year cost savings benefit.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is there tolling capacity available in China that would enable you to do that? Or would that have to be a more significant investment
Show response
Masters confirmed available tolling capacity in China plus growth from La Negra and Salar yield in Chile.
is this decision really just to capture the discrepancy in margin? Or do you have very differentiated views now over time on just the appetite for hydroxide?
Show response
Masters said it is about market demand favoring carbonate, not customer resistance to hydroxide. The plant was designed with this flexibility at minimal CapEx.
CTRACoterra8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you just kind of refresh us on how you kind of see the shape of the Delaware progressing throughout the year after some pretty aggressive growth what we've seen in the back half of '25?
Show response
Deckelbaum pressed for 2026 Delaware production shape. Deshazer declined to provide TIL timing granularity ahead of February guidance.
How the sort of large projects impact that going into next year? Or as we think about this, is it being driven more by reallocation between basins or the inclusion of more Wolfcamp relative to what...
Show response
Deckelbaum sought drivers of sub-$2.3B 2026 capital. Deshazer indicated steady operations across all business units extending into 2026 without dramatic changes.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you guys have an anticipated timeline on how long these wells would take to dewater before looking to go back and remediate and return to sales?
Show response
Blake Sirgo set expectations for a slow gradual build over time with no specific timeline, explaining why Harkey volumes are derisked from 2025 oil guidance.
How quickly can like a 3-miler program become part of the Mid-Con go forward?
Show response
Michael Deshazer explained 3-mile transitions depend on existing unit configurations. The Q4 project was an easy lateral extension opportunity, but full conversion will be gradual given legacy 2-mile unit setups.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if that oil to gas price ratio holds as we enter into next year, should we presume that there's more reallocation from oil to guest weighted assets?
Show response
Tom Jorden pushed back on presumptions, reiterating the three-year plan is an outlook not a commitment, and the company will readjust as conditions warrant with flexibility across oil, gas, and NGL opportunities.
Does the guidance presume that, that 5,000 barrel a day impact in the second quarter from the Harkey wells, does that come back as a 5,000 barrel a day contribution into 3Q and 4Q?
Show response
Shane Young confirmed guidance does NOT assume Harkey volumes returning, providing potential upside. Tom added volumes have been taken out of the plan conservatively.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how much of that sort of overall budget should we think of as being kinda contingent on continued strength in the gas curve?
Show response
Tom Jorden clarified the midpoint is not contingent on gas prices; the incremental $50 million for continued activity is the optionality piece. Decision will be made by mid-spring.
how did you guys sort of approach that development plan, you know, versus, you know, perhaps, like, cannibalize or weighing that as, you know, cannibalization of inventory
Show response
Tom Jorden firmly rejected the cannibalization framing, arguing fewer wells with higher returns and same production is the optimal approach. Cited Permian examples of fewer wells matching neighbor cumulative production.
FANGDiamondback Energy6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
should we anticipate any significant changes to those three graphs? Is it fair to assume that, that -- or can you talk to your confidence levels around well productivity
Show response
Kaes said Endeavor synergy shows up directly in Slide 8, they got bigger AND better. Al confirmed 2026 well performance expected to be very consistent with 2024/2025.
is that a decent kind of run rate for goalpost for '26 to sort of hold that 505,000 barrels a day of crude flat kind of pro forma for the Viper deal
Show response
Kaes confirmed Q4 CapEx range multiplied by four is a reasonable 2026 bogey, noting total spend came down $500M from original 2025 budget while production rose to 510K.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'm wondering if you can contextualize a bit more Kaes, the opportunity to address some of the production downtime
Show response
Danny described early results from acidization and stimulation on 3-5 year old wells showing 20-100% production improvement, though not yet quantifiable at scale.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how do we think about the variables for maybe keeping those rigs and building a DUC backlog in the context of what the right amount
Show response
Travis explained casing tariff inflation of 12% makes building DUCs less attractive now, preferring to drop rigs and buy back stock instead.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how do you think about the flexibility of getting above that fifty percent return of capital this year
Show response
Kaes said they were prepared to exceed 50% return in Q4 given December volatility but currently lean against going to 75-100% until debt targets are met.
how sort of, you know, imminent are these needs in terms of spends to expand what you would you would need
Show response
Kaes described an active power JV exploration with a large IPP and hyperscaler interest, but noted it's still in confidential discussions.
APAAPA Corporation5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
are you accelerating the ARO activity in the North Sea
Show response
Riney clarified no acceleration, planned well abandonment at Beryl Bravo and subsea program running for several years. Rodgers said production to decline 15-20% from 2025. After-tax cash flow impact of all ARO/decom year-over-year is only $55M.
Are you still -- are you assuming any incremental benefits on D&C costs
Show response
Riney said Midland is near best-in-class, Delaware at peer average with room to improve. 5 rigs holding 120K flat in 2026 benefits from: base uptime improvements, facility constraints resolving, small DUC drawdown (~5). Permian dev capital drops from $1.45B to $1.3B with $150M additional savings.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there any performance that APA needs to perform in terms of activity levels, et cetera, to earn into this award
Show response
Christmann confirmed a bonus payment netted against past-due receivables plus committed wells rolled into existing program. Acreage gets integrated into the merged concession. Activity levels unchanged but will drill on new acreage in Q4.
when you get there, how do you think about capital from beyond that in terms of free cash
Show response
Christmann pointed to the Total JV structure in Suriname as an example of smart funding, Total carries a large portion of capital, enabling returns framework without needing asset sales. Rodgers noted net debt target provides flexibility for exploration, decom, and returns.
Calendar 2024 Q4
this pertains to new drilling activity. And I'm just wanna get a sense of, you know, the comparative economics that you see relative to oil
Show response
Christmann confirmed gas price is on incremental gas above an agreed decline curve, on par with oil on full-cycle basis. Riney added 'on par' includes anticipated infrastructure build-out costs.
EQTEQT Corporation4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
we've seen an increase in liquids recovery. Is that happening from benefits on the midstream side? Or is that something that's more geologically driven
Show response
Toby attributed liquids increase to development geography, noting the Ohio Marcellus prospect (80,000+ acres) could add liquids exposure, though EQT will remain a dry gas story.
do you have an expectation for or a target for what percent of total EQT gas volumes will be on firm sales agreement in the direct-to-customer model
Show response
Jeremy described an 'all-you-can-eat' opportunity with no real limit on firm sales, as volumes can be grown and third-party gas marketed; team increasing frequency of conversations to capture as much as possible.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how do you square those opportunities on the Eastern portion of your acreage versus sort of the Ohio side
Show response
Toby noted Olympus is uniquely close to Pittsburgh's industrial corridor where data center opportunities are concentrating.
How do you square those opportunities or put it in context relative to your LNG strategy and those opportunities as it relates to contracting
Show response
Toby and Jeremy explained in-basin power demand can be served faster, cheaper, and with less financial risk than LNG, with EQT limiting LNG exposure to about 5% of production.
EOGEOG Resources2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
is this broad-based around, I guess, just better reservoir productivity? Or are you just seeing better responses from reservoir performance across your assets
Show response
Jeff said improvement is portfolio-wide using data and analytics to identify failure points in wellbores and artificial lift systems. HiFi sensors monitoring vibrations and real-time data to predict and prevent failures, minimizing downtime and maximizing production.
how do you put that in the context of your appetite for just expanding in the areas where you're at
Show response
Ezra said expect small bolt-ons and trades to shore up acreage. Encino was a unicorn with hand-in-glove acreage at compelling price due to emerging asset nature. Any opportunity evaluated through returns lens versus existing portfolio. Interested in quality, not just more inventory.
Show 3 more companies
EXEExpand Energy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
how impactful you could see this asset becoming to your overall program in what time frame?
Show response
Josh confirmed appraisal CapEx included in 2026 soft guide but declined to provide specific details. Emphasized it is way too early to speculate on future capital impact. Described it as first-inning stage.
what merits of this deal sort of propelled you or motivated you to sign this one
Show response
Dan Turco outlined how LCM met majority of guiding principles on Slide 10. Heritage relationship with ex-Cheniere principals, need for reliability, lower carbon intensity, and flexibility. Currently has 20-25 active conversations across LNG, power, and industrial opportunities.
COPConocoPhillips1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
How do you guys think about the cadence, if any, of non-core asset sales over the next few years
Show response
Ryan Lance indicated the big divestitures are done, with ongoing annual portfolio pruning of hundreds of millions to $500M based on cost of supply competitiveness.
DVNDevon Energy1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Do you anticipate focusing on other areas of the portfolio that might enhance some of the economics, specifically in areas like Anadarko?
Show response
Clay confirmed big wins in Delaware but also Anadarko progress; need to unlock more gas value and retain more dollars coming in.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ALB Albemarle Corporation | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| CTRA Coterra | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| FANG Diamondback Energy | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| APA APA Corporation | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| EQT EQT Corporation | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| EOG EOG Resources | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| EXE Expand Energy | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| DVN Devon Energy | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- ALBAlbemarle Corporation · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- CTRACoterra · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- FANGDiamondback Energy · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- APAAPA Corporation · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- EQTEQT Corporation · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- EOGEOG Resources · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- EXEExpand Energy · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- COPConocoPhillips · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- DVNDevon Energy · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions | 7 |
- 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q18 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q314 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 14 questions) · 7 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment12
- Capital Allocation9
- Pricing7
- M&A5
- Cost Pressure5
- Demand5
- Geographic Expansion4
- Guidance Reliability4
- Innovation & R&D4
- Competitive Dynamics4
Show all 14 topics
- Margin3
- Revenue Growth1
- Cloud & AI1
- Supply Chain1