Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

David Deckelbaum

TD Cowen · covers Basic Materials, Energy

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q3 (4 quarters).

Questions
37on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 37 questions
Companies
9questioned at least once
Reporting periods
4with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 37 of 37 questions from 9 companies

ALBAlbemarle Corporation8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
ALB company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

how much capital you'd be saving on the CapEx side, '26 just from divesting those assets

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sheorey said Ketjen represents ~10% of CapEx. Proceeds will be deployed toward deleveraging and other capital priorities once the transaction closes.

should that be a credible tailwind going into '26 in your view?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sheorey said Talison dividends will depend on CGP3 ramp speed and spodumene pricing. All JV partners are interested in dividends as the investment phase concludes.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Should volume growth, is it solely going to be coming from Greenbushes in '26 as you think of like the broader corporate portfolio?

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Masters said CGP3 is the biggest piece but also expects contributions from Wodgina, Salar yield project, and productivity gains across all assets.

How should we think about how you're approaching the balance sheet in '26 is considering the cash balance that you have

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Sheorey said deleveraging is a top capital allocation priority and they're studying additional actions beyond the November eurobond repayment.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what is sort of the incentive price for Albemarle to begin spending growth CapEx again?

Capex InvestmentPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Masters declined to give a specific incentive price, saying each project differs. Emphasized balance sheet repair as the current priority over growth investment.

How do you sort of think of the normalized EBITDA margin for the Energy Storage business exiting this year in sort of a $9 a kilo world?

Show response

Sheorey outlined multiple margin tailwinds for 2026: further asset ramp, CGP3 volumes, and full-year cost savings benefit.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is there tolling capacity available in China that would enable you to do that? Or would that have to be a more significant investment

Supply ChainCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Masters confirmed available tolling capacity in China plus growth from La Negra and Salar yield in Chile.

is this decision really just to capture the discrepancy in margin? Or do you have very differentiated views now over time on just the appetite for hydroxide?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Masters said it is about market demand favoring carbonate, not customer resistance to hydroxide. The plant was designed with this flexibility at minimal CapEx.

CTRACoterra8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
CTRA company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you just kind of refresh us on how you kind of see the shape of the Delaware progressing throughout the year after some pretty aggressive growth what we've seen in the back half of '25?

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Deckelbaum pressed for 2026 Delaware production shape. Deshazer declined to provide TIL timing granularity ahead of February guidance.

How the sort of large projects impact that going into next year? Or as we think about this, is it being driven more by reallocation between basins or the inclusion of more Wolfcamp relative to what...

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Deckelbaum sought drivers of sub-$2.3B 2026 capital. Deshazer indicated steady operations across all business units extending into 2026 without dramatic changes.

Calendar 2025 Q2

do you guys have an anticipated timeline on how long these wells would take to dewater before looking to go back and remediate and return to sales?

Show response

Blake Sirgo set expectations for a slow gradual build over time with no specific timeline, explaining why Harkey volumes are derisked from 2025 oil guidance.

How quickly can like a 3-miler program become part of the Mid-Con go forward?

Show response

Michael Deshazer explained 3-mile transitions depend on existing unit configurations. The Q4 project was an easy lateral extension opportunity, but full conversion will be gradual given legacy 2-mile unit setups.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if that oil to gas price ratio holds as we enter into next year, should we presume that there's more reallocation from oil to guest weighted assets?

Capital AllocationPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Tom Jorden pushed back on presumptions, reiterating the three-year plan is an outlook not a commitment, and the company will readjust as conditions warrant with flexibility across oil, gas, and NGL opportunities.

Does the guidance presume that, that 5,000 barrel a day impact in the second quarter from the Harkey wells, does that come back as a 5,000 barrel a day contribution into 3Q and 4Q?

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Shane Young confirmed guidance does NOT assume Harkey volumes returning, providing potential upside. Tom added volumes have been taken out of the plan conservatively.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how much of that sort of overall budget should we think of as being kinda contingent on continued strength in the gas curve?

PricingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Tom Jorden clarified the midpoint is not contingent on gas prices; the incremental $50 million for continued activity is the optionality piece. Decision will be made by mid-spring.

how did you guys sort of approach that development plan, you know, versus, you know, perhaps, like, cannibalize or weighing that as, you know, cannibalization of inventory

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Tom Jorden firmly rejected the cannibalization framing, arguing fewer wells with higher returns and same production is the optimal approach. Cited Permian examples of fewer wells matching neighbor cumulative production.

FANGDiamondback Energy6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
FANG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

should we anticipate any significant changes to those three graphs? Is it fair to assume that, that -- or can you talk to your confidence levels around well productivity

Innovation & R&DM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kaes said Endeavor synergy shows up directly in Slide 8, they got bigger AND better. Al confirmed 2026 well performance expected to be very consistent with 2024/2025.

is that a decent kind of run rate for goalpost for '26 to sort of hold that 505,000 barrels a day of crude flat kind of pro forma for the Viper deal

Capex InvestmentGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kaes confirmed Q4 CapEx range multiplied by four is a reasonable 2026 bogey, noting total spend came down $500M from original 2025 budget while production rose to 510K.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'm wondering if you can contextualize a bit more Kaes, the opportunity to address some of the production downtime

Innovation & R&DCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Danny described early results from acidization and stimulation on 3-5 year old wells showing 20-100% production improvement, though not yet quantifiable at scale.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how do we think about the variables for maybe keeping those rigs and building a DUC backlog in the context of what the right amount

Capex InvestmentCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Travis explained casing tariff inflation of 12% makes building DUCs less attractive now, preferring to drop rigs and buy back stock instead.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how do you think about the flexibility of getting above that fifty percent return of capital this year

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kaes said they were prepared to exceed 50% return in Q4 given December volatility but currently lean against going to 75-100% until debt targets are met.

how sort of, you know, imminent are these needs in terms of spends to expand what you would you would need

Innovation & R&DCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kaes described an active power JV exploration with a large IPP and hyperscaler interest, but noted it's still in confidential discussions.

APAAPA Corporation5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
APA company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

are you accelerating the ARO activity in the North Sea

Cost PressureGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Riney clarified no acceleration, planned well abandonment at Beryl Bravo and subsea program running for several years. Rodgers said production to decline 15-20% from 2025. After-tax cash flow impact of all ARO/decom year-over-year is only $55M.

Are you still -- are you assuming any incremental benefits on D&C costs

Cost PressureCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Riney said Midland is near best-in-class, Delaware at peer average with room to improve. 5 rigs holding 120K flat in 2026 benefits from: base uptime improvements, facility constraints resolving, small DUC drawdown (~5). Permian dev capital drops from $1.45B to $1.3B with $150M additional savings.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is there any performance that APA needs to perform in terms of activity levels, et cetera, to earn into this award

Geographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Christmann confirmed a bonus payment netted against past-due receivables plus committed wells rolled into existing program. Acreage gets integrated into the merged concession. Activity levels unchanged but will drill on new acreage in Q4.

when you get there, how do you think about capital from beyond that in terms of free cash

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Christmann pointed to the Total JV structure in Suriname as an example of smart funding, Total carries a large portion of capital, enabling returns framework without needing asset sales. Rodgers noted net debt target provides flexibility for exploration, decom, and returns.

Calendar 2024 Q4

this pertains to new drilling activity. And I'm just wanna get a sense of, you know, the comparative economics that you see relative to oil

PricingGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Christmann confirmed gas price is on incremental gas above an agreed decline curve, on par with oil on full-cycle basis. Riney added 'on par' includes anticipated infrastructure build-out costs.

EQTEQT Corporation4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
EQT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

we've seen an increase in liquids recovery. Is that happening from benefits on the midstream side? Or is that something that's more geologically driven

MarginCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Toby attributed liquids increase to development geography, noting the Ohio Marcellus prospect (80,000+ acres) could add liquids exposure, though EQT will remain a dry gas story.

do you have an expectation for or a target for what percent of total EQT gas volumes will be on firm sales agreement in the direct-to-customer model

Show response

Jeremy described an 'all-you-can-eat' opportunity with no real limit on firm sales, as volumes can be grown and third-party gas marketed; team increasing frequency of conversations to capture as much as possible.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how do you square those opportunities on the Eastern portion of your acreage versus sort of the Ohio side

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Toby noted Olympus is uniquely close to Pittsburgh's industrial corridor where data center opportunities are concentrating.

How do you square those opportunities or put it in context relative to your LNG strategy and those opportunities as it relates to contracting

Show response

Toby and Jeremy explained in-basin power demand can be served faster, cheaper, and with less financial risk than LNG, with EQT limiting LNG exposure to about 5% of production.

EOGEOG Resources2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
EOG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

is this broad-based around, I guess, just better reservoir productivity? Or are you just seeing better responses from reservoir performance across your assets

Cost PressureInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jeff said improvement is portfolio-wide using data and analytics to identify failure points in wellbores and artificial lift systems. HiFi sensors monitoring vibrations and real-time data to predict and prevent failures, minimizing downtime and maximizing production.

how do you put that in the context of your appetite for just expanding in the areas where you're at

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ezra said expect small bolt-ons and trades to shore up acreage. Encino was a unicorn with hand-in-glove acreage at compelling price due to emerging asset nature. Any opportunity evaluated through returns lens versus existing portfolio. Interested in quality, not just more inventory.

Show 3 more companies
EXEExpand Energy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
EXE company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

how impactful you could see this asset becoming to your overall program in what time frame?

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Josh confirmed appraisal CapEx included in 2026 soft guide but declined to provide specific details. Emphasized it is way too early to speculate on future capital impact. Described it as first-inning stage.

what merits of this deal sort of propelled you or motivated you to sign this one

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dan Turco outlined how LCM met majority of guiding principles on Slide 10. Heritage relationship with ex-Cheniere principals, need for reliability, lower carbon intensity, and flexibility. Currently has 20-25 active conversations across LNG, power, and industrial opportunities.

COPConocoPhillips1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
COP company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

How do you guys think about the cadence, if any, of non-core asset sales over the next few years

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ryan Lance indicated the big divestitures are done, with ongoing annual portfolio pruning of hundreds of millions to $500M based on cost of supply competitiveness.

DVNDevon Energy1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
DVN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

Do you anticipate focusing on other areas of the portfolio that might enhance some of the economics, specifically in areas like Anadarko?

Show response

Clay confirmed big wins in Delaware but also Anadarko progress; need to unlock more gas value and retain more dollars coming in.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ALB Albemarle Corporation80%none of 8 questions
CTRA Coterra80%none of 8 questions
FANG Diamondback Energy60%none of 6 questions
APA APA Corporation50%none of 5 questions
EQT EQT Corporation40%none of 4 questions
EOG EOG Resources2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
EXE Expand Energy2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
COP ConocoPhillips1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
DVN Devon Energy1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • ALB
    Albemarle Corporation · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • CTRA
    Coterra · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • FANG
    Diamondback Energy · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • APA
    APA Corporation · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • EQT
    EQT Corporation · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • EOG
    EOG Resources · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • EXE
    Expand Energy · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • COP
    ConocoPhillips · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • DVN
    Devon Energy · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q470%none of 7 questions4
2025 Q180%none of 8 questions5
2025 Q280%none of 8 questions5
2025 Q3140%none of 14 questions7
  1. 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  2. 2025 Q18 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  3. 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  4. 2025 Q314 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 14 questions) · 7 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Capex Investment12
  • Capital Allocation9
  • Pricing7
  • M&A5
  • Cost Pressure5
  • Demand5
  • Geographic Expansion4
  • Guidance Reliability4
  • Innovation & R&D4
  • Competitive Dynamics4
Show all 14 topics
  • Margin3
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Supply Chain1