Loading…
Loading…
how much capital you'd be saving on the CapEx side, '26 just from divesting those assets
should that be a credible tailwind going into '26 in your view?
Should volume growth, is it solely going to be coming from Greenbushes in '26 as you think of like the broader corporate portfolio?
How should we think about how you're approaching the balance sheet in '26 is considering the cash balance that you have
what is sort of the incentive price for Albemarle to begin spending growth CapEx again?
How do you sort of think of the normalized EBITDA margin for the Energy Storage business exiting this year in sort of a $9 a kilo world?
is there tolling capacity available in China that would enable you to do that? Or would that have to be a more significant investment
is this decision really just to capture the discrepancy in margin? Or do you have very differentiated views now over time on just the appetite for hydroxide?
are you accelerating the ARO activity in the North Sea
Are you still -- are you assuming any incremental benefits on D&C costs
is there any performance that APA needs to perform in terms of activity levels, et cetera, to earn into this award
when you get there, how do you think about capital from beyond that in terms of free cash
this pertains to new drilling activity. And I'm just wanna get a sense of, you know, the comparative economics that you see relative to oil
How do you guys think about the cadence, if any, of non-core asset sales over the next few years
can you just kind of refresh us on how you kind of see the shape of the Delaware progressing throughout the year after some pretty aggressive growth what we've seen in the back half of '25?
How the sort of large projects impact that going into next year? Or as we think about this, is it being driven more by reallocation between basins or the inclusion of more Wolfcamp relative to what...
do you guys have an anticipated timeline on how long these wells would take to dewater before looking to go back and remediate and return to sales?
How quickly can like a 3-miler program become part of the Mid-Con go forward?
if that oil to gas price ratio holds as we enter into next year, should we presume that there's more reallocation from oil to guest weighted assets?
Does the guidance presume that, that 5,000 barrel a day impact in the second quarter from the Harkey wells, does that come back as a 5,000 barrel a day contribution into 3Q and 4Q?
how much of that sort of overall budget should we think of as being kinda contingent on continued strength in the gas curve?
how did you guys sort of approach that development plan, you know, versus, you know, perhaps, like, cannibalize or weighing that as, you know, cannibalization of inventory
Do you anticipate focusing on other areas of the portfolio that might enhance some of the economics, specifically in areas like Anadarko?
is this broad-based around, I guess, just better reservoir productivity? Or are you just seeing better responses from reservoir performance across your assets
how do you put that in the context of your appetite for just expanding in the areas where you're at
we've seen an increase in liquids recovery. Is that happening from benefits on the midstream side? Or is that something that's more geologically driven
do you have an expectation for or a target for what percent of total EQT gas volumes will be on firm sales agreement in the direct-to-customer model
how do you square those opportunities on the Eastern portion of your acreage versus sort of the Ohio side
How do you square those opportunities or put it in context relative to your LNG strategy and those opportunities as it relates to contracting
how impactful you could see this asset becoming to your overall program in what time frame?
what merits of this deal sort of propelled you or motivated you to sign this one
should we anticipate any significant changes to those three graphs? Is it fair to assume that, that -- or can you talk to your confidence levels around well productivity
is that a decent kind of run rate for goalpost for '26 to sort of hold that 505,000 barrels a day of crude flat kind of pro forma for the Viper deal
I'm wondering if you can contextualize a bit more Kaes, the opportunity to address some of the production downtime
how do we think about the variables for maybe keeping those rigs and building a DUC backlog in the context of what the right amount
how do you think about the flexibility of getting above that fifty percent return of capital this year
how sort of, you know, imminent are these needs in terms of spends to expand what you would you would need