Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Dave Rochester

Cantor Fitzgerald · covers Financial Services

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (4 quarters; questions recorded in 3).

Questions
11on tracked calls
Challenge rate
9%1 of 11 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
3with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 11 of 11 questions from 3 companies

RFRegions Financial Corporation5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
RF company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

with pipeline stronger now, are you thinking that that back half could actually exceed growth in the first half?

DemandRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Pushed back on extrapolation and explained the first-quarter draw effect rather than accepting the bullish framing.

Calendar 2026 Q1

are you expecting to see more meaningful moves lower in NPAs and criticized assets as we get to the back half of the year

Show response

John Turner said NPAs could decline into the 60s but not much further given historical average near 1%. Credit largely normalized given current portfolio composition. Transportation in latter innings with total commitments at 1.2% of loans, NPLs at $51M, appropriately reserved.

given today's rates, is there any more you could do there

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Anil Chadda said limited remaining opportunity. Will monitor as securities approach maturity but disciplined on returns and payback period. Recent trade had strong 2-year payback.

Calendar 2025 Q3

it seems like you might be pretty well positioned to grow maybe even faster than GDP in group next year once you kick out that $300 million

Show response

John Turner confirmed loan growth expectations of GDP plus a little, with real GDP around 2%. Will provide specific 2026 loan growth guidance later.

How big is that exposure that you are looking at within that segment right now

Show response

John Turner sized telecom exposure at $700M, not significant relative to total portfolio. On NPL trajectory, indicated positive direction given ~$1B criticized loan reduction but reluctant to give specific guidance due to timing uncertainty. ACL ratio of 1.78% should trend toward day-one CECL of 1.63% over time.

CFGCitizens Financial Group3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
CFG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

there is a better chance you are going to land closer to the upper end of that 16% to 18% ROTCE target?

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Van Saun declined to commit to the upper end, noting NII development matters more than the private bank alone.

How meaningful could Florida be for you and what is the timeline for getting that density you want up and running?

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Gave a candid multi-year timeline and Coughlin sized the Florida ambition at 5 or 6 affluent communities over a 5 year horizon.

Calendar 2025 Q3

You reiterated the levels you talked about before in terms of loan deposit targets AUM. You're already there on deposits, so it would be great to just hear your outlook there.

Geographic ExpansionMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

First question on private bank outlook beyond year-end targets, noting deposits already at $12.5B vs $12B target. Follow-up positively noted Fed funds range lowered 25bp while NIM range maintained. Supportive framing.

MTBM&T Bank3 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 3 challenging
MTB company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Do you see any upside potential of that going forward given your outlook for more Fed rate cuts on the one hand and then given the repricing that you see you still have left to do

Show response

Bible detailed rate sensitivity: down 100 (2 more cuts) is flat NII; up 100 (rates stay flat) is slightly negative, balance sheet is nearly neutral. Consumer loan roll-on +75bps, investment portfolio +50-75bps. Deposit betas at 54% mirroring rate-up cycle.

when would you start to get worried about it from a credit perspective? How long would this have to drag on before you guys get more concerned about it?

MacroeconomicCreditTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Bible monitoring government contractors, SBA (already shut down), HUD/FHA reimbursements, C&I healthcare, nonprofits with grants, and government employees. Haven't seen impact yet but a few months would create stress.

hoping you'd just give a little update on your exposure if you have anything to the Tricolor situation

ChallengingCreditRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Bible confirmed no credit exposure to Tricolor. Roles limited to custodian, trustee, and securitization functions. Situation will play out over time. Industry needs to improve to prevent such events. Still believes in corporate trust business.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
RF Regions Financial Corporation50%none of 5 questions
CFG Citizens Financial Group30%none of 3 questions
MTB M&T Bank333%1 of 3 questions
  • RF
    Regions Financial Corporation · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • CFG
    Citizens Financial Group · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • MTB
    M&T Bank · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q3617%1 of 6 questions3
2025 Q4No questions recorded——
2026 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions2
  1. 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2025 Q4No questions recorded
  3. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Credit4
  • Demand3
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Revenue Growth2
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Margin2
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Regulation Policy1