Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Derrick Whitfield
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 58on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 58 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 58 of 58 questions from 6 companies
TPLTexas Pacific Land Corporation22 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 22 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How would you guys frame the opportunity with this kind of build-out in this project potential
Show response
Ty Glover framed the step-out acquisition as capturing the broader West Texas power/compute value chain while staying capital-light.
How would you frame the depth of interest you're seeing in your conversations with hyperscalers and AI labs
Show response
Robert Crain described strong interest spanning consumptive cooling and freeze-technology direct chip cooling, tied to water-neutrality goals.
Calendar 2026 Q1
any color that you can paint around the kind of counterparty and scale of this development?
Show response
Glover confirmed the project is not BOLT-related and mentioned brackish water to start with potential for desalinated water, but could not disclose counterparty or size.
it seems in your messaging that there is certainly a heightened urgency year over year among the hyperscalers
Show response
Glover explained that grid power is largely spoken for, pushing hyperscalers toward behind-the-meter gas power, which makes more TPL acreage viable and increases water usage.
Calendar 2025 Q4
could you speak to some of the things that TPL is actively doing to drive the strength in the business?
Show response
Robert Crain cited legacy contract positioning, out-of-basin pore space strategy, and infrastructure scale expansion as drivers of higher highs and higher lows.
the investor believes Bolt's ambition is to build a 10-gigawatt data center campus in West Texas and that each gigawatt could be worth over $125 million in water revenue for TPL
Show response
Tyler Glover confirmed the per-gigawatt water revenue estimates as reasonable under certain designs and noted some power generators cite even higher water usage.
I'd love to hear your thoughts on how the opportunity set for power and data center development has evolved for TPL
Show response
Tyler Glover emphasized TPL's unrivaled scale in land, gas and water, with a few deals in commercial negotiations for multi-gig energy campuses.
Calendar 2025 Q3
assuming flattish activity, what's a good run rate for that business? And how much of your water sales today are recycled barrels versus water from source water wells?
Show response
Robert Crain explained quarter-to-quarter water sales volatility is driven by consolidation-related spatial variation in completion activity rather than structural decline.
how would you characterize the competitive landscape in the Permian at present and the opportunities really you're seeing across the broader Permian footprint
Show response
Tyler Glover highlighted relationship-sourced deal success, with interesting opportunities emerging across Delaware, Midland and Central Basin Platform for power and data centers.
Just wanted to focus on how you're thinking about progressing desal beyond Phase II and Phase III and the degree of conversations you're having with the industry
Show response
Robert Crain emphasized 2026 focus on waste heat capture synergies with power gen rather than volume expansion, with NGL permits still in draft phase at TCEQ.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could you guys just maybe speak to your expectations for additional announcements based on the dialogue you're having with the industry?
Show response
Robert Crain described Coterra as first of many power gen announcements, noting accelerating conversations and significant near-term power demand in the Permian.
how do you see each of those businesses performing in the second half?
Show response
Robert Crain attributed water sales weakness to both commodity prices and spatial variation in completions, with Q3 looking very strong.
I'd love for you to kind of speak to just your cost objectives for the 10,000 barrel per day desal facility?
Show response
Robert Crain emphasized desal as R&D at scale with synergies across waste heat capture, cogen power and data center cooling expected to improve economics.
I'd love your thoughts on the Aris acquisition by Western while we look at it and question it from a timing perspective
Show response
Robert Crain confirmed the Western-Aris acquisition supports TPL's Delaware water thesis and creates more opportunity for land and pore space owners.
Calendar 2025 Q1
with those 3 larger pipeline projects that appear to be moving forward with WaterBridge, Western and ARRIS, how does that impact you guys?
Show response
Tyler Glover noted pipeline projects benefit TPL mineral development and that TPL will receive payments on Western Pathfinder volumes in both phases.
Do you have a sense on the underlying growth in produced water volumes across the basin before activity adjustments are considered?
Show response
Tyler Glover confirmed higher water cuts in deeper intervals, expecting produced water to grow rapidly over next 10 years, driving need for alternatives to disposal.
could you guys offer some perspective on the M&A landscape in the basin at present?
Show response
Tyler Glover indicated a friendly M&A environment with lot of opportunity in the backlog, though bid-ask spreads may widen if commodity prices continue declining.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how confident are you guys in achieving that $0.75 per barrel treatment cost with a commercial scale facility?
Show response
Robert Crain confirmed trending toward all three 75% targets and emphasized nat gas generation as key to achieving $0.75/bbl cost.
could the Trump administration make any federal changes in policy, which could open up greater amounts of pore space in New Mexico
Show response
Management indicated no awareness of federal policy changes for NM pore space, noting changes would likely be more state level than Fed level.
Where are you seeing the greatest opportunities today between royalties and surface?
Show response
Tyler Glover highlighted a strong deal pipeline for 2025 with larger, higher-quality packages becoming available across surface, mineral and water.
Could you further elaborate on the potential desal synergies with behind-the-meter power generation and data centers?
Show response
Robert Crain explained the synergies between behind-the-grid power, waste heat capture for desal, and water supply for data centers in the Permian.
How are you thinking about the turn-in-line quarterly run rate, if you will, for oil and gas royalties?
Show response
Chris Steddum provided detailed well inventory walkthrough suggesting 14-15 net wells could turn in line in 2025, a very robust run rate.
BGBunge Global12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Are you guys seeing any early time impacts due to the lack of fertilizer access in South America?
Show response
Heckman named phosphates rather than nitrogen as the watch item and flagged Argentine yield risk if the constraint persists.
regarding expected CSA updates within 45Z policy, how are you viewing the impact it can have on your U.S. business?
Show response
Neppl set out the winter canola cover crop work and said the economics hold even if CSA is not included; Heckman cited the switchable Destrehan plant.
Calendar 2025 Q4
where is your view on where the administration will land on absolute volumes? And the half range generation concept for imported products and feedstocks?
Show response
Neppl stated preference for 5.6B gallons, noted half-RIN likely kicked to 2027, hopes high end given that delay. Specific and transparent on policy expectations.
could you speak to that market opportunity for Bunge from this development?
Show response
Neppl confirmed SAF not in 2026 forecast (pure upside), described it as nascent but potentially massive demand. Heckman added partnerships with Chevron and Repsol plus novel seed/cover crop capabilities position Bunge well.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what are your thoughts on whether the administration will pursue the half RIN concept for foreign feedstocks
Show response
Neppl acknowledged uncertainty around half-RIN technical implementation but confirmed industry is pushing for it and hoping for implementation beginning early 2026.
Could you speak to any material projects that were underway at Viterra and if you're seeing new opportunities for growth investment from a Viterra perspective?
Show response
Neppl confirmed Viterra had only modest CapEx pipeline (debottlenecking projects). Combined sustaining + growth CapEx expected at about $1 billion/year post-2026. Heckman added teams are refreshing combined strategy and project list.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how do you see the interplay between SBL and other seed oils as it relates to food in the U.S.?
Show response
CEO noted food customers will switch to other oils on functionality and price as SBO tightens. BG sees opportunity in offering full suite of seed oils to customers.
Do you guys have a sense of how material ILUC is on average? And then as a build on that from an OBB perspective
Show response
CFO said ILUC removal is significant, putting SBO/canola on par with low-CI feedstocks. 45Z includes all NA feedstocks, benefiting Canadian canola crush. Bonus depreciation a tailwind for big CapEx projects.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Could you speak to the amount of camelina and safflower that could be processed as feedstock for their biorefinery or the mix that they're solving for
Show response
CEO said too early for specific volumes but strategy is to provide optionality across novel crops, soy oil, and UCO. Winter canola program seeing great farmer uptake in US.
Do you expect a more favorable assessment for SBO and winter canola based on industry feedback and your interaction with the administration on 45Z?
Show response
CEO expressed optimism but deferred specifics, noting engagement with policymakers. CSA practices for seed oils generating significant industry interest.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is there merit from a carbon counting perspective for canola to have a materially higher CI than SVO when you evaluate ag and processing practices?
Show response
CFO noted spring canola doesn't have a 45Z path currently but winter canola could be differentiated. Currently flowing to Europe where demand exists.
we've seen the spread between RBD, SBO, and crude SBO collapse to historically low levels. With the understanding that the majority of refiners are buying crude versus refined
Show response
CEO noted margin shift from refined to crude SBO as expected, but BG's specialty oils customer base and global footprint differentiate its portfolio from a pure NA player.
CTRACoterra8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
I'd like to go a different direction with it and ask for your perspective on how your PVIs compare across the basins
Show response
Whitfield asked for PVI comparison across basins in context of Kimmeridge letter. Jorden confirmed Marcellus delivers highest PVIs in 2025 portfolio, reinforcing multi-basin value proposition.
how are you guys thinking about managing your Waha exposure? And could this amount of incremental egress lead to favorable in-basin exposure if oil prices remain depressed?
Show response
Whitfield probed Waha exposure management strategy. Deshazer acknowledged Q3 struggles with low Waha gas prices and active engagement in new pipeline conversations for flow assurance and price improvement.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how much further could you compress costs if you were to lean into that asset given the constructive gas backdrop we have?
Show response
Michael Deshazer identified longer laterals, Permian/Marcellus technology transfer, and potential consistent frac crew as cost compression drivers. Tom noted Anadarko has best price realizations and NGL yields despite higher per-foot cost.
how would you characterize what's leading to your success and how you're positioning Coterra as a partner?
Show response
Blake Sirgo credited years of negotiations to find differentiated deals beyond Waha pricing. Tom added investment-grade balance sheet and reputation are prerequisites for initial conversations. Deal also provides access to purchase power.
Calendar 2025 Q1
would it change your view on the areas and intervals you develop in the Delaware over your 3-year forecast? And I'm primarily thinking of Culberson
Show response
Tom Jorden said the oil-to-gas ratio doesn't significantly shift capital within the Permian. Culberson is gassier which helps OpEx and productivity, and a stronger Waha price would marginally help but not enough to flex.
what price do you see as the next tipping point in all activity, assuming current service costs
Show response
Tom Jorden identified below $50 oil as the next tipping point for further activity reductions beyond the current cuts.
Calendar 2024 Q4
would you expect both the Anadarko and Marcellus to return to growth over the next three years if the gas market plays out as the strip indicates?
Show response
Tom Jorden enthusiastically confirmed the hope, emphasizing internal capital competition between basins. Blake Sirgo added the focus is on returns not growth, with relative oil/gas price ratios driving allocation.
could you perhaps speak to where those conversations are for you and what basins and what role you'd like to play in that arena more broadly?
Show response
Blake Sirgo identified Permian as primary focus for power discussions with inbounds across all basins, but noted commercial terms are still uncharted waters with room for negotiation.
FANGDiamondback Energy8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you speak to some of the design changes you incorporated this quarter to drive lower equipment cost per well?
Show response
Danny attributed the savings mainly to longer laterals and minimizing non-productive infrastructure capital.
Calendar 2026 Q1
where do you view mid-cycle pricing now in light of the current Middle East conflict and the risk premium associated with that?
Show response
CEO maintained mid-cycle at mid-60s WTI, mid-teens NGLs, $3 gas. Too early to raise. Cost curve going up industry-wide from geologic degradation. FANG positioned at low end.
How large could you reasonably grow this position beyond 200,000 that you're highlighting on the slide deck
Show response
CEO confirmed position growing via trades for longer laterals, small PE-backed packages coming to market. Sizable base in place to continue growth.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Could you perhaps elaborate on the degree of uplift you're seeing in production on average for dollars spent
Show response
Kaes provided quantified results: 60-well test, ~$0.5M/job, avg ~100 bbl/d uplift with some multi-hundred results. Not yet enough Viper data to assess new-well surfactant impact from peers.
I'd love your take on the view of that interval and your position over in Pecos
Show response
Kaes said Delaware Woodford will be more expensive than Midland Barnett; not ready for a big Delaware program. Viper's consolidated Delaware map will provide learnings as peers test.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How would you characterize the support from your peers out of basin and the pushback within the basin
Show response
Kaes said most industry peers and investors were supportive; activity declines confirmed their predictions with 60+ rigs and 20-25 frac spreads removed.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what price do you see as the next natural tipping point in activity or the point where you firmly press on the brakes
Show response
Travis provided the stoplight framework: red at sub-$50, yellow at $50s, green at mid-to-high $60s with path to $70.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how should we think about the capital and production impacts from your agreement with Double Eagle to accelerate
Show response
Kaes clarified the Double Eagle development agreement requires zero capital from FANG and generates ~$100M consolidated FCF in 2026.
APLDApplied Digital Corp.4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
How would you characterize what you're seeing in the market today since really the last call?
Show response
Wes said demand is unchanged at very high levels, 2027 largely contracted, and expects materially higher lease rates.
how build costs might compare versus the U.S. as you think about the labor, building and equipment supplies?
Show response
Wes expects build costs roughly equal in dollars to the U.S., but a longer delivery timeline in Europe.
Calendar 2026 Q2
what are the general conditions that would lead you to the lower end versus higher end of that range?
Show response
Wes explained the higher-end per-MW cost comes from front-loading full campus costs (substations, transmission, land) into the first buildings, working down with scale.
Are you guys sensing any change in demand based on inflationary pressures?
Show response
Wes reported no demand softening from inflation; rising market pricing signals demand outstripping supply, with robust demand across both hyperscaler tiers.
EOGEOG Resources4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
should we think about the increasing role international could play as we exit the three-year period
Show response
Ezra said three-year scenario includes Gulf States capital with slight activity increase but minor production assumption given exploration phase. Assumes success and commerciality declaration but within scenario timeframe international impact is relatively minor. Trinidad has longer line of sight with robust ongoing program.
how does that compare versus some of the premium U.S. unconventional oil basins
Show response
Keith said activity higher in UAE than Bahrain due to concession size. Production results expected in both countries in Q2 2026. First UAE wells drilled smoothly with completions upcoming. Working to refine subsurface understanding and bring latest unconventional technology to the region.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you broadly speak to your views on service prices in that environment and the structure of your service contracts
Show response
Jeff said unclear where high-spec service prices break over but EOG maintains maximum flexibility in contracts to step up or down activity quickly. Multi-basin portfolio enables rapid reallocation.
how are you broadly thinking about the amount of exposure you’d like to have in the LNG markets versus domestic markets?
Show response
Jeff outlined strategy of counter-cyclic gas sales agreements with Brent, JKM, and Henry Hub exposure. FOB stateside only, no gas-on-water risk. Focus on offshore exposure plus diverse pricing indices.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation | 22 | 0%none of 22 questions |
| BG Bunge Global | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| CTRA Coterra | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| FANG Diamondback Energy | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| APLD Applied Digital Corp. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| EOG EOG Resources | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
- TPLTexas Pacific Land Corporation · 22 questions0%none of 22 questions
- BGBunge Global · 12 questions0%none of 12 questions
- CTRACoterra · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- FANGDiamondback Energy · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- APLDApplied Digital Corp. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- EOGEOG Resources · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2024 Q410 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q110 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q29 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand16
- Innovation & R&D14
- Competitive Dynamics14
- Pricing9
- Capex Investment9
- Cloud & AI9
- Cost Pressure8
- Regulation Policy8
- M&A7
- Geographic Expansion6
Show all 15 topics
- Macroeconomic5
- Revenue Growth5
- Supply Chain3
- Product Launch1
- Guidance Reliability1