Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Drew Crum

B. Riley Securities · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q4 – 2026 Q1 (2 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 2 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
2on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 2 questionsLimited sample
Companies
1questioned at least once
Reporting periods
2with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 2 of 2 questions from 1 company

TTWOTake-Two Interactive2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
TTWO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how if in any way is potential cannibalization from G GTA 6 influencing your view or range of outcomes you see for fiscal 2027

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Strauss rejected the cannibalization framework entirely, arguing entertainment hits energize the broader market and drive increased consumption. Suggested a strong GTA VI year would benefit the entire industry.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you comment on what you're seeing in terms of market dynamics for launching new games and whether the backdrop is more supportive of delivering new hits?

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Strauss acknowledged the difficulty of launching mobile hits since paid user acquisition became dominant about nine years ago. Credited Zynga's refined approach of being selective, focusing on best talent, and iterating based on data after creative passion sets the foundation.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
TTWO Take-Two Interactive2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • TTWO
    Take-Two Interactive · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q410%none of 1 question1
2026 Q110%none of 1 question1
  1. 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Product Launch2
  • Demand1
  • Competitive Dynamics1