Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Greg Lewis
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 22on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 22 questions
- Companies
- 5questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 22 of 22 questions from 5 companies
CLSKCleanSpark, Inc.8 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
could we see some of those locations actually move more to the forefront?
Show response
Matt said non-Texas assets (Washington GA, Wyoming, Tennessee) gained value amid Texas audit uncertainty, though none would jump the line.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is there kind of a target range of power. These potential tenants they're looking for?
Show response
Matt Schultz explained that factory-based build vendors introduced portfolio-scale tenants wanting capacity across multiple geographies, including low-latency and larger-scale sites; a direct, illustrative answer.
Calendar 2025 Q4
How should we think about growth at the employee level here
Show response
CFO declined to give specific FTE numbers, citing timing uncertainty and the option to use outside contractors; a partial, non-quantified answer.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was hoping you could talk a little bit more about the Texas facility
Show response
Harry laid out the phased ERCOT-approved energization schedule and highlighted room to expand at the site.
Calendar 2025 Q2
did that maybe trigger some of those covered calls to be exercised?
Show response
Lewis asked whether July's price run-up triggered covered-call exercises; Vecchiarelli reframed around the no-dilution capital strategy rather than confirming specifics.
Calendar 2025 Q1
did we just cover the CapEx for Q2 with April sales? Like is that a fair way to think about it, Gary?
Show response
Gary confirmed roughly $35 million monthly covers operations, with excess going to CapEx or the credit line; direct.
what is happening with rig pricing, just given the lack of the slowdown in buying from some of your larger competitors
Show response
Zach confirmed a 15% rig price decrease and expects further declines as fewer buyers pressure ASIC pricing; direct.
Calendar 2024 Q4
has the tenor from potential small utilities or customers or municipalities, how has that kind of shifted?
Show response
Zach said sentiment has shifted to inbound interest, with communities recognizing the tax and employment benefits and small utilities seeing mining as a way to monetize idle assets in rural America.
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
is that more of a speed to market? Or could we actually also see it potentially make projects more economically compelling, i.e., lower upfront costs maybe than some of your competitors
Show response
Management emphasized supply chain control and speed as the primary ESS Metron benefit, citing the AMD delivery as impossible without internal capabilities, while noting $23.2M in cumulative CapEx savings with larger savings expected at full development scale.
Calendar 2025 Q3
could you talk a little bit how you're thinking about Rockdale
Show response
Management described Rockdale as sharing Corsicana's advantages (700 MW approved, active site, ample land) near Austin technology hub, with ongoing work to enhance tenant attractiveness while mining generates cash flow.
how you're thinking about the sequencing, the decision to go with 2 buildings, not 1 or 3
Show response
Management explained the two-building start reflects current demand signals with ability to rapidly spin up additional buildings if customer conversations require more capacity.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there any kind of premium for that larger power deal just in thinking about how potential transaction could shake out
Show response
Management noted hyperscalers scaling to gigawatt-plus requirements with neoclouds and enterprises also increasing, making large-scale capacity attractive for pipeline expansion beyond initial leases.
Could you talk a little bit about that decision to do that and how you're thinking about the HODL strategy in the back half of the year or even longer term
Show response
Jason Chung explained Bitcoin sales cover operating costs while Coinbase facility provides additional financing, both reducing ATM issuance and freeing equity raises for value-accretive growth.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is there kind of a dual process, i.e., is Riots kind of talking with EPCs
Show response
Management confirmed multiple parallel tracks including hyperscalers, infrastructure partners, and financing partners to maximize value.
are you seeing that window potentially widening, i.e., you know, it's great to have front power in 2025, but having power in further out years is almost just as valuable
Show response
Management confirmed power demand extends beyond 2025 with capacity in 2026-2027 remaining highly valuable due to 4-5 year lead times for new interconnects.
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
we are kind of in a holding pattern. Is that kind of fair way to think about it?
Show response
Only lease signing waits on closing; design and tenant discussions are advancing as if the deal were already closed.
Has there been any feedback from the federal, local, or state levels about the potential closing?
Show response
Management said no feedback received and expects FERC to respond before year end, with nothing expected to block approval.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are there any areas that are kind of gaining more interest as you and Starwood continue to look out
Show response
Fred described tenant site criteria (always-on power, fast build, internet, water) and prioritizing existing energized sites, but did not name specific regions gaining interest.
IRENIREN Limited2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
as we think about that $6 million to $7 million in the event that there are tariffs
Show response
Kent cited a diversified supply base and said any tariffs would be felt across the industry, but did not quantify how much equipment is imported.
When did we have to get start getting in the queue to even be able to try to get on that track
Show response
Dan described extraordinary difficulty getting signed interconnection agreements and Kent added that more recently submitted projects will take incrementally longer as utility/ERCOT queues congest.
SMRNuScale Power Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is that things that we're starting to look at now? Or is it more kind of getting everything in ready mode for when we eventually get the green light from our first commercial partner?
Show response
CEO said strategic suppliers, some of them NuScale investors, offer competitive rates; as OEM, NuScale's scope is about 30-plus percent of cost with the rest EPC and other contractors.
Is there any kind of timeline you can give us in terms of when we're going to have to start deploying that capital?
Show response
CFO tied capital draws to the timing of commercialization and pointed to supply-chain and fuel-design investments as signals, but gave no specific deployment timeline.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| CLSK CleanSpark, Inc. | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| RIOT Riot Platforms, Inc. | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| IREN IREN Limited | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- CLSKCleanSpark, Inc. · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc. · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- IRENIREN Limited · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SMRNuScale Power Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Cloud & AI6
- Capex Investment5
- Geographic Expansion4
- Capital Allocation4
- Demand3
- Regulation Policy3
- Supply Chain2
- Cost Pressure2
- M&A1
- Labor Market1
Show all 13 topics
- Competitive Dynamics1
- Pricing1
- Trade Tariffs1