Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Harlan Sur
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 129on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 3%4 of 129 questions
- Companies
- 18questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 129 of 129 questions from 18 companies
KLACKLA Corporation15 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 15 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
The team has raised their WFC outlook I think four times this year, including today to now sort of that low $150
Show response
Gave a specific 2027 market frame and translated it to a mid 20 type growth rate, similar to 2026.
How much of the improvements that you have seen in your calendar 26 and calendar 27 outlook is reflective of these
Show response
CEO confirmed broadening is a real driver and tied it to rising process control intensity in both logic and memory.
Calendar 2026 Q1
On the incremental upside this year, is it being driven by new brick-and-mortar sort of greenfield programs being pulled forward
Show response
Management attributed incremental WFE upside to broad-based customer urgency across segments, with 2027 driven by greenfield activity in logic, memory, flash, and packaging.
How should we think about the services growth profile this year?
Show response
Management expects services to trend within the 13-15% CAGR target range this year, with current-year shipments flowing into service revenue next year as an accelerant toward the higher end.
Calendar 2025 Q4
How are you guys thinking about the growth in inspection and patterning relative to WFE view of sort of low teens growth this year?
Show response
Rick highlighted broadband plasma products as a key driver with capacity additions underway, strong HBM-driven memory intensity, and reticle growth tied to design starts. Bren added confidence in sustaining multi-year outperformance.
I'm wondering if this is also driving incremental demand for your process control solution?
Show response
Rick confirmed back-penetration of newer process control to prior nodes driven by supply constraints and favorable pricing making additional yield worthwhile, with customers constrained by fab building timelines trying to maximize output.
Calendar 2025 Q3
has the magnitude on the WFE growth outlook improved? Or is it more just confidence level on the growth that you were thinking about 90 days ago?
Show response
Bren noted the improvement is more about proximity and timing clarity than a fundamentally stronger outlook, with encouraging signals across leading-edge foundry/logic, DRAM/HBM, and flash, offset by China normalization and export controls.
Wondering if these additional dynamics are driving the potential for incremental process control spend as you look into next year?
Show response
Rick confirmed that customers re-entering leading edge are benchmarking process control needs, and the broadening of players at leading edge in new locations is accretive to overall intensity.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the drivers of the massive strength in the inspection, is it broad-based? Is it across optical, darkfield, bare wafer, e-beam?
Show response
Bren cited optical inspection inflection for gate-all-around, packaging driving higher sampling, while patterning was lumpy with overlay attached to litho slowing.
where are you guys seeing the incremental upside?
Show response
Rick attributed upside to product adoption momentum and AI infrastructure build-out, with packaging share rising from 1% intensity to 5-6% in just a few years.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what's driving the incremental opportunity in e-beam? And how is the KLA's e-beam platform sort of differentiated?
Show response
Rick described years of investment paying off with customers now using optical and e-beam in concert on the most challenging layers, with demand outstripping initial capacity.
Maybe just take us through some of the puts and takes around tariffs and trade and your ability to modulate your global manufacturing operations
Show response
Bren detailed tariff exposure primarily through service contract parts imports, especially in China, with mitigation through process changes, network optimization, and longer-term pricing strategy.
Calendar 2024 Q4
your process control business should grow kind of low to mid-teens percent in calendar '25?
Show response
Rick acknowledged favorable dynamics but did not confirm specific growth rate, instead highlighting higher value wafers, larger die size, and accelerated technology nodes.
can you just kind of help us unpack that a bit? How much of that mixes 2.5D packaging technology
Show response
Rick noted mostly 2.5D/HBM currently with 3D SoIC on the horizon. Bren specified approximately 65%-70% semi-PC versus process in advanced packaging.
Calendar 2024 Q3
should we interpret the downshift in China as being more than offset by incrementally better spending
Show response
Higgins confirmed China stepping down is offset by leading-edge demand, leaving the 2025 view unchanged.
MCHPMicrochip Technology12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Do you anticipate growth outperformance for A&D for fiscal 2027?
Show response
Steve was qualitatively positive on A&D and data center but cautioned that year-over-year growth rates are inflated off depressed levels.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Is the team seeing some of this memory pricing dynamic reflected across your customer base?
Show response
Steve confirmed memory tightness with an upstream cascade (DRAM, NAND, NOR) that left serial EEPROM abandoned and prices doubled, creating opportunity for Microchip.
how is the team doing on expanding your leadership in midrange to broader market applications?
Show response
Steve said PolarFire 2 is in the fab and launching later this year with strong demand inside and outside A&D; initial sample runs are already spoken for.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you guys, I think, have a very strong firmware stack. Right now, ASN or SSD demand is very strong
Show response
Matthias confirmed continued investment in data center storage segment including both Flash and HDD controllers, with three solid product lines being supported and invested in across the switching and storage segments.
is it fair to assume that your turns business as a percent of total revenues came in well above historical trends
Show response
Steve confirmed stronger-than-expected turns drove the upside. Customers worked through all holidays without stopping, pulling backlog from January into December and now from April into March. Described it as upcycle-like behavior.
Calendar 2025 Q3
data center and compute was 19% of your total revenues in fiscal '25. What's the rough mix of data center versus client or PC compute
Show response
Brian confirmed majority of the 19% data center and compute segment is data center focused, but declined to provide specific mix breakdown.
you guys were targeting about $115 million in cost savings annually at that -- at the current quarterly revenue run rate
Show response
Eric clarified $90 million annual cash savings from Fab 2 closure are being realized. These costs are not impacting non-GAAP gross margins today. The two biggest factors remain underutilization charges and inventory write-offs. Fab 2 sale expected to close in December.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Did that turns percentage grow in the June quarter? And what are you guys seeing thus far here in the September quarter
Show response
Eric confirmed turns were strong in June, which was expected given the revenue beat. Turns expected to remain a high percentage given short lead times, though this may change as lead times extend.
Asia was up about 14% sequentially versus Europe and North America at about 8%
Show response
Steve explained Asia strength reflects U.S./European customers manufacturing in Asia, plus seasonal effect of Chinese New Year comparison quarter. Revenue is reported by ship-to location, not customer origin.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what was the performance megatrend revenues versus your total sales in fiscal 2025? And what was the percentage mix
Show response
Rich confirmed megatrend mix held steady but CAGR growth rate slowed as megatrends were equally impacted by inventory correction.
are you starting to see any signs of a pullback or perturbations in order activity from your small, medium sized China manufacturing
Show response
Steve said Chinese customers are rapidly moving production to Vietnam and elsewhere. Not seeing significant pullback but production geographic shifts accelerating.
Calendar 2024 Q3
can you guys quantify how successful TSS has been? How has the Microchip dollar content per customer opportunity increased
Show response
Ganesh couldn't provide specific dollar content metrics but said internal subset tracking confirms TSS multiplier effect. Rich pointed to reference designs on website.
AMATApplied Materials11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
are these global customers also starting to pick up their spending? And do you see your total ICAPS business growing
Show response
Brice confirmed rising ICAPS utilization and expects ICAPS to grow this year and next, including non-China customers in power and photonics.
could we see gross margins approaching the 40% range in operating margins in the mid-30s as AGS revenues continue
Show response
Brice said AI-driven information solutions and a growing installed base support continued AGS gross margin improvement, though the utilization tailwind normalizes.
Calendar 2026 Q2
how much of this is just more attach of some of the higher value-added services like your AIx software suite
Show response
Brice attributed margin improvement to favorable mix toward transactional and spare parts plus new service products. Sequential OpEx decline from restructuring.
Is the Applied team seeing this? And is this an incremental driver of growth, more tool sales to alleviate bottlenecks
Show response
Gary confirmed output and yield optimization is driving higher service growth, with AI-enabled applications across 35,000+ connected chambers accelerating productivity.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you see AGS growing faster than that 10% to 12% sort of historical CAGR this calendar year?
Show response
Brice confirmed all growth drivers are additive while noting trade restriction headwinds kept historical growth below potential. Gary added excitement about AIx service innovation pipeline.
where are you seeing the strongest pull for your PDC solutions
Show response
Gary declined to give a specific PDC revenue number but confirmed it is one of AMAT's fastest-growing businesses with very high confidence in continued high growth into 2027 and beyond.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can the team just throw us up like what type of growth are you expecting this fiscal year in advanced packaging
Show response
Brice noted packaging pacing similar to last year ex-HBM burst capacity. Gary emphasized Applied has highest packaging share, is #1 in HBM, and is on track to more than double to over $3B with strong pipeline including integrated hybrid bonding.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is that still the team's view? And then kind of tied to that, right, advanced technology drives more penetration of your integrated system solutions
Show response
Brice confirmed leading-edge acceleration is offsetting ICAPS slowdown, with cloud service provider CapEx only going up and new factory announcements. Integrated equipment averaging approximately 30% of systems.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how big the upcoming two-nanometer node transition and more importantly, volume production potential could be relative to three nanometer
Show response
Brice and Gary both confirmed expectations for 2-nanometer to be a large node with strong design momentum, drawing parallels to 7-nanometer as a major design landing spot.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Do your customers also get the additional benefit in terms of better operational and manufacturability dynamics
Show response
Gary confirmed integrated systems deliver cost innovation through process simplification, fewer EUV steps, and service innovations to drive customer operating costs lower.
operating margins are still about a 100 basis points below the 31% level
Show response
Brice attributed lower AGS operating margins to a structural change in corporate cost allocations across segments, noting continued improvement expected despite the reallocation.
LRCXLam Research11 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how much of the incremental gross margin improvement is coming from the volume mix to Malaysia and the increases there?
Show response
Archer framed the global manufacturing footprint and Bettinger attributed the gain to efficiencies, new products and pricing without a quantitative split.
Is the increase in the outlook due to HBM or 2.5D to 3.5D SOIC advanced packaging transitions happening faster
Show response
Archer said it is all of the above and flagged panel packaging, but did not break out the contribution of each driver.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how should we think about the OpEx growth through the remainder of this year
Show response
Doug confirmed top-line growth will outpace spending for leverage while growing R&D investment; updated long-term financial framework to be provided later this year.
how are you guys monetizing this? I assume it's maybe primarily services and upgrades
Show response
Tim detailed Equipment Intelligence for troubleshooting and tool matching, plus Dextro cobots delivering better uptime and yield; monetized through services and new tool sales.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Is the stronger velocity of demand having a similar impact to your manufacturing capability and ability to procure the necessary components and subsystems and any bottlenecks that you have in your ...
Show response
Tim said post-COVID supply chain improvements, broader and deeper supplier base, and automated warehouses mean Lam is not the big constraint, clean room space is the industry bottleneck.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you think that overall, growth in calendar '26 WFE might be limited by availability of clean room space not only in NAND but across DRAM
Show response
Tim said physical infrastructure rather than equipment supply chain is the potential limiter, noting Lam lead times fit within facility build timelines.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is the team still embedding about a $700 million negative impact from China in the second half of this year due to the restrictions
Show response
Doug confirmed the $700M restriction remains unchanged but overall China WFE rose, with advanced packaging running a little stronger than expected.
Calendar 2025 Q1
does the Lam team have enough manufacturing capability in the US to service your leading-edge customers that are gonna be aggressively building out plants here in the US?
Show response
Tim noted significant US manufacturing capability remains and the team can reassess local capacity as regional investment grows, though not instantaneously.
Calendar 2024 Q4
On advanced packaging and high bandwidth memory, I know you guys started last year with a view that
Show response
Doug confirmed advanced packaging finished above $1 billion in 2024 and will grow again in 2025, driven by HBM3 moving to 3D and 8-to-12-to-16 die transitions.
Calendar 2024 Q3
How are you thinking about sort of the growth trajectory of your HPM and advanced packaging business next year
Show response
Management declined a new milestone number but said advanced packaging strengthened beyond expectations and should keep trending higher into 2025.
Is the confidence level as strong on WFE spending growth outlook relative to let's say, 90-days ago?
Show response
Management stayed optimistic on NAND recovery driven by technology upgrades regardless of the absolute WFE level, given Lam's high upgrade capture.
MUMicron Technology, Inc.10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
does this give the team a runway to continue to drive sequential growth in ESSD
Show response
Sanjay confirmed continued data center SSD growth ahead with G9 ramp and said Micron is studying high-bandwidth flash but flagged NAND limitations (write speed, power, retention) limiting its applicability to specific workloads.
how much of these multiyear SCA agreements is due to the inherent requirements for earlier and longer-term engagement
Show response
Sanjay confirmed SCAs enable deeper R&D collaboration and roadmap co-planning with customers, acknowledging this as a meaningful benefit while not breaking out customer types.
Calendar 2025 Q4
there has been a significant upward revision on ASIC XPU volume shipments next year
Show response
Sanjay said Micron will manage the 3E/4 mix based on customer requirements with both products contributing to a strong YoY 2026 HBM revenue growth, and reiterated non-HBM DRAM tightness alongside HBM.
is the Micron Technology, Inc. team also entering into long-term supply agreements with your ES SSD customers
Show response
Sanjay confirmed enterprise SSDs are included in the multiyear contract discussions (not just DRAM) and framed the rapid AI model evolution from training to inference/video as driving broader SSD demand growth.
Calendar 2025 Q3
some of your HPM four customers are looking for as much as 25% more bandwidth
Show response
Sanjay credited the combined advanced CMOS DRAM die plus Micron's in-house advanced CMOS base die for HBM4's industry-leading 2.8TB/s bandwidth and 11+ Gbps pin speeds while maintaining power-efficiency leadership.
Days of inventory are now at your target levels as you had expected previously
Show response
Mark committed to DRAM remaining below target on DIO through the year and NAND DIO decreasing as well, underpinned by tight supply and disciplined NAND output.
Calendar 2025 Q2
where are you on your negotiations for your calendar '26 HBM supply and pricing discussions
Show response
Sanjay reconfirmed HBM is sold out for 2025 and said 2026 bit demand growth for HBM will significantly exceed DRAM demand growth, while deferring specific 2026 share commitments.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is that still the case that we should see gross margin improvements maybe starting in fiscal Q4
Show response
Mark directly confirmed Q4 gross margins would be up somewhat from Q3, while flagging NAND underutilization and DRAM start-up costs as offsets.
Calendar 2024 Q4
do you guys expect sequential reacceleration in data center SSD in fiscal Q3 and just overall growth in data center SSD business fiscal '25 and calendar '25
Show response
Sadana directly confirmed data center SSD bit shipment growth restarting in fiscal Q3 with continued trajectory growth supported by strong customer CapEx and strongest product portfolio in history.
blended DRAM pricing up sequentially in Q2?
Show response
Sadana declined to give specific pricing guidance, citing competitive reasons, but outlined positive mix and data center growth factors offsetting near-term NAND headwinds.
AVGOBroadcom Inc.8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Out of your 6 frontier model-based XPU customers, how many of them are using Tomahawk scale-out networking?
Show response
Charlie Kawwas said Tomahawk 6 is deployed across essentially all AI hyperscalers building XPUs and even non-XPU customers, with Tomahawk Ultra adoption surprising to the upside.
Calendar 2026 Q2
you talked about an AI backlog for the next 18 months was $73 billion
Show response
Hock tied out the FY26 ~$56B math directly but stayed general on the FY27 backlog, reiterating >$100B without confirming a $200B figure.
Calendar 2026 Q1
given your visibility into next year, do you see these COT science projects taking any meaningful TPU, XPU share from Broadcom?
Show response
Hock explained COT players need best-in-class silicon design, SerDes, packaging, and networking, Broadcom's 20+ year lead is hard to catch.
Calendar 2025 Q4
does the team have three nanometer, two nanometer wafer supply, COA substrate, HBM supply commitments to support all of the demand in your order book
Show response
Hock confirmed $73B is minimum; Singapore facility is for advanced packaging insourcing for supply chain security; TSMC 2nm/3nm capacity being secured.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how should we think about the magnitude of the cyclical upturn? And given your thirty to forty week lead times, are you seeing continued order improvements in the non AI segment
Show response
Hock said only broadband is showing consistent uptrend; expects a U-shaped recovery by late fiscal 2026. Bookings up 23% YoY but not yet sustainable V-shaped recovery.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you see the Broadcom team sustaining the 60% year-over-year growth rate exiting this year. And I assume that, that potentially implies that you see your AI business sustaining the 60% year-over-...
Show response
Hock explicitly confirmed Harlan's framework, sustained 60% AI growth into FY26. Not updating the 2027 SAM framework but providing directional FY26 visibility.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Has the profile changed? Either favorably less favorably versus what you thought, maybe ninety days ago because quite frankly, I mean, a lot has happened since last earnings
Show response
Hock declined to speculate on second half beyond saying there's pull-in acceleration of shipments in fiscal 2025, driven partly by improved networking demand.
Calendar 2024 Q4
our latest roll up is that the top four cloud and hyperscalers are going to grow their CapEx, 35%, 40% in fiscal '25
Show response
Hock pushed back on using aggregate hyperscaler CapEx as a proxy for Broadcom's AI growth, noting CapEx doesn't distinguish AI vs non-AI spending and AI spend outstrips non-AI.
Show 12 more companies
MRVLMarvell Technology8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
What does that number look like now based on the Google commercial agreement and some of the new programs associated with the agreement?
Show response
Murphy reaffirmed the $10B+ FY29 custom target as consistent since June 2025, said next-year custom will more than double, and deferred detailed FY29+ sizing to the October 6 Investor Day while flagging significant upside bias.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is the Marvell team leveraging this differentiation? Are you seeing more interest in SRAM based XPU offload ASICs
Show response
Murphy confirmed SRAM IP as competitive advantage tracing back to Avera/IBM acquisition; noted it contributes to XPU-attach wins alongside broader SerDes and packaging capabilities.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Within our better outlook for custom this year, and with you already starting to ramp your lead customers next-gen XPU program, do you still anticipate a stronger second half step-up
Show response
Murphy confirmed stronger second half profile for custom due to program transition. Exit run rate has upward bias with company exiting north of $3B quarterly revenue. XPU attach growing across all large hyperscalers regardless of XPU win. FY2028 setup driven by full-year effect of second-half programs, content increase, XPU attach layering, and new Tier 1 XPU program.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you just give us an update on your sub 3 nanometer design win pipeline does include both XPU, XPU attach programs
Show response
Murphy confirmed lead XPU customer transition fully baked into numbers with secured purchase orders. 2nm products expected to start ramping in FY2028. Engineering team executing extremely well across core IP, nodes, and packaging.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what's the update with Marvell's 3-nanometer XPU follow-on program with your lead customer
Show response
Murphy declined to comment on individual socket status, saying focus is on aggregate design win execution and 20% share of $90B+ TAM. Acknowledged noise from Asia competitors claiming victory on 3nm.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you anticipate a strong ramp of your 1.6 t solution starting now? More importantly, your five-nanometer solution, I think, is already qualified
Show response
Murphy confirmed 1.6T shipments commenced at 5nm but 800G still dominates this year. 3nm 1.6T has strong demand and big ecosystem push given power savings. Expects much stronger 1.6T ramp next year.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is the new follow-on XPU program, a training XPU as well? Is that a calendar '26 ramp
Show response
Murphy constrained by confidentiality but confirmed high volume program with node transitions. On inventory, Meintjes explained build is supporting custom program growth and strong optics demand.
Calendar 2024 Q4
fair to assume that you will be the ASIC vendor supporting your customer on this next-gen 3-nanometer training ASIC
Show response
Matt avoided confirming the specific 3nm program directly but emphasized the AWS five-year multi-generational agreement and 20% custom silicon market share target on $40B TAM. Pointed to revenue trajectory as evidence.
TXNTexas Instruments8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Are you executing positive pricing initiatives with customers? When do these go into effect?
Show response
Haviv confirmed price increases have started, customer by customer, phasing into Q3 and Q4, mainly on Analog first.
Do you expect this profile of strength to continue end market-wise into Q3 and maybe second half?
Show response
Haviv confirmed broader, stronger demand across industrial, data center and automotive, calling it the start of a very broad cycle.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are you still seeing that hesitancy, that sort of wait-and-see posture by customers? Or is the order activity there starting to now pick up
Show response
Haviv said secular industrial growth continues with more content per system. Orders are picking up including in industrial, but cautioned that a similar pickup earlier in 2025 subsequently calmed down. Won't know sustainability yet.
You guys have previously mentioned the team is ahead on the Sherman fab build-out, and on track to complete the build-out of fab two this year
Show response
Haviv said Sherman is ahead of schedule with high yield and higher throughput than originally hoped. Lehigh insourcing progressing well (65nm complete, 45nm radar underway). Rafael confirmed 2026 CapEx $2-3B, depreciation $2.2-2.4B, ITC at 35% effective 01/01/2026, and up to $1.6B in direct funding unchanged.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Did the team see terms business grow sequentially in Q2, both in dollars and percent of revenues? And was it broad-based across both your industrial and auto businesses
Show response
Haviv confirmed turns business continued to accelerate in Q2 with very short lead times and low customer inventories. Mike confirmed the building trend from late 2024 continued.
the largest subsegment industrial automation, which is tied to manufacturing activity is pretty sensitive to trade and tariffs. So just wondering if this segment is relatively weaker
Show response
Mike confirmed industrial recovery was broad across all sectors with no standout weakness in automation. A continuation of Q1 recovery patterns.
Calendar 2024 Q4
have you mapped out that $1.6 billion in CHIPS Act grants over 2025, 2026? And maybe have an updated view on the potential better free cash flow per share profile
Show response
Rafael confirmed $1.6B booked as receivable and updated depreciation guidance ($1.8-2B for 2025, lower end of $2.3-2.7B for 2026) but declined to map out grant payment timing.
Has this level activity remained at kind of normalized levels? And then, maybe on another metric we look at is turns orders
Show response
Haviv confirmed turns business was strong in Q4 driving upside; Dave added cancellations dropped several quarters ago and remain very low. Positive cycle indicators.
ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
With the strong ramp in Q3, is Scorpio X revenues going to exceed Scorpio P revenues this quarter
Show response
Sanjay confirmed the lead customer ramps Scorpio X to high volume in Q3, surpassing Scorpio P, with additional customers shipping by year-end.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how the transition to more inferencing-based workloads, especially agentic-based workloads, has potentially helped
Show response
Management cited KV Cache offload wins and the 320-lane Scorpio X with in-network compute as inference-driven opportunities.
Calendar 2025 Q3
your design win pipeline and engagements, XPUs or GPUs that either have decided to use Scorpio X or UALink
Show response
Management said the scale-up pipeline has grown, with 10+ PCIe engagements ramping into 2029 and UALink meaningfully additive with 2027 revenue.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is it performance, i.e. latency, throughput? Is it fully optimized with your signal conditioning products?
Show response
Management cited customer closeness, execution track record, and COSMOS software customization as the differentiators anchoring Scorpio.
Calendar 2025 Q1
has anything changed meaningfully positive or negative on the customer programs or the demand outlook for this year
Show response
CFO said tariffs have had no material impact yet, hyperscaler CapEx held or increased, but China restrictions are a contemplated headwind.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Is the significant step-up reflective of a strong multi-quarter shipment profile across the overall portfolio
Show response
Management explained the inventory build restored normalized levels after a Q3 drawdown, supporting sole-sourced programs.
what percentage of your business last year came from Merchants GPU AI systems versus ASIC-based systems
Show response
Management addressed the mix directly, explaining internal ASIC platforms inflected in Q3 and setting a new revenue baseline.
CDNSCadence Design Systems6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is this translating into some tailwinds for your custom Virtuoso family of EDA tool solutions
Show response
Devgan confirmed the tailwind across analog, digital and verification and pointed to hyperscaler custom silicon and renewed startup activity.
Calendar 2026 Q1
the average quarterly revenue run rate in the second half is actually slightly below the 2Q level
Show response
Wall noted Hexagon D&E is first-half weighted in its revenue profile. Q1 raise was one of their highest at this time of year; waiting until July to update second half.
Calendar 2025 Q3
On the third-generation upgrade cycle on your emulation and prototyping platforms, you're about 5 quarters into the upgrade cycle, drove record revenues in Q3
Show response
Anirudh expects 2026 hardware better than 2025 but prudent given 6-month visibility. Only company building own chips at TSMC. Racks emulate 1 trillion transistor designs. John Wall added demand very strong, scaling manufacturing capacity.
Calendar 2025 Q2
in some cases, your customers are integrating up to like 10 chips in a single package, right? This is a very complex undertaking
Show response
Anirudh detailed 3D-IC as orthogonal to Moore's Law. Working with all four major foundries. Packages expected to go from 3x to 10x reticle size.
Calendar 2025 Q1
tariff, trade, regulatory dynamics are, I think driving more focus on domestic China chip design programs, especially in AI
Show response
Anirudh pleased with China performance but maintaining prudent flat assumption. Design activity strong across data center and physical AI systems.
Calendar 2024 Q4
your three year revenue CAGR is going to drop below 15%, to be more specific, more like 13.5% for the first time in a number of years
Show response
John Wall said they start year prudently. Anirudh noted Rule of 40, first time guiding over 55% combined growth + margin at start of year.
ONON Semiconductor6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
How much of this was mass market strength? And then for the mass market, are you targeting Treo for more general-purpose catalog
Show response
Trent said mass market up 35% YoY, accelerating from ~30% a few quarters ago. El-Khoury confirmed Treo absolutely targets mass market with application-specific products deployed through distribution.
Is the team executing to this? And with VCORE, there is a sizable market opportunity
Show response
El-Khoury confirmed 100% focus on VCORE with dedicated team. Large opportunity across CPU and GPU. Vertical GaN sampling on track with revenue in 2027 as previously discussed.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Did the acquisition also include the DeWitt Syracuse fab facility? Or was that already a part of ON?
Show response
El-Khoury confirmed Syracuse fab came with the acquisition. ON brought manufacturing scale and wideband gap expertise to commercialize what a startup could not. Drew parallel to GTAT acquisition success with SiC.
How big is this segment as a percent of your total distribution revenues? And how did this subsegment do in the September quarter
Show response
Trent said mass market is roughly 25% of total distribution revenue. 58% of business goes through disti, half fulfillment, half demand creation. Mass market is a subset of the demand creation half.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Did that include your turns business? And within your guidance for this quarter, June quarter, are you guys assuming similar, higher, lower turns
Show response
Trent confirmed strength in late-Q1 orders, especially industrial. Q2 still needs turns, consistent with Q1 entry. Order patterns getting more stable.
your direct business is up 3% versus your disti business down about 34%. Do your direct customers have just have less excess inventories
Show response
El-Khoury said the divergence isn't meaningful since half of disti is named customers. Green shoots in industrial are driving better-than-expected outcomes.
ADIAnalog Devices5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Are these 2 dynamics driving most of the 100 basis points plus step-up in gross margins in October?
Show response
Rich Puccio confirmed ~150bps step-up to ~74% driven by mix, fixed-cost absorption, higher revenue, and price adjustments.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how are you leveraging your software, DSP and systems capabilities to gain further traction in this very fast-growing end market?
Show response
Vince explained digital control is becoming critical for multiphase power conversion and optical modem nervous systems, with ML now embedded in new product platforms.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Does the team anticipate continued strong double-digit growth in fiscal '26? And maybe help us understand like what are some of the ADI-specific product cycles
Show response
Vince outlined the A&D portfolio evolution from Hittite RF through LTC/Maxim power cross-sell, with strong demand in Europe and globally. Business has capacity to more than double by end of decade.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Looks like you guys had anticipated last earnings call gross margins for Q3 to be closer to 70%, but at actually, you know, actuals were actually closer to 69%
Show response
Rich attributed the miss to an unexpected utilization disruption rather than mix, noting it was a one-time event and expects to get back to 70% margin in Q4.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Did you guys see further sequential growth in industrial automation in April? And then coincidentally, trade and tariff historically has driven weakness in automation
Show response
Rich confirmed positive book-to-bill above one across all industrial subsectors, with continued automation growth expected into Q3 despite tariff uncertainty.
ARMArm Holdings5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you just give us a rough sense on the OpEx attributed to supporting your chip business this year and next year?
Show response
Jason said chip business OpEx is modest (dozens of people, not hundreds) because compute die development leverages existing CSS work. Expects operating profit positive next year, 35% margin at scale.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what percentage of the royalty mix is CSS today, and what proportion of the royalty revenue could it become over the next two to three years
Show response
Jason quantified CSS as now in the teens as a percentage of royalties, up from approaching double digits last year. Could reach upwards of 50% over the next couple of years. Every CSS customer offered a renewal has signed up for the next generation, a key indicator of value.
Calendar 2025 Q3
last fiscal year, cloud and networking accounted for about 10% of royalty revenues
Show response
Jason confirmed infrastructure growing double all other categories. Cloud/networking trending toward 15-20% of royalties by year-end. Rene added it is going faster than expected a year ago.
Calendar 2024 Q4
You guys are building an ecosystem around your CSA, or this chiplet system architecture?
Show response
Rene confirmed strong CSS and Total Design Partners demand across all major markets, driven by increasing design complexity and the need for faster time-to-market.
Calendar 2024 Q3
the upside in your business through the first half been coming from Licensing, right?
Show response
Rene cited broad licensing demand across all markets and CSS strength; Jason said licensing implied guidance is ~40-45% above the IPO plan but did not expect a big backlog step-up.
SNPSSynopsys5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you just help us understand what you're embedding for growth in EVH and IP
Show response
CEO attributed below-target EDA growth to China cumulative restrictions, tale of two markets, and non-AI customers with muted roadmaps. Long-term double-digit EDA view maintained.
if I look at your average quarterly expense run rate to the year on the full-year guidance, it's still averaging about $1.43 billion per quarter
Show response
CFO said synergies flowing through the 40.5% margin target. Expense profile changing due to ANSYS integration. Workforce reductions continuing but maintaining significant R&D investment.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I assume that the Q3 foundry revenue weakness in IP was due to your largest customer as they pivot from their prior focus on 18A to now 14A
Show response
CEO avoided directly confirming Intel but explained IP leader responsibility to support all foundry customers across nodes. IP already built for committed nodes regardless of customer pivots.
your total expense guidance for Q4 is coming in about $15 million higher, about three and a half percent higher
Show response
CFO attributed higher Q4 expenses to ANSYS integration costs. 10% headcount reduction through FY26 will accelerate synergies. FY26 guidance to come at Q4 earnings.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the Department of Commerce BIS Bureau put out an update on U.S. semiconductor and value chain rules and restrictions. There were some updates on the rules on EDA software
Show response
CEO confirmed impact from new BIS rules. CFO added all restrictions are fully incorporated into guidance.
WDCWestern Digital5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
what is the mix trend on UltraSMR into 2026? And is this mix shift towards UltraSMR a rather important part of the driver of the stronger incremental gross margin
Show response
Irving confirmed UltraSMR mix to keep growing as existing customers expand and two new hyperscalers qualify. Kris confirmed higher capacity drives translate to better gross margins.
Does the forward exabyte demand profile really suggest the normalization back to a 23% demand CAGR as you talked about
Show response
Irving confirmed demand trending to 23% with potential to go higher in 2027-28. Working with customers on areal density to support growing CAGR requirements.
Calendar 2025 Q1
does your forward demand profile also suggest a low 20% exabyte growth profile in this calendar year or better
Show response
Irving confirmed low-20% nearline exabyte growth CAGR is approximately right for calendar 2025, consistent with Investor Day three to five year forecast.
where do you expect that mix to be either second half of this year or exiting this calendar year
Show response
Irving noted Ultra SMR mix at 40-45% varying by quarter based on hyperscaler deployment timing. Ultra SMR delivers better ASP per drive and CapEx efficiency.
Calendar 2024 Q3
It looks like in the September quarter, it stepped up to about 12%, 13% of your Flash revenues. Is that about right?
Show response
Asked to confirm the enterprise SSD share of Flash revenue; management reframed to the bit-mix range rather than the exact figure, partial.
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
what is the AMD team doing to potentially address the ease of these deployments with the MI400?
Show response
Lisa Su framed ZT Systems as a direct solution to MI400 rackscale deployment challenges, with co-design underway with hyperscale and OEM partners to learn from recent industry issues.
seven consecutive quarters of strong year-over-year growth in your EPYC Enterprise and on-prem traction
Show response
Lisa Su credited Turin product breadth plus go-to-market headcount investment for enterprise traction, noting AMD is still underrepresented and in early stages of the opportunity.
Calendar 2024 Q4
For the fourth quarter, did your overall server CPU business grow double digits sequentially.
Show response
Lisa Su confirmed double-digit sequential growth in server in both cloud and enterprise, with enterprise gains driven by go-to-market investments converting POCs to volume deployments.
What's the feedback been like on your AI networking architectures? And any networking-related innovations
Show response
Lisa Su described growing proof points across generations, Pensando-developed in-house AI NIC, full rack solutions at MI350 and MI400, and Ethernet as the right long-term scale-out tech.
INTCIntel Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
is the team still supporting Clearwater Forest? Or just focusing now on Diamond Rapids? And has the team taped out or taped in your next-gen Xeon 7 Diamond Rapids products
Show response
Lip Bu confirmed Clearwater Forest continues. Diamond Rapids focused on high-end 16-channel. Coral Rapids with multi-threading is what customers are most excited about, working with Kevork's team to accelerate its introduction.
have customers commence test chip designs or are they maybe even further along than that and customers are already running their own 14A test chips now?
Show response
Lip Bu confirmed customers engaging on PDK 0.5 and looking at test chips. Some are already discussing specific products for foundry production. Parallel workstreams on IP readiness and yield readiness. Complex multi-step process Lip Bu described as familiar from Cadence background.
NVDANVIDIA Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
your networking revenues accelerated on a year-over-year basis every single quarter
Show response
Jensen described NVIDIA as the largest Ethernet networking company and emphasized Spectrum-X leverage for AI factories, without naming a specific run rate.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 15 | 0%none of 15 questions |
| MCHP Microchip Technology | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| AMAT Applied Materials | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| LRCX Lam Research | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| MRVL Marvell Technology | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| TXN Texas Instruments | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| CDNS Cadence Design Systems | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
- KLACKLA Corporation · 15 questions0%none of 15 questions
- MCHPMicrochip Technology · 12 questions0%none of 12 questions
- AMATApplied Materials · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- LRCXLam Research · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- MUMicron Technology, Inc. · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- AVGOBroadcom Inc. · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- MRVLMarvell Technology · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- TXNTexas Instruments · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- CDNSCadence Design Systems · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
Show all 18 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ON ON Semiconductor | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| ADI Analog Devices | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| ARM Arm Holdings | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| SNPS Synopsys | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions |
| WDC Western Digital | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| INTC Intel Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- ONON Semiconductor · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- ADIAnalog Devices · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- ARMArm Holdings · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- SNPSSynopsys · 5 questions40%2 of 5 questions
- WDCWestern Digital · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- INTCIntel Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- NVDANVIDIA Corporation · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2024 Q4 | 18 | 11%2 of 18 questions | 12 |
| 2025 Q1 | 17 | 0%none of 17 questions | 12 |
| 2025 Q2 | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions | 11 |
| 2025 Q3 | 20 | 5%1 of 20 questions | 14 |
| 2025 Q4 | 17 | 6%1 of 17 questions | 11 |
| 2026 Q1 | 19 | 0%none of 19 questions | 13 |
| 2026 Q2 | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions | 9 |
| 2026 Q3 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2024 Q418 questions · challenge rate 11% (2 of 18 questions) · 12 companies
- 2025 Q117 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 17 questions) · 12 companies
- 2025 Q214 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 14 questions) · 11 companies
- 2025 Q320 questions · challenge rate 5% (1 of 20 questions) · 14 companies
- 2025 Q417 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 17 questions) · 11 companies
- 2026 Q119 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 19 questions) · 13 companies
- 2026 Q213 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 9 companies
- 2026 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand57
- Innovation & R&D37
- Cloud & AI32
- Revenue Growth31
- Competitive Dynamics23
- Capex Investment14
- Product Launch14
- Margin13
- Supply Chain11
- Trade Tariffs8
Show all 20 topics
- Cost Pressure7
- Guidance Reliability6
- Pricing5
- Geographic Expansion4
- Regulation Policy4
- Inventory4
- Macroeconomic2
- Subscriber Growth1
- M&A1
- Capital Allocation1