Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Howard Ma

Guggenheim · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).

Questions
12on tracked calls
Challenge rate
17%2 of 12 questions
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 12 of 12 questions from 2 companies

PEverpure, Inc.8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 2 of 8 challenging
P company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

can you help us better understand the ASP versus volume mix so far this year?

ChallengingPricingDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Charlie framed the volume decline as price elasticity; management explicitly declined to address the back-half conservatism part of the question.

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you quantify what's actually contracted versus forecasted in the full year guide?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

CFO declined to quantify hyperscaler revenue; it is based on customer order commitments agreed before FY27, they are on track, and expect a multiple of FY26 hyperscaler revenue in FY27.

Calendar 2026 Q1

does the guidance factor in accelerated enterprise demand in Q1 that could come at the expense of future quarters?

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

CFO attributed strong Q1 guidance to back-end-loaded Q4 linearity and momentum carried into FY27; the rest of FY27 is in line with internal expectations, with H1 more weighted this year.

Calendar 2025 Q4

was there a continued mix shift to higher end products in the quarter?

Show response

CFO said product gross margin is driven by three vectors, product mix (higher/greater configs), Portworx term-license revenue, and hyperscaler royalty revenue, all contributing to the strong Q3 margin.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how much of the sequential gross margin improvement versus Q1 was a result of the Meta shipment

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CFO said the four-point product gross-margin improvement came from revenue mix, product mix (higher-end solutions), and pricing discipline plus a strong Portworx deal; Meta was not material to it.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are you seeing any changes in buyer behavior? For instance, is there a halt on flash storage purchases

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said Q1 (through April) showed no meaningful pull-ins or change in buyer behavior; second-half visibility is lower given tariffs and the economy. CFO cited broad-based strength.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how much of the product gross margin decline is -- how much is it due to incremental sales of the E and the C families

Show response

CEO said the margin pressure is entirely attributable to the E family, higher mix plus NAND price rises that don't affect disk competition; expected to abate as QLC prices moderate.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Could you just comment if the deal will be gross margin accretive?

MarginCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO gave high-level color: majority of deal value is still hardware, company gross margin is the right framework, multiyear duration with volumes TBD.

DDOGDatadog4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
DDOG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I'm curious how adoption and contribution compares to the previous major feature expansions in the past.

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Olivier said Bits AI has broadened well beyond its original alert-investigation use case into chat, monitoring, detection, coding, and testing, with a new AI credits packaging model rolling out and adoption across all surfaces.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Is the question is, is that a reacceleration, and is the growth driven by AI-native companies

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Pomel cited three drivers: simplified onboarding (best in market), differentiated DEM/digital experience driving broader APM adoption, and expanded go-to-market coverage. Still small share of the ~$10B+ APM market.

are the large AI-native customers significantly diluted to gross margin

Show response

Obstler reiterated that discount structure is based on customer size, not AI/non-AI classification. Highly diversified customer base maintains consistent margin profile regardless of AI mix.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I was hoping you guys could reconcile the consumption downtick in the Enterprise segment versus the strong new logo ARR growth

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Pomel dismissed any contradiction, noting normal usage volatility; bookings take months to convert to revenue.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
P Everpure, Inc.825%2 of 8 questions
DDOG Datadog40%none of 4 questions
  • P
    Everpure, Inc. · 8 questions
    25%2 of 8 questions
  • DDOG
    Datadog · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q310%none of 1 question1
2025 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2026 Q11100%1 of 1 question1
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q31100%1 of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 100% (1 of 1 question) · 1 company
  7. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  8. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 100% (1 of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Margin5
  • Demand4
  • Revenue Growth4
  • Pricing3
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Product Launch2
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Capex Investment1