Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Jack Egan

Charter Equity Research · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2025 Q4 (6 quarters; questions recorded in 5).

Questions
10on tracked calls
Challenge rate
10%1 of 10 questions
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 10 of 10 questions from 2 companies

MPWRMonolithic Power Systems6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
MPWR company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

that going to require you to kind of bring on new teams with experience in systems

Innovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Michael insisted the solutions transition is net positive for margins. Tony noted Investor Day model already anticipated this transformation with OpEx growing slower than revenue.

is that still a work in progress, or, you know, is there kind of a timeline for that milestone?

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Michael confirmed the doubled-density packaging is already sampling with customers and shipping this quarter and next, ahead of analyst expectations.

Calendar 2025 Q3

is there any one characteristic that's kind of being cited by your customers as the main reason that they are moving to those modules

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Michael noted customers are not migrating from chip to module, they start with one approach. MPS provides both chip and module solutions to accommodate all preferences.

how high could that mix of modules outside enterprise data go?

Innovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Michael noted auto industry unexpectedly adopting modules for ease of implementation. Industrial and telecom segments also growing module revenue, with acceleration expected.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are you seeing any signals that end demand broadly in maybe some of the more downtrend markets is starting to increase?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Bernie acknowledged competitors have noted bottoming but said MPS growth is driven by new product ramps. Feels well positioned regardless of macro for H2 and into 2026.

Is there really like a structural difference in the margin profile for those products going into custom ASICs and TPUs versus GPUs

Show response

Bernie denied a structural margin change. Michael emphasized MPS won't pursue high-volume low-margin business regardless of market segment.

COHRCoherent, Inc.4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
COHR company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

have these been more like discrete onetime improvements?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim described yield improvements as mix of one-time and ongoing improvements across multiple areas, plus broader cost efficiency focus on inputs and overhead.

have you made or are you looking to make any major changes when it comes to kind of the sales and marketing or the distribution side

Competitive DynamicsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim confirmed active reallocation of sales resources, reducing in some areas and increasing in others to focus on highest growth and margin opportunities.

Calendar 2024 Q3

are you seeing the margin benefit from a higher mix of 800-gig transceivers today? And if not, just when exactly does that impact kind of kick in?

Show response

Jim confirmed newer speed grades carry higher margins, Sherri noted networking segment profits increased sequentially visible in the 10-Q filing.

I'm just kind of curious on your long-term growth outlook for telecom and whether it may be challenged in the long-term

ChallengingDemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jim acknowledged near-term caution on telecom recovery but maintained long-term optimism, highlighted DCI as clear near-term growth area within telecom.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems60%none of 6 questions
COHR Coherent, Inc.425%1 of 4 questions
  • MPWR
    Monolithic Power Systems · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • COHR
    Coherent, Inc. · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q3250%1 of 2 questions1
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q2No questions recorded——
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q2No questions recorded
  5. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  6. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D4
  • Margin4
  • Cloud & AI4
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Demand2
  • Macroeconomic2
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Competitive Dynamics1