Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Jim Ricchiuti
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 20on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 20 questions
- Companies
- 2questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 20 of 20 questions from 2 companies
TDYTeledyne Technologies13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
in terms of the growth by business segment, how should we think about it looking out for the full year
Show response
Robert gave segment full-year growth: Digital Imaging ~7.5% (FLIR over 9%), Instrumentation ~5.7%, Aerospace & Defense 7.2%, Engineered Systems ~5.6%, and updated unmanned to about $575 million.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I know it's probably early yet, but are you seeing signs of potential increases in your defense business just related to the conflict in Iran?
Show response
Government directly investing in Teledyne capacity. Increased demand for drones, counter-drones, and underwater vehicles. Orders expected to pick up significantly in next 6 months.
on the M&A pipeline, just given valuation levels, are you still thinking the focus this year is going to be mainly tuck-ins? Or is there the potential for something larger?
Show response
Priority: tuck-ins first, midsized second, larger wait-and-see. Won't go outside portfolio for large deal requiring new segment. All segments except Engineered Systems targeted for M&A.
Calendar 2025 Q4
did you provide an order number and, Robert, any color as to how the book to bill was in the the main segments of the business?
Show response
Q4: Instruments ~1.0, DI ~1.06, A&D 1.25, ES <1 (lumpy). Overall Q4: 1.07. Full year: 1.08. All segments at or above 1.
What, what were the full year sales from the unmanned business again, if you provided it, I apologize. And I am wondering how you are thinking about the growth in the total unmanned business in 2026.
Show response
FY2025 unmanned ~$500M. Growing ~10% to ~$550M in FY2026. Corrected from '10% of revenue' to '$550M'. Air, ground, and subsea all growing.
Calendar 2025 Q3
are you able to give -- can you give us -- provide a book-to-bill for the various -- the 3 major segments?
Show response
George responded. DI 1.12 (strong). Instruments 0.9 (T&M 0.98, Enviro 0.95, Marine 0.8, lumpy, large backlog). A&D 0.84 (lumpy). ES >2x. Overall 1.09.
you alluded to in the earnings announcement, the potential for significant contract opportunities. And I'm just wondering if you can give us some color on which areas
Show response
George responded. OPFL full rate production order (tens of millions, near-term). LASSO U.S. Army competition (initially millions, then growth). Black Hornet, counter-UAS, integrated surveillance for border protection. Virginia/Columbia class submarine interconnects. Government shutdown may delay timelines.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'm wondering if your expectations for margin improvement for the full year have changed at all. I think versus your earlier expectation, correct me if I'm wrong, you were talking, I think, about 6...
Show response
50-60bps margin improvement target maintained. Q2 delivered 57bps. Year-to-date at 55bps. On track.
The marine instrumentation business has generated strong growth it seems like for the better part of a couple of years now. And I wanted to -- if we could, maybe just if you could talk a little bit...
Show response
George Bobb detailed: Energy ~40% of marine (subsea interconnects, geophysical streamers), defense ~30% (unmanned subsea vehicles for Baltic/Black Sea, Virginia/Columbia-class subs). Energy sustainable for several years subject to oil prices. Defense sustainable given geopolitical environment.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you seeing more -- potentially more acquisition opportunities in the current environment? Or is it too early?
Show response
Historical pattern: generate record cash flow during stress, then acquire. Already spent $750M in Q1. Pipeline healthy for smaller and mid-sized deals. Leverage heading to 1.2x by year-end without further action. $1B annual cash generation provides capacity.
I'm wondering how you're thinking about driving margin improvement in some of the newly acquired businesses over the next several quarters?
Show response
Qioptiq hitting A&D margins by ~200bps initially (down from 28.6%). Expected to improve every quarter per standard integration playbook. Will add $0.15 EPS accretion. Overall company margin improvement projected at 60bps for year.
Calendar 2024 Q4
If you were to look at areas that have the potential to maybe do a little better, would you say it would be some of the Instrumentation business or potentially in the Digital Imaging business
Show response
T&M assumed 2.5% growth but could be higher given improving trend. New DI products expected to be more competitive. Conservative approach described as prudent.
are you at all surprised by the slow recovery in that legacy Digital Imaging business?
Show response
Acknowledged surprise at slow recovery. Attributed to distributor inventory caution, China effect (both reduced imports and domestic sensor competition), and customers pushing for lower prices. Won't sacrifice margin for revenue.
ZBRAZebra Technologies7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I was curious about the RFID growth in the quarter and if you guys are still expecting that double-digit growth for the full year
Show response
Burns said RFID has a strong pipeline across retail, transportation, logistics, manufacturing, and government, with full-year growth expected despite a flat Q2 that was purely project timing. Use cases are broadening into parcel, fresh food and grocery, quick-serve restaurants, healthcare, and government, and new mobile devices and wearables with embedded near-field RFID are drawing strong customer interest. Winters added the Q3 EBITDA guide of ~22% is a slight step down on higher memory costs with a similar Q4 profile, and OpEx should scale about 1 point on higher volume plus completed first-half restructuring while continuing to invest in AI solutions and go-to-market coverage.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I'm wondering if you can talk to what kind of growth you're seeing across your RFID portfolio
Show response
Burns said RFID declined in Q1 due to cycling large prior-year compares. Not a concern, expects growth in Q2 and for the full year. Pipeline strong across retail, T&L parcel, manufacturing, government. Fresh food/grocery and quick-serve restaurants are new opportunities. New mobile computers with embedded RFID expanding functionality.
any change in the outlook looking out to the second half, either macro-related or the result of potential changes in the competitive landscape
Show response
Winters confirmed no changes to large deal pipeline. Mix of large deals and run rate both contributing equally to full-year guidance, consistent with prior earnings. Burns said focus is on expanding Zebra's lead through deep customer relationships and innovation rather than reacting to competitive transactions.
Calendar 2025 Q4
What kind of growth rate are you assuming in the RFID business this year? And are you seeing more of the activity coming from the emerging areas
Show response
Burns confirmed high double-digit RFID growth expected in 2026. Broad-based across retail, T&L parcel, manufacturing, government, quick-serve restaurants, and healthcare. Fresh food/grocery expanding beyond apparel. Adding RFID to majority of new mobile computing devices to support growing adoption. Number one share in fixed and handheld readers and RFID printers.
what kind of assumptions are you baking in for the large project business this year. What kind of visibility do you have
Show response
Burns said 2026 assumes similar refresh activity to 2025. Every customer on a different cycle driven by applications, AI, OS, security, and technology transitions. Retail refreshes have normalized. Large T&L discussions progressing for 2027 deployments. Memory discussions getting customers to engage earlier on project planning.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what changes have you seen in the various subsectors of the market more broadly, whether any changes in the overall retail, retail automation, e-commerce, logistics areas versus, say, 3 months ago
Show response
Burns detailed EMEA softness from cycling strong mobile computing compares, auto manufacturing weakness, and French retail challenges. Softness degraded through Q2. North America strong across mobile computing, data capture, and RFID. APAC strength in Australia, NZ, India with new RFID applications like Indian rail.
the way they go to market, are they working with similar channel partners that you work with? Or is this a different channel
Show response
Burns confirmed very similar go-to-market through value-added distributors and 2-tier distribution. Largest distributor is the same. Elo also sells direct. Different customer relationships in areas like quick-serve restaurants and fragmented health care segments.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| TDY Teledyne Technologies | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| ZBRA Zebra Technologies | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand13
- Revenue Growth5
- M&A4
- Guidance Reliability3
- Margin3
- Capital Allocation2
- Innovation & R&D2
- Regulation Policy1
- Competitive Dynamics1
- Geographic Expansion1